Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

sentiment-monitoring(情绪监测)

sentiment-monitoring 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

sentiment-monitoring 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 47,935。

总安装 710周安装 29GitHub Stars 114下载 230核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sentiment-monitoring(情绪监测)
来源仓库:https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills
仓库路径:skills/sentiment-monitoring
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill sentiment-monitoring
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill sentiment-monitoring

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,支持基于关键词的任务匹配。适合在需要快速定位候选结果时使用,提升研究效率。sentiment-monitoring 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发不必要的联网操作。

注意工具输出不能直接作为最终结论,需人工复核关键信息。

来源仓库内路径:skills/sentiment-monitoring

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill senti…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

sentiment-monitoring 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill sentiment-monit…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

sentiment-monitoring 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

sentiment-monitoring 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

sentiment-monitoring 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

sentiment-monitoring 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 710 次,近一周安装 29 次,下载 230 次,GitHub 114 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

sentiment-monitoring 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
sentiment-monitoring

情绪监测 · 本页

710114需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Sentiment Monitoring

When to Use

  • Founder wants to track what customers and the public are saying about their product
  • Founder wants to catch bad reviews early and respond before they spread
  • Founder wants to understand community sentiment trends over time
  • Founder wants to monitor specific review platforms for new reviews

This is different from review-mining (mining competitor reviews for pain points). This skill monitors your OWN product's reputation.

Context Required

  • Product name and any common misspellings or abbreviations
  • Platforms to monitor — the founder must provide the list of places to watch. Common options:

- Product Hunt (product page reviews and comments) - Google Maps / Google Business reviews - G2, Capterra, TrustRadius - Trustpilot - App Store / Play Store - Reddit mentions - Twitter/X mentions - Hacker News mentions - Industry-specific forums

  • Monitoring frequency (daily for post-launch, weekly for steady state)
  • Response policy — does the founder want draft responses for negative reviews?
  • Escalation threshold — what severity warrants immediate attention?

Workflow

  1. Set up the monitoring list — the founder provides which platforms to watch. For each platform, note:

- Direct URL to the product's review/listing page - Current rating and review count (baseline) - How to check for new reviews (RSS, manual, API, or alert tool)

  1. Define the severity scale — categorize incoming sentiment:

- Critical (respond within 24h): public accusations of data loss, security issues, billing fraud, or legal threats. 1-star reviews with detailed complaints that could go viral. - Negative (respond within 48h): legitimate complaints about bugs, missing features, poor support, or pricing frustration. 1-2 star reviews. - Mixed (respond within 1 week): 3-star reviews with constructive feedback. "Good product but..." - Positive (acknowledge): 4-5 star reviews. Thank the reviewer, ask for referrals.

  1. Scan platforms — check each platform on the founder's list for new reviews, mentions, or discussions since the last scan.
  2. Analyze each finding — for every new review or mention:

- Platform and date - Sentiment: positive / mixed / negative / critical - Core issue: what specifically is the person saying (quote verbatim) - Validity: is this a legitimate product issue, user error, or bad-faith review? - Impact: how visible is this? (high-traffic platform, many upvotes, or buried) - Pattern: does this match other recent complaints? (signals a systemic issue)

  1. Draft responses — for negative and critical reviews, draft a response that:

- Acknowledges the issue without being defensive - Shows the complaint was heard and understood - Offers a specific next step (DM, email, fix timeline) - Is written in the founder's voice, not corporate PR speak

  1. Flag patterns — if 3+ reviews mention the same issue, escalate it as a product issue, not just a review problem.
  2. Generate the sentiment report — summary of findings with trends.

Output Format

## Sentiment Report — [Date Range]

### Overview
- **Reviews scanned:** [count across all platforms]
- **New since last scan:** [count]
- **Sentiment breakdown:** [X positive, Y mixed, Z negative, W critical]
- **Average rating trend:** [up/down/stable vs. last period]

### Critical & Negative Items (action required)

**[Platform] — [Star Rating] — [Date]**
> "[Verbatim quote or summary]"
- **Core issue:** [what they're actually complaining about]
- **Validity:** [Legitimate / User error / Bad faith]
- **Pattern:** [First mention / Recurring — also seen on X, Y]
- **Suggested response:**
  > [Draft response in founder's voice]

### Emerging Patterns
| Issue | Mentions This Period | Platforms | First Seen | Trend |
|-------|---------------------|-----------|------------|-------|
| [Issue] | [count] | [platforms] | [date] | [new / growing / stable] |

### Positive Highlights
- [Platform]: "[positive quote]" — consider using as testimonial
- [Platform]: "[positive quote]" — share on social

### Recommended Actions
- [ ] Respond to [N] critical/negative reviews (drafts above)
- [ ] Investigate [issue] — mentioned [N] times across [platforms]
- [ ] Request reviews from happy customers to offset [negative trend]

Frameworks & Best Practices

Response principles for negative reviews:

  • Speed matters — respond within 24-48 hours. Unanswered negative reviews signal "they don't care."
  • Acknowledge, don't argue — "I hear you" beats "Actually, you're wrong" every time
  • Take it offline — "I'd love to look into this — can you email me at founder@company.com?" moves the conversation out of public view
  • Be the founder — sign with your name and title. "— Alex, CEO" hits differently than a generic support reply
  • Fix the issue, then update — come back to the review after fixing the problem: "We shipped a fix for this last week"

Platform-specific notes:

PlatformReview visibilityResponse capabilityNotes
Product HuntHigh (launch day)Comments onlyCritical during and after launch. Engage in comments actively.
Google MapsHigh (local SEO)Owner responseDirectly affects local search ranking. Respond to everything.
G2High (B2B buyers)Vendor responseEnterprise buyers read these. Detailed responses matter.
TrustpilotHigh (consumer)Business responseInvite happy customers to balance. TrustScore affects visibility.
App StoreHigh (affects downloads)Developer responseApple limits response frequency. Be concise.
RedditVariableComment as userDon't astroturf. Be transparent about who you are.

When negative reviews are actually gifts:

  • Specific, actionable complaints point to real product gaps — treat them as free user research
  • A pattern of "love the product but X is broken" means you have product-market fit with a fixable issue
  • No negative reviews at all usually means no one is using the product

Common mistakes:

  • Monitoring without responding (worse than not monitoring)
  • Getting defensive or arguing publicly with reviewers
  • Only monitoring one platform (customers complain wherever they are, not where you're watching)
  • Treating all negative reviews equally (a billing fraud accusation ≠ a UI complaint)
  • Not feeding review insights back into the product roadmap

Related Skills

  • review-mining — for mining COMPETITOR reviews (this skill monitors YOUR reviews)
  • feedback-synthesis — for synthesizing feedback patterns into product decisions
  • churn-analysis — negative reviews often correlate with churn signals
  • community-discovery — to find communities where people discuss your product

Examples

Prompt: "Set up monitoring for our reviews. We're on Product Hunt, G2, Trustpilot, and the App Store."

Good output includes: Monitoring checklist for all 4 platforms with current baselines, severity scale customized to the product, and a template for the weekly sentiment report.

Prompt: "We got 3 bad reviews on G2 this week. Help me respond."

Good output includes: Analysis of each review (core issue, validity, pattern detection), draft responses in the founder's voice, and a flag if the issues point to a systemic product problem.

平台分布

Codex

35.69%
按下载量换算82

Claude

30.97%
按下载量换算71

Cursor

17.97%
按下载量换算41

Gemini CLI

9.67%
按下载量换算22

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills