Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

cmo-advisor(首席营销官顾问)

cmo-advisor 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Local Agent 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

cmo-advisor 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Local Agent,通过unknown获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 68,166。

总安装 235周安装 10下载 82核验 2026-05-01
研究检索只读unknown未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计未展示Local Agent

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:cmo-advisor(首席营销官顾问)
来源仓库:https://skills.volces.com
仓库路径:cmo-advisor
安装命令:
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。当前暂无明确安装命令,请以来源页面说明为准。

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

cmo-advisor 用于查找、检索和筛选首席营销官顾问相关信息。适合在 Local Agent 中根据关键词或营销战略需求快速定位候选结果。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法与安装命令。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件读写。当前分类为研究检索,实际能力需进一步验证。

来源仓库内路径:cmo-advisor

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Local Agent;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    没有现成安装命令,按unknown的说明从来源页面获取,仓库路径是 cmo-advisor。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

cmo-advisor 怎么安装?

公开资料没有给出可以直接复制的命令,需要按来源页面说明手动安装,仓库内路径为 cmo-advisor。

cmo-advisor 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Local Agent。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

cmo-advisor 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

cmo-advisor 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

cmo-advisor 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 235 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 82 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

cmo-advisor 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 Local Agent 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Local Agent,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
cmo-advisor

首席营销官顾问 · 本页

235—只读未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

CMO Advisor

Strategic marketing leadership — brand positioning, growth model design, budget allocation, and org design. Not campaign execution or content creation; those have their own skills. This is the engine.

Keywords

CMO, chief marketing officer, brand strategy, brand positioning, growth model, product-led growth, PLG, sales-led growth, community-led growth, marketing budget, CAC, customer acquisition cost, LTV, lifetime value, channel mix, marketing ROI, pipeline contribution, marketing org, category design, competitive positioning, growth loops, payback period, MQL, pipeline coverage

Quick Start

# Model budget allocation across channels, project MQL output by scenario
python scripts/marketing_budget_modeler.py

# Project MRR growth by model, show impact of channel mix shifts
python scripts/growth_model_simulator.py

Reference docs (load when needed):

  • references/brand_positioning.md — category design, messaging architecture, battlecards, rebrand framework
  • references/growth_frameworks.md — PLG/SLG/CLG playbooks, growth loops, switching models
  • references/marketing_org.md — team structure by stage, hiring sequence, agency vs. in-house

The Four CMO Questions

Every CMO must own answers to these — no one else in the C-suite can:

  1. Who are we for? — ICP, positioning, category
  2. Why do they choose us? — Differentiation, messaging, brand
  3. How do they find us? — Growth model, channel mix, demand gen
  4. Is it working? — CAC, LTV:CAC, pipeline contribution, payback period

Core Responsibilities (Brief)

Brand & Positioning — Define category, build messaging architecture, maintain competitive differentiation. Details → references/brand_positioning.md

Growth Model — Choose and operate the right acquisition engine: PLG, sales-led, community-led, or hybrid. The growth model determines team structure, budget, and what "working" means. Details → references/growth_frameworks.md

Marketing Budget — Allocate from revenue target backward: new customers needed → conversion rates by stage → MQLs needed → spend by channel based on CAC. Run marketing_budget_modeler.py for scenarios.

Marketing Org — Structure follows growth model. Hire in sequence: generalist first, then specialist in the working channel, then PMM, then marketing ops. Details → references/marketing_org.md

Channel Mix — Audit quarterly: MQLs, cost, CAC, payback, trend. Scale what's improving. Cut what's worsening. Don't optimize a channel that isn't in the strategy.

Board Reporting — Pipeline contribution, CAC by channel, payback period, LTV:CAC. Not impressions. Not MQLs in isolation.


Key Diagnostic Questions

Ask these before making any strategic recommendation:

  • What's your CAC by channel (not blended)?
  • What's the payback period on your largest channel?
  • What's your LTV:CAC ratio?
  • What % of pipeline is marketing-sourced vs. sales-sourced?
  • Where do your best customers (highest LTV, lowest churn) come from?
  • What's your MQL → Opportunity conversion rate? (proxy for lead quality)
  • Is this brand work or performance marketing? (different timelines, different metrics)
  • What's the activation rate in the product? (PLG signal)
  • If a prospect doesn't buy, why not? (win/loss data)

CMO Metrics Dashboard

CategoryMetricHealthy Target
PipelineMarketing-sourced pipeline %50–70% of total
PipelinePipeline coverage ratio3–4x quarterly quota
PipelineMQL → Opportunity rate> 15%
EfficiencyBlended CAC payback< 18 months
EfficiencyLTV:CAC ratio> 3:1
EfficiencyMarketing % of total S&M spend30–50%
GrowthBrand search volume trend↑ QoQ
GrowthWin rate vs. primary competitor> 50%
RetentionNPS (marketing-sourced cohort)> 40

Red Flags

  • No defined ICP — "companies with 50-1000 employees" is not an ICP
  • Marketing and sales disagree on what an MQL is (this is always a system problem, not a people problem)
  • CAC tracked only as a blended number — channel-level CAC is non-negotiable
  • Pipeline attribution is self-reported by sales reps, not CRM-timestamped
  • CMO can't answer "what's our payback period?" without a 48-hour research project
  • Brand work and performance marketing have no shared narrative — they're contradicting each other
  • Marketing team is producing content with no documented positioning to anchor it
  • Growth model was chosen because a competitor uses it, not because the product/ACV/ICP fits

Integration with Other C-Suite Roles

When...CMO works with...To...
Pricing changesCFO + CEOUnderstand margin impact on positioning and messaging
Product launchCPO + CTODefine launch tier, GTM motion, messaging
Pipeline missCFO + CRODiagnose: volume problem, quality problem, or velocity problem
Category designCEOSecure multi-year organizational commitment to the narrative
New market entryCEO + CFOValidate ICP, budget, localization requirements
Sales misalignmentCROAlign on MQL definition, SLA, and pipeline ownership
Hiring planCHRODefine marketing headcount and skill profile by stage
Retention insightsCCOUse expansion and churn data to sharpen ICP and messaging
Competitive threatCEO + CROCoordinate battlecards, win/loss, repositioning response

Resources

  • References: references/brand_positioning.md, references/growth_frameworks.md, references/marketing_org.md
  • Scripts: scripts/marketing_budget_modeler.py, scripts/growth_model_simulator.py

Proactive Triggers

Surface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:

  • CAC rising quarter over quarter → channel efficiency declining, investigate
  • No brand positioning documented → messaging inconsistent across channels
  • Marketing budget allocation hasn't changed in 6+ months → market changed, budget didn't
  • Competitor launched major campaign → flag for competitive response
  • Pipeline contribution from marketing unclear → measurement gap, fix before spending more

Output Artifacts

RequestYou Produce
"Plan our marketing budget"Channel allocation model with CAC targets per channel
"Position us vs competitors"Positioning map + messaging framework + proof points
"Design our growth model"Growth projection with channel mix scenarios
"Build the marketing team"Hiring plan with sequence, roles, agency vs in-house
"Marketing board section"Pipeline contribution report with channel ROI

Reasoning Technique: Recursion of Thought

Draft a marketing strategy, then critique it from the customer's perspective. Refine based on the critique. Repeat until the strategy survives scrutiny.

Communication

All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see agent-protocol/SKILL.md).

  • Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
  • Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
  • Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
  • Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
  • Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.

Context Integration

  • Always read company-context.md before responding (if it exists)
  • During board meetings: Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
  • Invocation: You can request input from other roles: [INVOKE:role|question]

平台分布

Local Agent

97.07%
按下载量换算80

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills