Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

social-listening-report(社交聆听报告)

social-listening-report 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

social-listening-report 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 58,406。

总安装 416周安装 17GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 135核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:social-listening-report(社交聆听报告)
来源仓库:https://github.com/renehdzgtz/social-listening-report
安装命令:
openclaw skills install social-listening-report
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install social-listening-report

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

基于数字与社媒数据生成品牌健康度与竞品分析报告。适用于市场监测、舆情分析与战略调整参考场景。输入关键词后输出话题热度、情感倾向与机会点洞察。报告结论需结合业务背景解读,避免脱离实际误判趋势。social-listening-report 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install social-listening-report;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

social-listening-report 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install social-listening-report。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

social-listening-report 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

social-listening-report 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

social-listening-report 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

social-listening-report 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 416 次,近一周安装 17 次,下载 135 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

social-listening-report 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
social-listening-report

社交聆听报告 · 本页

416—只读MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
social-listening-report
description
>

Social Listening Report Skill

For: Marketing strategists, insights researchers, brand managers, agency analysts Philosophy: Data doesn't speak — insights do. The report's value is in what you decide to do next.


How to Use This Skill

User says...Go to module
"create a listening report" / "analyze our mentions" / "brand health report"→ [MODULE 1: Brand Listening Report]
"compare us vs competitors" / "share of voice" / "benchmark"→ [MODULE 2: Competitive Benchmark]
"campaign report" / "did the campaign work?" / "measure launch"→ [MODULE 3: Campaign Performance Report]
"monthly report" / "quarterly report" / "annual wrap"→ [MODULE 4: Periodic Reports]
"what are the trends?" / "emerging topics" / "what's being talked about"→ [MODULE 5: Trend & Insights Report]
"train my team" / "explain listening metrics" / "what does SOV mean"→ [MODULE 6: Metrics Glossary & Training]

Before executing any module: ask the user what data they have available (raw CSV, platform export, screenshots, or manual data). Adapt the output format to their data quality.


MODULE 1 — Brand Listening Report

Trigger: User wants a structured report on how their brand is being talked about online.

Step 1: Data Intake

Ask if not provided:

  • Brand/company name and main product or service
  • Time period (last 7d / 30d / quarter / custom)
  • Data source (Talkwalker, Brandwatch, Sprout Social, manual, screenshots)
  • Platforms to include (Twitter/X, Instagram, Reddit, news, forums, TikTok, LinkedIn)
  • Language(s) (EN, ES, both, other)
  • Audience or persona to focus on (optional but improves insight quality)

Step 2: Report Structure

BRAND LISTENING REPORT
──────────────────────
Brand: [Name] | Period: [Date range] | Prepared by: [Analyst]

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (5 bullet points max)
└── Top 3 findings + 1 recommendation + 1 risk to watch

VOLUME & REACH
├── Total mentions: [X] (+/-% vs previous period)
├── Total reach/impressions: [X]
├── Daily mention trend: [chart or table]
└── Spike analysis: [any days with unusual volume — what caused it?]

SENTIMENT BREAKDOWN
├── Positive: [X]%
├── Neutral: [X]%
├── Negative: [X]%
└── Sentiment trend: [improving / declining / stable]

CHANNEL DISTRIBUTION
[Pie or table: % of mentions by platform]
├── Twitter/X: [X]%
├── Instagram: [X]%
├── Reddit: [X]%
├── News: [X]%
└── Other: [X]%

TOP CONTENT
├── Most-shared post/article about the brand
├── Top positive mention (quote + link)
├── Top negative mention (quote + link)
└── Influencer mentions (>10K followers who mentioned brand)

KEY THEMES
[Categorize what people are actually saying]
├── Theme 1: [Label] — [X]% of mentions — [1-line description]
├── Theme 2: [Label] — [X]% of mentions
└── Theme 3: [Label] — [X]% of mentions

AUDIENCE PROFILE
├── Top demographics (if available)
├── Top locations
└── Top interests/affinities of people mentioning the brand

RECOMMENDATIONS
├── [Action 1 — specific, tied to a finding]
├── [Action 2]
└── [Action 3]

RISKS TO MONITOR
└── [Any negative theme, emerging FUD, or competitor narrative to watch]

Step 3: Insight Quality Rules

  • Every data point must connect to a "so what?" — no orphan numbers
  • Spike analysis is mandatory: if volume spiked, explain why
  • Sentiment alone is not an insight. "Sentiment is 72% positive" → so what? Compare to benchmark, explain drivers
  • Always end with recommendations — a report with no next steps is decoration

MODULE 2 — Competitive Benchmark

Trigger: User wants to compare brand performance vs. competitors.

Step 1: Competitive Set Definition

Ask:

  • Brand being analyzed (the client/subject)
  • 2–4 competitor brands to benchmark against
  • Metric priority: SOV / engagement / sentiment / follower growth / content performance

Step 2: Benchmark Report Structure

COMPETITIVE BENCHMARK REPORT
─────────────────────────────
Category: [Industry/vertical] | Period: [Date range]

SHARE OF VOICE (SOV)
[Brand] vs [Comp1] vs [Comp2] vs [Comp3]

Brand          | Mentions | SOV %  | Change vs prev period
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
[Brand]        | [X]      | [X]%   | [+/-%]
[Competitor 1] | [X]      | [X]%   | [+/-%]
[Competitor 2] | [X]      | [X]%   | [+/-%]
[Competitor 3] | [X]      | [X]%   | [+/-%]

SENTIMENT COMPARISON
[Same table format, with sentiment % per brand]

ENGAGEMENT RATE COMPARISON
[By platform: Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn]

CONTENT STRATEGY OBSERVATIONS
├── [Brand]: Posts [X] times/week. Top performing format: [type]. Key theme: [topic]
├── [Comp1]: [same structure]
└── [Comp2]: [same structure]

SHARE OF CONVERSATION BY TOPIC
[If multiple relevant topics exist: who owns each conversation]
Topic: [Security] — Leader: [Brand X] with [Y]% of conversation
Topic: [Innovation] — Leader: ...
Topic: [Community] — Leader: ...

GAPS & OPPORTUNITIES
├── [Topic or audience segment where [Brand] is underrepresented]
├── [Competitor weakness that [Brand] could exploit]
└── [Emerging conversation that nobody owns yet]

STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATIONS
[Specific actions based on competitive findings]

SOV Calculation:

SOV (Brand) = (Brand Mentions / Total Mentions in Category) × 100

Total = sum of all brand mentions in the competitive set.


MODULE 3 — Campaign Performance Report

Trigger: User ran a campaign (launch, event, paid, organic) and needs to measure results.

Step 1: Campaign Context

Ask:

  • Campaign name and objective
  • Start and end dates
  • Channels used
  • KPIs set beforehand (if any)
  • Budget (if relevant)
  • Hashtag or keyword to track

Step 2: Report Structure

CAMPAIGN PERFORMANCE REPORT
────────────────────────────
Campaign: [Name] | Objective: [Awareness/Engagement/Conversion/etc]
Period: [dates] | Channels: [list]

RESULTS VS. OBJECTIVES
Objective         | Target    | Actual    | Result
────────────────────────────────────────────────
[KPI 1]           | [X]       | [X]       | ✅ / ❌ / ⚠️
[KPI 2]           | [X]       | [X]       | ✅ / ❌ / ⚠️

REACH & VISIBILITY
├── Total impressions: [X]
├── Unique accounts reached: [X]
├── Hashtag uses: [X]
└── Earned media value: [$X] (if calculable)

ENGAGEMENT
├── Total engagements: [X]
├── Engagement rate: [X]%
├── Top performing piece of content: [title + metrics]
└── Most shared content: [link]

AUDIENCE RESPONSE
├── Sentiment: [X]% positive / [X]% neutral / [X]% negative
├── Top themes in response: [list]
└── Notable organic amplifiers (accounts that shared without being asked)

PAID PERFORMANCE (if applicable)
├── Total spend: [$X]
├── CPM: [$X]
├── CPC: [$X]
├── CTR: [X]%
└── Conversions: [X] at [$X CPA]

LEARNINGS
├── What worked and why
├── What didn't work and why
└── What to test in the next campaign

RECOMMENDATION FOR NEXT CAMPAIGN
[One concrete, actionable change based on this data]

MODULE 4 — Periodic Reports (Monthly / Quarterly / Annual)

Trigger: User needs a structured recurring report.

Monthly Report Template

[BRAND] MONTHLY LISTENING REPORT — [MONTH YEAR]

1-MINUTE SUMMARY
[3 bullet points: what happened, what it means, what to do]

MONTH IN NUMBERS
[Key metrics vs previous month — volume, sentiment, SOV, reach]

WHAT PEOPLE WERE SAYING
[Top 5 themes with volume %]

WHAT HAPPENED (events that drove conversation)
[Timeline of mentions spikes linked to specific events]

COMPETITIVE SNAPSHOT
[1-paragraph summary of competitor landscape this month]

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NEXT MONTH
[3 specific, prioritized actions]

Annual Report Add-ons

Include for annual reports:

  • YoY comparison (all major metrics)
  • "Moments that defined the year" — top 5 narrative events
  • Brand health trajectory chart
  • Prediction/outlook for next year
  • Strategic priorities based on year's data

MODULE 5 — Trend & Insights Report

Trigger: User wants to understand emerging topics, cultural trends, or audience interests.

Trend Analysis Framework

WHAT: What is being talked about? (volume + keywords) WHO: Who is talking about it? (audience profile, influencer map) WHERE: Which platforms are hosting this conversation? WHY NOW: What triggered this trend? (event, viral content, cultural moment) SO WHAT: What does this mean for the brand?

Trend Report Output

TREND & INSIGHTS REPORT
───────────────────────
Topic: [Trend name] | Period: [dates]

TREND OVERVIEW
[2–3 sentences: what the trend is and its current momentum]

VOLUME SIGNAL
├── Mentions this period: [X]
├── Growth vs. previous period: [+X%]
└── Peak day: [date + what happened]

KEY VOICES
├── Top accounts driving conversation: [list with follower count]
└── Content format dominating: [text / video / image / meme]

AUDIENCE AFFINITY
Who is engaging with this trend: [demographics/psychographics if available]

BRAND RELEVANCE
├── Opportunity: [how the brand could authentically participate]
├── Risk: [how engaging could backfire]
└── Verdict: [Engage now / Monitor / Avoid]

CONTENT IDEAS (if relevant)
[3 specific content angles the brand could take on this trend]

MODULE 6 — Metrics Glossary & Training

Trigger: User or team needs to understand social listening metrics.

Core Metrics Definitions

MetricDefinitionWhy it matters
Share of Voice (SOV)% of total category mentions a brand ownsCompetitive position indicator
Sentiment ScoreRatio of positive/neutral/negative mentionsBrand health proxy
ReachPotential unique accounts exposed to mentionsAwareness ceiling
ImpressionsTotal times content was displayedVisibility volume
Engagement RateEngagements / Reach × 100Quality of connection
Mention VolumeRaw count of brand mentions in a periodBaseline activity
Earned MediaOrganic mentions without paid promotionTrust indicator
Influencer TierNano (<10K) / Micro (10K–100K) / Macro (100K–1M) / Mega (1M+)Outreach planning
Share of Conversation% of topic discussion a brand ownsThought leadership proxy
Net Sentiment% Positive − % NegativeSingle-number health score

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Reporting volume without context (high volume ≠ good)
  • Treating all sentiment as equal (10 negative news articles ≠ 10 random negative tweets)
  • Ignoring dark social (WhatsApp, private Telegram, Discord — often largest channels)
  • Benchmarking against irrelevant competitors
  • Confusing reach with impressions (one account can generate multiple impressions)

General Quality Rules

  1. Insight first, data second. Lead every section with the "so what," not the numbers.
  2. One page executive summary — always. Decision-makers don't read full reports.
  3. Compare to something. Numbers mean nothing without a benchmark, previous period, or competitor.
  4. Visualize when possible. Even a text table beats a paragraph of numbers.
  5. Recommendations must be specific. "Increase engagement" is not a recommendation. "Post 3 educational threads per week on X targeting developers" is.
  6. Be honest about data quality. If the sample is small or the tool has limitations, say so.

*Social Listening Report Skill v1.0* *Built for marketing strategists and insights researchers who turn data into decisions.*

平台分布

OpenClaw

88.15%
按下载量换算119

安全审计

VirusTotal

未展示

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills