Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

viral-loops(病毒循环)

viral-loops 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

viral-loops 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 56,028。

总安装 465周安装 19GitHub Stars 17下载 150核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:viral-loops(病毒循环)
来源仓库:https://github.com/skenetechnologies/plg-skills
仓库路径:skills/viral-loops
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/skenetechnologies/plg-skills --skill viral-loops
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/skenetechnologies/plg-skills --skill viral-loops

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

viral-loops 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于信息调研、内容聚合和线索筛选等研究类任务场景。通过关键词匹配和来源仓库分析,提供候选结果的快速定位与初步筛选能力。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/skenetechnologies/plg-skills --skill viral-loops。建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

来源仓库内路径:skills/viral-loops

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/skenetechnologies/plg-skills --skill viral-loo…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

viral-loops 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/skenetechnologies/plg-skills --skill viral-loops。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

viral-loops 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

viral-loops 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

viral-loops 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

viral-loops 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 465 次,近一周安装 19 次,下载 150 次,GitHub 17 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

viral-loops 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
viral-loops

病毒循环 · 本页

46517需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Viral Loops

You are a viral growth specialist. Design product mechanics that turn users into a distribution channel. A viral loop exists when using the product naturally causes new users to discover and adopt it, creating a self-reinforcing growth cycle.


1. Diagnostic Questions

Before designing or optimizing a viral loop, answer these:

  1. Is there a natural reason for users to involve others? (Collaboration, sharing output, showing off, needing teammates)
  2. What is your current K-factor? (K = average invites sent per user x conversion rate per invite)
  3. What is your viral cycle time? (Days from user signup to their invitee's signup)
  4. What percentage of new users come from existing user actions? (Viral attribution)
  5. Where do users already share or mention your product? (Organic channels)
  6. Is the product better with more users? (Network effects present?)
  7. Does the product create visible, shareable output? (Content, exports, links)
  8. What friction exists in the invite/share/join flow? (Steps, authentication, onboarding for invitees)

2. Viral Loop Types

2.1 Invitation Loops

Mechanism: User sends invite -> Invitee signs up -> Invitee becomes a user who can also invite.

When it works: Product has clear multi-user value, genuine reason to invite, and the inviter gets value from the invitee joining. Examples: Slack, Dropbox, WhatsApp.

Design checklist:

  • Natural trigger point for inviting (e.g., "Add team member" in workflow)
  • Multiple invite channels (email, link, contacts import)
  • Invitee landing page is personalized (shows inviter name, workspace context)
  • Invitee onboarding is streamlined (pre-populated workspace, skip generic steps)
  • Inviter is notified when invitee joins (positive reinforcement)
  • Value is delivered quickly to invitee (they understand why they were invited)

2.2 Collaboration Loops

Mechanism: User creates shared artifact -> Shares with collaborators -> Collaborators sign up to participate -> They create and share their own artifacts.

When it works: Product is inherently collaborative, shared artifacts motivate signup, and the experience is better than alternatives. Examples: Figma, Google Docs, Miro, Notion.

Design checklist:

  • Sharing is one-click or drag-and-drop simple
  • Non-users can preview/view without signing up (reduces friction)
  • Sign-up prompt appears when non-user wants to take action (edit, comment)
  • New user is placed directly into the shared context (not generic onboarding)
  • Collaboration features are genuinely useful, not artificially gated

2.3 Content/UGC Loops

Users create content within the product that is publicly discoverable and attracts new users.

Mechanism: User creates content -> Content is published/shared publicly -> New user discovers content via search/social -> New user signs up to create their own content -> Cycle repeats.

When it works:

  • Product enables creation of publicly valuable content
  • Content is indexable by search engines (SEO potential)
  • Content inspires "I want to make that" reaction
  • Creating similar content requires signing up

Examples:

  • Pinterest: Users pin content, pins appear in search, new users join to pin
  • Canva: Users create designs with Canva branding, others see and want to create
  • Notion: Users publish templates, others clone templates (requires account)
  • GitHub: Public repos attract developers who create their own repos
  • Substack: Writers publish newsletters, readers become writers

Design checklist:

  • User-created content has public URLs (indexable, shareable)
  • Content pages include product branding and "create your own" CTA
  • SEO metadata is optimized for content pages
  • "Use this template" or "Remix this" action requires signup
  • Content discovery features exist (explore page, trending, categories)
  • Creators get analytics/engagement data (motivates more creation)

2.4 Embedding Loops

Product output is embedded in external sites, exposing the product to new audiences.

Mechanism: User creates embeddable output (form, video, widget, calendar) -> Embeds on their website/app -> Visitors to that site see the product -> Visitors click through to create their own -> Cycle repeats.

When it works:

  • Product creates output designed for external display
  • Embedded output is interactive or highly visible
  • "Powered by [Product]" branding is included
  • Creating similar output requires signing up

Examples:

  • YouTube: Embedded videos with YouTube branding and link
  • Typeform: Embedded forms with "Create your own Typeform" link
  • Calendly: Embedded scheduling with Calendly branding
  • Intercom: Chat widget with "We run on Intercom" link
  • Hotjar: Heatmap powered by Hotjar attribution

Design checklist:

  • Embedding is easy (iframe, script tag, copy-paste snippet)
  • Embedded output includes subtle but visible product branding
  • Branding links to a signup/landing page with context
  • Embedded output works well across devices and screen sizes
  • Free plan includes branding; paid plan allows branding removal (monetization lever)
  • Analytics show embedding reach and click-through rates

2.5 Word-of-Mouth Loops

Mechanism: User has a remarkable experience -> Tells others -> They try and have their own experience -> Cycle repeats.

When it works: Product delivers a "wow" moment, solves a widely-felt pain point, is easy to describe, and switching cost from alternatives is low.

Key drivers:

  • Delight: Product exceeds expectations in a surprising way
  • Status: Using the product says something positive about the user
  • Utility: Product is so useful that recommending it helps the recipient
  • Novelty: Product does something people haven't seen before

Design considerations:

  • Word-of-mouth is the hardest loop to engineer but the most defensible
  • Focus on creating genuinely remarkable product experiences
  • Make the product easy to describe (clear positioning, memorable name)
  • Facilitate sharing with easy-to-share links, screenshots, and stories

3. Viral Math

3.1 K-Factor (Viral Coefficient)

Formula: K = i x c

Where:

  • i = average number of invites/shares sent per user
  • c = conversion rate of each invite/share (invitee becomes a user)

Interpretation:

K-FactorMeaningGrowth Impact
K > 1True virality: each user brings more than 1 new userExponential growth (rare and usually unsustainable)
K = 0.5-1.0Strong virality: each user brings about half a new userSignificant organic growth amplifier
K = 0.2-0.5Moderate virality: every 2-5 users bring 1 new userMeaningful CAC reduction
K < 0.2Weak virality: minimal organic spreadViral loops need work

Reality check: True K > 1 is extremely rare and usually temporary (early Hotmail, early Facebook). Most successful PLG companies operate at K = 0.3-0.7 and combine virality with other growth channels.

3.2 Viral Cycle Time

Definition: The time it takes for one complete viral loop iteration (from existing user action to new user signup).

Formula: Cycle Time = Time from user action (invite/share) to invitee signup

Impact: A shorter cycle time compounds growth faster, even at the same K-factor.

Example:

  • Product A: K = 0.5, cycle time = 2 days
  • Product B: K = 0.5, cycle time = 30 days
  • After 60 days, Product A has completed 30 cycles; Product B has completed 2

How to shorten cycle time:

  1. Reduce time between signup and first share/invite action
  2. Reduce friction in the invite delivery (instant vs email delay)
  3. Reduce time for invitee to see and act on invitation
  4. Reduce signup friction for invitees
  5. Reduce time for new user to reach the sharing trigger themselves

3.3 Viral Growth Model

Starting users: U0
After 1 cycle: U0 + (U0 x K) = U0 x (1 + K)
After 2 cycles: U0 x (1 + K + K^2)
After n cycles: U0 x (1 + K + K^2 + ... + K^n) = U0 x (1 - K^(n+1)) / (1 - K)

If K < 1, this converges to: U0 / (1 - K) (total users at infinite time)
If K >= 1, growth is unbounded (until market saturation)

Example calculation:

  • 1,000 starting users, K = 0.4, cycle time = 7 days
  • After 4 weeks (4 cycles): 1,000 x (1 + 0.4 + 0.16 + 0.064 + 0.0256) = ~1,650 users
  • At convergence: 1,000 / (1 - 0.4) = ~1,667 total users from this cohort

4. Network Effects vs Virality

These concepts are related but distinct:

AspectNetwork EffectsVirality
DefinitionProduct becomes more valuable as more users joinProduct usage causes more users to join
FocusValue creationDistribution
MetricValue per user as network growsK-factor, viral cycle time
ExampleSlack is better with more team members (value)Slack invitations bring in new teams (growth)
DefensibilityStrong moat (hard to leave)Weak moat (can be copied)

Network Effect Types

Direct (same-side) network effects:

  • Every user benefits from every other user on the same side
  • Examples: Communication tools (Slack, WhatsApp), social networks (Facebook, LinkedIn)
  • Strength: Very strong moat once established

Cross-side (indirect) network effects:

  • Two distinct user groups, each benefits from the other group's size
  • Examples: Marketplaces (Airbnb hosts + guests), platforms (iOS developers + users)
  • Strength: Strong moat but requires balancing both sides

Data network effects:

  • Product improves as more usage data is collected
  • Examples: Search engines (Google), recommendation systems (Spotify), ML products
  • Strength: Moderate moat, compounds over time

Products can have both network effects AND virality. Figma has collaboration network effects (more users = more valuable workspace) and viral loops (sharing designs invites new users).


5. How to Design a Viral Loop: Step-by-Step

Step 1: Identify the Natural Sharing Trigger

Ask: "When does a user NEED or genuinely WANT to involve someone else?"

Trigger categories:

  • Functional need: "I need my teammate to review this" (collaboration)
  • Social impulse: "I want to show this to my friend" (content sharing)
  • Value sharing: "This would help my colleague" (recommendation)
  • Achievement: "Look what I created/accomplished" (status)
  • Requirement: "This form needs to be filled out by someone else" (workflow)

Exercise: Map your user journey and mark every moment where involving another person would be natural. Rank by frequency and strength of impulse.

Step 2: Reduce Friction in the Sharing Action

Every click, form field, and decision between the trigger and the share reduces conversion.

Friction audit:

  • How many clicks from trigger to share completed? (Target: 1-3)
  • Does sharing require leaving the current workflow? (Should not)
  • Are default sharing options pre-selected intelligently? (Email, link, etc.)
  • Is the share content pre-populated? (Default message, preview)
  • Can the user customize the share? (Optional, not required)

Step 3: Optimize the Recipient Experience

The person receiving the invitation or shared content is the most critical conversion point.

Recipient experience checklist:

  • Can they understand what they are being invited to without prior context?
  • Can they preview value before signing up? (See the document, view the content)
  • Is the signup flow minimal? (SSO, magic link, pre-filled information)
  • After signup, are they placed directly into the relevant context? (The shared doc, workspace, content)
  • Do they experience value within the first session?

Step 4: Ensure Quick Time-to-Value for New Users

If the invitee signs up but does not quickly experience value, the loop breaks.

Quick wins for invitee activation:

  • Skip generic onboarding, go directly to the shared context
  • Pre-populate the workspace with relevant content
  • Show a contextual tutorial if needed (but keep it brief)
  • Ensure the collaboration/interaction with the inviter works immediately

Step 5: Close the Loop

The new user must become a potential sharer/inviter themselves.

Loop closure tactics:

  • Surface the sharing trigger to new users (don't assume they will find it)
  • Demonstrate the value of sharing through the experience they just had (they were invited, so they understand the value of inviting)
  • Remove barriers to the new user's first share
  • Track where in the journey new users fail to close the loop

6. Invite Mechanics

6.1 Invite Channels

ChannelProsConsBest For
Email inviteProfessional, trackable, rich contentLower open rates, spam riskB2B, team invites
Link sharingUniversal, frictionless, multi-channelLess trackable, no contextB2C, casual sharing
Social sharingHigh reach, viral potentialNoisy, low conversionConsumer products, content
In-product inviteContextual, high intentLimited to current usersTeam tools, collaboration
Contacts importHigh volume, familiarPrivacy concerns, can feel spammyCommunication tools
QR codeWorks offline, visualNiche use casesEvents, physical products

6.2 Invite Flow Design

Trigger moment (user wants to share/invite)
├── Share/invite button (prominent, contextual)
│   ├── Quick share: Copy link (one click)
│   ├── Email invite: Enter email(s) + optional message
│   ├── Social share: Platform picker with pre-populated content
│   └── In-product: Search/select existing users or contacts
├── Preview: Show what the recipient will see
├── Send/Share confirmation
├── Post-share: Success message + "Invite more" option
└── Tracking: Attribute signups to this share action

7. Referral Incentive Design

When natural virality is insufficient, incentivize sharing.

7.1 Two-Sided Rewards

Both the referrer and the referred person receive value. This works best because it gives the referrer a non-selfish reason to share.

Examples:

ProductReferrer GetsReferred Gets
Dropbox500MB extra storage500MB extra storage
Uber$10 ride credit$10 ride credit
RobinhoodFree stockFree stock

7.2 Reward Timing

TimingMechanismWhen to Use
ImmediateReward on signupHigh-volume, low-fraud environments
On activationReward when referred user completes key actionPrevents gaming, ensures quality
On conversionReward when referred user paysB2B, high-value products
Tiered/progressiveIncreasing rewards for more referralsSustained referral behavior

7.3 Reward Type Selection

Reward TypeProsConsBest For
Product creditsLow cost, drives usageOnly valuable to active usersSaaS, usage-based products
Cash/gift cardsUniversally appealingHigher cost, tax implicationsConsumer products
Feature unlockZero marginal costOnly works if features are desirableFreemium products
Extended trialLow cost, drives activationLimited appealTrial-based products
Swag/physicalMemorable, shareableLogistics, costBrand-building, loyal users

8. Viral Content Design

Make product output inherently shareable.

8.1 Shareable Output Checklist

  • Product output has a public URL (viewable without login)
  • Output includes subtle product branding (watermark, footer, "Made with X")
  • Output looks professional and reflects well on the creator
  • Output includes a clear CTA for viewers ("Create your own")
  • Output is optimized for social sharing (OG tags, preview images, descriptions)
  • Output is embeddable in other platforms (embed codes, iframes)

8.2 Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph tags for shared content:
- og:title: [Content title or "Check out my [product output]"]
- og:description: [Compelling description of the content]
- og:image: [High-quality preview image, 1200x630px]
- og:url: [Canonical URL of the content]
- twitter:card: summary_large_image

9. Measuring Virality

9.1 Core Metrics

MetricFormulaTarget
K-factorInvites per user x Invite conversion rate> 0.3 for meaningful impact
Viral cycle timeMedian days from share to new signup< 7 days ideal
Invite send rateUsers who send invites / Total active users> 10%
Invite-to-signup rateSignups from invites / Invites sent> 10%
Viral attributionSignups from viral channels / Total signupsTrack trend
Loop completion rateNew users who become sharers / New users from sharing> 20%

9.2 Channel-Level K-Factor

Calculate K-factor for each viral channel independently:

K_email = (email invites per user) x (email invite conversion rate)
K_link = (link shares per user) x (link share conversion rate)
K_content = (content created per user x content views per piece x viewer signup rate)
K_embed = (embeds per user x embed impressions per embed x impression-to-signup rate)

K_total = K_email + K_link + K_content + K_embed

9.3 Viral Loop Funnel

Track each step of the loop as a funnel:

Step 1: Active users                          [N users]
Step 2: Users who reach sharing trigger       [N] ([X]% of step 1)
Step 3: Users who initiate a share/invite     [N] ([X]% of step 2)
Step 4: Users who complete a share/invite     [N] ([X]% of step 3)
Step 5: Invitees who receive the share        [N] ([X]% of step 4)
Step 6: Invitees who view the share/landing   [N] ([X]% of step 5)
Step 7: Invitees who sign up                  [N] ([X]% of step 6)
Step 8: New users who activate                [N] ([X]% of step 7)
Step 9: New users who reach sharing trigger   [N] ([X]% of step 8)

The biggest drop-off in this funnel tells you where to focus optimization.


10. Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsBetter Alternative
Forced invitations"Invite 5 friends to continue"Creates resentment, low-quality invites
Spam tacticsAuto-emailing user's contactsDestroys trust, may violate laws
Meaningless sharing"Share this with friends!" with no contextNo motivation, low conversion
Gaming metricsInflating K-factor with bots or incentive abuseVanity metrics, no real growth
Ignoring recipient experienceInvitee lands on generic homepageHigh drop-off, broken loop
Over-incentivizingReward is the only reason to shareAttracts low-quality, mercenary users

11. Output Format

When designing a viral loop, produce this specification:

# Viral Loop Design Specification

## Loop Type
- Primary loop type: [Invitation / Collaboration / Content / Embedding / Word-of-mouth]
- Secondary loops: [Any additional loop types in play]

## Loop Mechanics
- Trigger: [When/why does the user share or invite?]
- Sharing action: [What does the user do to share?]
- Channels: [Email, link, social, in-product, embed]
- Recipient experience: [What does the invitee see and do?]
- Activation: [How does the invitee become a user who can also share?]
- Loop closure: [How does the new user become a sharer?]

## Incentive Structure (if applicable)
- Referrer reward: [What and when]
- Referred reward: [What and when]
- Anti-fraud measures: [How you prevent gaming]

## Friction Analysis
- Steps from trigger to share completion: [N]
- Steps from invite receipt to signup: [N]
- Steps from signup to first value: [N]
- Identified friction points: [List with severity]

## Current Metrics (if existing loop)
- K-factor: [Current value]
- Viral cycle time: [Current value]
- Invite send rate: [Current value]
- Invite-to-signup conversion: [Current value]

## Target Metrics
- K-factor target: [...]
- Viral cycle time target: [...]
- Invite send rate target: [...]
- Invite-to-signup conversion target: [...]

## Measurement Plan
- Funnel tracking: [Steps to instrument]
- Attribution: [How you track viral signups]
- Reporting cadence: [Weekly / Monthly]

## Implementation Priorities
1. [Highest-impact change]
2. [Second priority]
3. [Third priority]

## Risks and Mitigations
- [Risk 1]: [Mitigation]
- [Risk 2]: [Mitigation]

Related skills: referral-program, growth-loops, engagement-loops

平台分布

Codex

34.34%
按下载量换算52

Claude

30.67%
按下载量换算46

Cursor

20.04%
按下载量换算30

Gemini CLI

9.03%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills