Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

social-media-analyzer(社交媒体分析器)

social-media-analyzer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

social-media-analyzer 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 12,958。

总安装 9,816周安装 409GitHub Stars 13,166下载 3,272核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:social-media-analyzer(社交媒体分析器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/social-media-analyzer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill social-media-analyzer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill social-media-analyzer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

社交媒体活动的参与度指标、投资回报率计算和平台基准测试。

计算 Instagram、Facebook、Twitter/X、LinkedIn 和 TikTok 上的参与率、点击率、覆盖率、病毒式传播率和保存率 将实际性能与特定于平台的基准和性能评级(优秀、良好、平均、差)进行比较 在提供广告支出时计算 ROI 和成本指标(CPE、CPC、CPM),并估算每种操作类型的参与度价值 识别表现最好和最差的帖子,标记表现问题(尽管覆盖率很高,但参与度较低),并生成可行的建议

来源仓库内路径:skills/social-media-analyzer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill social-me…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

social-media-analyzer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill social-media-analyz…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

social-media-analyzer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

social-media-analyzer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

social-media-analyzer 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

social-media-analyzer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 9,816 次,近一周安装 409 次,下载 3,272 次,GitHub 13,166 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

social-media-analyzer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
social-media-analyzer

社交媒体分析器 · 本页

9,81613,166只读MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Social Media Analyzer

Campaign performance analysis with engagement metrics, ROI calculations, and platform benchmarks.


Table of Contents


Analysis Workflow

Analyze social media campaign performance:

  1. Validate input data completeness (reach > 0, dates valid)
  2. Calculate engagement metrics per post
  3. Aggregate campaign-level metrics
  4. Calculate ROI if ad spend provided
  5. Compare against platform benchmarks
  6. Identify top and bottom performers
  7. Generate recommendations
  8. Validation: Engagement rate < 100%, ROI matches spend data

Input Requirements

FieldRequiredDescription
platformYesinstagram, facebook, twitter, linkedin, tiktok
posts[]YesArray of post data
posts[].likesYesLike/reaction count
posts[].commentsYesComment count
posts[].reachYesUnique users reached
posts[].impressionsNoTotal views
posts[].sharesNoShare/retweet count
posts[].savesNoSave/bookmark count
posts[].clicksNoLink clicks
total_spendNoAd spend (for ROI)

Data Validation Checks

Before analysis, verify:

  • Reach > 0 for all posts (avoid division by zero)
  • Engagement counts are non-negative
  • Date range is valid (start < end)
  • Platform is recognized
  • Spend > 0 if ROI requested

Engagement Metrics

Engagement Rate Calculation

Engagement Rate = (Likes + Comments + Shares + Saves) / Reach × 100

Metric Definitions

MetricFormulaInterpretation
Engagement RateEngagements / Reach × 100Audience interaction level
CTRClicks / Impressions × 100Content click appeal
Reach RateReach / Followers × 100Content distribution
Virality RateShares / Impressions × 100Share-worthiness
Save RateSaves / Reach × 100Content value

Performance Categories

RatingEngagement RateAction
Excellent> 6%Scale and replicate
Good3-6%Optimize and expand
Average1-3%Test improvements
Poor< 1%Analyze and pivot

ROI Calculation

Calculate return on ad spend:

  1. Sum total engagements across posts
  2. Calculate cost per engagement (CPE)
  3. Calculate cost per click (CPC) if clicks available
  4. Estimate engagement value using benchmark rates
  5. Calculate ROI percentage
  6. Validation: ROI = (Value - Spend) / Spend × 100

ROI Formulas

MetricFormula
Cost Per Engagement (CPE)Total Spend / Total Engagements
Cost Per Click (CPC)Total Spend / Total Clicks
Cost Per Thousand (CPM)(Spend / Impressions) × 1000
Return on Ad Spend (ROAS)Revenue / Ad Spend

Engagement Value Estimates

ActionValueRationale
Like$0.50Brand awareness
Comment$2.00Active engagement
Share$5.00Amplification
Save$3.00Intent signal
Click$1.50Traffic value

ROI Interpretation

ROI %RatingRecommendation
> 500%ExcellentScale budget significantly
200-500%GoodIncrease budget moderately
100-200%AcceptableOptimize before scaling
0-100%Break-evenReview targeting and creative
< 0%NegativePause and restructure

Platform Benchmarks

Engagement Rate by Platform

PlatformAverageGoodExcellent
Instagram1.22%3-6%>6%
Facebook0.07%0.5-1%>1%
Twitter/X0.05%0.1-0.5%>0.5%
LinkedIn2.0%3-5%>5%
TikTok5.96%8-15%>15%

CTR by Platform

PlatformAverageGoodExcellent
Instagram0.22%0.5-1%>1%
Facebook0.90%1.5-2.5%>2.5%
LinkedIn0.44%1-2%>2%
TikTok0.30%0.5-1%>1%

CPC by Platform

PlatformAverageGood
Facebook$0.97<$0.50
Instagram$1.20<$0.70
LinkedIn$5.26<$3.00
TikTok$1.00<$0.50

See references/platform-benchmarks.md for complete benchmark data.


Tools

Calculate Metrics

python scripts/calculate_metrics.py assets/sample_input.json

Calculates engagement rate, CTR, reach rate for each post and campaign totals.

Analyze Performance

python scripts/analyze_performance.py assets/sample_input.json

Generates full performance analysis with ROI, benchmarks, and recommendations.

Output includes:

  • Campaign-level metrics
  • Post-by-post breakdown
  • Benchmark comparisons
  • Top performers ranked
  • Actionable recommendations

Examples

Sample Input

See assets/sample_input.json:

{
  "platform": "instagram",
  "total_spend": 500,
  "posts": [
    {
      "post_id": "post_001",
      "content_type": "image",
      "likes": 342,
      "comments": 28,
      "shares": 15,
      "saves": 45,
      "reach": 5200,
      "impressions": 8500,
      "clicks": 120
    }
  ]
}

Sample Output

See assets/expected_output.json:

{
  "campaign_metrics": {
    "total_engagements": 1521,
    "avg_engagement_rate": 8.36,
    "ctr": 1.55
  },
  "roi_metrics": {
    "total_spend": 500.0,
    "cost_per_engagement": 0.33,
    "roi_percentage": 660.5
  },
  "insights": {
    "overall_health": "excellent",
    "benchmark_comparison": {
      "engagement_status": "excellent",
      "engagement_benchmark": "1.22%",
      "engagement_actual": "8.36%"
    }
  }
}

Interpretation

The sample campaign shows:

  • Engagement rate 8.36% vs 1.22% benchmark = Excellent (6.8x above average)
  • CTR 1.55% vs 0.22% benchmark = Excellent (7x above average)
  • ROI 660% = Outstanding return on $500 spend
  • Recommendation: Scale budget, replicate successful elements

Reference Documentation

Platform Benchmarks

references/platform-benchmarks.md contains:

  • Engagement rate benchmarks by platform and industry
  • CTR benchmarks for organic and paid content
  • Cost benchmarks (CPC, CPM, CPE)
  • Content type performance by platform
  • Optimal posting times and frequency
  • ROI calculation formulas

Proactive Triggers

  • Engagement rate below platform average → Content isn't resonating. Analyze top performers for patterns.
  • Follower growth stalled → Content distribution or frequency issue. Audit posting patterns.
  • High impressions, low engagement → Reach without resonance. Content quality issue.
  • Competitor outperforming significantly → Content gap. Analyze their successful posts.

Output Artifacts

When you ask for...You get...
"Social media audit"Performance analysis across platforms with benchmarks
"What's performing?"Top content analysis with patterns and recommendations
"Competitor social analysis"Competitive social media comparison with gaps

Communication

All output passes quality verification:

  • Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
  • Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act
  • Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.

Related Skills

  • social-content: For creating social posts. Use this skill for analyzing performance.
  • campaign-analytics: For cross-channel analytics including social.
  • content-strategy: For planning social content themes.
  • marketing-context: Provides audience context for better analysis.

平台分布

Claude Code

28.21%
按下载量换算923

OpenCode

22.29%
按下载量换算729

Gemini CLI

18.1%
按下载量换算592

Codex

11.71%
按下载量换算383

Antigravity

7.41%
按下载量换算242

Cursor

3.41%
按下载量换算112

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills