Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

landing-page(登陆页面)

landing-page 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

landing-page 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 45,786。

总安装 824周安装 34GitHub Stars 115下载 269核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:landing-page(登陆页面)
来源仓库:https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills
仓库路径:skills/landing-page
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill landing-page
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill landing-page

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

landing-page 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于研究检索类任务,可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。

通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装,支持主流 AI 宿主环境。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。当前顶部介绍为空,需结合原始 SKILL.md 内容进一步核验功能细节和使用限制。

来源仓库内路径:skills/landing-page

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill landi…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

landing-page 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill landing-page。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

landing-page 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

landing-page 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

landing-page 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

landing-page 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 824 次,近一周安装 34 次,下载 269 次,GitHub 115 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

landing-page 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
landing-page

登陆页面 · 本页

824115需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Landing Page

When to Use

  • Creating a new landing page from scratch (product launch, feature page, waitlist).
  • Auditing an existing page for conversion rate optimization (CRO).
  • Rewriting headlines, CTAs, or hero sections.
  • Structuring page sections for a specific audience and traffic source.
  • Generating A/B test variants for copy or layout changes.

Context Required

  • From startup-context: product description, ICP (ideal customer profile), value proposition, competitive positioning, stage, tone of voice.
  • From the user: page URL or current copy (if auditing), page type (homepage, landing page, pricing, feature, blog), primary conversion goal (signup, demo, purchase, subscribe, download), traffic source (organic, paid, email, social), any existing conversion data or user research.

Workflow

  1. Identify page type and conversion goal -- Every page gets one primary conversion action. Determine whether this is a homepage, landing page, pricing page, feature page, or blog post -- each has a different CRO framework.
  2. Assess value proposition clarity -- Can a visitor understand what this is and why they should care within 5 seconds? Check whether copy is benefit-focused (good) or feature-focused (common problem). Ensure it is written in the customer's language, not company jargon.
  3. Evaluate headline effectiveness -- Does the headline communicate the core value proposition? Is it specific enough to be meaningful? Does it match the traffic source's messaging? Apply headline patterns:

- Outcome-focused: "Get [desired outcome] without [pain point]" - Specificity: Include numbers, timeframes, or concrete results - Social proof: "Join [N] teams who [achieve outcome]" - Direct address: "You [do painful thing]. There's a better way."

  1. Audit CTA placement, copy, and hierarchy -- Is there one clear primary action visible without scrolling? Does button copy communicate value, not just action? ("Start my free trial" beats "Submit"). Check CTA hierarchy: primary vs. secondary, repeated at key decision points.
  2. Check visual hierarchy and scannability -- Can someone scanning the page get the main message? Are the most important elements visually prominent? Is there sufficient whitespace? Do images support or distract from the message?
  3. Evaluate trust signals and social proof -- Look for: customer logos (especially recognizable ones), testimonials with specifics and attribution, case study snippets with real numbers, review scores, security badges. Place trust signals near CTAs and after benefit claims.
  4. Identify objection handling -- Are common objections addressed? Price/value concerns, "will this work for me?", implementation difficulty, "what if it doesn't work?" Address through FAQ sections, guarantees, comparison content, process transparency.
  5. Find friction points -- Too many form fields, unclear next steps, confusing navigation, required fields that should not be required, poor mobile experience, slow load times.

Output Format

  • If auditing: Recommendations structured as: (1) Quick Wins -- easy changes with immediate impact, (2) High-Impact Changes -- bigger efforts with significant conversion improvement, (3) Test Ideas -- hypotheses worth A/B testing. For key elements, provide 2-3 copy alternatives with rationale.
  • If drafting: Full page copy organized by section with 2-3 headline variants and CTA text options. Include layout and visual recommendations.

Frameworks & Best Practices

Page-Specific CRO

  • Homepage: Clear positioning for cold visitors, quick path to primary conversion, handle both "ready to buy" and "still researching" visitors.
  • Landing page: Message-match with traffic source, single CTA (remove navigation if possible), complete argument on one page.
  • Pricing page: Clear plan comparison, recommended plan indication, address "which plan is right for me?" anxiety.
  • Feature page: Connect feature to benefit, include use cases and examples, clear path to try/buy.
  • Blog post: Contextual CTAs matching content topic, inline CTAs at natural stopping points.

Copy Principles

  • The headline is the most important element on the page. If the headline does not stop the scroll, nothing else matters. Test headlines before anything else.
  • Specificity beats cleverness. "Save 12 hours per week on reporting" outperforms "Work smarter, not harder" every time.
  • The subheadline does the heavy lifting. The headline earns attention; the subheadline explains the value. Use it to clarify who the product is for, what it does, and why it matters.
  • Awareness-level matching. Match copy depth to visitor awareness. Paid search visitors are typically solution-aware (want pricing and CTAs). Social ad visitors are typically problem-aware or unaware (need problem education first). Traffic source reveals awareness level.

Conversion Principles

  • One page, one goal. Never give the visitor two equal choices. Every element should push toward the primary CTA.
  • Above-the-fold rule. Visitor should understand what you do, who it is for, and what to do next within 5 seconds.
  • Risk reversal near final CTA. Address "what if it doesn't work?" -- free trial, money-back guarantee, or no-commitment language.
  • Social proof placement. Small proof element in hero section ("Trusted by 500+ teams"), dedicated proof section below the fold.
  • Testimonial specificity. "This product is great" is worthless. "We reduced onboarding time from 3 weeks to 2 days" is persuasive. Seek specific, outcome-driven testimonials with numbers.
  • Reduce cognitive load. Every additional choice, link, or piece of information adds friction. Cut anything that does not directly support the primary conversion.
  • Mobile-first. Over 60% of traffic is mobile. Design for thumb zones. Ensure CTAs are tappable without zooming.

Related Skills

  • content-strategy -- when the landing page needs supporting content to drive traffic
  • seo-technical -- when the landing page needs to rank organically
  • cold-outreach -- when the landing page is the destination for outbound campaigns and copy must align with email messaging

Examples

Example 1: Page audit

"Here's our landing page copy. We're getting 15k visitors/month but only 1.2% conversion. What's wrong?"

Good output: Quick wins (e.g., rewrite feature-focused headline to outcome-focused), high-impact changes (restructure page sections, add social proof to hero), and test ideas (3 headline variants, 2 CTA copy options). Each recommendation includes the specific issue, the fix, and expected impact.

Example 2: New page draft

"We're launching a waitlist page for our developer tool. Target audience is backend engineers frustrated with deployment complexity."

Good output: Full section-by-section copy. Hero headline: "Deploy to production in 3 commands, not 30 steps." Problem agitation naming the specific pain. 3-step "how it works" section. Social proof placeholder guidance. CTA: "Join 2,400 engineers on the waitlist." Two alternative headline options and layout notes.

Example 3: A/B test recommendations

"Our signup page converts at 3.5%. What should we test first?"

Good output: Priority-ordered test plan. (1) Headline -- 3 variants reframing value prop from feature-first to outcome-first. (2) CTA copy -- "Start free trial" vs. "See it in action" vs. "Get started in 2 minutes." (3) Hero trust element -- customer count or logo bar. Each test includes control, variant, hypothesis, and minimum sample size guidance.

平台分布

Codex

40.89%
按下载量换算110

Claude

28.1%
按下载量换算76

Cursor

17.39%
按下载量换算47

Gemini CLI

9.43%
按下载量换算25

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills