Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

shadows-bug-hunter(阴影昆虫猎人)

shadows-bug-hunter 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 OpenClaw 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

shadows-bug-hunter 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 13,146。

总安装 9,645周安装 394GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 3,120核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.1.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:shadows-bug-hunter(阴影昆虫猎人)
来源仓库:https://github.com/nakedoshadow/shadows-bug-hunter
安装命令:
openclaw skills install shadows-bug-hunter
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install shadows-bug-hunter

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

使用日志注入、屏幕截图分析等技术进行结构化调试的辅助工具。适合处理错误、UI 损坏或回归问题时的任务执行记录与修正。通过 clawhub 安装后可用于持续沉淀问题与最佳实践。需注意其可能触发文件读写或网络请求,应提前确认权限范围。

shadows-bug-hunter 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。建议参考原始 README 了解具体触发条件和调试流程。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install shadows-bug-hunter;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

shadows-bug-hunter 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install shadows-bug-hunter。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

shadows-bug-hunter 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

shadows-bug-hunter 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

shadows-bug-hunter 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

shadows-bug-hunter 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 9,645 次,近一周安装 394 次,下载 3,120 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

shadows-bug-hunter 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
shadows-bug-hunter

阴影昆虫猎人 · 本页

9,645—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
bug-hunter
description
Structured debugging with 4 techniques — Log Injection, Screenshot Analysis, Manual Trace, Test-Driven Fix. Use when facing errors, broken UI, regressions, or runtime issues.
metadata
{ "openclaw": { "emoji": "🐛", "homepage": "https://clawhub.ai/NakedoShadow", "requires": { "bins": ["git"] }, "os": ["darwin", "linux", "win32"] } }

Bug Hunter — Structured Debugging Protocol

Version: 1.1.0 | Author: Shadows Company | License: MIT


WHEN TO TRIGGER

  • Runtime errors, exceptions, stack traces
  • UI rendering issues or visual bugs
  • Regression after recent changes
  • User says "debug", "fix this bug", "it's broken", "not working"
  • Test failures with unclear root cause
  • Performance degradation

WHEN NOT TO TRIGGER

  • Feature requests (use brainstorming skill)
  • Code style / formatting issues
  • Simple typos with obvious fix

PREREQUISITES

Required:

  • git — Used in Triage step to inspect recent changes via git log --oneline -10. Detection: which git or git --version.

Optional (auto-detected per project):

  • pytest — Python test runner, used in Technique 4. Detected via python -m pytest --version or presence of pytest.ini / pyproject.toml [tool.pytest].
  • jest — JavaScript test runner, used in Technique 4. Detected via npx jest --version or presence of jest.config.*.
  • vitest — Vite-based test runner, used in Technique 4. Detected via npx vitest --version or presence of vitest.config.*.

If no test runner is detected, Technique 4 (Test-Driven Fix) is limited to writing the test file — execution must be deferred.


PROTOCOL — 4 TECHNIQUES

Before choosing a technique, run Triage first:

Triage (MANDATORY — 60 seconds max)

  1. Read the error message completely — what does it actually say?
  2. When did it start? Check recent git changes: git log --oneline -10
  3. Is it reproducible? Try the failing action once
  4. Classify severity: Crash / Wrong result / Visual / Performance

Based on triage, select the most appropriate technique:


Technique 1 — LOG INJECTION (Best for: backend, data flow, async issues)

  1. Add strategic console.log / print() at key decision points
  2. Log inputs AND outputs of suspected functions
  3. Run the failing scenario
  4. Read logs to identify where expected != actual
  5. Fix the root cause
  6. CLEANUP: Remove ALL debug logs before committing
[LOG] function_name() called with: {params}
[LOG] function_name() returned: {result}
[LOG] condition_check: variable = {value}
WARNING: This technique temporarily modifies source files. All injected debug code MUST be removed before any commit. See CLEANUP GUARANTEE below.

Technique 2 — SCREENSHOT ANALYSIS (Best for: UI bugs, layout issues)

  1. Capture or describe the current (broken) state
  2. Identify what SHOULD be displayed vs what IS displayed
  3. Inspect the component tree top-down
  4. Check: CSS specificity, z-index, overflow, flexbox/grid alignment
  5. Fix the styling or rendering logic
  6. Verify at breakpoints: 375px, 768px, 1024px, 1440px

Technique 3 — MANUAL TRACE (Best for: logic errors, algorithm bugs)

  1. Read the failing function line by line
  2. Manually compute expected values at each step
  3. Identify the exact line where expectation diverges from reality
  4. Check edge cases: null, undefined, empty array, zero, negative
  5. Fix the logic and add a test for the edge case

Technique 4 — TEST-DRIVEN FIX (Best for: regressions, complex interactions)

  1. Write a failing test that reproduces the bug FIRST
  2. Run the test to confirm it fails: python -m pytest {test_file} -x -q or npx jest {test_file} or npx vitest run {test_file}
  3. Fix the code until the test passes (green)
  4. Run the full test suite to check for regressions: python -m pytest -x -q or npx jest or npx vitest run
  5. Refactor if needed (refactor)
NOTE: Technique 4 executes the project's test suite, which runs repository code. Only use on trusted repositories or within a sandboxed environment.

PROCESS

TRIAGE → SELECT TECHNIQUE → INVESTIGATE → HYPOTHESIZE → FIX → VERIFY → CLEANUP

Verification Checklist (after fix)

  • [ ] The original bug is fixed
  • [ ] No new errors introduced
  • [ ] Existing tests still pass
  • [ ] Debug artifacts removed (logs, console.log, print, TODO)
  • [ ] Edge cases covered

CLEANUP GUARANTEE

After every fix, the agent MUST perform a final verification pass:

  1. Search modified files for debug markers: grep -n "\\[LOG\\]\|console\\.log\|print(\|debugger\|# DEBUG\|// DEBUG" {modified_files}
  2. Remove any remaining debug artifacts
  3. Confirm the working tree is clean of injected debug code before reporting completion

This step is non-negotiable and applies to all techniques, not just Technique 1.


RULES

  1. Read before guessing — always read the actual error, never assume
  2. One fix at a time — change ONE thing, test, repeat
  3. Root cause, not symptoms — fix WHY it broke, not just the surface
  4. No shotgun debugging — don't change random things hoping it works
  5. Clean up — remove ALL debug code before committing
  6. Regression test — add a test to prevent the same bug from returning

SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS

  • Commands executed: git log (read-only). Technique 4 runs project test suites (pytest, jest, vitest) which execute repository code.
  • Data read: Source files in the local repository.
  • File modification: Technique 1 (Log Injection) temporarily modifies source files to inject debug statements. All injected code MUST be removed before commit (see CLEANUP GUARANTEE).
  • Network access: None.
  • Persistence: None.
  • Credentials: None required.
  • Sandboxing: Recommended when using Technique 4 on untrusted repositories, as test execution runs arbitrary project code.

OUTPUT FORMAT

## Bug Report
- **Error**: [exact error message]
- **Severity**: [Crash/Wrong Result/Visual/Performance]
- **Reproducible**: [Yes/No + steps]

## Root Cause
[Explanation of why the bug occurs]

## Fix Applied
[Description of the fix with file:line references]

## Verification
- [x] Original bug resolved
- [x] Tests pass
- [x] No debug artifacts remain

Published by Shadows Company — "We work in the shadows to serve the Light."

平台分布

OpenClaw

96.71%
按下载量换算3,017

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills