Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问clear审计异常

skill-validator技能验证器

Agent Skill

skill-validator 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

14,875

周安装

781

GitHub Stars

25

下载量

7,670
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:skill-validator(技能验证器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards
仓库路径:skills/skill-validator
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards --skill 'Skill Validator'
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards --skill 'Skill Validator'

简介

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。

  • 适合围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。
  • 可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态。
  • skill-validator 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Skill Validator

Validate implementations match manifests using Codex for semantic comparison

Purpose

Ensures that skill/MCP implementations actually deliver what their manifests promise. Uses Codex to perform semantic analysis comparing descriptions, preconditions, and effects against actual code. Detects drift, missing functionality, and over-promised capabilities.

When to Use

  • After updating skill implementations
  • During quality audits to verify accuracy
  • When manifests feel outdated or incorrect
  • To detect description-implementation drift
  • Before releasing new versions of resources

Key Capabilities

  • Semantic Comparison: Uses Codex to understand if code matches description
  • Precondition Validation: Verifies claimed preconditions are actually checked
  • Effect Verification: Confirms code produces claimed effects
  • API Surface Analysis: Validates exposed functions match manifest
  • Drift Detection: Identifies when implementation diverges from manifest
  • Coverage Scoring: Measures how much of manifest is implemented

Inputs

inputs:
  resource_path: string # Path to skill/MCP directory
  manifest_path: string # Path to manifest.yaml (default: resource_path/manifest.yaml)
  implementation_path: string # Path to code (default: resource_path/index.js)
  strict_mode: boolean # Fail on warnings (default: false)

Process

Step 1: Load Manifest and Implementation

#!/bin/bash
# Load manifest and implementation

RESOURCE_PATH="$1"
MANIFEST_PATH="${2:-$RESOURCE_PATH/manifest.yaml}"
IMPL_PATH="${3:-$RESOURCE_PATH/index.js}"

if [ ! -f "$MANIFEST_PATH" ]; then
  echo "❌ Manifest not found: $MANIFEST_PATH"
  exit 1
fi

if [ ! -f "$IMPL_PATH" ]; then
  # Try alternative extensions
  if [ -f "$RESOURCE_PATH/index.ts" ]; then
    IMPL_PATH="$RESOURCE_PATH/index.ts"
  elif [ -f "$RESOURCE_PATH/SKILL.md" ]; then
    # Skill might be declarative only
    IMPL_PATH=""
  else
    echo "⚠️  No implementation file found, validating description only"
    IMPL_PATH=""
  fi
fi

# Read manifest
MANIFEST=$(cat "$MANIFEST_PATH")

# Read implementation (if exists)
if [ -n "$IMPL_PATH" ]; then
  IMPLEMENTATION=$(cat "$IMPL_PATH")
else
  IMPLEMENTATION=""
fi

Step 2: Validate Description Accuracy

# Use Codex to compare description with implementation
codex exec "
Compare this manifest description with the actual implementation:

MANIFEST:
$MANIFEST

IMPLEMENTATION:
$IMPLEMENTATION

Questions:
1. Does the implementation match the description?
2. Are there features described but not implemented?
3. Are there features implemented but not described?
4. Is the description accurate and complete?

Output JSON:
{
  \"description_accurate\": boolean,
  \"missing_features\": [\"feature1\", \"feature2\"],
  \"undocumented_features\": [\"feature3\"],
  \"accuracy_score\": 0.0-1.0,
  \"issues\": [
    {
      \"type\": \"missing_feature\",
      \"severity\": \"high|medium|low\",
      \"description\": \"...\",
      \"suggestion\": \"...\"
    }
  ]
}
" > /tmp/validation-description.json

Step 3: Validate Preconditions

# Check if preconditions are actually enforced in code
PRECONDITIONS=$(python3 -c "
import yaml, json
manifest = yaml.safe_load(open('$MANIFEST_PATH'))
print(json.dumps(manifest.get('preconditions', []), indent=2))
")

codex exec "
Analyze if these preconditions are actually checked in the code:

PRECONDITIONS:
$PRECONDITIONS

IMPLEMENTATION:
$IMPLEMENTATION

For each precondition, determine:
1. Is it checked in the code?
2. Where is it checked (function name, line number)?
3. Does it fail gracefully if not met?
4. Is the error message clear?

Output JSON:
{
  \"preconditions_validated\": [
    {
      \"check\": \"file_exists('package.json')\",
      \"enforced\": boolean,
      \"location\": \"function:line\",
      \"error_handling\": \"good|poor|missing\",
      \"suggestion\": \"...\"
    }
  ],
  \"coverage_score\": 0.0-1.0
}
" > /tmp/validation-preconditions.json

Step 4: Validate Effects

# Check if claimed effects are actually produced
EFFECTS=$(python3 -c "
import yaml, json
manifest = yaml.safe_load(open('$MANIFEST_PATH'))
print(json.dumps(manifest.get('effects', []), indent=2))
")

codex exec "
Verify that this code actually produces the claimed effects:

CLAIMED EFFECTS:
$EFFECTS

IMPLEMENTATION:
$IMPLEMENTATION

For each effect, determine:
1. Is the effect actually produced?
2. Where in the code does it happen?
3. Are there conditions where it might not happen?
4. Are there other effects not listed?

Output JSON:
{
  \"effects_validated\": [
    {
      \"effect\": \"creates_vector_index\",
      \"implemented\": boolean,
      \"location\": \"function:line\",
      \"conditional\": boolean,
      \"confidence\": 0.0-1.0
    }
  ],
  \"missing_effects\": [\"effect1\"],
  \"extra_effects\": [\"effect2\"],
  \"coverage_score\": 0.0-1.0
}
" > /tmp/validation-effects.json

Step 5: Validate API Surface

# For MCPs/tools with defined APIs, validate exports
if [ -n "$IMPLEMENTATION" ]; then
  codex exec "
Analyze the API surface of this implementation:

IMPLEMENTATION:
$IMPLEMENTATION

Questions:
1. What functions/classes are exported?
2. What are their signatures?
3. Are they documented?
4. Do they match what the manifest describes?

Output JSON:
{
  \"exports\": [
    {
      \"name\": \"functionName\",
      \"type\": \"function|class|object\",
      \"signature\": \"(args) => result\",
      \"documented\": boolean
    }
  ],
  \"api_complete\": boolean,
  \"documentation_quality\": \"good|fair|poor\"
}
" > /tmp/validation-api.json
fi

Step 6: Generate Validation Report

# Combine all validation results
python3 <<'PYTHON_SCRIPT'
import json
from datetime import datetime

# Load validation results
with open('/tmp/validation-description.json') as f:
    desc_validation = json.load(f)

with open('/tmp/validation-preconditions.json') as f:
    precond_validation = json.load(f)

with open('/tmp/validation-effects.json') as f:
    effects_validation = json.load(f)

try:
    with open('/tmp/validation-api.json') as f:
        api_validation = json.load(f)
except FileNotFoundError:
    api_validation = None

# Calculate overall score
scores = [
    desc_validation.get('accuracy_score', 0),
    precond_validation.get('coverage_score', 0),
    effects_validation.get('coverage_score', 0)
]
overall_score = sum(scores) / len(scores)

# Collect all issues
all_issues = []
all_issues.extend(desc_validation.get('issues', []))

for precond in precond_validation.get('preconditions_validated', []):
    if not precond.get('enforced'):
        all_issues.append({
            'type': 'unenforced_precondition',
            'severity': 'medium',
            'description': f"Precondition not enforced: {precond['check']}",
            'suggestion': precond.get('suggestion', '')
        })

for effect in effects_validation.get('effects_validated', []):
    if not effect.get('implemented'):
        all_issues.append({
            'type': 'unimplemented_effect',
            'severity': 'high',
            'description': f"Effect not implemented: {effect['effect']}",
            'suggestion': 'Implement this effect or remove from manifest'
        })

# Generate report
report = {
    'resource': 'RESOURCE_NAME_PLACEHOLDER',
    'validated_at': datetime.utcnow().isoformat() + 'Z',
    'overall_score': round(overall_score, 3),
    'scores': {
        'description_accuracy': desc_validation.get('accuracy_score', 0),
        'precondition_coverage': precond_validation.get('coverage_score', 0),
        'effect_coverage': effects_validation.get('coverage_score', 0)
    },
    'validation_results': {
        'description': desc_validation,
        'preconditions': precond_validation,
        'effects': effects_validation,
        'api': api_validation
    },
    'issues': all_issues,
    'issue_count': len(all_issues),
    'passed': overall_score >= 0.8 and len([i for i in all_issues if i['severity'] == 'high']) == 0
}

with open('/tmp/validation-report.json', 'w') as f:
    json.dump(report, f, indent=2)

# Print summary
print(f"\nValidation Score: {overall_score:.2f}")
print(f"Issues Found: {len(all_issues)}")
print(f"Status: {'✅ PASSED' if report['passed'] else '❌ FAILED'}")
PYTHON_SCRIPT

Validation Criteria

Scoring Rules

// Overall score is average of component scores
overallScore = (descriptionAccuracy + preconditionCoverage + effectCoverage) / 3

// Pass criteria
passed = overallScore >= 0.8 && highSeverityIssues.length === 0

Severity Levels

  • High: Missing core functionality, unenforced preconditions, unimplemented effects
  • Medium: Incomplete features, poor error handling, undocumented exports
  • Low: Minor inconsistencies, documentation gaps, style issues

Example Output

{
  "resource": "rag-implementer",
  "validated_at": "2025-10-28T12:00:00Z",
  "overall_score": 0.85,
  "scores": {
    "description_accuracy": 0.9,
    "precondition_coverage": 0.8,
    "effect_coverage": 0.85
  },
  "validation_results": {
    "description": {
      "description_accurate": true,
      "missing_features": [],
      "undocumented_features": ["vector_index_optimization"],
      "accuracy_score": 0.9,
      "issues": [
        {
          "type": "undocumented_feature",
          "severity": "low",
          "description": "Implementation includes vector optimization not mentioned in manifest",
          "suggestion": "Add 'optimizes_vector_queries' to effects"
        }
      ]
    },
    "preconditions": {
      "preconditions_validated": [
        {
          "check": "file_exists('package.json')",
          "enforced": true,
          "location": "validateProject:12",
          "error_handling": "good"
        },
        {
          "check": "env_var_set('OPENAI_API_KEY')",
          "enforced": true,
          "location": "setupEmbeddings:45",
          "error_handling": "good"
        }
      ],
      "coverage_score": 0.8
    },
    "effects": {
      "effects_validated": [
        {
          "effect": "creates_vector_index",
          "implemented": true,
          "location": "createIndex:120",
          "conditional": false,
          "confidence": 0.95
        },
        {
          "effect": "adds_embedding_pipeline",
          "implemented": true,
          "location": "setupPipeline:85",
          "conditional": false,
          "confidence": 0.9
        }
      ],
      "missing_effects": [],
      "extra_effects": ["optimizes_vector_queries"],
      "coverage_score": 0.85
    }
  },
  "issues": [
    {
      "type": "undocumented_feature",
      "severity": "low",
      "description": "Implementation includes vector optimization not mentioned in manifest",
      "suggestion": "Add 'optimizes_vector_queries' to effects"
    }
  ],
  "issue_count": 1,
  "passed": true
}

Integration

With manifest-generator

Validates that generated manifests are accurate by comparing with implementation.

With capability-graph-builder

Ensures graph relationships are based on accurate capability descriptions.

CI/CD Pipeline

# .github/workflows/validate-skills.yml
name: Validate Skills

on: [push, pull_request]

jobs:
  validate:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - name: Validate all skills
        run: |
          for skill in SKILLS/*/; do
            bash SKILLS/skill-validator/validate.sh "$skill"
          done

Success Metrics

  • ✅ All skills score >= 0.8
  • ✅ No high severity issues in production skills
  • ✅ 100% of preconditions enforced
  • ✅ 95%+ of effects implemented
  • ✅ API surface matches manifest

Related Skills

  • manifest-generator: Generates manifests to be validated
  • capability-graph-builder: Uses validated manifests
  • system-diagnostician: Uses validation results for health checks

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

29.59%
按下载量换算2,270

OpenCode

25.76%
按下载量换算1,976

Antigravity

18.28%
按下载量换算1,402

Gemini CLI

12.78%
按下载量换算980

Codex

7.88%
按下载量换算604

Cursor

3.38%
按下载量换算259

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。来源字段存在多来源差异,先按来源优先级自动处理,无法消解时进入异常复核队列。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills