Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

terraform-skill(Terraform 技能)

用于辅助云资源、部署、容器、基础设施和运维自动化任务。它适合让 Agent 检查配置、整理部署步骤、分析资源状态、生成排障思路或辅助云服务接入。使用时需要明确目标环境、账号权限、区域和资源组,区分本地测试与生产操作;涉及删除资源、重启服务、修改网络或权限配置时,应先确认影响范围。

terraform-skill 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 20,143。

总安装 5,316周安装 226GitHub Stars 35,680下载 1,862核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:terraform-skill(Terraform 技能)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
仓库路径:skills/terraform-skill
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill terraform-skill
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill terraform-skill

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助云资源、部署、容器和基础设施的自动化管理。terraform-skill 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适合检查配置、整理部署步骤、分析资源状态或生成排障思路。使用时需明确目标环境、账号权限和资源组,区分测试与生产操作。涉及删除或修改网络配置时,应先确认影响范围和安全边界。

建议结合本地预览和构建验证,避免误操作影响线上服务。

来源仓库内路径:skills/terraform-skill

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill ter…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

terraform-skill 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill terraform-ski…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

terraform-skill 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

terraform-skill 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

terraform-skill 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

terraform-skill 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,316 次,近一周安装 226 次,下载 1,862 次,GitHub 35,680 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

terraform-skill 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 35,680 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
terraform-skill

Terraform 技能 · 本页

5,31635,680调用外部服务未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Terraform Skill for Claude

Comprehensive Terraform and OpenTofu guidance covering testing, modules, CI/CD, and production patterns. Based on terraform-best-practices.com and enterprise experience.

When to Use This Skill

Activate this skill when:

  • Creating new Terraform or OpenTofu configurations or modules
  • Setting up testing infrastructure for IaC code
  • Deciding between testing approaches (validate, plan, frameworks)
  • Structuring multi-environment deployments
  • Implementing CI/CD for infrastructure-as-code
  • Reviewing or refactoring existing Terraform/OpenTofu projects
  • Choosing between module patterns or state management approaches

Don't use this skill for:

  • Basic Terraform/OpenTofu syntax questions (Claude knows this)
  • Provider-specific API reference (link to docs instead)
  • Cloud platform questions unrelated to Terraform/OpenTofu

Core Principles

1. Code Structure Philosophy

Module Hierarchy:

TypeWhen to UseScope
Resource ModuleSingle logical group of connected resourcesVPC + subnets, Security group + rules
Infrastructure ModuleCollection of resource modules for a purposeMultiple resource modules in one region/account
CompositionComplete infrastructureSpans multiple regions/accounts

Hierarchy: Resource → Resource Module → Infrastructure Module → Composition

Directory Structure:

environments/        # Environment-specific configurations
├── prod/
├── staging/
└── dev/

modules/            # Reusable modules
├── networking/
├── compute/
└── data/

examples/           # Module usage examples (also serve as tests)
├── complete/
└── minimal/

Key principle from terraform-best-practices.com:

  • Separate environments (prod, staging) from modules (reusable components)
  • Use examples/ as both documentation and integration test fixtures
  • Keep modules small and focused (single responsibility)

For detailed module architecture, see: Code Patterns: Module Types & Hierarchy

2. Naming Conventions

Resources:

# Good: Descriptive, contextual
resource "aws_instance" "web_server" { }
resource "aws_s3_bucket" "application_logs" { }

# Good: "this" for singleton resources (only one of that type)
resource "aws_vpc" "this" { }
resource "aws_security_group" "this" { }

# Avoid: Generic names for non-singletons
resource "aws_instance" "main" { }
resource "aws_s3_bucket" "bucket" { }

Singleton Resources:

Use "this" when your module creates only one resource of that type:

✅ DO:

resource "aws_vpc" "this" {}           # Module creates one VPC
resource "aws_security_group" "this" {}  # Module creates one SG

❌ DON'T use "this" for multiple resources:

resource "aws_subnet" "this" {}  # If creating multiple subnets

Use descriptive names when creating multiple resources of the same type.

Variables:

# Prefix with context when needed
var.vpc_cidr_block          # Not just "cidr"
var.database_instance_class # Not just "instance_class"

Files:

  • main.tf - Primary resources
  • variables.tf - Input variables
  • outputs.tf - Output values
  • versions.tf - Provider versions
  • data.tf - Data sources (optional)

Testing Strategy Framework

Decision Matrix: Which Testing Approach?

Your SituationRecommended ApproachToolsCost
Quick syntax checkStatic analysisterraform validate, fmtFree
Pre-commit validationStatic + lintvalidate, tflint, trivy, checkovFree
Terraform 1.6+, simple logicNative test frameworkBuilt-in terraform testFree-Low
Pre-1.6, or Go expertiseIntegration testingTerratestLow-Med
Security/compliance focusPolicy as codeOPA, SentinelFree
Cost-sensitive workflowMock providers (1.7+)Native tests + mockingFree
Multi-cloud, complexFull integrationTerratest + real infraMed-High

Testing Pyramid for Infrastructure

        /\
       /  \          End-to-End Tests (Expensive)
      /____\         - Full environment deployment
     /      \        - Production-like setup
    /________\
   /          \      Integration Tests (Moderate)
  /____________\     - Module testing in isolation
 /              \    - Real resources in test account
/________________\   Static Analysis (Cheap)
                     - validate, fmt, lint
                     - Security scanning

Native Test Best Practices (1.6+)

Before generating test code:

  1. Validate schemas with Terraform MCP: Search provider docs → Get resource schema → Identify block types
  2. Choose correct command mode:

- command = plan - Fast, for input validation - command = apply - Required for computed values and set-type blocks

  1. Handle set-type blocks correctly:

- Cannot index with [0] - Use for expressions to iterate - Or use command = apply to materialize

Common patterns:

  • S3 encryption rules: set (use for expressions)
  • Lifecycle transitions: set (use for expressions)
  • IAM policy statements: set (use for expressions)

For detailed testing guides, see:

  • Testing Frameworks Guide - Deep dive into static analysis, native tests, and Terratest
  • Quick Reference - Decision flowchart and command cheat sheet

Code Structure Standards

Resource Block Ordering

Strict ordering for consistency:

  1. count or for_each FIRST (blank line after)
  2. Other arguments
  3. tags as last real argument
  4. depends_on after tags (if needed)
  5. lifecycle at the very end (if needed)
# ✅ GOOD - Correct ordering
resource "aws_nat_gateway" "this" {
  count = var.create_nat_gateway ? 1 : 0

  allocation_id = aws_eip.this[0].id
  subnet_id     = aws_subnet.public[0].id

  tags = {
    Name = "${var.name}-nat"
  }

  depends_on = [aws_internet_gateway.this]

  lifecycle {
    create_before_destroy = true
  }
}

Variable Block Ordering

  1. description (ALWAYS required)
  2. type
  3. default
  4. validation
  5. nullable (when setting to false)
variable "environment" {
  description = "Environment name for resource tagging"
  type        = string
  default     = "dev"

  validation {
    condition     = contains(["dev", "staging", "prod"], var.environment)
    error_message = "Environment must be one of: dev, staging, prod."
  }

  nullable = false
}

For complete structure guidelines, see: Code Patterns: Block Ordering & Structure

Count vs For_Each: When to Use Each

Quick Decision Guide

ScenarioUseWhy
Boolean condition (create or don't)count = condition? 1: 0Simple on/off toggle
Simple numeric replicationcount = 3Fixed number of identical resources
Items may be reordered/removedfor_each = toset(list)Stable resource addresses
Reference by keyfor_each = mapNamed access to resources
Multiple named resourcesfor_eachBetter maintainability

Common Patterns

Boolean conditions:

# ✅ GOOD - Boolean condition
resource "aws_nat_gateway" "this" {
  count = var.create_nat_gateway ? 1 : 0
  # ...
}

Stable addressing with for_each:

# ✅ GOOD - Removing "us-east-1b" only affects that subnet
resource "aws_subnet" "private" {
  for_each = toset(var.availability_zones)

  availability_zone = each.key
  # ...
}

# ❌ BAD - Removing middle AZ recreates all subsequent subnets
resource "aws_subnet" "private" {
  count = length(var.availability_zones)

  availability_zone = var.availability_zones[count.index]
  # ...
}

For migration guides and detailed examples, see: Code Patterns: Count vs For_Each

Locals for Dependency Management

Use locals to ensure correct resource deletion order:

# Problem: Subnets might be deleted after CIDR blocks, causing errors
# Solution: Use try() in locals to hint deletion order

locals {
  # References secondary CIDR first, falling back to VPC
  # Forces Terraform to delete subnets before CIDR association
  vpc_id = try(
    aws_vpc_ipv4_cidr_block_association.this[0].vpc_id,
    aws_vpc.this.id,
    ""
  )
}

resource "aws_vpc" "this" {
  cidr_block = "10.0.0.0/16"
}

resource "aws_vpc_ipv4_cidr_block_association" "this" {
  count = var.add_secondary_cidr ? 1 : 0

  vpc_id     = aws_vpc.this.id
  cidr_block = "10.1.0.0/16"
}

resource "aws_subnet" "public" {
  vpc_id     = local.vpc_id  # Uses local, not direct reference
  cidr_block = "10.1.0.0/24"
}

Why this matters:

  • Prevents deletion errors when destroying infrastructure
  • Ensures correct dependency order without explicit depends_on
  • Particularly useful for VPC configurations with secondary CIDR blocks

For detailed examples, see: Code Patterns: Locals for Dependency Management

Module Development

Standard Module Structure

my-module/
├── README.md           # Usage documentation
├── main.tf             # Primary resources
├── variables.tf        # Input variables with descriptions
├── outputs.tf          # Output values
├── versions.tf         # Provider version constraints
├── examples/
│   ├── minimal/        # Minimal working example
│   └── complete/       # Full-featured example
└── tests/              # Test files
    └── module_test.tftest.hcl  # Or .go

Best Practices Summary

Variables:

  • ✅ Always include description
  • ✅ Use explicit type constraints
  • ✅ Provide sensible default values where appropriate
  • ✅ Add validation blocks for complex constraints
  • ✅ Use sensitive = true for secrets

Outputs:

  • ✅ Always include description
  • ✅ Mark sensitive outputs with sensitive = true
  • ✅ Consider returning objects for related values
  • ✅ Document what consumers should do with each output

For detailed module patterns, see:

  • Module Patterns Guide - Variable best practices, output design, ✅ DO vs ❌ DON'T patterns
  • Quick Reference - Resource naming, variable naming, file organization

CI/CD Integration

Recommended Workflow Stages

  1. Validate - Format check + syntax validation + linting
  2. Test - Run automated tests (native or Terratest)
  3. Plan - Generate and review execution plan
  4. Apply - Execute changes (with approvals for production)

Cost Optimization Strategy

  1. Use mocking for PR validation (free)
  2. Run integration tests only on main branch (controlled cost)
  3. Implement auto-cleanup (prevent orphaned resources)
  4. Tag all test resources (track spending)

For complete CI/CD templates, see:

  • CI/CD Workflows Guide - GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Atlantis integration, cost optimization
  • Quick Reference - Common CI/CD issues and solutions

Security & Compliance

Essential Security Checks

# Static security scanning
trivy config .
checkov -d .

Common Issues to Avoid

❌ Don't:

  • Store secrets in variables
  • Use default VPC
  • Skip encryption
  • Open security groups to 0.0.0.0/0

✅ Do:

  • Use AWS Secrets Manager / Parameter Store
  • Create dedicated VPCs
  • Enable encryption at rest
  • Use least-privilege security groups

For detailed security guidance, see:

  • Security & Compliance Guide - Trivy/Checkov integration, secrets management, state file security, compliance testing

Version Management

Version Constraint Syntax

version = "5.0.0"      # Exact (avoid - inflexible)
version = "~> 5.0"     # Recommended: 5.0.x only
version = ">= 5.0"     # Minimum (risky - breaking changes)

Strategy by Component

ComponentStrategyExample
TerraformPin minor versionrequired_version = "~> 1.9"
ProvidersPin major versionversion = "~> 5.0"
Modules (prod)Pin exact versionversion = "5.1.2"
Modules (dev)Allow patch updatesversion = "~> 5.1"

Update Workflow

# Lock versions initially
terraform init              # Creates .terraform.lock.hcl

# Update to latest within constraints
terraform init -upgrade     # Updates providers

# Review and test
terraform plan

For detailed version management, see: Code Patterns: Version Management

Modern Terraform Features (1.0+)

Feature Availability by Version

FeatureVersionUse Case
try() function0.13+Safe fallbacks, replaces element(concat())
nullable = false1.1+Prevent null values in variables
moved blocks1.1+Refactor without destroy/recreate
optional() with defaults1.3+Optional object attributes
Native testing1.6+Built-in test framework
Mock providers1.7+Cost-free unit testing
Provider functions1.8+Provider-specific data transformation
Cross-variable validation1.9+Validate relationships between variables
Write-only arguments1.11+Secrets never stored in state

Quick Examples

# try() - Safe fallbacks (0.13+)
output "sg_id" {
  value = try(aws_security_group.this[0].id, "")
}

# optional() - Optional attributes with defaults (1.3+)
variable "config" {
  type = object({
    name    = string
    timeout = optional(number, 300)  # Default: 300
  })
}

# Cross-variable validation (1.9+)
variable "environment" { type = string }
variable "backup_days" {
  type = number
  validation {
    condition     = var.environment == "prod" ? var.backup_days >= 7 : true
    error_message = "Production requires backup_days >= 7"
  }
}

For complete patterns and examples, see: Code Patterns: Modern Terraform Features

Version-Specific Guidance

Terraform 1.0-1.5

  • Use Terratest for testing
  • No native testing framework available
  • Focus on static analysis and plan validation

Terraform 1.6+ / OpenTofu 1.6+

  • New: Native terraform test / tofu test command
  • Consider migrating from external frameworks for simple tests
  • Keep Terratest only for complex integration tests

Terraform 1.7+ / OpenTofu 1.7+

  • New: Mock providers for unit testing
  • Reduce cost by mocking external dependencies
  • Use real integration tests for final validation

Terraform vs OpenTofu

Both are fully supported by this skill. For licensing, governance, and feature comparison, see Quick Reference: Terraform vs OpenTofu.

Detailed Guides

This skill uses progressive disclosure - essential information is in this main file, detailed guides are available when needed:

📚 Reference Files:

  • Testing Frameworks - In-depth guide to static analysis, native tests, and Terratest
  • Module Patterns - Module structure, variable/output best practices, ✅ DO vs ❌ DON'T patterns
  • CI/CD Workflows - GitHub Actions, GitLab CI templates, cost optimization, automated cleanup
  • Security & Compliance - Trivy/Checkov integration, secrets management, compliance testing
  • Quick Reference - Command cheat sheets, decision flowcharts, troubleshooting guide

How to use: When you need detailed information on a topic, reference the appropriate guide. Claude will load it on demand to provide comprehensive guidance.

License

This skill is licensed under the Apache License 2.0. See the LICENSE file for full terms.

Copyright © 2026 Anton Babenko

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

平台分布

Codex

34.08%
按下载量换算635

Claude

31.33%
按下载量换算583

Cursor

16.48%
按下载量换算307

Gemini CLI

9.63%
按下载量换算179

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills