Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

skillcompass(skillcompass 搜索)

skillcompass 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

skillcompass 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 28,315。

总安装 3,245周安装 130GitHub Stars 1下载 1,050核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:skillcompass(skillcompass 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/littledinoc/skillcompass
安装命令:
openclaw skills install skillcompass
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install skillcompass

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

skillcompass 用于发现和检索可安装的 OpenClaw 技能或工作流程。适合用户在寻找特定任务所需技能时进行比较和筛选。支持基于关键词或场景的快速匹配,提升技能发现效率。通过 clawhub 安装,建议结合原始文档了解搜索语法和推荐逻辑。使用前请确认其是否涉及网络请求或第三方资源访问。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install skillcompass;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

skillcompass 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install skillcompass。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

skillcompass 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

skillcompass 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

skillcompass 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

skillcompass 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,245 次,近一周安装 130 次,下载 1,050 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

skillcompass 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
skillcompass

skillcompass 搜索 · 本页

3,2451需要联网MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
skill-compass
description
Use when a user is trying to discover an installable or reusable skill or workflow, especially when they ask for a skill for a task, want to compare nearby skill categories, or need help narrowing discovery results.

Search Skills

Overview

Use real API calls only. Do not output pseudo-instructions.

Primary objective for this deployment:

  • ship stable retrieval and complete feedback telemetry for each recommendation cycle

High-level flow:

  1. build structured query
  2. call POST /search_multi
  3. if needed, ask one clarification
  4. call POST /search_multi again
  5. return 1-3 final recommendations
  6. call POST /feedback after user verdict

Hard limits:

  • at most two retrieval passes
  • at most one clarification question
  • never skip feedback submission after final verdict

<HARD-GATE> If clarification was asked, the next user reply MUST be treated as continuation input for this same retrieval session. Do not exit this skill before pass #2 (or explicit stop on API failure). </HARD-GATE>

Operational Integration

  • base URL env: https://skills.megatechai.com/
  • search endpoint: POST /search_multi
  • feedback endpoint: POST /feedback

Session policy:

  • create one retrieval_session_id at pass #1 and reuse it for pass #2
  • always set round explicitly (1 then 2)
  • when pass #2 is used, always set parent_search_id to pass #1 search_id

Request Contract (/search_multi)

{
  "query": "optional broad query",
  "query_fields": {
    "name": "short capability label",
    "description": "core problem",
    "when_to_use": "triggering scenario",
    "sections": "optional expected coverage"
  },
  "weights": {
    "name": 0.1,
    "description": 0.6,
    "when_to_use": 0.2,
    "sections": 0.1
  },
  "top_k": 10,
  "candidate_k": 200,
  "quality_weight": 0.1,
  "retrieval_session_id": "optional session id",
  "round": 1,
  "parent_search_id": "optional previous search id",
  "clarification_used": false,
  "clarification_text": "optional short summary",
  "consent_granted": true
}

Field rules:

  • retrieval_session_id: shared across pass #1 and pass #2
  • round: pass number (1, 2, ...), API records only and does not block
  • parent_search_id: pass #2 points to pass #1 search_id
  • clarification_used: true only when pass #2 is triggered by clarification
  • clarification_text: short summary of clarification reason
  • consent_granted: whether detailed telemetry may be stored
  • query_fields.description: preferred strongest signal; keep concise and task-focused
  • keep unknown fields empty instead of copying the same sentence into all fields

Language rule:

  • if user input is not English, translate to natural English before sending payload text

Response Contract (/search_multi)

{
  "search_id": "uuid",
  "retrieval_session_id": "uuid-or-provided",
  "results": [
    {
      "skill_id": "owner/repo@skill",
      "repo": "repo",
      "name": "skill",
      "description": "...",
      "when_to_use": ["..."],
      "weekly_installs_num": 100,
      "github_stars_num": 300,
      "final_score": 0.8
    }
  ]
}

Response notes (envelope response, not array root):

  • search_id: anchor for search-level feedback and round linking
  • retrieval_session_id: anchor for session-level feedback
  • results: rank output for recommendation reasoning

- github_stars_num: GitHub star count of the skill repository - weekly_installs_num: weekly install volume - final_score: final retrieval/ranking score

Validation before using results:

  • require search_id as non-empty string
  • require retrieval_session_id as non-empty string
  • require results as array (can be empty)
  • if contract is broken, return parse/contract error and stop

Feedback Contract (/feedback)

Search-level feedback:

{
  "target_type": "search",
  "search_id": "search-id",
  "feedback_type": "thumb_up",
  "selected_skill_ids": ["owner/repo@skill"],
  "comment": "optional"
}

Session-level feedback:

{
  "target_type": "session",
  "retrieval_session_id": "session-id",
  "feedback_type": "thumb_up",
  "selected_skill_ids": ["owner/repo@skill"],
  "comment": "optional"
}

Feedback types:

  • thumb_up
  • irrelevant
  • clicked_only

Feedback policy:

  • prefer target_type=session for final user verdict
  • fallback to target_type=search only when session id is unavailable
  • include selected_skill_ids when user explicitly approves/rejects specific items
  • keep comment short and factual; omit if none

Full Retrieval + Feedback Procedure

1) Generate structured query

  1. Transform user need into these fields:

- name: short capability label - description: main problem to solve (strongest field) - when_to_use: triggering scenario - sections: optional coverage expectation Guidelines: - keep unknown fields empty - do not duplicate one sentence into all fields - use sections only when user explicitly cares about coverage

  1. call POST /search_multi with:

- round=1 - clarification_used=false - retrieval_session_id generated once and reused

  1. keep returned search_id as search_id_round1

2) Clarification decision

  • if top results are coherent: skip clarification, finalize
  • if top results split: ask exactly one targeted clarification

Use clarification when one or more is true:

  • top candidates represent different intents (for example tooling vs process)
  • top 2 scores are close and imply different recommendation directions
  • user request is under-specified for an irreversible recommendation

Clarification question quality bar:

  • one question only
  • present 2-3 concrete options found in pass #1
  • ask for one decisive preference, not open-ended brainstorming

3) Regenerate structured query and retrieve again (only if clarification happened)

  1. regenerate full query object (not only a raw append)
  2. call POST /search_multi with:

- round=2 - same retrieval_session_id - parent_search_id=search_id_round1 - clarification_used=true - short clarification_text

  1. finalize with 1-3 recommendations

Final recommendation output must include per item:

  • skill_id
  • fit reason linked to user intent/query fields
  • final_score
  • github_stars_num

4) Feedback submission

After user accepts/rejects recommendations, call POST /feedback.

Recommended mapping:

  • user approves final recommendation -> thumb_up
  • user says irrelevant/wrong direction -> irrelevant
  • user clicked but no clear verdict -> clicked_only

Feedback timing rules:

  • do not send final feedback before user verdict exists
  • once verdict exists, send exactly one final feedback event for this session
  • if user updates verdict in the same conversation, send one additional corrected feedback event

End-to-End Example

1) Pass #1

POST /search_multi
{
  "query_fields": {
    "description": "find a skill to author and validate new skills"
  },
  "top_k": 10,
  "candidate_k": 200,
  "quality_weight": 0.1,
  "retrieval_session_id": "sess-abc",
  "round": 1,
  "clarification_used": false,
  "consent_granted": true
}

2) Pass #2

POST /search_multi
{
  "query_fields": {
    "name": "writing-skills",
    "description": "author reusable skills and verify quality before release",
    "when_to_use": "after deciding to create or edit a skill",
    "sections": "testing, anti-patterns, deployment"
  },
  "weights": {
    "name": 0.2,
    "description": 0.45,
    "when_to_use": 0.25,
    "sections": 0.1
  },
  "top_k": 6,
  "candidate_k": 150,
  "quality_weight": 0.1,
  "retrieval_session_id": "sess-abc",
  "round": 2,
  "parent_search_id": "<search_id_round1>",
  "clarification_used": true,
  "clarification_text": "focus on writing-skills instead of generic skill discovery",
  "consent_granted": true
}

3) Feedback

POST /feedback
{
  "target_type": "session",
  "retrieval_session_id": "sess-abc",
  "feedback_type": "thumb_up",
  "selected_skill_ids": ["obra/superpowers@writing-skills"],
  "comment": "second pass solved ambiguity"
}

Error Handling

  • if API call fails after retry: return concrete error and stop
  • if API returns non-JSON/invalid schema: return contract error and stop
  • if pass #1 returns empty results: tell user no relevant skills found and request refined intent (no pass #2 unless this is the one clarification)
  • do not fabricate retrieval results
  • do not continue to recommendation stage without at least one successful retrieval

Completion Rules

  • recommend 1-3 skills and briefly explain why they are relevant to user needs
  • DO NOT show users final_score or weekly_installs_num
  • display the GitHub star count of the repository it belongs to. Make it explicit that this is the star count of the GitHub repository
  • when launch goal is explicit, state which recommendation helps API launch vs skill authoring
  • stop after pass #2
  • after final user verdict, call POST /feedback

Installing Skills

When user wants to download a recommended skill, please provide feedback first, and then download the skills as follows:

Option 1: Primary method (one-click install):

npx skills add https://github.com/owner/repo --skill skill_name

Example for a skill frontend-design from repo anthropics/skills:

npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/skills --skill frontend-design

Option 2: Manual download:

You can manually download from GitHub repo and place in the correct local skills directory.

Common Mistakes

  • parsing /search_multi as array root instead of envelope response
  • forgetting to persist search_id / retrieval_session_id
  • skipping parent_search_id on pass #2
  • asking a second clarification question
  • skipping consent_granted or round
  • not sending /feedback after final user verdict

平台分布

OpenClaw

79.44%
按下载量换算834

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills