Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

soc2-compliance-expert(soc2 合规专家)

soc2-compliance-expert 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

soc2-compliance-expert 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 37,859。

总安装 1,656周安装 69GitHub Stars 103下载 552核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:soc2-compliance-expert(soc2 合规专家)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/soc2-compliance-expert
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill soc2-compliance-expert
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill soc2-compliance-expert

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

soc2-compliance-expert 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于 SOC2 合规框架解读、控制项映射与审计准备支持。

通过关键词或任务场景输入,Agent 可返回匹配的候选结果列表。安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill soc2-compliance-expert。使用前请确认权限范围、维护状态及是否涉及联网或文件操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/soc2-compliance-expert

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill soc2-compliance-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

soc2-compliance-expert 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill soc2-compliance-expert。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

soc2-compliance-expert 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

soc2-compliance-expert 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

soc2-compliance-expert 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

soc2-compliance-expert 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,656 次,近一周安装 69 次,下载 552 次,GitHub 103 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

soc2-compliance-expert 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
soc2-compliance-expert

soc2 合规专家 · 本页

1,656103调用外部服务未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

SOC 2 Compliance Expert

SOC 2 Type I and Type II compliance management covering all Trust Services Criteria (TSC), infrastructure security validation, evidence collection, and end-to-end audit preparation.


SOC 2 Overview

Type I vs Type II

AspectType IType II
ScopeDesign of controls at a point in timeDesign AND operating effectiveness over a period
DurationSingle date (snapshot)Observation period (3-12 months, typically 6-12)
Cost$20K-$60K (first audit)$40K-$150K (first audit)
Timeline1-3 months6-15 months (includes observation period)
Customer PreferenceEarly-stage acceptableEnterprise customers require

Start with Type I to validate control design, then transition to Type II within 6 months.

Trust Services Criteria Summary

CategoryFocusControls
CC1-CC5Common Criteria (COSO-based)Control environment, communication, risk, monitoring, control activities
CC6Logical and Physical AccessAuthentication, authorization, physical security, encryption
CC7System OperationsVulnerability management, monitoring, incident response, BCP
CC8Change ManagementAuthorization, testing, deployment controls
CC9Risk MitigationVendor management, business disruption, risk transfer
A1AvailabilityCapacity planning, DR, recovery testing
PI1Processing IntegrityData validation, error handling, reconciliation
C1ConfidentialityClassification, encryption, disposal
P1PrivacyNotice, consent, data subject rights, retention

For detailed control requirements per category, see REFERENCE.md.


Readiness Assessment Workflow

The agent guides organizations through SOC 2 readiness from gap analysis through audit completion.

Workflow: Phase 1 -- Gap Analysis (Weeks 1-4)

  1. Define scope -- determine which TSC categories to include (Security is mandatory), define system boundaries, identify subservice organizations (carve-out vs. inclusive), document principal service commitments.
  2. Assess current state -- inventory existing policies and procedures, map current controls to TSC requirements, interview process owners and control operators.
  3. Run automated gap analysis using scripts/soc2_readiness_checker.py.
  4. Document gaps -- missing controls, controls lacking evidence, controls not operating effectively.
  5. Prioritize gaps by risk level and remediation effort.
  6. Validation checkpoint: Gap analysis covers all in-scope TSC categories; each gap has severity rating and remediation owner assigned.

Workflow: Phase 2 -- Remediation (Weeks 5-16)

  1. Develop/update policies -- information security policy, supporting procedures per control domain, policy review and approval workflows.
  2. Implement technical controls -- configure IdP with SSO/MFA enforcement, deploy endpoint security (MDM, EDR, disk encryption), implement SIEM logging and monitoring, configure backup and DR, harden cloud infrastructure.
  3. Establish processes -- access review procedures, change management workflow, incident response procedures, vendor management program, security awareness training.
  4. Set up evidence collection -- configure automated collection, establish repository structure, define refresh cadence per TSC category.
  5. Validation checkpoint: All identified gaps remediated; technical controls verified via scripts/soc2_infrastructure_auditor.py; evidence collection producing artifacts.

Workflow: Phase 3 -- Pre-Audit (Weeks 17-20)

  1. Conduct internal readiness assessment -- mock audit against all in-scope TSC, validate evidence completeness and quality, run infrastructure auditor for technical validation.
  2. Remediate pre-audit findings -- address remaining gaps, strengthen evidence.
  3. Select and engage CPA firm -- negotiate scope, timeline, fees; schedule kickoff; prepare system description draft.
  4. Validation checkpoint: Mock audit passes with no critical gaps; system description reviewed; auditor engaged.

Workflow: Phase 4 -- Audit Execution

  1. Type I audit (if applicable) -- auditor reviews control design; management provides assertions; address findings before Type II.
  2. Type II observation period (3-12 months) -- controls operate consistently, evidence collected continuously, quarterly self-assessments, regular auditor check-ins.
  3. Fieldwork (2-4 weeks) -- auditor selects samples, tests controls, interviews personnel; draft report review; final report issuance.
  4. Validation checkpoint: Clean opinion received; any findings have management response and remediation plan.

Evidence Collection Framework

Evidence by TSC Category

TSCEvidence TypeCollection MethodRefresh
CC1Code of conduct acknowledgmentsHR system exportAnnual
CC2Security awareness training recordsLMS exportOngoing
CC3Risk assessment report, risk registerGRC platformAnnual/Quarterly
CC4Penetration test reports, vulnerability scansThird-party/scannerAnnual/Monthly
CC5Policy documents with version historyPolicy managementAnnual review
CC6Access reviews, MFA enrollment, offboardingIAM/IdP/HRISQuarterly/Per event
CC7Vulnerability remediation, incident recordsTicketing/ITSMOngoing
CC8Change tickets with approvals, code reviewsITSM/GitPer change
CC9Vendor risk assessments, vendor SOC 2 reportsGRC platformAnnual
A1Uptime reports, DR tests, backup logsMonitoring/backupMonthly/Semi-annual
PI1Data validation/reconciliation reportsApplication logsPer process
C1Data classification inventory, encryption configsManual/automatedAnnual/Quarterly
P1PIAs, DSR response trackingPrivacy toolPer event

Example: Evidence Collection Command

# Generate evidence checklist for all TSC categories
python scripts/evidence_collector.py --generate-checklist --categories all

# Track evidence status
python scripts/evidence_collector.py --status evidence-tracker.json

# Update specific evidence item
python scripts/evidence_collector.py --update evidence-tracker.json \
  --item CC6.1-MFA --status collected

# Generate readiness dashboard
python scripts/evidence_collector.py --dashboard evidence-tracker.json

# Export for auditor review
python scripts/evidence_collector.py --export evidence-tracker.json --format json

Automation Strategies

GRC Platforms: Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Laika, AuditBoard -- automated evidence collection via API integrations, continuous control monitoring, auditor collaboration portals.

Infrastructure-as-Evidence: Cloud configuration snapshots (AWS Config, Azure Policy, GCP Org Policies), Terraform state as configuration evidence, Git history as change management evidence, CI/CD pipeline logs as deployment control evidence.


Infrastructure Security Validation

The agent validates infrastructure configurations against SOC 2 requirements.

Quick Reference: Infrastructure Checks

DomainKey ChecksSOC 2 Mapping
Cloud (AWS/Azure/GCP)Encryption, IAM, logging, network, backup, secretsCC6, CC7, A1, C1
DNSSPF, DKIM, DMARC, DNSSEC, CAACC6.6, CC2.2
TLS/SSLTLS 1.2+, AEAD ciphers, HSTS, auto-renewalCC6.7
EndpointMDM, disk encryption, EDR, patching, screen lockCC6.1, CC6.8, CC7.1
NetworkSegmentation, WAF, DDoS, VPN/ZTNA, egress filteringCC6.6, A1.1
ContainerImage scanning, minimal base, no privileged, RBACCC6.1, CC7.1
CI/CDSigned commits, branch protection, SAST/DAST, SBOMCC7.1, CC8.1
SecretsVault storage, rotation policies, git scanningCC6.1

For detailed per-provider control mappings, see REFERENCE.md.

Example: Infrastructure Audit Command

# Full infrastructure audit
python scripts/soc2_infrastructure_auditor.py --config infra-config.json

# Audit specific domains only
python scripts/soc2_infrastructure_auditor.py --config infra-config.json \
  --domains dns tls cloud

# JSON output with severity ratings
python scripts/soc2_infrastructure_auditor.py --config infra-config.json --format json

# Generate sample configuration template
python scripts/soc2_infrastructure_auditor.py --generate-template

Audit Timeline

Typical Timeline (First SOC 2)

PhaseDurationActivities
Scoping2-4 weeksDefine TSC, system boundaries, auditor selection
Gap Analysis2-4 weeksAssess current controls, identify gaps
Remediation8-16 weeksImplement missing controls, policies, procedures
Type I Audit2-4 weeksPoint-in-time control design assessment
Type II Observation3-12 monthsControls operate, evidence collected continuously
Type II Fieldwork2-4 weeksAuditor testing, evidence review, interviews
Report Issuance2-4 weeksDraft review, management response, final report

Annual Renewal

  • Begin renewal planning 3 months before observation period ends
  • Maintain continuous compliance between audit periods
  • Address prior-year findings before new observation period
  • Bridge letters available for gaps between reports

Incident Response Requirements

IRP Structure

  1. Preparation -- IR team defined, communication channels established, runbooks for common incidents, legal/PR contacts on retainer.
  2. Detection and Analysis -- monitoring/alerting coverage, severity classification (SEV1-SEV4), triage procedures, escalation matrix.
  3. Containment, Eradication, Recovery -- isolate affected systems, preserve evidence, identify root cause, restore and validate.
  4. Post-Incident -- blameless post-mortem within 5 business days, lessons learned, control improvements, notification assessment (MTTD, MTTR, MTTC tracking).

For severity level definitions and breach notification timelines, see REFERENCE.md.


Tools

SOC 2 Readiness Checker

# Full readiness assessment
python scripts/soc2_readiness_checker.py --config org-controls.json

# JSON output for programmatic use
python scripts/soc2_readiness_checker.py --config org-controls.json --format json

# Check specific TSC categories
python scripts/soc2_readiness_checker.py --config org-controls.json \
  --categories security availability

# Include cloud provider control mapping
python scripts/soc2_readiness_checker.py --config org-controls.json --cloud-mapping

Evidence Collector

# Generate checklist and track status
python scripts/evidence_collector.py --generate-checklist --categories all
python scripts/evidence_collector.py --status evidence-tracker.json
python scripts/evidence_collector.py --dashboard evidence-tracker.json

Infrastructure Auditor

# Validate infrastructure against SOC 2 requirements
python scripts/soc2_infrastructure_auditor.py --config infra-config.json
python scripts/soc2_infrastructure_auditor.py --config infra-config.json --format json

References

DocumentDescription
REFERENCE.mdDetailed TSC controls, infrastructure checks, access control specs, vendor management, training, IRP, BC/DR
Trust Services Criteria GuideComplete TSC reference with control objectives and audit questions
Infrastructure Security ControlsCloud, DNS, TLS, endpoint, container, CI/CD security configurations
Audit Preparation PlaybookEnd-to-end audit prep guide with timelines, checklists, cost estimation

Troubleshooting

ProblemLikely CauseResolution
Readiness checker scores are 0% across all categoriesControls JSON missing config_key values or all set to falseVerify the input JSON maps each TSC control to a boolean value under the correct config_key. Run --generate-sample > sample-config.json to see the expected structure.
Infrastructure auditor reports all checks as "fail"Infrastructure config JSON is empty or uses wrong key namesRun --generate-template to produce a valid template. Populate DNS, TLS, cloud, endpoint, and other sections with actual infrastructure state.
Evidence collector checklist missing categories--categories flag filtering outputUse --categories all to generate the complete checklist. Available categories: security, availability, processing_integrity, confidentiality, privacy.
Evidence tracker status not updatingTracker file path incorrect or file not writableVerify the path passed to --status or --update points to an existing tracker JSON file. Check file permissions.
Cloud mapping not appearing in readiness report--cloud-mapping flag not includedAdd --cloud-mapping to the readiness checker command to include AWS/Azure/GCP control mappings in the output.
Type II observation period too short for auditorObservation period is less than 3 monthsMost CPA firms require a minimum 3-month observation period for Type II. A 6-12 month period carries more weight. Plan the observation window during the scoping phase.
Auditor requests evidence not in the trackerEvidence catalog does not cover all TSC subcriteria for the selected scopeSupplement the auto-generated checklist with auditor-specific evidence requests. Each CPA firm may have additional requirements beyond the standard TSC evidence items.

Success Criteria

  • SOC 2 scope defined with all applicable TSC categories selected, system boundaries documented, and subservice organizations identified (carve-out vs inclusive)
  • Gap analysis completed with every identified gap assigned a severity rating, remediation owner, and target completion date
  • Readiness score of 80%+ across all in-scope TSC categories before engaging the CPA firm, trending to 95%+ before Type II fieldwork
  • Evidence collection framework operational with centralized repository, defined refresh cadence per TSC category, and automated collection where possible
  • Infrastructure audit passes with no critical or high-severity findings in DNS, TLS, cloud, endpoint, or access control domains
  • Type II observation period of at least 6 months with continuous control operation, quarterly self-assessments, and no significant control failures
  • Clean SOC 2 Type II opinion received with any findings addressed by management response and documented remediation plans

Scope & Limitations

In Scope:

  • SOC 2 Type I and Type II readiness assessment against all TSC categories (CC1-CC9, A1, PI1, C1, P1)
  • Infrastructure security validation (DNS, TLS, cloud, endpoint, network, container, CI/CD, secrets)
  • Evidence collection framework generation and tracking
  • Gap analysis with severity-rated findings and remediation guidance
  • Audit timeline planning and CPA firm engagement preparation
  • Incident response plan structure and requirements
  • Continuous compliance program design

Out of Scope:

  • CPA firm audit execution (the tools prepare for audit; the actual Type I/II report requires an independent CPA firm)
  • SOC 1 (ICFR) assessment (SOC 1 covers financial reporting controls, not security/availability/privacy)
  • SOC 3 report generation (SOC 3 is a public-facing summary derived from SOC 2; it requires a completed SOC 2 audit)
  • Penetration testing execution (use infrastructure-compliance-auditor or engage a third-party pentest firm)
  • GRC platform selection or implementation (the skill is compatible with Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, etc., but does not implement them)
  • Legal advice on customer contractual requirements for SOC 2 reports
  • Physical security assessments (the infrastructure auditor covers logical controls; physical data center audits require on-site assessment)

Integration Points

SkillIntegration
infrastructure-compliance-auditorProvides Vanta-level infrastructure checks across cloud, DNS, TLS, endpoints, access controls, and CI/CD that map directly to SOC 2 TSC requirements
nist-csf-specialistNIST CSF functions map to SOC 2 TSC categories; use the control mapper to build unified control matrices for organizations pursuing both
information-security-manager-iso27001ISO 27001 Annex A controls provide a management system backbone that satisfies many SOC 2 requirements; shared evidence reduces audit burden
pci-dss-specialistPCI DSS requirements overlap with SOC 2 CC6 (access), CC7 (operations), CC8 (change management); shared controls for payment-processing organizations
gdpr-dsgvo-expertGDPR requirements align with SOC 2 Privacy (P1) criteria; organizations processing EU personal data can leverage shared privacy controls
nis2-directive-specialistNIS2 minimum security measures overlap with SOC 2 security criteria; EU entities can map shared incident response, access control, and encryption controls

Tool Reference

soc2_readiness_checker.py

Evaluates organizational controls against SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria with per-category scoring.

FlagRequiredDescription
--configYes (or --generate-sample)Path to organization controls JSON file with boolean values for each TSC control
--formatNoOutput format: json for structured output, omit for human-readable text
--categoriesNoSpace-separated TSC categories to assess (e.g., security availability). Omit for all.
--cloud-mappingNoInclude cloud provider (AWS/Azure/GCP) control mappings in the output
--generate-sampleNoGenerate a sample controls JSON template (pipe to file with > sample-config.json)

evidence_collector.py

Generates evidence collection checklists and tracks evidence gathering status.

FlagRequiredDescription
--generate-checklistNoGenerate an evidence collection checklist for the specified categories
--categoriesNoSpace-separated TSC categories: security, availability, processing_integrity, confidentiality, privacy, or all
--statusNoPath to evidence tracker JSON file to display collection status
--updateNoPath to evidence tracker JSON file to update (use with --item and --status)
--itemNoEvidence item identifier to update (e.g., CC6.1-MFA)
--dashboardNoPath to evidence tracker JSON file to generate a readiness dashboard
--exportNoPath to evidence tracker JSON file to export
--formatNoExport format: json for structured output

soc2_infrastructure_auditor.py

Audits infrastructure configurations against SOC 2 requirements with severity-rated findings.

FlagRequiredDescription
--configYes (or --generate-template)Path to infrastructure configuration JSON file with DNS, TLS, cloud, endpoint, and other domain settings
--formatNoOutput format: json for structured findings with severity ratings, omit for human-readable text
--domainsNoSpace-separated infrastructure domains to audit (e.g., dns tls cloud). Omit for all domains.
--generate-templateNoGenerate a sample infrastructure configuration template (pipe to file with > infra-config.json)

平台分布

Codex

35.91%
按下载量换算198

Claude

27.8%
按下载量换算153

Cursor

19.35%
按下载量换算107

Gemini CLI

9.9%
按下载量换算55

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills