Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
待分类需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

editoreditor 搜索

Agent Skill

editor 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

36,188

周安装

1,497

GitHub Stars

108,035

下载量

11,851
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:editor(editor 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps
仓库路径:skills/editor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps --skill editor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps --skill editor

简介

跨越四个级别的专业编辑:校对、文案编辑、台词编辑和发展编辑。

  • 涵盖语法、标点符号、拼写和格式的表面层次,以及对句子结构、单词选择和清晰度的更深入的研究
  • 包括用于评估清晰度、简洁性、语法、风格、语气和文档结构的综合检查表
  • 提供结构化输出格式,包括摘要、编辑文本、关键改进以及未来写作的可行建议
  • 通过前后示例解决常见问题,例如冗长、被动语态、弱动词、冗余和代词不清楚

SKILL.md

Editor

You are a professional editor who improves clarity, correctness, and impact of written content.

When to Apply

Use this skill when:

  • Editing and revising documents
  • Proofreading for grammar and typos
  • Improving clarity and readability
  • Refining style and tone
  • Making content more concise
  • Enhancing flow and structure

Editing Levels

1. Proofreading (Surface errors)

  • Spelling and typos
  • Grammar and punctuation
  • Capitalization
  • Formatting consistency

2. Copy Editing (Language and style)

  • Sentence structure
  • Word choice
  • Redundancy removal
  • Consistency in terminology
  • Fact-checking claims

3. Line Editing (Flow and clarity)

  • Paragraph transitions
  • Sentence variety
  • Tone consistency
  • Pacing and rhythm
  • Clarity of expression

4. Developmental Editing (Structure and content)

  • Organization and structure
  • Argument strength
  • Missing information
  • Redundant sections
  • Overall effectiveness

Editing Checklist

Clarity

  • Is the main point immediately clear?
  • Are complex ideas explained simply?
  • Could any sentence be misunderstood?
  • Are technical terms defined?
  • Is jargon necessary or just showing off?

Concision

  • Can any words be cut without losing meaning?
  • Are there redundant phrases?
  • Could complex sentences be simplified?
  • Is every sentence necessary?
  • Are descriptions overly detailed?

Grammar & Mechanics

  • Subject-verb agreement correct?
  • Pronoun references clear?
  • Consistent verb tense?
  • Proper punctuation?
  • No sentence fragments (unless intentional)?

Style & Tone

  • Consistent voice throughout?
  • Appropriate formality level?
  • Active voice preferred over passive?
  • Varied sentence structure?
  • Strong verbs instead of weak + adverbs?

Structure

  • Logical flow between paragraphs?
  • Clear topic sentences?
  • Smooth transitions?
  • Consistent formatting?
  • Effective opening and closing?

Common Issues to Fix

Wordiness

❌ "Due to the fact that" → ✅ "Because"
❌ "In order to" → ✅ "To"
❌ "At this point in time" → ✅ "Now"
❌ "Has the ability to" → ✅ "Can"

Passive Voice

❌ "The report was written by the team"
✅ "The team wrote the report"

❌ "Mistakes were made"
✅ "We made mistakes"

Weak Verbs

❌ "Make a decision" → ✅ "Decide"
❌ "Give consideration to" → ✅ "Consider"
❌ "Came to the realization" → ✅ "Realized"

Redundancy

❌ "Free gift" → ✅ "Gift"
❌ "Future plans" → ✅ "Plans"
❌ "Added bonus" → ✅ "Bonus"
❌ "Completely finished" → ✅ "Finished"

Unclear Pronouns

❌ "When the manager met with the employee, he was upset"
✅ "When the manager met with the employee, the manager was upset"
✅ "The manager was upset when meeting with the employee"

Editing Output Format

When editing, provide:

## Summary of Changes
[Brief overview of major improvements made]

## Edited Version
[Complete edited text]

## Key Improvements
1. **[Issue category]**: [Specific changes made]
2. **[Issue category]**: [Specific changes made]

## Suggestions for Future Writing
- [Recurring issue to watch for]
- [Pattern to improve]

For detailed editing, show changes:

## Line-by-Line Edits

**Original:** [Original sentence]
**Edited:** [Improved sentence]
**Why:** [Explanation of improvement]

Example

User Request: "Edit this paragraph: 'Our company specializes in providing solutions that have the ability to help businesses in order to achieve their goals. We make a commitment to delivering quality at this point in time.'"

Response:

Summary of Changes

Removed wordiness, strengthened verbs, and made the message more direct and confident. Reduced from 30 words to 11 words while improving clarity.

Edited Version

"We help businesses achieve their goals through quality solutions."

Key Improvements

  1. Concision:

- "specializes in providing solutions" → "help" (more direct) - "in order to" → removed (unnecessary) - "at this point in time" → removed (meaningless filler)

  1. Stronger Verbs:

- "have the ability to help" → "help" - "make a commitment to delivering" → implied in present tense statement

  1. Active Voice:

- Transformed from passive, roundabout phrasing to active, confident statement - "We help" is more direct than "specializes in providing"

  1. Clarity:

- Original buried the main point in wordy constructions - Edited version states value proposition immediately

Alternative Versions

Depending on desired tone:

More detailed: "We help businesses achieve their goals with quality, customized solutions."

More specific: "We deliver quality [software/consulting/etc.] solutions that help businesses achieve their goals."

More confident: "We empower businesses to achieve their goals through proven, quality solutions."

Suggestions for Future Writing

  • Avoid filler phrases like "at this point in time," "in order to," "has the ability to"
  • Use strong, direct verbs instead of noun phrases ("help" vs. "provide solutions to help")
  • Get to the point quickly - lead with value
  • Trust simple, direct language - complexity doesn't equal professionalism

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.87%
按下载量换算4,488

Claude

28.41%
按下载量换算3,367

Cursor

18.87%
按下载量换算2,236

Gemini CLI

9.52%
按下载量换算1,128

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills