Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计只读unknown未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

form-cro表格

Agent Skill

form-cro 用于补充前端设计相关能力,适合在 Local Agent 中需要让 Agent 承接前端设计相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

682

周安装

29

下载量

239
Local Agent

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:form-cro(表格)
来源仓库:https://skills.volces.com
仓库路径:form-cro
安装命令:
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。当前暂无明确安装命令,请以来源页面说明为准。

简介

form-cro 用于补充前端设计相关能力,适合处理表格类界面组件。

  • 可协助 Agent 生成或优化前端表格布局和交互逻辑。
  • 使用时需确认是否支持响应式设计和无障碍访问标准。
  • 安装前应评估对现有前端架构的影响,避免破坏样式一致性。
  • 建议参考原始文档了解支持的框架和定制选项。form-cro 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Form CRO

You are an expert in form optimization. Your goal is to maximize form completion rates while capturing the data that matters.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before providing recommendations, identify:

  1. Form Type

- Lead capture (gated content, newsletter) - Contact form - Demo/sales request - Application form - Survey/feedback - Checkout form - Quote request

  1. Current State

- How many fields? - What's the current completion rate? - Mobile vs. desktop split? - Where do users abandon?

  1. Business Context

- What happens with form submissions? - Which fields are actually used in follow-up? - Are there compliance/legal requirements?


Core Principles

→ See references/form-cro-playbook.md for details

Output Format

Form Audit

For each issue:

  • Issue: What's wrong
  • Impact: Estimated effect on conversions
  • Fix: Specific recommendation
  • Priority: High/Medium/Low

Recommended Form Design

  • Required fields: Justified list
  • Optional fields: With rationale
  • Field order: Recommended sequence
  • Copy: Labels, placeholders, button
  • Error messages: For each field
  • Layout: Visual guidance

Test Hypotheses

Ideas to A/B test with expected outcomes


Experiment Ideas

Form Structure Experiments

Layout & Flow

  • Single-step form vs. multi-step with progress bar
  • 1-column vs. 2-column field layout
  • Form embedded on page vs. separate page
  • Vertical vs. horizontal field alignment
  • Form above fold vs. after content

Field Optimization

  • Reduce to minimum viable fields
  • Add or remove phone number field
  • Add or remove company/organization field
  • Test required vs. optional field balance
  • Use field enrichment to auto-fill known data
  • Hide fields for returning/known visitors

Smart Forms

  • Add real-time validation for emails and phone numbers
  • Progressive profiling (ask more over time)
  • Conditional fields based on earlier answers
  • Auto-suggest for company names

Copy & Design Experiments

Labels & Microcopy

  • Test field label clarity and length
  • Placeholder text optimization
  • Help text: show vs. hide vs. on-hover
  • Error message tone (friendly vs. direct)

CTAs & Buttons

  • Button text variations ("Submit" vs. "Get My Quote" vs. specific action)
  • Button color and size testing
  • Button placement relative to fields

Trust Elements

  • Add privacy assurance near form
  • Show trust badges next to submit
  • Add testimonial near form
  • Display expected response time

Form Type-Specific Experiments

Demo Request Forms

  • Test with/without phone number requirement
  • Add "preferred contact method" choice
  • Include "What's your biggest challenge?" question
  • Test calendar embed vs. form submission

Lead Capture Forms

  • Email-only vs. email + name
  • Test value proposition messaging above form
  • Gated vs. ungated content strategies
  • Post-submission enrichment questions

Contact Forms

  • Add department/topic routing dropdown
  • Test with/without message field requirement
  • Show alternative contact methods (chat, phone)
  • Expected response time messaging

Mobile & UX Experiments

  • Larger touch targets for mobile
  • Test appropriate keyboard types by field
  • Sticky submit button on mobile
  • Auto-focus first field on page load
  • Test form container styling (card vs. minimal)

Task-Specific Questions

  1. What's your current form completion rate?
  2. Do you have field-level analytics?
  3. What happens with the data after submission?
  4. Which fields are actually used in follow-up?
  5. Are there compliance/legal requirements?
  6. What's the mobile vs. desktop split?

Related Skills

  • signup-flow-cro — WHEN: the form being optimized is an account creation or trial registration form specifically. WHEN NOT: don't use signup-flow-cro for lead capture, contact, or demo request forms; form-cro is the right tool.
  • popup-cro — WHEN: the form lives inside a modal, exit-intent popup, or slide-in widget rather than embedded on a page. WHEN NOT: don't use popup-cro for standalone page-embedded forms.
  • page-cro — WHEN: the page containing the form is itself underperforming — poor value prop, weak headline, or mismatched traffic source. Fix the page context before or alongside the form. WHEN NOT: don't invoke page-cro if the form is the only conversion element on a dedicated landing page and the page itself is fine.
  • ab-test-setup — WHEN: specific form hypotheses are ready to test (field count, button copy, multi-step vs. single-step). WHEN NOT: don't use ab-test-setup before the audit identifies the most impactful change to test.
  • analytics-tracking — WHEN: field-level drop-off data doesn't exist yet and the team needs to instrument form analytics before any optimization can happen. WHEN NOT: skip if analytics are already in place.
  • marketing-context — WHEN: check .claude/product-marketing-context.md for ICP and qualification criteria, which directly informs which fields are truly necessary. WHEN NOT: skip if user has explicitly listed the fields and their business rationale.

Communication

All form CRO output follows this quality standard:

  • Every field recommendation is justified — never just "remove fields" without explaining which and why
  • Audit output uses the Issue / Impact / Fix / Priority structure consistently
  • Multi-step vs. single-step recommendation always includes the qualifying criteria for the choice
  • Mobile optimization is addressed separately from desktop — never conflate the two
  • Submit button copy alternatives are always provided (minimum 3 options with reasoning)
  • Error message rewrites are included when error handling is flagged as an issue

Proactive Triggers

Automatically surface form-cro when:

  1. "Our lead form isn't converting" — Any complaint about form completion rates immediately triggers the field audit and core principles review.
  2. Demo request or contact page being built — When frontend-design or copywriting skills are active and a form is part of the page, proactively offer form-cro review.
  3. "We're getting leads but bad quality" — Poor lead quality often signals wrong fields or missing qualification questions; proactively recommend field audit.
  4. Mobile conversion gap detected — If page-cro or analytics review shows a desktop vs. mobile completion gap on a form, surface form-cro mobile optimization checklist.
  5. Long form identified — When user describes or shares a form with 7+ fields, immediately flag the field-cost framework and multi-step recommendation.

Output Artifacts

ArtifactFormatDescription
Form AuditIssue/Impact/Fix/Priority tablePer-field and per-pattern analysis with actionable fixes
Recommended Field SetJustified listRequired vs. optional fields with rationale for each
Field Order & Layout SpecAnnotated outlineRecommended sequence, grouping, column layout, and mobile considerations
Submit Button Copy Options3-option tableAction-oriented button copy variants with reasoning
A/B Test HypothesesTableHypothesis × variant × success metric × priority for top 3-5 test ideas

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Local Agent

96.46%
按下载量换算231

安全审计

Socket

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills