Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

soc-user-research(社会用户研究)

soc-user-research 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

soc-user-research 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 60,816。

总安装 364周安装 15GitHub Stars 125下载 119核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:soc-user-research(社会用户研究)
来源仓库:https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills
仓库路径:skills/soc-user-research
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill soc-user-research
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill soc-user-research

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

soc-user-research 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于用户行为研究、需求洞察与用户体验分析等社会科学领域。通过关键词或任务场景输入,Agent 可返回匹配的候选结果列表。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill soc-user-research。使用前请确认权限范围、维护状态及是否涉及联网或文件操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/soc-user-research

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill soc-user-res…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

soc-user-research 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill soc-user-research。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

soc-user-research 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

soc-user-research 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

soc-user-research 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

soc-user-research 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 364 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 119 次,GitHub 125 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

soc-user-research 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
soc-user-research

社会用户研究 · 本页

364125只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

User Research Methods

Overview

User research uncovers what people need, want, and do — through direct observation and conversation, not assumptions. This skill covers four core methods: depth interviews, focus groups, surveys, and field observation, plus when to use each.

Framework

IRON LAW: Method Follows Question

Choose the method based on what you need to learn, not what's convenient.
"Why" questions → Interviews/Observation (qualitative)
"How many" questions → Surveys (quantitative)
"What do they really do" → Observation (behavioral)

Running a survey to answer "why" produces misleading data.

Method Selection

MethodBest ForSampleDepthCost
Depth InterviewUnderstanding motivations, pain points, mental models8-15 peopleVery highMedium
Focus GroupExploring reactions, generating ideas, social dynamics6-10 per group, 2-3 groupsMediumMedium
SurveyMeasuring prevalence, preferences, demographics at scale100+ responsesLowLow-Med
Field ObservationUnderstanding actual behavior in context (not self-reported)5-10 sessionsVery highHigh

Depth Interview Guide

  1. Warm-up: Build rapport (2 min) — "Tell me about your role/day"
  2. Context: Understand their world (5 min) — "Walk me through the last time you..."
  3. Core questions: Explore the topic (20 min) — Open-ended, no leading questions
  4. Probing: Go deeper on interesting threads — "Tell me more about that", "Why?"
  5. Wrap-up: Summarize and confirm (3 min) — "Did I understand correctly that...?"

Rules:

  • Ask about past behavior, not hypothetical future ("What did you do?" not "What would you do?")
  • Never ask "Would you use this?" — people are terrible at predicting their own behavior
  • Silence is a tool — let them fill the gap

Survey Design

  1. Start with screening questions (qualify respondents)
  2. Move from general to specific
  3. Put sensitive/demographic questions last
  4. Limit to 15-20 questions (5-7 min completion)
  5. Use validated scales where possible (Likert, NPS, SUS)

Question types to avoid:

  • Double-barreled: "Is the product fast and reliable?" (which one?)
  • Leading: "Don't you think our app is easy to use?"
  • Hypothetical: "Would you pay $10/month for this feature?"

Analysis

Qualitative (interviews, observation):

  • Affinity mapping: Group observations into themes
  • Look for patterns across 5+ participants
  • Quote verbatim — don't paraphrase

Quantitative (surveys):

  • Descriptive stats first (means, distributions)
  • Cross-tabulate by segments
  • Statistical significance for comparisons (p < 0.05)

Output Format

# User Research Plan: {Project}

## Research Questions
1. {what we need to learn}

## Method
- Type: {interview / focus group / survey / observation}
- Rationale: {why this method for this question}
- Sample: {who, how many, recruitment criteria}
- Timeline: {duration}

## Discussion Guide / Survey Instrument
{Key questions or survey structure}

## Analysis Plan
{How findings will be synthesized}

Examples

Correct Application

Scenario: Understanding why users abandon a food delivery app at checkout

  • Method: Depth interviews (need to understand "why", not "how many")
  • Sample: 10 users who abandoned in the last 30 days (recruit via in-app data)
  • Key question: "Walk me through your last order that you didn't complete. What happened?" (behavioral, past-tense, open-ended ✓)

Incorrect Application

  • Survey asking "Would you complete your order if we removed the delivery fee?" → Hypothetical. Users will say yes but behavior may not change. Should observe actual behavior or test with a real experiment.

Gotchas

  • 5 users find 85% of usability problems (Nielsen): For usability testing, diminishing returns after 5. For understanding motivations, need 8-15.
  • Self-reported behavior ≠ actual behavior: People overestimate how healthy they eat, how often they exercise, and how much they'd pay. Observation and behavioral data > self-report.
  • Recruitment bias: If you recruit "users of our app", you miss non-users and churned users. Define the population carefully.
  • Interviewer bias: The interviewer's reactions (nodding, "great!") influence responses. Stay neutral.
  • Surveys measure what you ask, not what matters: If you didn't think to ask about a pain point, the survey won't reveal it. Use qualitative research first to discover the right questions.

References

  • For interview script templates, see references/interview-templates.md
  • For survey design best practices, see references/survey-design.md

平台分布

Codex

35.43%
按下载量换算42

Claude

27.87%
按下载量换算33

Cursor

19.22%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

9.07%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills