Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

siem-logging(暹罗日志记录)

siem-logging 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

siem-logging 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 58,593。

总安装 413周安装 34GitHub Stars 350下载 280核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:siem-logging(暹罗日志记录)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components
仓库路径:skills/siem-logging
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill siem-logging
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill siem-logging

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。siem-logging 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适合在需要线索匹配或关键词搜索的场景使用。通过 GitHub 安装,需确认是否触发联网或文件读写。安装前建议核实权限范围和维护状态。适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor 等研究检索类宿主环境。

来源仓库内路径:skills/siem-logging

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill siem-lo…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

siem-logging 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill siem-logging。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

siem-logging 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

siem-logging 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

siem-logging 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

siem-logging 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 413 次,近一周安装 34 次,下载 280 次,GitHub 350 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

siem-logging 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
siem-logging

暹罗日志记录 · 本页

413350调用外部服务未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

SIEM Logging

Purpose

Configure comprehensive security logging infrastructure using SIEM platforms (Elastic SIEM, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, Splunk) to detect threats, investigate incidents, and maintain compliance audit trails. This skill covers platform selection, log aggregation architecture, detection rule development (SIGMA format and platform-specific), alert tuning, and retention policies for regulatory compliance (GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2).

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Implementing centralized security event monitoring across infrastructure
  • Writing threat detection rules for authentication failures, privilege escalation, data exfiltration
  • Designing log aggregation for multi-cloud environments (AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes)
  • Meeting compliance requirements for log retention and audit trails
  • Tuning security alerts to reduce false positives and alert fatigue
  • Calculating costs for high-volume security logging (TB/day scale)
  • Integrating security logging with incident response workflows

SIEM Platform Selection

Quick Decision Framework

Choose SIEM platform based on:

Budget Considerations:

  • Unlimited budget → Splunk Enterprise Security (enterprise features, proven scale)
  • Moderate budget ($50k-$500k/year) → Microsoft Sentinel or Elastic SIEM (cloud-native, flexible)
  • Tight budget (<$50k/year) → Wazuh (free, open-source XDR/SIEM)

Infrastructure Context:

  • Heavy Azure investment → Microsoft Sentinel (native integration, built-in SOAR)
  • Heavy AWS investment → AWS Security Lake + OpenSearch (AWS-native)
  • Multi-cloud or on-premise → Elastic SIEM or Wazuh (platform-agnostic)

Data Volume:

  • >1 TB/day → Splunk or Elastic Cloud (proven at scale)
  • 100 GB - 1 TB/day → Microsoft Sentinel or Elastic SIEM
  • <100 GB/day → Wazuh or Sentinel 50 GB tier

Team Expertise:

  • Elasticsearch experience → Elastic SIEM (familiar tooling)
  • Microsoft/Azure expertise → Microsoft Sentinel (Azure ecosystem)
  • Generalists or limited resources → Wazuh (easiest learning curve)

Platform Comparison Summary

PlatformCostDeploymentBest For
Elastic SIEM$$$Cloud/Self-HostedMulti-cloud, customization needs, DevOps teams
Microsoft Sentinel$$$Cloud (Azure)Azure-heavy orgs, built-in SOAR, cloud-first
WazuhFreeSelf-HostedCost-conscious, SMBs, compliance requirements
Splunk ES$$$$$Cloud/On-PremLarge enterprises, massive scale, unlimited budget

For detailed feature comparison, see references/platform-comparison.md.

Detection Rules

Universal Format: SIGMA Rules

SIGMA provides a universal detection rule format that compiles to any SIEM query language (Elastic EQL, Splunk SPL, Microsoft KQL).

SIGMA Rule Structure:

title: Multiple Failed Login Attempts from Single Source
id: 8a9e3c7f-4b2d-4e8a-9f1c-2d5e6f7a8b9c
status: stable
description: Detects potential brute force attacks (10+ failed logins in 10 minutes)
author: Security Team
date: 2025/12/03
references:
  - https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1110/
tags:
  - attack.credential_access
  - attack.t1110
logsource:
  category: authentication
  product: linux
detection:
  selection:
    event.type: authentication
    event.outcome: failure
  timeframe: 10m
  condition: selection | count() by source.ip > 10
level: high

Compile SIGMA to Platform-Specific:

# Install SIGMA compiler
pip install sigma-cli

# Compile to Elastic EQL
sigmac -t es-eql sigma_rule.yml

# Compile to Splunk SPL
sigmac -t splunk sigma_rule.yml

# Compile to Microsoft KQL
sigmac -t kusto sigma_rule.yml

Platform-Specific Detection Formats

Elastic EQL (Event Query Language):

sequence by user.name with maxspan=5m
  [process where process.name == "powershell.exe" and
   process.args : ("Invoke-WebRequest", "iwr", "wget")]
  [process where process.parent.name == "powershell.exe"]

Microsoft Sentinel KQL:

SigninLogs
| where TimeGenerated > ago(1h)
| where ResultType != 0  // Failed login
| summarize FailedAttempts=count() by UserPrincipalName, IPAddress
| where FailedAttempts >= 10

Splunk SPL:

index=web_logs sourcetype=access_combined
| rex field=uri "(?<sql_keywords>union|select|insert|update|delete)"
| where isnotnull(sql_keywords)
| stats count by src_ip, uri
| where count > 5

For comprehensive detection rule examples, see:

  • examples/sigma-rules/ - Universal SIGMA detection rules
  • examples/elastic-eql/ - Elastic-specific queries
  • examples/microsoft-kql/ - Microsoft Sentinel queries
  • examples/splunk-spl/ - Splunk searches
  • references/detection-rules-guide.md - Complete guide

Log Aggregation Architecture

Centralized Architecture

Single SIEM instance for all logs. Use when:

  • Single region deployment
  • Small to medium volumes (<1 TB/day)
  • Single cloud provider or on-premise
  • Limited security team (1-10 analysts)

Architecture:

Application Servers → Log Shippers (Filebeat/Fluentd)
                   ↓
              Log Aggregator (Logstash/Fluentd)
                   ↓
          SIEM Platform (Elasticsearch/Splunk/Sentinel)
                   ↓
            Security Analysts (Dashboard/Alerts)

Distributed Architecture (Multi-Region)

Regional SIEM instances with global aggregation. Use when:

  • Multi-region global deployments
  • Data residency requirements (GDPR, sovereignty)
  • High volumes (>1 TB/day per region)
  • Low-latency requirements for regional analysis

Architecture:

Global SIEM (Correlation, Threat Intelligence)
    ↓
Regional SIEM (US-East) | Regional SIEM (EU-West) | Regional SIEM (APAC)
    ↓                        ↓                          ↓
Local Logs               Local Logs                 Local Logs

Cloud-Native Architecture

Leverage managed cloud services. Use when:

  • Cloud-first organization (AWS/Azure/GCP)
  • Want to avoid managing infrastructure
  • Elastic workloads with variable log volumes
  • Budget for cloud service costs

AWS Example:

CloudTrail + VPC Flow Logs + GuardDuty
              ↓
       AWS Security Lake (S3 Data Lake)
              ↓
    OpenSearch (Analysis) | Athena (SQL Queries)

For deployment examples, see:

  • examples/architectures/elk-stack-docker-compose.yml
  • examples/architectures/fluentd-kubernetes-daemonset.yaml
  • examples/architectures/aws-security-lake-terraform/
  • examples/architectures/wazuh-docker-compose.yml
  • references/cloud-native-logging.md

Log Aggregation Tools

Fluentd (Cloud-Native): CNCF project for Kubernetes and multi-cloud environments. Use for containerized applications.

Logstash (Elastic Stack): Native Elasticsearch integration. Use for advanced parsing (grok patterns) and data enrichment.

For complete configuration examples, see examples/logstash-pipelines/ and references/cloud-native-logging.md.

Log Retention and Compliance

Compliance Requirements

FrameworkMinimum RetentionHot StorageWarm StorageCold Storage
GDPR30-90 days7 days30 days60 days
HIPAA6 years30 days180 days6 years
PCI DSS1 year90 days180 days1 year
SOC 21 year30 days90 days1 year

Storage Tiering Strategy

Hot Tier (SSD, Real-Time):

  • Last 7-30 days
  • Real-time indexing and fast queries
  • Most expensive ($0.10/GB/month)

Warm Tier (HDD, Recent):

  • 30-90 days
  • Read-only indices, occasional searches
  • Moderate cost ($0.05/GB/month)

Cold Tier (S3/Blob, Archive):

  • 90 days to retention limit
  • Searchable snapshots, rare queries
  • Cheapest ($0.01/GB/month)

Example Cost Optimization:

500 GB/day log volume, 1-year retention

Hot (30 days):   15 TB @ $0.10/GB = $1,500/month
Warm (60 days):  30 TB @ $0.05/GB = $1,500/month
Cold (275 days): 137.5 TB @ $0.01/GB = $1,375/month

Total: $4,375/month = $52,500/year

vs. Hot-only: $18,250/month = $219,000/year
Savings: 76% ($166,500/year)

For detailed retention policies and cost optimization, see:

  • references/log-retention-policies.md
  • references/cost-optimization.md
  • scripts/cost-calculator.py

What to Log (Security Events)

Critical Events (MUST LOG):

  • Authentication: Login attempts, MFA, password changes, privilege escalation
  • Authorization: Permission changes, role modifications, access denials
  • Data Access: Sensitive database/file access, API calls, exports
  • Network: Connections, firewall denials, VPN, DNS queries
  • System: Service changes, configuration modifications, software installations

Severity Levels: Failed auth (3+): HIGH alert | Privilege escalation: CRITICAL alert | Data export: HIGH alert | Config change: MEDIUM (no alert)

Alert Tuning and Noise Reduction

Alert Lifecycle

  1. Detection Rule Created - Conservative thresholds, deploy to production
  2. Baseline Period (2-4 weeks) - Collect alert data, tag true/false positives
  3. Tuning Phase - Add whitelisting, adjust thresholds, refine correlation
  4. Continuous Improvement - Weekly metrics review, monthly effectiveness review

Noise Reduction Techniques

Whitelisting (Known-Safe Patterns):

# Example: Allow scanner IPs
- rule_id: brute_force_detection
  whitelist:
    - source_ip: "10.0.0.100"  # Security scanner
    - user_agent: "Nagios"      # Monitoring system

Threshold Tuning:

# Before: Too sensitive (500 alerts/day, 5% true positive rate)
- rule: failed_login_attempts
  threshold: 3 attempts in 5 minutes

# After: Tuned (50 alerts/day, 40% true positive rate)
- rule: failed_login_attempts
  threshold: 10 attempts in 10 minutes

Multi-Event Correlation:

# Instead of: Single event alert
- alert_on: "Failed authentication"

# Use: Correlated pattern
- alert_on:
    - "Failed authentication (5+ times)"
    - AND "From new IP address"
    - AND "Successful authentication follows"
    - WITHIN: 30 minutes

Target Alert Metrics

MetricTarget
Total Alerts/Day<100
True Positive Rate>30%
Mean Time to Investigate<15 min
False Positive Rate<50%
Critical Alerts/Day<10

For comprehensive alert tuning strategies, see references/alert-tuning-strategies.md.

Quick Start

Deploy Wazuh: git clone https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh-docker.git && cd wazuh-docker/single-node && docker-compose up -d (see examples/architectures/wazuh-docker-compose.yml)

Create SIGMA Rule: See examples/sigma-rules/brute-force-detection.yml for SSH brute force detection template

Elastic Cloud: Sign up at cloud.elastic.co, create Security tier deployment, install Elastic Agent on endpoints

Integration with Related Skills

observability skill:

  • Route security logs to SIEM, performance logs to observability platform
  • Shared log aggregation infrastructure (Fluentd/Logstash)
  • Different analysis purposes (security vs. performance)

incident-management skill:

  • SIEM alerts trigger incident response workflows
  • Integration with PagerDuty, Opsgenie, ServiceNow
  • Automated incident creation for critical security events

security-hardening skill:

  • SIEM monitors security configurations and compliance
  • Detect configuration drift from CIS benchmarks
  • Alert on security policy violations

building-ci-pipelines skill:

  • Log CI/CD security events (deployments, secrets access)
  • GitHub Actions/GitLab CI integration with SIEM
  • Supply chain security monitoring

secret-management skill:

  • Audit all secrets access operations
  • HashiCorp Vault/AWS Secrets Manager logs to SIEM
  • Detect unauthorized secrets access attempts

Reference Documentation

Detailed Guides

  • references/platform-comparison.md - Comprehensive SIEM platform feature comparison
  • references/detection-rules-guide.md - Detection rule formats (SIGMA, EQL, KQL, SPL)
  • references/log-retention-policies.md - Compliance requirements and retention strategies
  • references/cloud-native-logging.md - AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes logging setup
  • references/alert-tuning-strategies.md - False positive reduction and alert optimization
  • references/cost-optimization.md - Storage tiering and cost management

Working Examples

  • examples/sigma-rules/ - Universal SIGMA detection rules (10+ examples)
  • examples/elastic-eql/ - Elastic Event Query Language queries
  • examples/microsoft-kql/ - Microsoft Sentinel Kusto queries
  • examples/splunk-spl/ - Splunk Search Processing Language
  • examples/architectures/ - Complete deployment examples (Docker, Kubernetes, Terraform)
  • examples/logstash-pipelines/ - Logstash pipeline configurations

Utility Scripts

  • scripts/sigma-to-elastic.sh - Convert SIGMA rules to Elastic EQL
  • scripts/cost-calculator.py - Estimate SIEM costs based on volume and retention

Official Documentation

平台分布

Codex

39.1%
按下载量换算109

Claude

28.19%
按下载量换算79

Cursor

18.97%
按下载量换算53

Gemini CLI

8.6%
按下载量换算24

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills