Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

testing-workflow(测试工作流程)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

testing-workflow 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Local Agent,通过unknown获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 69,749。

总安装 216周安装 9下载 72核验 2026-05-01
研究检索需要联网unknown未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计未展示Local Agent

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:testing-workflow(测试工作流程)
来源仓库:https://skills.volces.com
仓库路径:testing-workflow
安装命令:
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。当前暂无明确安装命令,请以来源页面说明为准。

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

testing-workflow 用于辅助测试设计与自动化验证,适合在 Local Agent 中编写用例与排查问题。它可生成单元测试、端到端脚本或回归计划,支持多种测试框架集成。使用时需提供项目结构、测试目标与运行环境,Agent 将输出可执行测试代码。安装前请确认测试框架依赖与夹具数据路径,避免因配置错误导致失败。

建议在模拟环境与真实数据分离的场景下运行,确保测试不影响生产系统。

来源仓库内路径:testing-workflow

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Local Agent;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    没有现成安装命令,按unknown的说明从来源页面获取,仓库路径是 testing-workflow。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

testing-workflow 怎么安装?

公开资料没有给出可以直接复制的命令,需要按来源页面说明手动安装,仓库内路径为 testing-workflow。

testing-workflow 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Local Agent。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

testing-workflow 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

testing-workflow 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

testing-workflow 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 216 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 72 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

testing-workflow 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 Local Agent 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Local Agent,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
testing-workflow

测试工作流程 · 本页

216—需要联网未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Testing Workflow

Orchestrate comprehensive testing across a project by coordinating the testing-patterns skill, e2e-testing skill, and testing agents. This meta-skill does not define test patterns itself — it routes to the right skill or agent at each stage and ensures nothing is missed.


When to Use

  • Setting up testing for a new project from scratch
  • Improving coverage for an existing project with gaps
  • Establishing or revising a testing strategy
  • Before a major release to verify quality gates are met
  • After a large refactor to confirm nothing broke
  • During code review when test adequacy is in question
  • Onboarding a team to a testing workflow

Orchestration Flow

Follow these steps in order. Each step routes to a specific skill or agent — read and apply that resource before moving to the next step.

Phase 1: Discovery and Baseline

Scan the project to understand existing test infrastructure, measure current coverage, and identify gaps before making changes. Without a baseline, you cannot demonstrate improvement.

  1. Identify test infrastructure — Determine the test runner, assertion library, coverage tool, and CI configuration already in use. If none exist, flag that setup is needed.
  2. Measure current coverage — Run the existing test suite and record statement, branch, and function coverage. This is the baseline.
  3. Map untested code — Identify modules, functions, and code paths with no test coverage. Prioritize by risk: business-critical logic first, utilities last.
  4. Catalog existing tests — Categorize existing tests as unit, integration, or E2E. Check for skipped tests, flaky tests, and tests that don't assert anything meaningful.

Phase 2: Strategy Selection

Based on the discovery results, select the appropriate testing approach for this project.

  1. Determine project type — Use the Coverage Targets table below to set appropriate thresholds for the project type.
  2. Select test patterns — Read ai/skills/testing/testing-patterns/SKILL.md and choose the unit/integration test patterns that match the project's architecture, language, and framework.
  3. Identify critical user journeys — List the 3-10 most important user workflows that require E2E coverage. These are flows where a failure would directly impact revenue, user trust, or safety.
  4. Document the strategy — Fill in the Testing Strategy Template (below) and commit it to the repository.

Phase 3: Implementation

Generate tests following the patterns selected in Phase 2.

  1. Unit tests first — Write unit tests for uncovered business logic, starting with the highest-risk modules. Follow the testing pyramid: ~70% of your tests should be unit tests.
  2. Integration tests next — Write integration tests for module boundaries, API endpoints, and database queries. Focus on the seams where components interact.
  3. E2E tests for critical journeys — Read ai/skills/testing/e2e-testing/SKILL.md and write E2E tests for each critical user journey identified in Phase 2.
  4. Edge case coverage — After the happy paths are covered, add tests for error conditions, boundary values, null/empty inputs, and concurrency scenarios.

Phase 4: Validation

Verify that the new tests meet quality standards and coverage targets.

  1. Run the full test suite — Every test must pass. Fix failures before proceeding.
  2. Measure coverage against targets — Compare new coverage against the thresholds for the project type. If targets are not met, return to Phase 3.
  3. Check test quality — Review tests for the anti-patterns listed in testing-patterns (assert-free tests, overmocking, flaky tests, test pollution). Fix any found.
  4. Verify CI integration — Confirm that tests run automatically on every push/PR and that coverage thresholds are enforced in CI.

Phase 5: Maintenance

Establish ongoing practices to keep the test suite healthy.

  1. Set up coverage ratcheting — Configure CI to fail if coverage drops below the current level. Coverage should only go up.
  2. Establish flaky test policy — Any test that fails intermittently must be fixed within one sprint or removed with a justification.
  3. Define test review standards — Every PR that adds or changes logic must include corresponding test changes. Reviewers check for this.
  4. Schedule test health audits — Quarterly, review test execution time, flaky test rate, skipped test count, and coverage trends.

Skill Routing Table

Use this table to route specific needs to the correct resource:

NeedRoute ToPath
Unit/integration test patternstesting-patternsai/skills/testing/testing-patterns/SKILL.md
E2E test patternse2e-testingai/skills/testing/e2e-testing/SKILL.md
Code quality standardsclean-codeai/skills/testing/clean-code/SKILL.md
Review checklistcode-reviewai/skills/testing/code-review/SKILL.md
CI/CD quality gatesquality-gatesai/skills/testing/quality-gates/SKILL.md
Debugging test failuresdebuggingai/skills/testing/debugging/SKILL.md

When a request falls clearly into one row, go directly to that resource. Use the full orchestration flow only when comprehensive coverage is the goal.


Coverage Targets

Targets vary by project type. Use the appropriate row to set expectations:

Project TypeStatementBranchFunctionE2E JourneysNotes
Startup MVP60%50%60%Top 3 flowsFocus on critical paths only
Production App80%70%80%Top 10 flowsBalance speed with confidence
Library / Package90%85%95%N/APublic API must be fully covered
Critical Infrastructure95%90%95%All flowsZero tolerance for gaps

These are minimums. Aim higher when time permits, but do not block releases on vanity metrics — prioritize meaningful coverage over percentage points.


Testing Strategy Template

Use this template to document the testing strategy for a project. Fill it in during the orchestration flow and keep it in the repo.

# Testing Strategy

## Project Overview
- **Project**: [name]
- **Type**: [startup MVP | production app | library | critical infrastructure]
- **Primary Language**: [language]
- **Framework**: [framework]
- **Test Runner**: [runner]
- **Coverage Tool**: [tool]

## Coverage Baseline
- **Statement**: [X%]
- **Branch**: [X%]
- **Function**: [X%]
- **E2E Journeys Covered**: [N of M]
- **Date Measured**: [YYYY-MM-DD]

## Coverage Targets
- **Statement**: [target%]
- **Branch**: [target%]
- **Function**: [target%]
- **E2E Journeys**: [target count]

## Test Patterns Selected
- [ ] [Pattern 1 — reason for selection]
- [ ] [Pattern 2 — reason for selection]
- [ ] [Pattern 3 — reason for selection]

## Critical User Journeys (E2E)
1. [Journey 1 — e.g., signup -> onboarding -> first action]
2. [Journey 2 — e.g., login -> dashboard -> export]
3. [Journey 3 — e.g., checkout -> payment -> confirmation]

## Gaps and Risks
- [Untested area 1 — risk level, mitigation plan]
- [Untested area 2 — risk level, mitigation plan]

## Quality Gate Status
- [ ] All tests pass
- [ ] Coverage targets met
- [ ] Critical journeys covered with E2E
- [ ] No skipped tests without justification
- [ ] Test execution time within budget
- [ ] CI enforces coverage thresholds

Quality Gates for Testing Completion

All of the following must be satisfied before marking testing complete:

GateRequirementWhy
All tests passZero failures, zero errorsFlaky tests count as failures
Coverage targets metStatement, branch, and function coverage meet project-type thresholdsUntested code is unverified code
Critical journeys coveredEvery critical user journey has a passing E2E testRevenue and trust depend on these flows
No unjustified skipsEvery skip, xit, or xdescribe has a comment and linked issueSkipped tests rot into permanent gaps
Execution time budgetUnit < 60s, E2E < 10minSlow suites get skipped by developers
No test pollutionRunning any test file alone produces same results as full suiteShared state masks failures
Mocks are justifiedEvery mock has a comment explaining why the real impl cannot be usedOver-mocking hides real bugs

NEVER Do

  1. NEVER write tests that test implementation details instead of behavior — tests must verify what the code does, not how it does it
  2. NEVER skip the discovery phase — always measure the baseline before writing new tests, or you cannot demonstrate improvement
  3. NEVER merge tests that depend on execution order — each test must be independent and idempotent
  4. NEVER mock what you do not own — wrap third-party dependencies in your own adapters and mock the adapters instead
  5. NEVER treat coverage percentage as the sole quality metric — 100% coverage with weak assertions is worse than 70% coverage with strong assertions
  6. NEVER leave the test suite in a failing state — if a test fails, fix it or remove it with a justification before moving on
  7. NEVER skip E2E tests for critical user journeys — unit tests alone cannot catch integration failures in flows that matter most
  8. NEVER deploy without running the full test suite — partial test runs create false confidence

平台分布

Local Agent

94.99%
按下载量换算68

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills