Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

self-improving-business(自强不息的事业)

self-improving-business 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 OpenClaw 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

self-improving-business 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 32,245。

总安装 2,546周安装 103GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 799核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:self-improving-business(自强不息的事业)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jose-compu/self-improving-business
安装命令:
openclaw skills install self-improving-business
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install self-improving-business

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于捕获业务管理中的问题,如政策差距、KPI 不一致与决策延迟等。适用于运营优化、流程改进与利益相关者协调等场景。通过系统化记录业务教训,提升代理在战略制定与执行中的有效性。安装命令:openclaw skills install self-improving-business,需确认是否访问企业系统。

使用前应评估其对业务流程的侵入性,避免干扰正常运作。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install self-improving-business;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

self-improving-business 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install self-improving-business。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

self-improving-business 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

self-improving-business 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

self-improving-business 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

self-improving-business 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,546 次,近一周安装 103 次,下载 799 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

self-improving-business 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
self-improving-business

自强不息的事业 · 本页

2,546—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
self-improving-business
description
Captures business administration issues, policy gaps, KPI misalignment, decision delays, handoff failures, and stakeholder misalignment to improve operational decision quality. Use when: (1) approval or execution bottlenecks appear, (2) KPI definitions conflict across teams, (3) process governance is inconsistent, (4) SLA commitments are missed or trending late, (5) budget variance requires triage, (6) vendor or cross-team handoff breaks, (7) policy documentation drifts from actual practice.

Self-Improving Business Skill

Log business administration learnings, operational issues, and governance improvements to markdown files for continuous improvement. This skill focuses on business administration operations, cross-functional coordination, process governance, KPI tracking, execution risk, policy consistency, stakeholder communication, and operational decision quality.

CRITICAL: Safety Posture (Reminder-Only)

This skill is documentation and reminder only.

It does not execute or authorize:

  • spending approvals
  • vendor commitments
  • payroll actions
  • legal actions
  • procurement commitments
  • policy sign-offs
  • executive approvals

Use this skill to capture structured findings and recommendations. Human owners remain responsible for all high-impact business decisions.

Always require explicit human approval for high-impact decisions, including:

  • budget reallocations
  • vendor selection or termination
  • policy exceptions
  • operating model changes
  • governance escalations
  • staffing or compensation effects

First-Use Initialisation

Before logging anything, ensure the .learnings/ directory and files exist in the project or workspace root. If any are missing, create them:

mkdir -p .learnings
[ -f .learnings/LEARNINGS.md ] || printf "# Business Learnings\
\
Business administration learnings across process, governance, KPI tracking, and decision quality.\
\
**Categories**: process_breakdown | policy_gap | kpi_misalignment | decision_latency | handoff_failure | stakeholder_misalignment | documentation_drift | compliance_oversight\
**Areas**: planning | execution | governance | reporting | operations | budgeting | procurement | vendor_management | risk_management | communication\
\
---\
" > .learnings/LEARNINGS.md
[ -f .learnings/BUSINESS_ISSUES.md ] || printf "# Business Issues Log\
\
Operational execution issues, policy inconsistencies, KPI risks, and governance concerns.\
\
---\
" > .learnings/BUSINESS_ISSUES.md
[ -f .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md ] || printf "# Business Operations Feature Requests\
\
Business administration automation and process-improvement requests.\
\
---\
" > .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md

Never overwrite existing files. This is a no-op if .learnings/ is already initialised.

Do not treat this skill as an approval engine. It is a structured learning and reminder system only.

If you want automatic reminders, use the opt-in workflow in Hook Integration.

Quick Reference

SituationAction
Missed SLA in operational workflowLog to .learnings/BUSINESS_ISSUES.md with decision_latency or process_breakdown
KPI value disputed due to conflicting definitionsLog to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with kpi_misalignment
Policy exists but team did not follow itLog to .learnings/BUSINESS_ISSUES.md with policy_gap
Handoff failed between departmentsLog to .learnings/BUSINESS_ISSUES.md with handoff_failure
Stakeholder expectations diverge from execution planLog to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with stakeholder_misalignment
Dashboard differs from source-of-truth reportLog to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with documentation_drift
Compliance or audit requirement missed in workflowLog to .learnings/BUSINESS_ISSUES.md with compliance_oversight
Similar entry already existsAdd **See Also**, increase recurrence metadata
Reusable operating guidance emergesPromote to playbook/checklist/KPI registry/RACI/cadence artifact

OpenClaw Setup (Recommended)

OpenClaw is the primary platform for this skill. It uses workspace-based prompt injection with automatic skill loading.

Installation

Via ClawdHub (recommended):

clawdhub install self-improving-business

Manual:

git clone https://github.com/jose-compu/self-improving-business.git ~/.openclaw/skills/self-improving-business

Create Learning Files

mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/workspace/.learnings

Then create the log files (or copy from assets/):

  • LEARNINGS.md - reusable business learnings and governance improvements
  • BUSINESS_ISSUES.md - execution problems, policy misses, and risk items
  • FEATURE_REQUESTS.md - requested capabilities for administration workflows

Promotion Targets

When business patterns are broadly applicable, promote them:

Learning TypePromote ToExample
Repeatable cross-team processProcess playbooks"Procurement intake triage in 2 business days"
Governance controls and checksGovernance checklists"Quarterly policy attestation for budget owners"
KPI definition clarityKPI definition registry"On-time delivery = committed date at order acceptance"
Ownership ambiguity resolutionRACI matrix updates"Vendor SLA exceptions accountable by Operations Director"
Execution rhythm improvementsOperating cadences"Weekly risk triage + monthly KPI review forum"
Agent collaboration patternAGENTS.md"Route budgeting conflicts to governance triage agent"

Optional: Enable Hook

For automatic reminders at session start:

cp -r hooks/openclaw ~/.openclaw/hooks/self-improving-business
openclaw hooks enable self-improving-business

See references/openclaw-integration.md for complete details.


Generic Setup (Other Agents)

For Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, or other agents, create .learnings/ in the project or workspace root:

mkdir -p .learnings

Create the files inline using the headers shown above.

Agent file reminder

Add a short note in AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md to log LRN/BUS/FEAT entries and keep this workflow reminder-only with human approval for high-impact decisions.

Logging Format

Learning Entry [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX]

Append to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md:

## [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX] category

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: low | medium | high | critical
**Status**: pending
**Area**: planning | execution | governance | reporting | operations | budgeting | procurement | vendor_management | risk_management | communication

### Summary
One-line description of the business learning

### Details
Context of the finding: what happened, which teams were involved, where the process,
policy, KPI definition, or communication failed, and what improved outcome is expected.

### Recommended Action
Specific process correction, governance control, KPI definition update, or cadence change.
Reminder-only: this does not execute approvals.

### Metadata
- Source: meeting_review | retrospective | dashboard_audit | vendor_sync | finance_review | incident_postmortem
- Stakeholders: operations | finance | procurement | legal | hr | product | sales
- Related Files: path/to/process.md, path/to/report.csv
- Tags: tag1, tag2
- See Also: LRN-20260413-001
- Pattern-Key: ops.handoff_failure | kpi.definition_mismatch (optional)
- Recurrence-Count: 1 (optional)
- First-Seen: 2026-04-13 (optional)
- Last-Seen: 2026-04-13 (optional)

---

Categories for learnings:

CategoryUse When
process_breakdownA repeatable business process fails due to missing or weak controls
policy_gapExisting policy is absent, unclear, or not operationalized
kpi_misalignmentKPI meaning, source, or target differs across functions
decision_latencyDecision gates are consistently delayed and impact execution
handoff_failureWork transfer between teams causes errors or delays
stakeholder_misalignmentStakeholders disagree on goals, scope, or priorities
documentation_driftDocumentation diverges from actual process or system behavior
compliance_oversightInternal or external compliance expectations are not met

Business Issue Entry [BUS-YYYYMMDD-XXX]

Append to .learnings/BUSINESS_ISSUES.md:

## [BUS-YYYYMMDD-XXX] issue_type

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: critical | high | medium | low
**Status**: pending
**Area**: planning | execution | governance | reporting | operations | budgeting | procurement | vendor_management | risk_management | communication
**Severity**: critical | high | medium | low

### Summary
Brief description of the business issue

### Issue Details
What happened, why it matters, where dependencies broke, and what operational risk emerged.
Keep this as a documented finding and recommendation; this skill does not execute decisions.

### Impact Assessment
- Affected functions and owners
- KPI or SLA impact estimate
- Cost or budget impact range
- Governance or compliance implication

### Recommended Action
- Immediate containment steps
- Owner + escalation path
- Long-term process hardening
- Human approval required for any high-impact decisions

### Timeline
- **Identified**: ISO-8601
- **Escalated**: ISO-8601 (if applicable)
- **Resolved**: ISO-8601 (if applicable)

### Metadata
- Trigger: sla_miss | approval_delay | raci_conflict | kpi_variance | budget_alert | handoff_block | policy_missing | audit_finding | dependency_blocked
- Stakeholders: operations | finance | procurement | vendor_management | compliance | leadership
- Related Files: path/to/doc
- See Also: BUS-20260413-001

---

Feature Request Entry [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX]

Append to .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md:

## [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX] capability_name

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: medium
**Status**: pending
**Area**: planning | execution | governance | reporting | operations | budgeting | procurement | vendor_management | risk_management | communication

### Requested Capability
What business administration capability is needed

### Business Justification
Why it improves speed, quality, policy consistency, or risk reduction

### Complexity Estimate
simple | medium | complex

### Suggested Implementation
How this could be built: workflow automation, dashboard guardrails, dependency tracker,
handoff checklist, policy linting, governance workflow reminders.

### Metadata
- Frequency: first_time | recurring
- Related Features: existing_tool_or_feature
- Benefit: cycle_time | decision_quality | risk_reduction | policy_consistency

---

ID Generation

Format: TYPE-YYYYMMDD-XXX

  • TYPE: LRN (learning), BUS (business issue), FEAT (feature request)
  • YYYYMMDD: Current date
  • XXX: Sequential number or random 3 chars (for example 001, A7B)

Examples: LRN-20260413-001, BUS-20260413-A3F, FEAT-20260413-002

Resolving Entries

When an issue is resolved, update the entry:

  1. Change **Status**: pending to **Status**: resolved
  2. Add a resolution block after Metadata:
### Resolution
- **Resolved**: 2026-04-13T09:00:00Z
- **Action Taken**: Brief description of process or governance fix
- **Artifact Updated**: Playbook/checklist/KPI registry/RACI/cadence reference
- **Verified By**: operations review | finance review | governance committee | internal audit

Other status values:

  • in_progress - actively being remediated
  • wont_fix - risk accepted with documented rationale and human approver
  • promoted - elevated to permanent business operating artifacts
  • promoted_to_skill - extracted as reusable skill

Detection Triggers

Automatically log when you encounter:

Execution Signals (learning or business issue):

  • missed SLA on committed deliverable
  • overdue approval at decision gate
  • repeated dependency blocked status
  • handoff without complete acceptance criteria

Governance Signals (learning or business issue):

  • policy exists but team follows outdated practice
  • control owner unknown or contested
  • RACI accountability conflict between teams
  • governance board receives contradictory status reports

KPI Signals (learning):

  • KPI definition mismatch across dashboards
  • variance unexplained beyond tolerance band
  • lagging metrics reported as leading indicators

Budget and Procurement Signals (business issue):

  • budget overrun warning without mitigation owner
  • purchase request bypasses policy threshold
  • vendor onboarding stalled at approval handoff

Compliance and Documentation Signals (learning):

  • audit issue reveals missing process evidence
  • runbook differs from actual operational behavior
  • required approval record missing for material decision

Priority Guidelines

PriorityWhen to UseBusiness Examples
criticalMaterial operational disruption, uncontrolled budget risk, or compliance exposurePayroll-impacting process outage, major procurement exception without approval trail
highSLA misses, delayed governance decisions, or significant KPI varianceMissed month-end close dependency, recurring approval bottleneck
mediumImportant process hardening or definition alignment workKPI glossary mismatch, outdated handoff checklist
lowDocumentation cleanup and minor process optimizationNaming consistency updates, low-risk reporting cleanup

Area Tags

Use these areas to classify learnings:

AreaScope
planningplanning cycles, prioritization, resource alignment
executiontask flow, dependency management, delivery completion
governanceapprovals, controls, operating model oversight
reportingKPI reporting quality, cadence, dashboard trust
operationsday-to-day process reliability and service delivery
budgetingbudget planning, variance review, spend controls
procurementpurchasing controls, approvals, sourcing process
vendor_managementvendor onboarding, SLA adherence, performance reviews
risk_managementrisk identification, escalation, mitigation tracking
communicationcross-functional alignment, decision clarity, status clarity

Promoting to Permanent Business Standards

When a learning is broadly applicable, promote it to business administration standards.

When to Promote

  • the same process breakdown recurs across teams
  • policy gap repeatedly creates execution risk
  • KPI definition issue causes repeated reporting conflicts
  • decision latency appears in multiple planning or governance cycles
  • handoff failures recur with shared root causes

Promotion Targets

TargetWhat Belongs There
Process playbooksdocumented steps, guardrails, exception routing
Governance checklistsdecision controls, evidence requirements, escalation criteria
KPI definition registrymetric owners, formulas, data sources, review cadence
RACI matrix updatesrole clarity for accountable/responsible/consulted/informed
Operating cadencesrecurring forums, review rituals, frequency and owners
CLAUDE.mdagent operating conventions for business context
AGENTS.mdcross-agent routing and workflow orchestration

How to Promote

  1. Distill the finding into concise and reusable operational guidance
  2. Add it to the correct target artifact
  3. Update original entry:

- set **Status**: promoted - add **Promoted**: process_playbook (or other target)

  1. confirm human owner for adoption and enforcement

Promotion Examples

Learning to governance checklist:

Overdue approvals repeatedly blocked procurement. Added checklist rule: "Any approval older than 48h triggers escalation to backup approver."

Learning to KPI registry:

Revenue-at-risk definition mismatched between sales and finance. Registered canonical formula and source system for both teams.

Recurring Pattern Detection

If logging something similar to an existing entry:

  1. Search first: rg "keyword" .learnings/
  2. Link entries with **See Also**
  3. Increment recurrence fields
  4. Raise priority if impact is increasing
  5. Trigger systemic fix proposal when recurrence exceeds threshold

Recurring business patterns usually indicate one or more root causes:

  • missing process control
  • weak policy communication
  • unclear ownership model
  • inconsistent KPI definition
  • brittle cross-team handoff protocol
  • insufficient governance cadence

Simplify/Harden Feed

Keep incoming signals easy to process, and harden the learning feed against noise.

Simplify Rules

  • prefer one clear issue statement per entry
  • include only evidence needed for a decision
  • use standard categories and area tags
  • avoid duplicating the same incident in multiple files
  • route uncertain items to pending with explicit open questions

Harden Rules

  • require source attribution in metadata
  • require owner and next action for high and critical
  • require explicit approval note for wont_fix
  • require recurrence tracking for repeated issues
  • require status updates before review meetings

Periodic Review

Review .learnings/ at operational checkpoints.

When to Review

  • before weekly operating review
  • before monthly business review
  • before quarterly planning cycle
  • before budget review forums
  • after major incident retrospectives
  • before governance committee decisions

Quick Status Check

rg "Status\\*\\*: pending" .learnings/*.md | wc -l
rg "Priority\\*\\*: critical|Priority\\*\\*: high" .learnings/*.md
rg "Area\\*\\*: budgeting|Area\\*\\*: procurement" .learnings/*.md
rg "Category\\*\\*:|\\] process_breakdown|\\] decision_latency" .learnings/*.md

Review Actions

  • close resolved entries and capture verification evidence
  • merge duplicates and strengthen canonical entries
  • promote proven patterns to permanent artifacts
  • add or adjust operating cadence for recurring issues

Hook Integration

Enable automatic reminders through hooks. This is opt-in.

Quick Setup (Claude Code / Codex)

Create .claude/settings.json:

{
  "hooks": {
    "UserPromptSubmit": [{
      "matcher": "",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "./skills/self-improving-business/scripts/activator.sh"
      }]
    }]
  }
}

This injects a business-administration reminder after each prompt.

Advanced Setup (With Pattern Detection)

{
  "hooks": {
    "UserPromptSubmit": [{
      "matcher": "",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "./skills/self-improving-business/scripts/activator.sh"
      }]
    }],
    "PostToolUse": [{
      "matcher": "Bash",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "./skills/self-improving-business/scripts/error-detector.sh"
      }]
    }]
  }
}

Enable PostToolUse only if you want command output pattern reminders.

Available Hook Scripts

ScriptHook TypePurpose
scripts/activator.shUserPromptSubmitreminds to evaluate business learnings
scripts/error-detector.shPostToolUse (Bash)triggers on high-signal business patterns

See references/hooks-setup.md for details.

Automatic Skill Extraction

When a learning becomes stable and reusable, extract it into a dedicated skill.

Skill Extraction Criteria

CriterionDescription
recurringsame pattern appears in multiple teams or cycles
verifiedstatus is resolved with validated operational improvement
non-obviousrequired cross-functional reasoning or governance design
broadly applicableuseful outside a single incident
user-flaggeduser requests conversion into a reusable skill

Extraction Workflow

  1. identify candidate entry
  2. run helper:
   ./skills/self-improving-business/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name --dry-run
   ./skills/self-improving-business/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name
  1. customize generated SKILL.md
  2. update source entry status to promoted_to_skill
  3. verify no transactional instructions were embedded

Multi-Agent Support

AgentActivationDetection
Claude Codehooksautomatic via scripts
Codex CLIhooksautomatic via scripts
GitHub Copilotmanual guidancemanual review
OpenClawworkspace injection + hookssession reminders

Regardless of agent, apply this workflow when you:

  1. coordinate cross-functional delivery with dependencies
  2. track KPI quality and reporting consistency
  3. manage policy-governed approvals and exceptions
  4. monitor budget, procurement, and vendor execution
  5. document risk controls and escalation outcomes
  6. resolve stakeholder alignment and communication gaps

Business Administration Best Practices

  1. keep ownership explicit and visible in each entry
  2. separate signal from symptom using root-cause notes
  3. normalize KPI definitions before target discussions
  4. document decision deadlines and escalation rules
  5. review RACI regularly for contested responsibilities
  6. harden handoffs with acceptance criteria and evidence
  7. tie governance controls to actual operating cadences
  8. use consistent tags for reporting and searchability
  9. require human approval for high-impact decisions
  10. avoid turning reminders into hidden execution commands

Gitignore Options

Keep learnings local when entries include sensitive business context:

.learnings/

Hybrid option (track structure, ignore contents):

.learnings/*.md
!.learnings/.gitkeep

Track learnings in-repo only when content is sanitized and approved for sharing.

Final Reminder

This skill is a structured memory and improvement mechanism. It does not approve, execute, sign, spend, commit, or authorize business actions. Use it to improve clarity and decision quality, and require human approval for high-impact outcomes.

Stackability Contract (Standalone + Multi-Skill)

This skill is standalone-compatible and stackable with other self-improving skills.

Namespaced Logging (recommended for 2+ skills)

  • Namespace for this skill: .learnings/business/
  • Keep current standalone behavior if you prefer flat files.
  • Optional shared index for all skills: .learnings/INDEX.md

Required Metadata

Every new entry must include:

**Skill**: business

Hook Arbitration (when 2+ skills are enabled)

  • Use one dispatcher hook as the single entrypoint.
  • Dispatcher responsibilities: route by matcher, dedupe repeated events, and rate-limit reminders.
  • Suggested defaults: dedupe key = event + matcher + file + 5m_window; max 1 reminder per skill every 5 minutes.

Narrow Matcher Scope (business)

Only trigger this skill automatically for business signals such as:

  • kpi|revenue|margin|strategy|roadmap
  • pricing|forecast|market shift|business case
  • explicit business intent in user prompt

Cross-Skill Precedence

When guidance conflicts, apply:

  1. security
  2. engineering
  3. coding
  4. ai
  5. user-explicit domain skill
  6. meta as tie-breaker

Ownership Rules

  • This skill writes only to .learnings/business/ in stackable mode.
  • It may read other skill folders for cross-linking, but should not rewrite their entries.

平台分布

OpenClaw

80.15%
按下载量换算640

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills