Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

skill-design(技能设计)

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

skill-design 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 49,573。

总安装 648周安装 27GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 216核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:skill-design(技能设计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/shihyuho/skills
仓库路径:skills/skill-design
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/shihyuho/skills --skill skill-design
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/shihyuho/skills --skill skill-design

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

skill-design 用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范与交互体验优化,适合生成 UI 方案或改进组件层级。适用于产品页面结构整理、配色布局建议和一致性检查等设计相关任务。使用时需结合品牌与设计系统,避免堆砌装饰元素;涉及真实改动时应通过截图验证表现。

通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 安装,建议确认权限范围与维护状态后再启用。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/skill-design

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/shihyuho/skills --skill skill-design;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

skill-design 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/shihyuho/skills --skill skill-design。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

skill-design 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

skill-design 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/shihyuho/skills --skill skill-design 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

skill-design 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

skill-design 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 648 次,近一周安装 27 次,下载 216 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

skill-design 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
skill-design

技能设计 · 本页

648—执行命令未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Skill Design

Design skills as reusable behavior systems that are easy to discover and execute.

Trigger Contract

Use this skill when users ask to:

  • create a new skill
  • refactor an existing skill
  • improve trigger quality or discoverability
  • align SKILL.md, README.md, and references/
  • remove ambiguity or conflicting guidance

Typical trigger phrases:

  • "create a skill for X"
  • "design a new skill"
  • "refactor this skill"
  • "make this skill reusable"
  • "align README and SKILL behavior"

Core Principles

  • Optimize for reliable agent behavior, not document aesthetics.
  • Make trigger conditions explicit and searchable.
  • Keep instructions executable and verifiable.
  • Avoid implicit project context unless explicitly required.
  • Default to secure-by-construction wording for any instructions that may trigger execution.

Writing Style Rules

  • Use imperative voice.
  • Keep sections short and high-signal.
  • Prefer concrete constraints over abstract advice.
  • Use MUST/NEVER for true invariants (safety, correctness, irreversible failure).
  • For normal guidance, use direct action verbs and clear defaults.
  • Avoid weak modal wording for hard rules (should, could, may, consider, usually).
  • Remove narrative text that does not change execution.

Metadata and Discovery

  • Write frontmatter description in third person.
  • Include both what the skill does and when to use it.
  • Keep trigger terms concrete (file type, task type, user phrasing).
  • Do not put workflow details in description; keep those in the body.

Workflow

Phase 1 - Define Contract

  1. Define who uses the skill and when it triggers.
  2. Define non-negotiable behavior and failure boundaries.
  3. Define deterministic vs heuristic decisions.

Phase 2 - Structure Content

  1. Write trigger and constraints first.
  2. Keep SKILL.md as execution logic and decision constraints.
  3. Move bulky detail to references/ and keep one source of truth per schema.
  4. Add scripts/ only for repeatable deterministic operations.
  5. When composing with other skills, invoke them by name and never copy their instruction bodies.

Phase 2.5 - Outer/Inner Boundary

  1. Treat SKILL.md as outer governance: trigger contract, conservative boundaries, workflow, verification gates, and escalation path.
  2. Treat references/ as inner detail: practical conventions, preferred patterns, examples, and extended rationale.
  3. Do not place decision gates only in references/; keep governing decisions in SKILL.md.
  4. If references/ and SKILL.md conflict, align references/ to SKILL.md.

Phase 3 - Author/Refactor SKILL

  1. Tighten description and trigger wording.
  2. Convert soft guidance into explicit, executable instructions.
  3. Provide one default path first; add alternatives only when necessary.
  4. Remove duplicate or contradictory instructions.

Phase 3.5 - Security Hardening Pass (When Skill Includes Commands/Automation)

  1. Replace direct execution language with review-gated flow (fetch -> review/validate -> explicit approval).
  2. Add trust-boundary disclosure when external services or remote content are involved.
  3. Add forbidden command patterns and safer alternatives.
  4. Add persistence checkpoints for changes that mutate shell/profile/system state.
  5. Add provenance requirements for external artifacts (source rationale, version pin, integrity verification, rollback).
  6. Document residual risk explicitly rather than implying risk elimination.

Phase 4 - Align README (Human-Facing)

  1. Keep README value-first: problem -> value -> example -> activation.
  2. Treat README.md as style charter for future AI output quality.
  3. Keep implementation internals out of README.
  4. Keep claims behavior-accurate.

Phase 5 - Validate

  1. Run available validator for your environment.
  2. If no validator exists, run manual consistency checks.
  3. Confirm no repository-specific assumptions remain unless explicitly intended.

Progressive Disclosure Rules

  • Keep SKILL.md body compact (target under 500 lines).
  • Put advanced or domain-specific detail in references/.
  • Link reference files directly from SKILL.md (avoid deep nested references).
  • For long reference files (100+ lines), add a short table of contents.

README Rules

  • In this skill, README.md means the skill-level README (for example skills/<skill-name>/README.md), not the repository root README.
  • README.md is not required by Agent Skills Specification.
  • README.md is recommended for faster human understanding and adoption.
  • Keep README focused on outcomes, style expectations, and activation cues.

Anti-Patterns

  • Hardcoded local paths as universal defaults.
  • Tool lock-in with no fallback path.
  • Copying external skill instruction bodies instead of invoking the source skill.
  • Workflow summary inside frontmatter description.
  • Duplicated schema definitions across files.
  • Long narrative prose with no executable instruction.
  • Repeating MUST/NEVER for non-critical guidance.
  • Offering too many equivalent options without a default recommendation.
  • Fetch-and-follow phrasing that implies autonomous execution of remote content.
  • Unsafe install examples (curl|bash, wget|bash) without review and verification gates.
  • Persistent environment mutation guidance without explicit confirmation checkpoint.
  • Security logic split across multiple docs with no single source of truth.
  • Keeping conservative boundaries, workflow gates, or escalation rules only in references/.
  • Letting references/ override governing decisions defined in SKILL.md.

Security Patterns (Execution-Sensitive Skills)

Apply these when skills can produce or run commands:

  1. Review Gate Pattern

- Use: fetch -> review/validate -> explicit approval -> execute. - Never imply direct execution from raw URLs.

  1. Trust Boundary Pattern

- Explicitly state outbound data flow to external APIs/services. - Require redaction/sanitization guidance for sensitive content.

  1. Command Safety Pattern

- Define forbidden command patterns. - Provide safer alternatives (pinned versions, checksum/signature, least privilege).

  1. Persistence Checkpoint Pattern

- Prefer session-scoped behavior by default. - Require explicit confirmation before persistent shell/profile mutation.

  1. Provenance Pattern

- Require source rationale, version pin, integrity verification command, rollback/uninstall path.

Required Output Contract for Security Patterns

When applying security patterns, the resulting skill text MUST include explicit, auditable wording:

  1. Review gate text

- MUST include all four steps in order: fetch -> review/validate -> explicit approval -> execute. - MUST include a prohibition sentence equivalent to: "Do not execute remote content directly from URL."

  1. Trust boundary text

- MUST name the external destination (domain/service) when data leaves local context. - MUST include redaction/sanitization instruction before transmission.

  1. Command safety text

- MUST include a forbidden list with concrete examples. - MUST include at least one safer alternative for each high-risk pattern class.

  1. Persistence checkpoint text

- MUST include session-scoped default first. - MUST include explicit confirmation checkpoint before persistent shell/profile change.

  1. Provenance text

- MUST require source rationale, version pin, integrity verification command, and rollback/uninstall path.

Rewrite Templates (Use Verbatim Structure)

  • Replace risky phrase:

- from: Fetch and follow instructions from [URL] - to: Fetch [URL], review and validate steps, ask for explicit approval, then execute.

  • Add prohibition:

- Never execute remote raw content directly from URL.

  • Add persistence checkpoint:

- Use session-scoped change by default; require explicit confirmation before persistent shell rc updates.

Security Verification Checklist (MANDATORY)

Before finalizing an execution-sensitive skill, verify all checks pass:

  1. No fetch-and-follow wording remains.
  2. Forbidden patterns and safer alternatives are both present.
  3. Trust boundary disclosure includes explicit external destination.
  4. Persistent mutation requires explicit confirmation language.
  5. Provenance requirements include all four fields.
  6. Residual risk statement exists and does not claim full elimination.

Consolidation Pattern (Multi-Plan Work)

When multiple plan docs overlap:

  1. Create one consolidated execution plan as single source of truth.
  2. Keep a "Sources Consolidated" section with explicit source paths.
  3. Preserve all unique requirements via phased plan + detailed task matrix.
  4. Prefer deleting superseded plan docs after consolidation to prevent drift.

Done Checklist

  • SKILL.md has explicit trigger contract and executable workflow.
  • SKILL.md defines outer governance boundaries (conservative rules, gates, escalation).
  • Frontmatter description clearly states what + when.
  • README.md defines style expectations for future contributions.
  • references/ contains heavy details only when needed.
  • references/ extends details without conflicting with SKILL.md governance.
  • No stale terms, duplicated schema ownership, or contradictory rules.
  • Validation evidence is recorded (tool-based or manual).
  • Example validation command: npx --yes skills-ref validate./skills/<skill-name>.

See Also

平台分布

Codex

33.69%
按下载量换算73

Claude

33.77%
按下载量换算73

Cursor

18.16%
按下载量换算39

Gemini CLI

10.04%
按下载量换算22

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/shihyuho/skills --skill skill-design 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills