Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

sherpy-flow(夏皮流)

sherpy-flow 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

sherpy-flow 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 17,352。

总安装 419周安装 18GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 147核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sherpy-flow(夏皮流)
来源仓库:https://github.com/validkeys/sherpy
仓库路径:skills/sherpy-flow
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/validkeys/sherpy --skill sherpy-flow
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/validkeys/sherpy --skill sherpy-flow

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue 和 Pull Request 协作信息。适合整理代码变更、跟踪任务状态或分析协作流程。可通过 GitHub API 获取仓库元数据和事件历史。安装前需确认账号权限,避免越权访问敏感仓库。sherpy-flow 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

建议结合原始 README 了解具体命令和数据格式。

来源仓库内路径:skills/sherpy-flow

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/validkeys/sherpy --skill sherpy-flow;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

sherpy-flow 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/validkeys/sherpy --skill sherpy-flow。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

sherpy-flow 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

sherpy-flow 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

sherpy-flow 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

sherpy-flow 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 419 次,近一周安装 18 次,下载 147 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

sherpy-flow 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
sherpy-flow

夏皮流 · 本页

419—只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Sherpy Flow

Runs the complete Sherpy planning pipeline from start to finish. Detects your current position in the workflow based on existing artifacts and resumes from there. You never need to remember which skill comes next or what its inputs are.

Usage

/sherpy-flow [output-directory]

If no directory is provided, prompt the user: "Where should I create the planning documents?"

Wait for the user to provide a path before proceeding.

The Pipeline

Step 1   Gap Analysis Worksheet         → gap-analysis-worksheet.md
Step 2   Business Requirements          → business-requirements.yaml
Step 3   Technical Requirements         → technical-requirements.yaml
Step 4   Style Anchors Collection       → style-anchors/index.yaml + *.md
Step 5   Implementation Planner         → milestones.yaml + milestone-m*.tasks.yaml (with optional acceptance_criteria)
Step 6   Implementation Plan Review     → implementation-plan-review.yaml
Step 7   Architecture Decision Records  → adrs/INDEX.md + adrs/ADR-*.md
Step 8   Delivery Timeline              → timeline.yaml
Step 9   QA Test Plan                   → qa-test-plan.yaml
Step 10  Generate Summaries             → developer-summary.md + executive-summary.md

All artifacts are automatically organized into:

<output-directory>/
├── requirements/       (requirements, gap analysis)
├── implementation/
│   ├── milestones.yaml (with optional acceptance_criteria)
│   └── tasks/          (milestone task files)
├── delivery/           (timeline, QA test plan)
├── architecture/
│   └── adrs/           (ADRs)
├── artifacts/          (reviews, interview transcripts, style anchors, CONTINUE.md, etc.)
└── summaries/          (developer & executive summaries)

Process

Step 0: Determine Output Directory

If no directory was provided as a parameter, prompt the user:

"Where should I create the planning documents?"

Wait for user response. Store the provided path as base_directory.

Do not create any folders at this stage. Folders will be created on-demand by individual skills as they generate files.

Step 1: Scan for Existing Artifacts

Check the base_directory for existing files in the organized structure:

ArtifactExpected LocationIndicates step complete
gap-analysis-worksheet.mdrequirements/Step 1
business-requirements.yamlrequirements/Step 2
technical-requirements.yamlrequirements/Step 3
style-anchors/index.yamlartifacts/style-anchors/Step 4
milestones.yamlimplementation/Step 5
milestone-m*.tasks.yamlimplementation/tasks/Step 5
implementation-plan-review.yamlartifacts/Step 6
adrs/INDEX.mdarchitecture/adrs/Step 7
timeline.yamldelivery/Step 8
qa-test-plan.yamldelivery/Step 9
developer-summary.mdsummaries/Step 10
executive-summary.mdsummaries/Step 10

Artifact Detection Logic:

  • Check expected location within base_directory
  • If file exists, step is considered complete
  • Skills will create folders as needed when generating files

Step 2: Show Pipeline Status

Display a visual status of the pipeline before doing any work:

## Sherpy Flow — [Project Directory]

 ✓  Step 1   Gap Analysis Worksheet
 ✓  Step 2   Business Requirements
 →  Step 3   Technical Requirements        ← resuming here
 ○  Step 4   Style Anchors Collection
 ○  Step 5   Implementation Planner
 ○  Step 6   Implementation Plan Review
 ○  Step 7   Architecture Decision Records
 ○  Step 8   Delivery Timeline
 ○  Step 9   QA Test Plan
 ○  Step 10  Generate Summaries

Resuming from Step 3. Type "start over" to restart from Step 1,
or specify a step number to jump to a specific point.

Legend: ✓ complete · → current · ○ pending

Then ask:

"Ready to continue from Step [n]: [Step Name]? (yes / start over / jump to step N)"

Wait for confirmation before proceeding.

Step 3: Execute Each Step

For each pending step, invoke the referenced skill with base_directory as a parameter. The behavior at each step is identical to invoking the skill standalone — sherpy-flow is a sequencer, not a replacement.

CRITICAL EXECUTION RULES:

  1. NEVER proceed to the next step without explicit user confirmation — wait after EVERY step completion
  2. Step 4 (Style Anchors Collection) MUST NOT be skipped automatically — always prompt the user and show risk warning if they want to skip
  3. If a step requires input that doesn't exist (e.g., Step 5 needs style anchors), STOP and warn the user before proceeding

Important: Pass base_directory to each skill so files are created in the correct location. Skills will create necessary folders as they generate output.

Each skill is responsible for outputting files to the correct location within base_directory. No post-skill file organization is needed — skills create folders and files in the right place from the start.

Expected Output Locations

When invoking skills, pass base_directory as a parameter (or skills will auto-detect by looking for requirements/business-requirements.yaml):

Requirements Documents:

  • gap-analysis-worksheet.md → {base_directory}/requirements/
  • business-requirements.yaml → {base_directory}/requirements/
  • technical-requirements.yaml → {base_directory}/requirements/

Implementation Documents:

  • milestones.yaml → {base_directory}/implementation/
  • milestone-m*.tasks.yaml → {base_directory}/implementation/tasks/

Delivery Documents:

  • timeline.yaml → {base_directory}/delivery/
  • qa-test-plan.yaml → {base_directory}/delivery/

Architecture Documents:

  • adrs/INDEX.md + ADR-*.md → {base_directory}/architecture/adrs/

Artifact/Review Documents:

  • business-interview.jsonl → {base_directory}/artifacts/
  • technical-interview.jsonl → {base_directory}/artifacts/
  • style-anchors/index.yaml + *.md → {base_directory}/artifacts/style-anchors/
  • implementation-plan-review.yaml → {base_directory}/artifacts/
  • CONTINUE.md → {base_directory}/artifacts/
  • FEATURE_FLAGS.md → {base_directory}/artifacts/
  • UPDATES.md → {base_directory}/artifacts/

Summary Documents:

  • developer-summary.md → {base_directory}/summaries/
  • executive-summary.md → {base_directory}/summaries/

Step 1 — Gap Analysis Worksheet (/gap-analysis-worksheet)

  • Skip this step if no initial requirements document is present in the project directory.
  • If an initial requirements document exists (any .md, .txt, or .docx-described file), run the gap analysis against it.
  • After completing, ask: "Gap analysis worksheet generated. Shall I continue to the Business Requirements Interview?"

Step 2 — Business Requirements Interview (/business-requirements-interview)

  • Run the full interview process (one question at a time, tracks progress in business-interview.jsonl).
  • After business-requirements.yaml is generated, display the summary and ask: "Business requirements complete. Continue to Technical Requirements?"

Step 3 — Technical Requirements Interview (/technical-requirements-interview)

  • Requires business-requirements.yaml.
  • Run the full interview process.
  • After technical-requirements.yaml is generated, display the summary and ask: "Technical requirements complete. Continue to Style Anchors Collection?"

Step 4 — Style Anchors Collection (/style-anchors-collection) — MANDATORY

  • Requires technical-requirements.yaml.
  • CRITICAL: This step MUST NOT be skipped. Style anchors prevent architectural drift during implementation.
  • Interactive collection of code examples demonstrating approved patterns.
  • For each pattern identified in technical requirements:

- Ask user to provide file path, line range - Document what pattern demonstrates - Specify when to use it

  • Generate style-anchors/ directory with individual .md files and index.yaml.
  • If user wants to skip: Ask "Skipping style anchors significantly increases drift risk. Are you sure? (yes to skip / no to collect anchors)"
  • After completion, display anchor count by category and ask: "Style anchors collected. Continue to Implementation Planner?"

Step 5 — Implementation Planner (/implementation-planner)

  • Requires business-requirements.yaml, technical-requirements.yaml.
  • Strongly Recommended: style-anchors/index.yaml from Step 4.
  • Before running: If no style anchors exist, STOP and ask: "⚠️ No style anchors found. The implementation plan will be generated WITHOUT concrete code examples, which significantly increases architectural drift risk. Would you like to: Go back to Step 4 and collect style anchors now (recommended) Continue without style anchors (not recommended)"
  • If user chooses option 1, return to Step 4.
  • If user chooses option 2, confirm with: "Proceeding without style anchors. Expect higher drift during implementation. Continue? (yes/no)"
  • Generate milestones.yaml + milestone-m*.tasks.yaml.
  • Style anchors from Step 4 are automatically referenced in task instructions (if collected).
  • After completion, display milestone summary and ask: "Implementation plan generated. Continue to Plan Review?"

Step 6 — Implementation Plan Review (/implementation-plan-review)

  • Requires milestones.yaml + task files.
  • Run the full review.
  • After implementation-plan-review.yaml is generated, display the readiness score and critical issues.
  • If critical issues exist, ask: "The plan review found [n] critical issue(s). Would you like to: Address issues now (loops back to Step 5) Continue with acknowledged issues Review the issues in detail first"
  • Otherwise ask: "Plan review passed. Continue to Architecture Decision Records?"

Step 7 — Architecture Decision Records (/architecture-decision-record)

  • Requires technical-requirements.yaml.
  • Generate adrs/ directory with all ADR files.
  • After completion, display ADR count and ask: "Architecture decisions recorded. Continue to Delivery Timeline?"

Step 8 — Delivery Timeline (/delivery-timeline)

  • Requires milestones.yaml.
  • Ask the three delivery parameter questions (production deploy date, QA rounds, days per round) as defined in that skill.
  • Generate timeline.yaml.
  • After completion, display the workback summary (project start → deploy date) and ask: "Delivery timeline generated. Continue to QA Test Plan?"

Step 9 — QA Test Plan (/qa-test-plan)

  • Requires business-requirements.yaml + technical-requirements.yaml.
  • Generate qa-test-plan.yaml.
  • After completion, display coverage summary and ask: "QA test plan generated. Continue to Generate Summaries?"

Step 10 — Generate Summaries (/developer-summary + /executive-summary)

  • Requires: business-requirements.yaml, technical-requirements.yaml, milestones.yaml, timeline.yaml.
  • Run /developer-summary first to generate the developer-focused summary.
  • Then run /executive-summary to generate the executive/stakeholder summary.
  • Both skills auto-discover required files from the docs/ folder structure.
  • After both summaries are generated, display confirmation and proceed to final summary.

Step 4: Final Summary

After all steps are complete, display a final summary:

## Sherpy Flow Complete ✓

**Project:** [name]
**Directory:** [path]

All artifacts organized in: [base_directory]/

📋 Requirements
  ✓ gap-analysis-worksheet.md       [if generated]
  ✓ business-requirements.yaml
  ✓ technical-requirements.yaml

🔨 Implementation
  ✓ milestones.yaml
  ✓ tasks/milestone-m*.tasks.yaml   ([n] task files)

🚀 Delivery
  ✓ timeline.yaml
  ✓ qa-test-plan.yaml

🏛️ Architecture
  ✓ adrs/INDEX.md + ADR-*.md        ([n] decision records)

📊 Summaries
  ✓ developer-summary.md
  ✓ executive-summary.md

📁 Artifacts
  ✓ implementation-plan-review.yaml
  ✓ business-interview.jsonl
  ✓ technical-interview.jsonl
  ✓ style-anchors/index.yaml + [n] anchor files

Timeline: [project start date] → [production deploy date]
Total Delivery Days: [n] business days
QA Rounds: [n] × [n] days each

Your project is fully planned and ready for development!

Next Steps:
- Review summaries/ for project overview
- Start development with implementation/milestones.yaml
- Use /create-continuation-prompt to hand off context to a new session

Transition Rules

  • CRITICAL: Always confirm before moving to the next step — NEVER auto-advance. Wait for explicit user confirmation after EVERY step completion.
  • Step 4 (Style Anchors) is MANDATORY: Do not skip this step unless user explicitly requests to skip AND confirms after seeing the risk warning.
  • Loop-back: If the user says "go back" or "redo step N", return to that step and re-run it. The new output overwrites the previous artifact.
  • Skip: If the user says "skip step N":

- If N == 4 (Style Anchors): Display warning about drift risk and require explicit "yes to skip" confirmation - For other steps: Mark as skipped and note it in the final summary. Downstream steps that require its output will warn if the input is missing.

  • Jump: If the user says "jump to step N", run from that step forward. Load any required inputs from existing artifacts.
  • Interruption: If the user needs to stop mid-flow, remind them they can resume by running /sherpy-flow again — the pipeline status will show exactly where they left off.

平台分布

Codex

37.3%
按下载量换算55

Claude

31.21%
按下载量换算46

Cursor

19.14%
按下载量换算28

Gemini CLI

9.7%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills