Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

sf-docs(科幻文档)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

sf-docs 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 6,305。

总安装 22,639周安装 907GitHub Stars 401下载 7,329核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sf-docs(科幻文档)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jaganpro/sf-skills
仓库路径:skills/sf-docs
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jaganpro/sf-skills --skill sf-docs
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jaganpro/sf-skills --skill sf-docs

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助文档、README 和 Markdown 内容的整理与改写。可提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语或检查链接有效性。sf-docs 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。使用时应保留项目已有事实,不把未确认信息写成确定结论。涉及对外文案时,需控制语气避免过度营销或夸大能力。

安装方式:通过 npx 从指定 GitHub 仓库添加技能。

来源仓库内路径:skills/sf-docs

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/jaganpro/sf-skills --skill sf-docs;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

sf-docs 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/jaganpro/sf-skills --skill sf-docs。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

sf-docs 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

sf-docs 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

sf-docs 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

sf-docs 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 22,639 次,近一周安装 907 次,下载 7,329 次,GitHub 401 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

sf-docs 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
sf-docs

科幻文档 · 本页

22,639401操作浏览器未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

sf-docs

Use this skill to retrieve and ground answers in official Salesforce documentation on the public web.

This skill is intentionally simple:

  • no local corpus
  • no indexing
  • no benchmark workflow
  • no helper CLI dependency
  • no PDF fallback

Its job is to provide a reliable online retrieval playbook for Salesforce docs that are hard to fetch, especially help.salesforce.com, JS-heavy developer.salesforce.com, Lightning Design System docs on lightningdesignsystem.com, and other official Salesforce-owned doc pages such as architect.salesforce.com and admin.salesforce.com.

An optional wrapper script is available at:

  • skills/sf-docs/scripts/extract_salesforce_doc.py

It automatically routes help.salesforce.com URLs into the dedicated Help extractor and supports other official documentation pages such as *.salesforce.com and lightningdesignsystem.com through a generic browser-rendered path. For bot-sensitive pages, it also supports best-effort optional stealth mode via --stealth when playwright-stealth is installed.

The dedicated Help extractor is also available directly at:

  • skills/sf-docs/scripts/extract_help_salesforce.py

Core Goal

Find the best official Salesforce HTML page online and extract enough real content to answer confidently.

If the evidence is weak, say so clearly instead of forcing a weak answer.

When to Use

Use sf-docs when a user asks for:

  • official Salesforce documentation
  • Apex, API, LWC, metadata, Agentforce, setup, or help articles
  • docs from developer.salesforce.com
  • docs from help.salesforce.com
  • pages that look JS-heavy, shell-rendered, or difficult to read with ordinary fetches

Official Sources Only

Prefer Salesforce-owned documentation sources:

  • developer.salesforce.com
  • help.salesforce.com
  • architect.salesforce.com
  • admin.salesforce.com
  • lightningdesignsystem.com
  • other relevant official Salesforce documentation pages when Salesforce uses them as the source of truth

Avoid third-party blogs, videos, or summary articles unless the user explicitly asks for them.

Do not fall back to PDFs.

Retrieval Workflow

1. Classify the request first

Before fetching anything, identify the likely doc family.

FamilyTypical SourceUse For
Developer docsdeveloper.salesforce.com/docs/...Apex, APIs, LWC, metadata, Agentforce developer docs
Help docshelp.salesforce.com/...setup, admin, product configuration
Architect/Admin docsarchitect.salesforce.com/..., admin.salesforce.com/...best practices, patterns, well-architected guidance, admin enablement
Design system docslightningdesignsystem.com/...SLDS, Cosmos, design tokens, component and styling guidance
Legacy atlas docsdeveloper.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.*older official guide and reference docs

2. Identify the exact concept

Extract the real target before you search:

  • exact API/class/method name
  • exact feature name
  • exact product phrase
  • exact setup concept

Examples:

  • Lightning Message Service
  • Wire Service
  • System.StubProvider
  • Agentforce Actions
  • Messaging for In-App and Web allowed domains

3. Prefer targeted official retrieval

Do not broad-crawl Salesforce docs.

Instead:

  1. identify the most likely official guide root or article
  2. if search is needed, restrict it to official Salesforce domains only
  3. fetch that official page
  4. check whether the exact concept actually appears on the page
  5. if not, inspect and follow the most relevant 1–3 official child links
  6. stop once you have grounded evidence

4. Do not stop at broad landing pages

A guide landing page is not enough unless it clearly contains the exact requested concept.

This is especially important for:

  • LWC docs
  • Agentforce docs
  • broad platform guide homepages
  • help landing pages that link to the real article

5. For developer.salesforce.com

Use this playbook:

  • start with the most likely official guide root
  • if the page is JS-heavy, prefer browser-rendered extraction
  • check whether the exact concept appears on the page
  • if the concept is missing, inspect official child links and follow the best matching 1–3 links
  • prefer exact concept pages over broad guide roots
  • legacy atlas pages are valid if they are the real official reference for the concept

6. For help.salesforce.com

Help pages often fail with naive fetching.

Use this playbook:

  • prefer exact articleView?id=... URLs when available
  • use browser-rendered extraction when plain fetch returns shell content
  • treat outputs like Loading, Sorry to interrupt, CSS Error, or mostly chrome/navigation text as failed extraction, not evidence
  • look for the real article body, not just header, nav, or footer text
  • reject shell pages and soft-404 pages such as:

- "We looked high and low but couldn't find that page" - generic empty help shells

  • if starting from a nearby guide or hub page, follow linked Help articles until you reach the real article body
  • if extraction still fails after targeted retries, return the best official Help URLs you found and explicitly say that article-body extraction was unsuccessful

Acceptance Rules

A page is good enough to answer from only when at least one of these is true:

  • the exact identifier appears on the page
  • the exact concept phrase appears on the page
  • multiple query-specific phrases appear in the correct official context

A page is not good enough when:

  • it is only a broad landing page
  • it is a shell page with little real article text
  • it is from the wrong product area
  • it does not contain the requested identifier or concept
  • it is a third-party explanation when an official page should exist

Rejection Rules

Reject these as final evidence:

  • broad guide homepages without the exact concept
  • release notes when a concept/reference page is expected
  • admin blog posts when developer docs are requested
  • third-party blogs when official docs are available
  • shell-rendered pages with no real article body
  • pages whose titles sound right but whose body does not contain the requested concept

Grounding Requirements

When answering, include:

  1. guide/article title
  2. exact official URL
  3. source type:

- developer doc page - atlas reference page - help article page

  1. any caveat if extraction was partial or browser-rendered

If evidence is weak, say so plainly.

Examples

Example: Lightning Message Service

Do not stop at the general LWC guide root. Find the exact LWC page for Lightning Message Service or follow the most relevant child links from the LWC docs until the exact concept appears.

Example: Wire Service

Do not answer from the LWC homepage unless Wire Service is actually present there. Follow the relevant child doc page for wire service or wire adapters.

Example: Agentforce Actions

Do not answer from a broad Agentforce landing page or a blog post. Find the official Agentforce developer page for actions, or follow the best matching child pages from the official Agentforce docs.

Example: Messaging for In-App and Web allowed domains

Prefer official Help articles and browser-rendered extraction. Reject generic help shells. Follow linked Help articles from nearby official messaging docs if needed.

Example: System.StubProvider

Prefer the official Salesforce reference/developer page where the exact identifier appears. Do not substitute a broader Apex landing page if the identifier is absent.

Non-Goals

This skill should not:

  • maintain a local documentation corpus
  • rely on a local index
  • use PDF fallback
  • run benchmark workflows
  • depend on repo-specific scripts to be useful

Cross-Skill Role

Other sf-* skills should use sf-docs when they need authoritative Salesforce documentation instead of relying on generic search alone.

平台分布

Codex

37.22%
按下载量换算2,728

Claude

30.42%
按下载量换算2,229

Cursor

20.45%
按下载量换算1,499

Gemini CLI

9.35%
按下载量换算685

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills