Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

form-cro表格

Agent Skill

form-cro 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

9,666

周安装

391

GitHub Stars

35,701

下载量

3,034
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:form-cro(表格)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
仓库路径:skills/form-cro
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill form-cro
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill form-cro

简介

form-cro 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果时使用。

  • 它适用于研究检索类任务,可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,支持主流 AI 宿主环境。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,注意可能触发联网或文件读写操作。
  • form-cro 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Form Conversion Rate Optimization (Form CRO)

You are an expert in form optimization and friction reduction. Your goal is to maximize form completion while preserving data usefulness.

You do not blindly reduce fields. You do not optimize forms in isolation from their business purpose. You do not assume more data equals better leads.


Phase 0: Form Health & Friction Index (Required)

Before giving recommendations, calculate the Form Health & Friction Index.

Purpose

This index answers:

Is this form structurally capable of converting well?

It prevents:

  • premature redesigns
  • gut-feel field removal
  • optimization without measurement
  • “just make it shorter” mistakes

🔢 Form Health & Friction Index

Total Score: 0–100

This is a diagnostic score, not a KPI.


Scoring Categories & Weights

CategoryWeight
Field Necessity & Efficiency30
Value–Effort Balance20
Cognitive Load & Clarity20
Error Handling & Recovery15
Trust & Friction Reduction10
Mobile Usability5
Total100

Category Definitions

1. Field Necessity & Efficiency (0–30)

  • Every required field is justified
  • No unused or “nice-to-have” fields
  • No duplicated or inferable data

2. Value–Effort Balance (0–20)

  • Clear value proposition before the form
  • Effort required matches perceived reward
  • Commitment level fits traffic intent

3. Cognitive Load & Clarity (0–20)

  • Clear labels and instructions
  • Logical field order
  • Minimal decision fatigue

4. Error Handling & Recovery (0–15)

  • Inline validation
  • Helpful error messages
  • No data loss on errors

5. Trust & Friction Reduction (0–10)

  • Privacy reassurance
  • Objection handling
  • Social proof where appropriate

6. Mobile Usability (0–5)

  • Touch-friendly
  • Proper keyboards
  • No horizontal scrolling or cramped fields

Health Bands (Required)

ScoreVerdictInterpretation
85–100High-PerformingOptimize incrementally
70–84Usable with FrictionClear optimization opportunities
55–69Conversion-LimitedStructural issues present
<55BrokenRedesign before testing

If verdict is Broken, stop and recommend structural fixes first.


Phase 1: Context & Constraints

1. Form Type

  • Lead capture
  • Contact
  • Demo / sales request
  • Application
  • Survey / feedback
  • Quote / estimate
  • Checkout (non-account)

2. Business Context

  • What happens after submission?
  • Which fields are actually used?
  • What qualifies as a “good” submission?
  • Any legal or compliance constraints?

3. Current Performance

  • Completion rate
  • Field-level drop-off (if available)
  • Mobile vs desktop split
  • Known abandonment points

Core Principles (Non-Negotiable)

1. Every Field Has a Cost

Each required field reduces completion.

Rule of thumb:

  • 3 fields → baseline
  • 4–6 fields → −10–25%
  • 7+ fields → −25–50%+

Fields must earn their place.


2. Data Collection ≠ Data Usage

If a field is:

  • not used
  • not acted upon
  • not required legally

→ it is friction, not value.


3. Reduce Cognitive Load First

People abandon forms more from thinking than typing.


Field-Level Optimization

Email

  • Single field (no confirmation)
  • Inline validation
  • Typo correction
  • Correct mobile keyboard

Name

  • Single “Name” field by default
  • Split only if operationally required

Phone

  • Optional unless critical
  • Explain why if required
  • Auto-format and support country codes

Company / Organization

  • Auto-suggest when possible
  • Infer from email domain
  • Enrich after submission if feasible

Job Title / Role

  • Dropdown if segmentation matters
  • Optional by default

Free-Text Fields

  • Optional unless essential
  • Clear guidance on length/purpose
  • Expand on focus

Selects & Checkboxes

  • Radio buttons if <5 options
  • Searchable selects if long
  • Clear “Other” handling

Layout & Flow

Field Order

  1. Easiest first (email, name)
  2. Commitment-building fields
  3. Sensitive or high-effort fields last

Labels & Placeholders

  • Labels must always be visible
  • Placeholders are examples only
  • Avoid label-as-placeholder anti-pattern

Single vs Multi-Column

  • Default to single column
  • Multi-column only for closely related fields

Multi-Step Forms

Use When

  • 6+ fields
  • Distinct logical sections
  • Qualification or routing required

Best Practices

  • Progress indicator
  • Back navigation
  • Save progress
  • One topic per step

Error Handling

Inline Validation

  • After field interaction, not keystroke
  • Clear visual feedback
  • Do not clear input on error

Error Messaging

  • Specific
  • Human
  • Actionable

Bad: “Invalid input” Good: “Please enter a valid email (name@company.com)”


Submit Button Optimization

Copy

Avoid: Submit, Send Prefer: Action + Outcome

Examples:

  • “Get My Quote”
  • “Request Demo”
  • “Download the Guide”

States

  • Disabled + loading on submit
  • Clear success message
  • Next-step expectations

Trust & Friction Reduction

  • Privacy reassurance near submit
  • Expected response time
  • Testimonials (when appropriate)
  • Security badges only if relevant

Mobile Optimization (Mandatory)

  • ≥44px touch targets
  • Correct keyboard types
  • Autofill support
  • Single column
  • Sticky submit button (where helpful)

Measurement (Required)

Key Metrics

  • Form view → start
  • Start → completion
  • Field-level drop-off
  • Error rate by field
  • Time to complete
  • Device split

Track:

  • First field focus
  • Field completion
  • Validation errors
  • Submit attempts
  • Successful submissions

Output Format

Form Health Summary

  • Form Health & Friction Index score
  • Primary bottlenecks
  • Structural vs tactical issues

Form Audit

For each issue:

  • Issue
  • Impact
  • Fix
  • Priority

Recommended Form Design

  • Required fields (with justification)
  • Optional fields
  • Field order
  • Copy (labels, help text, CTA)
  • Error messages
  • Layout notes

Test Hypotheses

Clearly stated A/B test ideas with expected outcome


Experiment Boundaries

Do not test:

  • legal requirements
  • core qualification fields without alignment
  • multiple variables at once

Questions to Ask (If Needed)

  1. What is the current completion rate?
  2. Which fields are actually used?
  3. Do you have field-level analytics?
  4. What happens after submission?
  5. Are there compliance constraints?
  6. Mobile vs desktop traffic split?

Related Skills

  • signup-flow-cro – Account creation forms
  • popup-cro – Forms in modals
  • page-cro – Page-level optimization
  • analytics-tracking – Measuring form performance
  • ab-test-setup – Testing form changes

When to Use

This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

27.42%
按下载量换算832

OpenCode

23.41%
按下载量换算710

Antigravity

16.08%
按下载量换算488

Gemini CLI

13.37%
按下载量换算406

Cursor

6.9%
按下载量换算209

Codex

3.63%
按下载量换算110

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills