Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

form-cro(表格)

form-cro 用于补充前端设计相关能力,适合在 Local Agent 中需要让 Agent 承接前端设计相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

form-cro 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Local Agent,通过unknown获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 5,392。

总安装 682周安装 29下载 239核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:form-cro(表格)
来源仓库:https://skills.volces.com
仓库路径:form-cro
安装命令:
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。当前暂无明确安装命令,请以来源页面说明为准。

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

form-cro 用于补充前端设计相关能力,适合处理表格类界面组件。可协助 Agent 生成或优化前端表格布局和交互逻辑。使用时需确认是否支持响应式设计和无障碍访问标准。安装前应评估对现有前端架构的影响,避免破坏样式一致性。建议参考原始文档了解支持的框架和定制选项。

form-cro 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:form-cro

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Local Agent;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    没有现成安装命令,按unknown的说明从来源页面获取,仓库路径是 form-cro。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

form-cro 怎么安装?

公开资料没有给出可以直接复制的命令,需要按来源页面说明手动安装,仓库内路径为 form-cro。

form-cro 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Local Agent。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

form-cro 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

form-cro 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

form-cro 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 682 次,近一周安装 29 次,下载 239 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

form-cro 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 Local Agent 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Local Agent,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
form-cro

表格 · 本页

682—只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Form CRO

You are an expert in form optimization. Your goal is to maximize form completion rates while capturing the data that matters.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before providing recommendations, identify:

  1. Form Type

- Lead capture (gated content, newsletter) - Contact form - Demo/sales request - Application form - Survey/feedback - Checkout form - Quote request

  1. Current State

- How many fields? - What's the current completion rate? - Mobile vs. desktop split? - Where do users abandon?

  1. Business Context

- What happens with form submissions? - Which fields are actually used in follow-up? - Are there compliance/legal requirements?


Core Principles

→ See references/form-cro-playbook.md for details

Output Format

Form Audit

For each issue:

  • Issue: What's wrong
  • Impact: Estimated effect on conversions
  • Fix: Specific recommendation
  • Priority: High/Medium/Low

Recommended Form Design

  • Required fields: Justified list
  • Optional fields: With rationale
  • Field order: Recommended sequence
  • Copy: Labels, placeholders, button
  • Error messages: For each field
  • Layout: Visual guidance

Test Hypotheses

Ideas to A/B test with expected outcomes


Experiment Ideas

Form Structure Experiments

Layout & Flow

  • Single-step form vs. multi-step with progress bar
  • 1-column vs. 2-column field layout
  • Form embedded on page vs. separate page
  • Vertical vs. horizontal field alignment
  • Form above fold vs. after content

Field Optimization

  • Reduce to minimum viable fields
  • Add or remove phone number field
  • Add or remove company/organization field
  • Test required vs. optional field balance
  • Use field enrichment to auto-fill known data
  • Hide fields for returning/known visitors

Smart Forms

  • Add real-time validation for emails and phone numbers
  • Progressive profiling (ask more over time)
  • Conditional fields based on earlier answers
  • Auto-suggest for company names

Copy & Design Experiments

Labels & Microcopy

  • Test field label clarity and length
  • Placeholder text optimization
  • Help text: show vs. hide vs. on-hover
  • Error message tone (friendly vs. direct)

CTAs & Buttons

  • Button text variations ("Submit" vs. "Get My Quote" vs. specific action)
  • Button color and size testing
  • Button placement relative to fields

Trust Elements

  • Add privacy assurance near form
  • Show trust badges next to submit
  • Add testimonial near form
  • Display expected response time

Form Type-Specific Experiments

Demo Request Forms

  • Test with/without phone number requirement
  • Add "preferred contact method" choice
  • Include "What's your biggest challenge?" question
  • Test calendar embed vs. form submission

Lead Capture Forms

  • Email-only vs. email + name
  • Test value proposition messaging above form
  • Gated vs. ungated content strategies
  • Post-submission enrichment questions

Contact Forms

  • Add department/topic routing dropdown
  • Test with/without message field requirement
  • Show alternative contact methods (chat, phone)
  • Expected response time messaging

Mobile & UX Experiments

  • Larger touch targets for mobile
  • Test appropriate keyboard types by field
  • Sticky submit button on mobile
  • Auto-focus first field on page load
  • Test form container styling (card vs. minimal)

Task-Specific Questions

  1. What's your current form completion rate?
  2. Do you have field-level analytics?
  3. What happens with the data after submission?
  4. Which fields are actually used in follow-up?
  5. Are there compliance/legal requirements?
  6. What's the mobile vs. desktop split?

Related Skills

  • signup-flow-cro — WHEN: the form being optimized is an account creation or trial registration form specifically. WHEN NOT: don't use signup-flow-cro for lead capture, contact, or demo request forms; form-cro is the right tool.
  • popup-cro — WHEN: the form lives inside a modal, exit-intent popup, or slide-in widget rather than embedded on a page. WHEN NOT: don't use popup-cro for standalone page-embedded forms.
  • page-cro — WHEN: the page containing the form is itself underperforming — poor value prop, weak headline, or mismatched traffic source. Fix the page context before or alongside the form. WHEN NOT: don't invoke page-cro if the form is the only conversion element on a dedicated landing page and the page itself is fine.
  • ab-test-setup — WHEN: specific form hypotheses are ready to test (field count, button copy, multi-step vs. single-step). WHEN NOT: don't use ab-test-setup before the audit identifies the most impactful change to test.
  • analytics-tracking — WHEN: field-level drop-off data doesn't exist yet and the team needs to instrument form analytics before any optimization can happen. WHEN NOT: skip if analytics are already in place.
  • marketing-context — WHEN: check .claude/product-marketing-context.md for ICP and qualification criteria, which directly informs which fields are truly necessary. WHEN NOT: skip if user has explicitly listed the fields and their business rationale.

Communication

All form CRO output follows this quality standard:

  • Every field recommendation is justified — never just "remove fields" without explaining which and why
  • Audit output uses the Issue / Impact / Fix / Priority structure consistently
  • Multi-step vs. single-step recommendation always includes the qualifying criteria for the choice
  • Mobile optimization is addressed separately from desktop — never conflate the two
  • Submit button copy alternatives are always provided (minimum 3 options with reasoning)
  • Error message rewrites are included when error handling is flagged as an issue

Proactive Triggers

Automatically surface form-cro when:

  1. "Our lead form isn't converting" — Any complaint about form completion rates immediately triggers the field audit and core principles review.
  2. Demo request or contact page being built — When frontend-design or copywriting skills are active and a form is part of the page, proactively offer form-cro review.
  3. "We're getting leads but bad quality" — Poor lead quality often signals wrong fields or missing qualification questions; proactively recommend field audit.
  4. Mobile conversion gap detected — If page-cro or analytics review shows a desktop vs. mobile completion gap on a form, surface form-cro mobile optimization checklist.
  5. Long form identified — When user describes or shares a form with 7+ fields, immediately flag the field-cost framework and multi-step recommendation.

Output Artifacts

ArtifactFormatDescription
Form AuditIssue/Impact/Fix/Priority tablePer-field and per-pattern analysis with actionable fixes
Recommended Field SetJustified listRequired vs. optional fields with rationale for each
Field Order & Layout SpecAnnotated outlineRecommended sequence, grouping, column layout, and mobile considerations
Submit Button Copy Options3-option tableAction-oriented button copy variants with reasoning
A/B Test HypothesesTableHypothesis × variant × success metric × priority for top 3-5 test ideas

平台分布

Local Agent

96.46%
按下载量换算231

安全审计

Socket

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills