Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 效率

self-improving-robotics(自我改进的机器人)

self-improving-robotics 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 OpenClaw 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

self-improving-robotics 是效率类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在效率类的 21,003 个 Skill 里排第 15,830。

总安装 3,011周安装 128GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,055核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.1.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:self-improving-robotics(自我改进的机器人)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jose-compu/self-improving-robotics
安装命令:
openclaw skills install self-improving-robotics
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install self-improving-robotics

这个 Skill 是做什么的

效率类 Skill 把重复的整理、汇总、转换工作交给助手完成,减少手工复制粘贴。

记录机器人自主故障与工程事件,持续改进感知、定位与规划能力。适用于自动驾驶、工业机械臂等复杂系统,支持故障回溯与方法优化。通过 OpenClaw 集成,需确认其与硬件接口或日志系统的兼容性。涉及物理设备操作时,务必限制权限并设置安全边界。

self-improving-robotics 属于效率类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install self-improving-robotics;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

self-improving-robotics 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install self-improving-robotics。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

self-improving-robotics 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

self-improving-robotics 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

self-improving-robotics 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

self-improving-robotics 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,011 次,近一周安装 128 次,下载 1,055 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

self-improving-robotics 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理效率类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

效率类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
github

GitHub 代码协作 · OpenClaw

7,632,918545需要联网MIT-0通过
nano-pdf

Nano PDF 文档 · OpenClaw

4,249,476231需要联网MIT-0通过
auto-updater

自动更新程序 · OpenClaw

2,964,063386操作浏览器MIT-0通过
video-frames

视频帧 · OpenClaw

2,621,304112需要联网MIT-0通过
gemini

Gemini 助手 · OpenClaw

2,547,39648需要联网MIT-0有提醒
self-improving-robotics

自我改进的机器人 · 本页

3,011—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
self-improving-robotics
description
Captures robotics autonomy failures, operational incidents, and engineering learnings to enable continuous improvement across perception, localization, planning, control, simulation, safety, and hardware integration. Use when: (1) Robot fails to localize in dynamic environment, (2) Planner fails in narrow passage or obstacle-rich scene, (3) Oscillatory control behavior or unstable PID tuning appears, (4) Sensor desync occurs (camera-lidar-imu timestamp mismatch), (5) Hardware driver drops packets or CAN timeout occurs, (6) Safety stop or emergency brake triggers unexpectedly, (7) Simulation succeeds but real robot fails, (8) Thermal throttling, battery sag, or power brownout appears.

Self-Improving Robotics Skill

Log robotics-specific learnings, incidents, and feature requests to markdown files for continuous improvement. This skill captures localization drift, planning failures, control instability, sensor fusion issues, hardware interface faults, safety boundary violations, sim-to-real gaps, and power/thermal constraints.

Important learnings get promoted to durable operational artifacts:

  • Safety checklists
  • Calibration playbooks
  • Tuning runbooks
  • Robotics sections in SOUL.md, AGENTS.md, and TOOLS.md

First-Use Initialisation

Before logging anything, ensure the .learnings/ directory and files exist in the project or workspace root. If any are missing, create them:

mkdir -p .learnings
[ -f .learnings/LEARNINGS.md ] || printf "# Robotics Learnings\
\
Localization drift events, planning failures, control instabilities, sensor fusion errors, hardware interface issues, safety boundary violations, sim-to-real gaps, and power/thermal constraints captured during robotics engineering work.\
\
**Categories**: localization_drift | planning_failure | control_instability | sensor_fusion_error | hardware_interface_issue | safety_boundary_violation | sim_to_real_gap | power_thermal_constraint\
**Areas**: perception | localization | mapping | planning | control | manipulation | navigation | safety | simulation | hardware_integration\
\
---\
" > .learnings/LEARNINGS.md
[ -f .learnings/ROBOTICS_ISSUES.md ] || printf "# Robotics Issues Log\
\
Recurring robotics failures, autonomy incidents, and subsystem-level defects.\
\
---\
" > .learnings/ROBOTICS_ISSUES.md
[ -f .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md ] || printf "# Feature Requests\
\
Robotics tooling, automation, and autonomy capability requests.\
\
---\
" > .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md

Never overwrite existing files. This is a no-op if .learnings/ is already initialised.

Do not log secrets, private keys, or sensitive infrastructure endpoints. Prefer redacted excerpts for logs, telemetry, and stack traces.

If you want automatic reminders, use the opt-in hook workflow described in Hook Integration.

Quick Reference

SituationAction
Robot fails to localize in dynamic environmentLog issue to .learnings/ROBOTICS_ISSUES.md and learning to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with localization_drift
Planner fails in narrow passage / obstacle-rich sceneLog to .learnings/ROBOTICS_ISSUES.md with reproducible scene metadata
Oscillatory control behavior / unstable PID tuningLog to .learnings/ROBOTICS_ISSUES.md with control loop telemetry and frequency
Sensor desync (camera-lidar-imu timestamp mismatch)Log to .learnings/ROBOTICS_ISSUES.md and tag sensor_fusion_error
Driver drops packets / CAN timeout / serial disconnectLog to .learnings/ROBOTICS_ISSUES.md with bus and firmware details
Safety stop or emergency brake unexpectedly triggeredLog to .learnings/ROBOTICS_ISSUES.md with safety state transitions
Simulation success but real robot failureLog to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category sim_to_real_gap
Thermal throttling / battery sag / brownoutLog to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category power_thermal_constraint
New capability needed for robotics workflowLog to .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md
Recurring issue (3+ occurrences)Link entries, increase priority, and promote to runbook/checklist
Broadly applicable autonomy patternPromote to safety checklist, calibration playbook, tuning runbook, or core prompt docs

OpenClaw Setup (Recommended)

OpenClaw is the primary platform for this skill. It uses workspace-based prompt injection with automatic skill loading.

Installation

Via ClawdHub (recommended):

clawdhub install self-improving-robotics

Manual clone:

git clone https://github.com/jose-compu/self-improving-robotics.git ~/.openclaw/skills/self-improving-robotics

Workspace Structure

OpenClaw injects these files into every session:

~/.openclaw/workspace/
├── AGENTS.md          # Multi-agent workflows and delegation
├── SOUL.md            # Behavioral and safety guardrails
├── TOOLS.md           # Tooling usage and integration notes
├── MEMORY.md          # Long-term memory (main session only)
├── memory/            # Daily memory files
│   └── YYYY-MM-DD.md
└── .learnings/        # This skill's log files
    ├── LEARNINGS.md
    ├── ROBOTICS_ISSUES.md
    └── FEATURE_REQUESTS.md

Create Learning Files

mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/workspace/.learnings

Then create the log files (or copy from assets/):

  • LEARNINGS.md - category-based learnings
  • ROBOTICS_ISSUES.md - concrete incidents and failures
  • FEATURE_REQUESTS.md - tooling and capability requests

Promotion Targets

When robotics learnings prove broadly applicable, promote them:

Learning TypePromote ToExample
Safety-critical incident patternsSafety checklist"Require sensor freshness checks before enabling autonomous motion"
Calibration/sync workflowsCalibration playbook"Camera-lidar-imu time sync verification sequence"
Stable tuning methodsTuning runbook"PID retune order under payload changes"
Robotics behavior principlesSOUL.md"Never bypass safety interlocks for speed"
Multi-agent robotics workflowAGENTS.md"Separate sim, HIL, and field validation owners"
Tooling integration standardsTOOLS.md"Always record synchronized telemetry bundles"
Reusable failure mitigationsNew reusable skill"narrow-passage-planning-resilience"

Optional: Enable Hook

For automatic reminders at session start:

cp -r hooks/openclaw ~/.openclaw/hooks/self-improving-robotics
openclaw hooks enable self-improving-robotics

See references/openclaw-integration.md for complete details.


Generic Setup (Other Agents)

For Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, or other agents, create .learnings/ in project or workspace root:

mkdir -p .learnings

Create files using the headers shown in this skill.

Logging Format

Use entry types:

  • LRN = learning
  • ROB = robotics issue
  • FEAT = feature request

Learning Entry [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX]

Append to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md:

## [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX] category

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: low | medium | high | critical
**Status**: pending
**Area**: perception | localization | mapping | planning | control | manipulation | navigation | safety | simulation | hardware_integration

### Summary
One-line description of the learning

### Details
Full context: what was observed, why it happened, what constraints mattered,
and how the mitigation should be applied. Include specific telemetry indicators.

### Suggested Action
Concrete process or config update to apply

### Metadata
- Source: telemetry_alert | simulation_failure | hil_test | field_test | safety_event | hardware_diagnostics | code_review | postmortem
- Platform: robot_model_or_stack (optional)
- Related Files: path/to/config_or_code
- Tags: tag1, tag2
- See Also: LRN-20250110-001 (if related)
- Pattern-Key: localization_drift.dynamic_scene (optional)
- Recurrence-Count: 1 (optional)
- First-Seen: 2025-01-15 (optional)
- Last-Seen: 2025-01-15 (optional)

---

Categories for learnings:

CategoryUse When
localization_driftPose confidence degrades over time or in dynamic scenes
planning_failurePlanner repeatedly cannot find safe/feasible path
control_instabilityOscillation, overshoot, divergence, or instability appears
sensor_fusion_errorMulti-sensor alignment/timing inconsistency corrupts estimate
hardware_interface_issueDriver, bus, transport, or actuator interface defects
safety_boundary_violationSafety envelope trigger or near-violation occurs
sim_to_real_gapSimulation passes but field behavior fails
power_thermal_constraintThermal, voltage, or energy limits degrade behavior

Robotics Issue Entry [ROB-YYYYMMDD-XXX]

Append to .learnings/ROBOTICS_ISSUES.md:

## [ROB-YYYYMMDD-XXX] issue_name

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: high
**Status**: pending
**Area**: perception | localization | mapping | planning | control | manipulation | navigation | safety | simulation | hardware_integration

### Summary
Brief description of the robotics issue

### Error Output

Command output, safety alerts, diagnostics, or stack traces (redacted/summarized)


### Root Cause
What subsystem or integration issue caused the failure.

### Fix
Specific mitigations, parameter adjustments, code updates, or operational changes.

### Prevention
How to avoid recurrence (checklist guardrail, test, monitor, fallback behavior).

### Context
- Trigger: telemetry_alert | simulation_failure | hil_test | field_test | safety_event | hardware_diagnostics
- Environment: sim | lab | warehouse | outdoors | unknown
- Run ID or mission segment

### Metadata
- Reproducible: yes | no | unknown
- Related Files: path/to/config_or_code
- See Also: ROB-20250110-001 (if recurring)

---

Feature Request Entry [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX]

Append to .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md:

## [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX] capability_name

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: medium
**Status**: pending
**Area**: perception | localization | mapping | planning | control | manipulation | navigation | safety | simulation | hardware_integration

### Requested Capability
What robotics capability, tool, or automation is needed

### User Context
Why it is needed and what workflow it improves

### Complexity Estimate
simple | medium | complex

### Suggested Implementation
How this could be built (tooling, pipeline, monitor, playbook, simulation harness)

### Metadata
- Frequency: first_time | recurring
- Related Features: existing_tool_or_feature

---

ID Generation

Format: TYPE-YYYYMMDD-XXX

  • TYPE: LRN (learning), ROB (robotics issue), FEAT (feature request)
  • YYYYMMDD: current date
  • XXX: sequential number or random 3 chars (example: 001, A7B)

Examples: LRN-20250415-001, ROB-20250415-A3F, FEAT-20250415-002

Resolving Entries

When an issue is fixed, update the entry:

  1. Change **Status**: pending to **Status**: resolved
  2. Add a resolution block after Metadata:
### Resolution
- **Resolved**: 2025-01-16T09:00:00Z
- **Commit/PR**: abc123 or #42
- **Validation**: simulation + HIL + controlled field test
- **Notes**: Parameter retuned, watchdog threshold adjusted, and safety test added

Other status values:

  • in_progress - actively being diagnosed or fixed
  • wont_fix - intentionally not addressed (add reason in Resolution notes)
  • promoted - elevated to checklist, playbook, runbook, or core docs
  • promoted_to_skill - extracted as reusable skill

Detection Triggers

Automatically log when you encounter:

Localization degradation (issue + learning):

  • Robot fails to localize in dynamic environment
  • Covariance growth or pose jump after sensor occlusion
  • Repeated relocalization events in stable map zones
  • Odom drift divergence against fused pose estimate

Planning failures (issue + learning):

  • Planner fails in narrow passage
  • No valid path in obstacle-rich scenes
  • Recovery loops exceed threshold
  • Frequent oscillation between alternative paths

Control instability (issue + learning):

  • Oscillatory control behavior appears
  • Unstable PID tuning under payload changes
  • Command saturation and watchdog warnings
  • Tracking error diverges during low-speed maneuvers

Sensor fusion anomalies (issue + learning):

  • Camera-lidar-imu timestamp mismatch
  • Out-of-order sensor packets
  • Frame transform inconsistencies
  • Fusion jumps due to delayed sensor stream

Hardware interface faults (issue + learning):

  • Driver drops packets
  • CAN timeout bursts
  • Serial disconnects
  • Motor driver overcurrent faults

Safety incidents (issue + learning):

  • Safety stop unexpectedly triggered
  • Emergency brake event without true obstacle
  • Boundary monitor false positives
  • Interlock state transitions out of sequence

Sim-to-real mismatches (learning):

  • Simulation success but real robot failure
  • Sensor noise or latency assumptions differ from field
  • Domain randomization lacks critical disturbances
  • Control policy brittle under real-world traction or dynamics

Power and thermal limits (learning):

  • Thermal throttling under sustained workload
  • Battery sag causes degraded control rate
  • Brownout events during high actuator demand
  • Compute frequency throttling impacts planner timing

Priority Guidelines

PriorityWhen to UseRobotics Examples
criticalSafety risk, collision potential, emergency stop instability, hardware damage riskEmergency stop false negatives, repeated collision near-miss, motor overcurrent damage risk
highRecurring failure that blocks autonomy missionsPlanner fails in narrow corridor, localization drift in common dynamic scenes
mediumSignificant but recoverable issue with available fallbackSensor desync occasional spikes, moderate control oscillation with fallback enabled
lowMinor tuning or observability improvementDashboard labeling mismatch, non-critical telemetry naming cleanup

Area Tags

Use area tags to filter and route issues:

AreaScope
perceptionObject detection, feature extraction, sensor preprocessing
localizationPose estimation, drift correction, relocalization strategies
mappingMap quality, occupancy updates, semantic map consistency
planningGlobal/local planning, feasibility, obstacle avoidance
controlPID/MPC/controller behavior, stability, actuator command tracking
manipulationGrasp planning, arm trajectories, end-effector behavior
navigationEnd-to-end mission routing and navigation state transitions
safetySafety monitors, interlocks, emergency stop logic, boundaries
simulationSimulator fidelity, scenario generation, domain randomization
hardware_integrationDrivers, buses, firmware, power systems, interfaces

Promoting to Permanent Robotics Standards

When a learning is broadly applicable (not a one-off fix), promote it to permanent project standards.

When to Promote

  • Same failure pattern appears in 2+ missions or sites
  • Mitigation proves stable across sim and real robot
  • Safety impact warrants mandatory guardrail
  • Reproducible diagnostics workflow saves repeated debugging time

Promotion Targets

TargetWhat Belongs There
Safety checklistMandatory pre-run and post-incident safety checks
Calibration playbookRepeatable calibration/time-sync procedures
Tuning runbookStable controller/planner tuning workflow and limits
SOUL.mdRobotics behavior principles and non-negotiable guardrails
AGENTS.mdMulti-agent validation workflows and decision steps
TOOLS.mdTelemetry, replay, simulation, and diagnostics tooling guidance
Simulation test suite docsScenario matrices and acceptance thresholds

How to Promote

  1. Distill the learning into concise operational rule or checklist item
  2. Place it in the right target document
  3. Update original entry:

- Change **Status**: pending to **Status**: promoted - Add **Promoted**: safety checklist (or calibration playbook, tuning runbook, SOUL.md, AGENTS.md, TOOLS.md)

Recurring Pattern Detection

If logging something similar to an existing entry:

  1. Search first: rg "keyword" .learnings/
  2. Link entries: add **See Also**: ROB-20250110-001 in Metadata
  3. Bump priority if recurrence grows and fallback weakens
  4. Escalate systemic fix when recurrence suggests process or tooling gaps.

Pattern Keys and Recurrence

Use Pattern-Key for dedupe, such as:

  • localization_drift.dynamic_aisle
  • planning_failure.narrow_passage_clearance
  • control_instability.low_speed_heading
  • sensor_fusion_error.timestamp_skew

When recurrence is tracked:

  • Increment Recurrence-Count
  • Update Last-Seen
  • Add See Also links between related LRN and ROB entries

Periodic Review Cadence

Review .learnings/ at natural robotics development milestones:

When to Review

  • Before new field deployment
  • After each incident postmortem
  • At end of each tuning cycle
  • Weekly during active autonomy development
  • Before releasing updated safety or calibration docs

Quick Status Check

# Count pending robotics entries
rg "Status\\*\\*: pending" .learnings/*.md | wc -l

# List high-priority unresolved robotics issues
rg -n "Priority\\*\\*: high|Priority\\*\\*: critical" .learnings/ROBOTICS_ISSUES.md

# Find all localization learnings
rg -n "localization_drift|Area\\*\\*: localization" .learnings/*.md

# Find unresolved safety incidents
rg -n "Area\\*\\*: safety" .learnings/ROBOTICS_ISSUES.md

Review Actions

  • Resolve fixed incidents and add validation evidence
  • Promote recurring patterns to checklist/playbook/runbook
  • Link related entries across learnings and issues
  • Archive stale low-priority items if explicitly wont_fix
  • Convert strong patterns into reusable skills

Best Practices

  1. Safety first - if there is risk to people, environment, or hardware, log and escalate immediately
  2. Capture synchronized telemetry - include timestamps and subsystem context, not isolated log snippets
  3. Record reproducibility conditions - include robot model, firmware, map, payload, and environment
  4. Use staged validation - simulation -> HIL -> controlled field before declaring resolved
  5. Separate symptom from root cause - emergency stop is symptom; stale safety mask may be cause
  6. Preserve fallback behavior context - note which fallback mitigated risk and where it failed
  7. Track sim-to-real assumptions - list what simulator omitted or simplified
  8. Treat power and thermal as first-class constraints - degraded compute can mimic software defects
  9. Prefer minimal, actionable entries - concise and precise entries are easier to promote
  10. Promote aggressively when recurrence appears - repeated failures should become standards, not isolated notes

Resolution Workflow

Follow this workflow for each ROB or LRN item:

  1. Triage

- classify severity and safety impact - assign area and category

  1. Reproduce

- replicate in closest safe environment - capture deterministic evidence when possible

  1. Diagnose

- isolate subsystem boundaries - verify whether failure is data, model, control, hardware, or integration

  1. Mitigate

- apply smallest safe change first - add guardrail if risk remains

  1. Validate

- run simulation/HIL/field checks per severity - verify no regression in adjacent subsystem

  1. Document

- update status and resolution block - link related entries and promotion target if warranted

Hook Integration

Enable automatic reminders through agent hooks. This is opt-in.

Quick Setup (Claude Code / Codex)

Create .claude/settings.json in your project:

{
  "hooks": {
    "UserPromptSubmit": [{
      "matcher": "",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "./skills/self-improving-robotics/scripts/activator.sh"
      }]
    }]
  }
}

This injects a robotics-focused reminder after each prompt (~50-100 tokens overhead).

Advanced Setup (With Error Detection)

{
  "hooks": {
    "UserPromptSubmit": [{
      "matcher": "",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "./skills/self-improving-robotics/scripts/activator.sh"
      }]
    }],
    "PostToolUse": [{
      "matcher": "Bash",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "./skills/self-improving-robotics/scripts/error-detector.sh"
      }]
    }]
  }
}

Enable PostToolUse when you want automatic scan of command output for robotics/autonomy failure patterns.

Available Hook Scripts

ScriptHook TypePurpose
scripts/activator.shUserPromptSubmitReminds to evaluate robotics learnings
scripts/error-detector.shPostToolUse (Bash)Detects common robotics/autonomy error terms in output

See references/hooks-setup.md for complete setup and troubleshooting.

Automatic Skill Extraction

When a robotics learning is valuable enough to become reusable, extract it.

Skill Extraction Criteria

CriterionDescription
RecurringSame failure mode appears in 2+ subsystems, robots, or deployments
VerifiedStatus is resolved with validated mitigation
Non-obviousRequired meaningful diagnosis beyond trivial config typo
Broadly applicableUseful across projects or autonomy stacks
Safety/ops valuePrevents incidents or reduces operational risk
User-flaggedUser says "save this as a skill" or equivalent

Extraction Workflow

  1. Identify candidate: learning meets extraction criteria
  2. Run helper (or create manually):
   ./skills/self-improving-robotics/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name --dry-run
   ./skills/self-improving-robotics/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name
  1. Customize SKILL.md: fill template with telemetry-backed robotics content
  2. Update learning: set status to promoted_to_skill, add Skill-Path
  3. Verify: ensure extracted skill is clear and safe to apply

Extraction Detection Triggers

In conversation:

  • "This keeps happening in field tests"
  • "Document this as a reusable robotics workflow"
  • "Save this mitigation as a skill"
  • "We keep seeing this planner/localization/control failure"

In entries:

  • Multiple See Also links
  • High/critical resolved issues with strong validations
  • Repeated Pattern-Key across environments
  • Similar ROB and LRN entries over multiple dates

Multi-Agent Support

AgentActivationDetection
Claude CodeHooks (UserPromptSubmit, PostToolUse)Automatic via error-detector.sh
Codex CLIHooks (same pattern)Automatic via hook scripts
GitHub CopilotManual (.github/copilot-instructions.md)Manual review
OpenClawWorkspace injection + inter-agent messagingVia sessions and shared .learnings/

Stackability Contract (Standalone + Multi-Skill)

This skill is standalone-compatible and stackable with other self-improving skills.

Namespaced Logging (recommended for 2+ skills)

  • Namespace for this skill: .learnings/robotics/
  • Keep current standalone behavior if you prefer flat files.
  • Optional shared index for all skills: .learnings/INDEX.md

Required Metadata

Every new entry must include:

**Skill**: robotics

Hook Arbitration (when 2+ skills are enabled)

  • Use one dispatcher hook as the single entrypoint.
  • Dispatcher responsibilities: route by matcher, dedupe repeated events, and rate-limit reminders.
  • Suggested defaults: dedupe key = event + matcher + file + 5m_window; max 1 reminder per skill every 5 minutes.

Narrow Matcher Scope (robotics)

Only trigger this skill automatically for robotics signals such as:

  • planner|localization|slam|trajectory|control loop
  • sensor fusion|actuator fault|sim2real|safety stop
  • explicit robotics intent in user prompt

Cross-Skill Precedence

When guidance conflicts, apply:

  1. security
  2. engineering
  3. coding
  4. ai
  5. user-explicit domain skill
  6. meta as tie-breaker

Ownership Rules

  • This skill writes only to .learnings/robotics/ in stackable mode.
  • It may read other skill folders for cross-linking, but should not rewrite their entries.

平台分布

OpenClaw

75.6%
按下载量换算798

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills