Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

bug-hunter(错误猎人)

bug-hunter 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

bug-hunter 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 37,991。

总安装 1,632周安装 68GitHub Stars 35,665下载 544核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:bug-hunter(错误猎人)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
仓库路径:skills/bug-hunter
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill bug-hunter
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill bug-hunter

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于错误猎人相关研究检索的技能。bug-hunter 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装使用。

建议结合原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前需确认权限范围和是否触发文件操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/bug-hunter

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill bug…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

bug-hunter 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill bug-hunter。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

bug-hunter 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

bug-hunter 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

bug-hunter 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

bug-hunter 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,632 次,近一周安装 68 次,下载 544 次,GitHub 35,665 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

bug-hunter 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 35,665 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
bug-hunter

错误猎人 · 本页

1,63235,665操作浏览器未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Bug Hunter

Systematically hunt down and fix bugs using proven debugging techniques. No guessing—follow the evidence.

When to Use This Skill

  • User reports a bug or error
  • Something isn't working as expected
  • User says "fix the bug" or "debug this"
  • Intermittent failures or weird behavior
  • Production issues need investigation

The Debugging Process

1. Reproduce the Bug

First, make it happen consistently:

1. Get exact steps to reproduce
2. Try to reproduce locally
3. Note what triggers it
4. Document the error message/behavior
5. Check if it happens every time or randomly

If you can't reproduce it, gather more info:

  • What environment? (dev, staging, prod)
  • What browser/device?
  • What user actions preceded it?
  • Any error logs?

2. Gather Evidence

Collect all available information:

Check logs:

# Application logs
tail -f logs/app.log

# System logs
journalctl -u myapp -f

# Browser console
# Open DevTools → Console tab

Check error messages:

  • Full stack trace
  • Error type and message
  • Line numbers
  • Timestamp

Check state:

  • What data was being processed?
  • What was the user trying to do?
  • What's in the database?
  • What's in local storage/cookies?

3. Form a Hypothesis

Based on evidence, guess what's wrong:

"The login times out because the session cookie
expires before the auth check completes"

"The form fails because email validation regex
doesn't handle plus signs"

"The API returns 500 because the database query
has a syntax error with special characters"

4. Test the Hypothesis

Prove or disprove your guess:

Add logging:

console.log('Before API call:', userData);
const response = await api.login(userData);
console.log('After API call:', response);

Use debugger:

debugger; // Execution pauses here
const result = processData(input);

Isolate the problem:

// Comment out code to narrow down
// const result = complexFunction();
const result = { mock: 'data' }; // Use mock data

5. Find Root Cause

Trace back to the actual problem:

Common root causes:

  • Null/undefined values
  • Wrong data types
  • Race conditions
  • Missing error handling
  • Incorrect logic
  • Off-by-one errors
  • Async/await issues
  • Missing validation

Example trace:

Symptom: "Cannot read property 'name' of undefined"
↓
Where: user.profile.name
↓
Why: user.profile is undefined
↓
Why: API didn't return profile
↓
Why: User ID was null
↓
Root cause: Login didn't set user ID in session

6. Implement Fix

Fix the root cause, not the symptom:

Bad fix (symptom):

// Just hide the error
const name = user?.profile?.name || 'Unknown';

Good fix (root cause):

// Ensure user ID is set on login
const login = async (credentials) => {
  const user = await authenticate(credentials);
  if (user) {
    session.userId = user.id; // Fix: Set user ID
    return user;
  }
  throw new Error('Invalid credentials');
};

7. Test the Fix

Verify it actually works:

1. Reproduce the original bug
2. Apply the fix
3. Try to reproduce again (should fail)
4. Test edge cases
5. Test related functionality
6. Run existing tests

8. Prevent Regression

Add a test so it doesn't come back:

test('login sets user ID in session', async () => {
  const user = await login({ email: 'test@example.com', password: 'pass' });

  expect(session.userId).toBe(user.id);
  expect(session.userId).not.toBeNull();
});

Debugging Techniques

Binary Search

Cut the problem space in half repeatedly:

// Does the bug happen before or after this line?
console.log('CHECKPOINT 1');
// ... code ...
console.log('CHECKPOINT 2');
// ... code ...
console.log('CHECKPOINT 3');

Rubber Duck Debugging

Explain the code line by line out loud. Often you'll spot the issue while explaining.

Print Debugging

Strategic console.logs:

console.log('Input:', input);
console.log('After transform:', transformed);
console.log('Before save:', data);
console.log('Result:', result);

Diff Debugging

Compare working vs broken:

  • What changed recently?
  • What's different between environments?
  • What's different in the data?

Time Travel Debugging

Use git to find when it broke:

git bisect start
git bisect bad  # Current commit is broken
git bisect good abc123  # This old commit worked
# Git will check out commits for you to test

Common Bug Patterns

Null/Undefined

// Bug
const name = user.profile.name;

// Fix
const name = user?.profile?.name || 'Unknown';

// Better fix
if (!user || !user.profile) {
  throw new Error('User profile required');
}
const name = user.profile.name;

Race Condition

// Bug
let data = null;
fetchData().then(result => data = result);
console.log(data); // null - not loaded yet

// Fix
const data = await fetchData();
console.log(data); // correct value

Off-by-One

// Bug
for (let i = 0; i <= array.length; i++) {
  console.log(array[i]); // undefined on last iteration
}

// Fix
for (let i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
  console.log(array[i]);
}

Type Coercion

// Bug
if (count == 0) { // true for "", [], null

// Fix
if (count === 0) { // only true for 0

Async Without Await

// Bug
const result = asyncFunction(); // Returns Promise
console.log(result.data); // undefined

// Fix
const result = await asyncFunction();
console.log(result.data); // correct value

Debugging Tools

Browser DevTools

Console: View logs and errors
Sources: Set breakpoints, step through code
Network: Check API calls and responses
Application: View cookies, storage, cache
Performance: Find slow operations

Node.js Debugging

// Built-in debugger
node --inspect app.js

// Then open chrome://inspect in Chrome

VS Code Debugging

// .vscode/launch.json
{
  "type": "node",
  "request": "launch",
  "name": "Debug App",
  "program": "${workspaceFolder}/app.js"
}

When You're Stuck

  1. Take a break (seriously, walk away for 10 minutes)
  2. Explain it to someone else (or a rubber duck)
  3. Search for the exact error message
  4. Check if it's a known issue (GitHub issues, Stack Overflow)
  5. Simplify: Create minimal reproduction
  6. Start over: Delete and rewrite the problematic code
  7. Ask for help (provide context, what you've tried)

Documentation Template

After fixing, document it:

## Bug: Login timeout after 30 seconds

**Symptom:** Users get logged out immediately after login

**Root Cause:** Session cookie expires before auth check completes

**Fix:** Increased session timeout from 30s to 3600s in config

**Files Changed:**
- config/session.js (line 12)

**Testing:** Verified login persists for 1 hour

**Prevention:** Added test for session persistence

Key Principles

  • Reproduce first, fix second
  • Follow the evidence, don't guess
  • Fix root cause, not symptoms
  • Test the fix thoroughly
  • Add tests to prevent regression
  • Document what you learned

Related Skills

  • @systematic-debugging - Advanced debugging
  • @test-driven-development - Testing
  • @codebase-audit-pre-push - Code review

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

平台分布

Codex

35.73%
按下载量换算194

Claude

31.85%
按下载量换算173

Cursor

19.25%
按下载量换算105

Gemini CLI

8.91%
按下载量换算48

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills