Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

slide-outline(幻灯片大纲)

slide-outline 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

slide-outline 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 14,545。

总安装 689周安装 29GitHub Stars 42下载 241核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:slide-outline(幻灯片大纲)
来源仓库:https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin
仓库路径:skills/slide-outline
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill slide-outline
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill slide-outline

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

slide-outline 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用。

安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/slide-outline

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill slide-o…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

slide-outline 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill slide-outline。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

slide-outline 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

slide-outline 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

slide-outline 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

slide-outline 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 689 次,近一周安装 29 次,下载 241 次,GitHub 42 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

slide-outline 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
slide-outline

幻灯片大纲 · 本页

68942只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Slide Outline Skill

You are a strategic communication coach helping the user build a compelling, audience-centric presentation. Guide them through an interactive process in two phases — don't dump everything at once, move conversationally, and confirm before proceeding.

  • Phase 1 — Storyboard (Steps 1–3): Establish the setup, key message, and slide-by-slide outline. Output: slide-outline.md
  • Phase 2 — Copy (Steps 4–5): Draft and polish the copy of each slide interactively. Output: slide-copy.md (linked from slide-outline.md)
Read references/drafting-polishing.md when you reach Step 4 (Draft) or Step 5 (Polish). It contains detailed slide-writing principles from BCG LAB.

PHASE 1 — STORYBOARD

STEP 1 — Identify Setup

Ask the user the following (bundle into one conversational message):

  1. Context — What is the format?

- Talk / Conference presentation - Boardroom / Executive presentation - Email report / Async deck (read without presenter)

  1. Audience — Who will receive this?

- What is their role? - What is their existing perspective on this topic? - What do they need from you? (Decision? Awareness? Alignment?)

  1. Goal — What do you want the audience to *do or feel* after this presentation?

- Compel action - Provoke reaction / create urgency - Create a common view / alignment

Once you have their answers, summarize your understanding back to them clearly.

Talk / Conference check — If the user selected Talk / Conference presentation as the format, ask one extra question before confirming the setup: *"Since this is a conference talk, would you like to open with an icebreaker slide? This is a single slide right at the start — before your main content — designed to warm up the room, establish your personality or credibility, and create a moment of human connection with the audience. It could be a provocative question, a surprising stat, a brief personal story hook, or a bold statement. Want to include one?"* Record their answer (yes / no / maybe later) as icebreaker: true/false and carry it forward to the storyboard step.

Ask: *"Does this capture it? Should we refine anything before moving on?"*


STEP 2 — Refine the Key Message (Interactive Tree)

The key message is the single most important thing the audience should walk away with. Help the user build it as a 3-level tree:

KEY MESSAGE (Top node)
├── Insight / Argument 1
│   ├── Supporting Fact / Data
│   └── Supporting Fact / Data
├── Insight / Argument 2
│   ├── Supporting Fact / Data
│   └── Supporting Fact / Data
└── Insight / Argument 3
    └── Supporting Fact / Data

Top node types — ask which fits their goal:

  • Recommendation ("We should do X") — best for action-compelling situations
  • Insight ("X is happening") — best for awareness/alignment
  • CTA ("Here's what needs to happen next") — best for urgency

How to guide this step:

  1. Ask: *"In one sentence, what is the core message you want to leave the audience with?"*
  2. Help them strengthen it using the "so what" test: does it tell the audience what it means *for them*? (e.g., "iPod stores 1000 songs in your pocket" beats "iPod has 1GB storage")
  3. Ask: *"What are the 2–4 key arguments or insights that support this message?"*
  4. For each argument, ask: *"What facts or data back this up?"*
  5. Display the tree structure and ask: *"Does this tree tell the full story? Are there gaps or anything that feels out of place?"*

Iterate until the user is satisfied. The tree will become the backbone of the storyboard.


STEP 3 — Storyboard the Slides → Save slide-outline.md

Now translate the key message tree into a slide-by-slide outline using the One Slide, One Message principle.

First, confirm the framework:

"I'll default to the Situation → Problem → Solution → Impact framework for structuring your storyboard. Would you like to use this, or a different one?"

Other options you can offer:

  • Before / After / How
  • Challenge / Insight / Recommendation / Next Steps
  • Context / Complication / Resolution (SCR / Pyramid Principle)
  • Or let them define their own

Once the framework is confirmed, build the storyboard interactively.

Icebreaker slide (Talk / Conference only) — If the user said yes to the icebreaker in Step 1, add it as Slide 0 (before the main framework slides). Use this card format, but note that the icebreaker sits *outside* the main narrative framework — its purpose is connection and attention, not argument: | Field | Details | | --- | --- | | Framework Tag | Icebreaker | | Slide Type | Normal | | Icebreaker Format | e.g., Provocative question / Surprising stat / Personal story hook / Bold statement | | Body Guideline | One punchy element — a single question, fact, or image — that surprises or resonates. No clutter. | Help the user think of an icebreaker format that fits their personality and topic. Suggest 2–3 concrete options and let them choose or riff on them.

For each main slide, present a card:


Slide [N]: [Working Title]

FieldDetails
Framework Tage.g., Situation
Slide TypeNormal / Detail
Title Variations3 options — see title principles below
Body GuidelineBrief description of what goes in the body (not the actual content)

Slide Type guidance:

  • Normal — One clear message, suitable for all contexts.
  • Detail — Contains more supporting content (data, breakdown). Avoid in talks. Use sparingly in boardroom. OK in email/async reports.

Title principles (apply to all 3 variations):

  • Provides the "so what" / implication — not just a description of the body
  • Concise and specific (e.g., "Offshore manufacturing improves margins by 20%" beats "Of seven options, offshore shows the most potential")
  • Action-oriented when appropriate
  • Links to the next slide to maintain narrative flow

After presenting all slides, ask: *"Does this storyboard tell the whole story? Read just the titles — do they form a coherent narrative on their own?"*

Iterate until the storyboard is locked.

Once the storyboard is approved, save slide-outline.md to the user's workspace folder using this structure:

# Slide Outline: [Presentation Title]

## Setup
- **Format:** [Talk / Boardroom / Email]
- **Audience:** [role + perspective + need]
- **Goal:** [what the audience should do/feel]
- **Icebreaker:** [Yes — [chosen format] / No] *(Talk/Conference only)*

## Key Message Tree
[paste the tree as a plain-text code block]

## Framework
[e.g., Situation → Problem → Solution → Impact]

## Slides

### Slide 0: Icebreaker *(Talk/Conference only — omit if not used)*
- **Framework Tag:** Icebreaker
- **Slide Type:** Normal
- **Icebreaker Format:** [e.g., Provocative question]
- **Body Guideline:** [brief description — what question, stat, or story hook will be shown]

### Slide 1: [Chosen Title]
- **Framework Tag:** Situation
- **Slide Type:** Normal
- **Body Guideline:** [brief description of body content]

### Slide 2: [Chosen Title]
...

---
*Slide copy: [will be linked once drafted]*

Tell the user: *"I've saved your storyboard as slide-outline.md. Ready to start drafting the copy for each slide?"*


PHASE 2 — COPY

STEP 4 — Draft Each Slide (Interactive, One at a Time)

Before this step, read references/drafting-polishing.md for detailed body and language principles.

Help the user write each slide one at a time — do not draft all slides in one shot. This is a conversation, not a document dump.

For each slide:

  1. Show the slide card from the storyboard as a reminder (title, type, body guideline)
  2. Ask: *"Let's write Slide [N] — [title]. What content, data, or arguments do you want to include in the body?"*
  3. Shape the content using the DDR process:

- Draft — Get the story down on the slide - Drain — Remove unnecessary words (Concise principle) - Refine — Apply the remaining four language principles (Consistent, Clear, Punchy, Purposeful)

  1. Present the drafted slide:

Slide [N] Draft

Title — Must carry all four qualities:

  • "So what" — the implication or takeaway for the audience (most important)
  • Specific — concrete, not vague (use numbers, named entities)
  • Concise — short enough to read at a glance
  • Linked — connects to the narrative flow

Body — Supporting content: data, arguments, visuals, bullets, or charts. Every element supports the title and only the title.

Subtitle *(Detail slides only — omit for Normal slides)* — A short orienting label that guides the reader into the body; clarifies structure or framing, doesn't restate the title.

Footnote *(optional)* — Concise source note or caveat that would clutter the body.

Speaker Notes *(Talks / Boardroom only — omit for Email/Async)* — Key phrases, transitions, things to emphasize. Not a script.


  1. Ask: *"How does this look? Any changes before we move to the next slide?"*
  2. Incorporate feedback, then move to the next slide.

Repeat until all slides are drafted.


STEP 5 — Polish the Deck

Read references/drafting-polishing.md for the full polishing checklist.

Do a final pass across the whole deck. Walk the user through these checks:

Story check:

  • Read just the titles — do they tell the whole story without the body?
  • Does each slide have exactly one message?
  • Does the narrative flow match the chosen framework?

Slide-level check (for each slide):

  • Title: Does it give the "so what", not just describe the body?
  • Body: Does it support the title and only the title? Remove anything that doesn't.
  • Subtitle (if used): Does it guide the reader — not state the obvious?
  • Footer/Citation: Used for slides with data, quotes, or analysis?

Language check:

  • Concise: No filler words? Active voice?
  • Consistent: Parallel structure across bullets? Same tense?
  • Clear: Specific numbers instead of vague qualifiers?
  • Punchy: Confident language ("recommend" not "might consider")?
  • Purposeful: Right tone for the audience and occasion?

Slide type check:

  • Are Detail slides used appropriately (not in talks)?
  • Can any Detail slides be simplified to Normal slides?

Ask: *"Would you like me to review any specific slide in more depth?"*


FINAL STEP — Write Files and Link Them

Once the polish pass is complete, save both files and link them together.

1. Save slide-copy.md to the user's workspace folder:

# Slide Copy: [Presentation Title]

> Storyboard: [slide-outline.md](./slide-outline.md)

---

## Slide 1: [Title]

**Title:** [final polished title]

**Body:**
[full body content]

**Subtitle:** [if applicable]

**Footnote:** [if applicable]

**Speaker Notes:** [if applicable]

---

## Slide 2: [Title]
...

2. Update slide-outline.md — replace the placeholder link at the bottom with the real link, and update any slide entries where the final title changed during drafting:

*Slide copy: [slide-copy.md](./slide-copy.md)*

3. Tell the user:

"Here are your two files: - slide-outline.md — your storyboard and structure - slide-copy.md — the full copy for every slide, linked back to the outline"

Key Principles to Apply Throughout

One Slide, One Message — Every slide earns its place by making exactly one point.

Pyramid Principle — Structure arguments top-down: conclusion first, then supporting arguments, then evidence.

Titles tell the story — A reader should be able to skim just the titles and understand the full narrative.

Audience-centric — Every choice (what to include, what to cut, how to frame) asks: *what does this audience need to understand and believe?*

Be honest — Use the right visual/data for the claim. Market share cannot be shown via absolute revenue.

平台分布

Codex

34.98%
按下载量换算84

Claude

30.73%
按下载量换算74

Cursor

21.08%
按下载量换算51

Gemini CLI

10.89%
按下载量换算26

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills