Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

sentiment-monitoring情绪监测

Agent Skill

sentiment-monitoring 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

710

周安装

29

GitHub Stars

114

下载量

230
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sentiment-monitoring(情绪监测)
来源仓库:https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills
仓库路径:skills/sentiment-monitoring
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill sentiment-monitoring
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill sentiment-monitoring

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,支持基于关键词的任务匹配。

  • 适合在需要快速定位候选结果时使用,提升研究效率。sentiment-monitoring 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 可结合来源仓库和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发不必要的联网操作。
  • 注意工具输出不能直接作为最终结论,需人工复核关键信息。

SKILL.md

Sentiment Monitoring

When to Use

  • Founder wants to track what customers and the public are saying about their product
  • Founder wants to catch bad reviews early and respond before they spread
  • Founder wants to understand community sentiment trends over time
  • Founder wants to monitor specific review platforms for new reviews

This is different from review-mining (mining competitor reviews for pain points). This skill monitors your OWN product's reputation.

Context Required

  • Product name and any common misspellings or abbreviations
  • Platforms to monitor — the founder must provide the list of places to watch. Common options:

- Product Hunt (product page reviews and comments) - Google Maps / Google Business reviews - G2, Capterra, TrustRadius - Trustpilot - App Store / Play Store - Reddit mentions - Twitter/X mentions - Hacker News mentions - Industry-specific forums

  • Monitoring frequency (daily for post-launch, weekly for steady state)
  • Response policy — does the founder want draft responses for negative reviews?
  • Escalation threshold — what severity warrants immediate attention?

Workflow

  1. Set up the monitoring list — the founder provides which platforms to watch. For each platform, note:

- Direct URL to the product's review/listing page - Current rating and review count (baseline) - How to check for new reviews (RSS, manual, API, or alert tool)

  1. Define the severity scale — categorize incoming sentiment:

- Critical (respond within 24h): public accusations of data loss, security issues, billing fraud, or legal threats. 1-star reviews with detailed complaints that could go viral. - Negative (respond within 48h): legitimate complaints about bugs, missing features, poor support, or pricing frustration. 1-2 star reviews. - Mixed (respond within 1 week): 3-star reviews with constructive feedback. "Good product but..." - Positive (acknowledge): 4-5 star reviews. Thank the reviewer, ask for referrals.

  1. Scan platforms — check each platform on the founder's list for new reviews, mentions, or discussions since the last scan.
  2. Analyze each finding — for every new review or mention:

- Platform and date - Sentiment: positive / mixed / negative / critical - Core issue: what specifically is the person saying (quote verbatim) - Validity: is this a legitimate product issue, user error, or bad-faith review? - Impact: how visible is this? (high-traffic platform, many upvotes, or buried) - Pattern: does this match other recent complaints? (signals a systemic issue)

  1. Draft responses — for negative and critical reviews, draft a response that:

- Acknowledges the issue without being defensive - Shows the complaint was heard and understood - Offers a specific next step (DM, email, fix timeline) - Is written in the founder's voice, not corporate PR speak

  1. Flag patterns — if 3+ reviews mention the same issue, escalate it as a product issue, not just a review problem.
  2. Generate the sentiment report — summary of findings with trends.

Output Format

## Sentiment Report — [Date Range]

### Overview
- **Reviews scanned:** [count across all platforms]
- **New since last scan:** [count]
- **Sentiment breakdown:** [X positive, Y mixed, Z negative, W critical]
- **Average rating trend:** [up/down/stable vs. last period]

### Critical & Negative Items (action required)

**[Platform] — [Star Rating] — [Date]**
> "[Verbatim quote or summary]"
- **Core issue:** [what they're actually complaining about]
- **Validity:** [Legitimate / User error / Bad faith]
- **Pattern:** [First mention / Recurring — also seen on X, Y]
- **Suggested response:**
  > [Draft response in founder's voice]

### Emerging Patterns
| Issue | Mentions This Period | Platforms | First Seen | Trend |
|-------|---------------------|-----------|------------|-------|
| [Issue] | [count] | [platforms] | [date] | [new / growing / stable] |

### Positive Highlights
- [Platform]: "[positive quote]" — consider using as testimonial
- [Platform]: "[positive quote]" — share on social

### Recommended Actions
- [ ] Respond to [N] critical/negative reviews (drafts above)
- [ ] Investigate [issue] — mentioned [N] times across [platforms]
- [ ] Request reviews from happy customers to offset [negative trend]

Frameworks & Best Practices

Response principles for negative reviews:

  • Speed matters — respond within 24-48 hours. Unanswered negative reviews signal "they don't care."
  • Acknowledge, don't argue — "I hear you" beats "Actually, you're wrong" every time
  • Take it offline — "I'd love to look into this — can you email me at founder@company.com?" moves the conversation out of public view
  • Be the founder — sign with your name and title. "— Alex, CEO" hits differently than a generic support reply
  • Fix the issue, then update — come back to the review after fixing the problem: "We shipped a fix for this last week"

Platform-specific notes:

PlatformReview visibilityResponse capabilityNotes
Product HuntHigh (launch day)Comments onlyCritical during and after launch. Engage in comments actively.
Google MapsHigh (local SEO)Owner responseDirectly affects local search ranking. Respond to everything.
G2High (B2B buyers)Vendor responseEnterprise buyers read these. Detailed responses matter.
TrustpilotHigh (consumer)Business responseInvite happy customers to balance. TrustScore affects visibility.
App StoreHigh (affects downloads)Developer responseApple limits response frequency. Be concise.
RedditVariableComment as userDon't astroturf. Be transparent about who you are.

When negative reviews are actually gifts:

  • Specific, actionable complaints point to real product gaps — treat them as free user research
  • A pattern of "love the product but X is broken" means you have product-market fit with a fixable issue
  • No negative reviews at all usually means no one is using the product

Common mistakes:

  • Monitoring without responding (worse than not monitoring)
  • Getting defensive or arguing publicly with reviewers
  • Only monitoring one platform (customers complain wherever they are, not where you're watching)
  • Treating all negative reviews equally (a billing fraud accusation ≠ a UI complaint)
  • Not feeding review insights back into the product roadmap

Related Skills

  • review-mining — for mining COMPETITOR reviews (this skill monitors YOUR reviews)
  • feedback-synthesis — for synthesizing feedback patterns into product decisions
  • churn-analysis — negative reviews often correlate with churn signals
  • community-discovery — to find communities where people discuss your product

Examples

Prompt: "Set up monitoring for our reviews. We're on Product Hunt, G2, Trustpilot, and the App Store."

Good output includes: Monitoring checklist for all 4 platforms with current baselines, severity scale customized to the product, and a template for the weekly sentiment report.

Prompt: "We got 3 bad reviews on G2 this week. Help me respond."

Good output includes: Analysis of each review (core issue, validity, pattern detection), draft responses in the founder's voice, and a flag if the issues point to a systemic product problem.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.69%
按下载量换算82

Claude

30.97%
按下载量换算71

Cursor

17.97%
按下载量换算41

Gemini CLI

9.67%
按下载量换算22

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills