Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao(自强剂 1 0 2 力调)

self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 OpenClaw 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 22,041。

总安装 4,672周安装 189GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,467核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao(自强剂 1 0 2 力调)
来源仓库:https://github.com/litiao1224/self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao
安装命令:
openclaw skills install self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

力调特化版改进器,针对特定行业术语优化反馈机制。适用于垂直领域如金融、医疗等专业性强的工作流。内置行业关键词库辅助判断错误性质与严重等级。需验证专业术语覆盖完整性及误判风险控制。self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

建议由领域专家参与规则校准以确保适用性。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,672 次,近一周安装 189 次,下载 1,467 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao

自强剂 1 0 2 力调 · 本页

4,672—调用外部服务MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
self-improving-agent-1-0-2-litiao
description
Captures learnings, errors, and corrections to enable continuous improvement. Use when: (1) A command or operation fails unexpectedly, (2) User corrects Claude ('No, that's wrong...', 'Actually...'), (3) User requests a capability that doesn't exist, (4) An external API or tool fails, (5) Claude realizes its knowledge is outdated or incorrect, (6) A better approach is discovered for a recurring task. Also review learnings before major tasks.

Self-Improvement Skill

Log learnings and errors to markdown files for continuous improvement. Coding agents can later process these into fixes, and important learnings get promoted to project memory.

Quick Reference

SituationAction
Command/operation failsLog to .learnings/ERRORS.md
User corrects youLog to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category correction
User wants missing featureLog to .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md
API/external tool failsLog to .learnings/ERRORS.md with integration details
Knowledge was outdatedLog to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category knowledge_gap
Found better approachLog to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category best_practice
Similar to existing entryLink with **See Also**, consider priority bump
Broadly applicable learningPromote to CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and/or .github/copilot-instructions.md
Workflow improvementsPromote to AGENTS.md (clawdbot workspace)
Tool gotchasPromote to TOOLS.md (clawdbot workspace)
Behavioral patternsPromote to SOUL.md (clawdbot workspace)

Setup

Create .learnings/ directory in project root if it doesn't exist:

mkdir -p .learnings

Copy templates from assets/ or create files with headers.

Logging Format

Learning Entry

Append to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md:

## [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX] category

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: low | medium | high | critical
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config

### Summary
One-line description of what was learned

### Details
Full context: what happened, what was wrong, what's correct

### Suggested Action
Specific fix or improvement to make

### Metadata
- Source: conversation | error | user_feedback
- Related Files: path/to/file.ext
- Tags: tag1, tag2
- See Also: LRN-20250110-001 (if related to existing entry)

---

Error Entry

Append to .learnings/ERRORS.md:

## [ERR-YYYYMMDD-XXX] skill_or_command_name

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: high
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config

### Summary
Brief description of what failed

### Error

Actual error message or output


### Context
- Command/operation attempted
- Input or parameters used
- Environment details if relevant

### Suggested Fix
If identifiable, what might resolve this

### Metadata
- Reproducible: yes | no | unknown
- Related Files: path/to/file.ext
- See Also: ERR-20250110-001 (if recurring)

---

Feature Request Entry

Append to .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md:

## [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX] capability_name

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: medium
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config

### Requested Capability
What the user wanted to do

### User Context
Why they needed it, what problem they're solving

### Complexity Estimate
simple | medium | complex

### Suggested Implementation
How this could be built, what it might extend

### Metadata
- Frequency: first_time | recurring
- Related Features: existing_feature_name

---

ID Generation

Format: TYPE-YYYYMMDD-XXX

  • TYPE: LRN (learning), ERR (error), FEAT (feature)
  • YYYYMMDD: Current date
  • XXX: Sequential number or random 3 chars (e.g., 001, A7B)

Examples: LRN-20250115-001, ERR-20250115-A3F, FEAT-20250115-002

Resolving Entries

When an issue is fixed, update the entry:

  1. Change **Status**: pending → **Status**: resolved
  2. Add resolution block after Metadata:
### Resolution
- **Resolved**: 2025-01-16T09:00:00Z
- **Commit/PR**: abc123 or #42
- **Notes**: Brief description of what was done

Other status values:

  • in_progress - Actively being worked on
  • wont_fix - Decided not to address (add reason in Resolution notes)
  • promoted - Elevated to CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, or .github/copilot-instructions.md

Promoting to Project Memory

When a learning is broadly applicable (not a one-off fix), promote it to permanent project memory.

When to Promote

  • Learning applies across multiple files/features
  • Knowledge any contributor (human or AI) should know
  • Prevents recurring mistakes
  • Documents project-specific conventions

Promotion Targets

TargetWhat Belongs There
CLAUDE.mdProject facts, conventions, gotchas for all Claude interactions
AGENTS.mdAgent-specific workflows, tool usage patterns, automation rules
.github/copilot-instructions.mdProject context and conventions for GitHub Copilot
SOUL.mdBehavioral guidelines, communication style, principles (clawdbot)
TOOLS.mdTool capabilities, usage patterns, integration gotchas (clawdbot)

How to Promote

  1. Distill the learning into a concise rule or fact
  2. Add to appropriate section in target file (create file if needed)
  3. Update original entry:

- Change **Status**: pending → **Status**: promoted - Add **Promoted**: CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, or .github/copilot-instructions.md

Promotion Examples

Learning (verbose):

Project uses pnpm workspaces. Attempted npm install but failed. Lock file is pnpm-lock.yaml. Must use pnpm install.

In CLAUDE.md (concise):

## Build & Dependencies
- Package manager: pnpm (not npm) - use `pnpm install`

Learning (verbose):

When modifying API endpoints, must regenerate TypeScript client. Forgetting this causes type mismatches at runtime.

In AGENTS.md (actionable):

## After API Changes
1. Regenerate client: `pnpm run generate:api`
2. Check for type errors: `pnpm tsc --noEmit`

Recurring Pattern Detection

If logging something similar to an existing entry:

  1. Search first: grep -r "keyword" .learnings/
  2. Link entries: Add **See Also**: ERR-20250110-001 in Metadata
  3. Bump priority if issue keeps recurring
  4. Consider systemic fix: Recurring issues often indicate:

- Missing documentation (→ promote to CLAUDE.md or .github/copilot-instructions.md) - Missing automation (→ add to AGENTS.md) - Architectural problem (→ create tech debt ticket)

Periodic Review

Review .learnings/ at natural breakpoints:

When to Review

  • Before starting a new major task
  • After completing a feature
  • When working in an area with past learnings
  • Weekly during active development

Quick Status Check

# Count pending items
grep -h "Status\*\*: pending" .learnings/*.md | wc -l

# List pending high-priority items
grep -B5 "Priority\*\*: high" .learnings/*.md | grep "^## \["

# Find learnings for a specific area
grep -l "Area\*\*: backend" .learnings/*.md

Review Actions

  • Resolve fixed items
  • Promote applicable learnings
  • Link related entries
  • Escalate recurring issues

Detection Triggers

Automatically log when you notice:

Corrections (→ learning with correction category):

  • "No, that's not right..."
  • "Actually, it should be..."
  • "You're wrong about..."
  • "That's outdated..."

Feature Requests (→ feature request):

  • "Can you also..."
  • "I wish you could..."
  • "Is there a way to..."
  • "Why can't you..."

Knowledge Gaps (→ learning with knowledge_gap category):

  • User provides information you didn't know
  • Documentation you referenced is outdated
  • API behavior differs from your understanding

Errors (→ error entry):

  • Command returns non-zero exit code
  • Exception or stack trace
  • Unexpected output or behavior
  • Timeout or connection failure

Priority Guidelines

PriorityWhen to Use
criticalBlocks core functionality, data loss risk, security issue
highSignificant impact, affects common workflows, recurring issue
mediumModerate impact, workaround exists
lowMinor inconvenience, edge case, nice-to-have

Area Tags

Use to filter learnings by codebase region:

AreaScope
frontendUI, components, client-side code
backendAPI, services, server-side code
infraCI/CD, deployment, Docker, cloud
testsTest files, testing utilities, coverage
docsDocumentation, comments, READMEs
configConfiguration files, environment, settings

Best Practices

  1. Log immediately - context is freshest right after the issue
  2. Be specific - future agents need to understand quickly
  3. Include reproduction steps - especially for errors
  4. Link related files - makes fixes easier
  5. Suggest concrete fixes - not just "investigate"
  6. Use consistent categories - enables filtering
  7. Promote aggressively - if in doubt, add to CLAUDE.md or .github/copilot-instructions.md
  8. Review regularly - stale learnings lose value

Gitignore Options

Keep learnings local (per-developer):

.learnings/

Track learnings in repo (team-wide): Don't add to .gitignore - learnings become shared knowledge.

Hybrid (track templates, ignore entries):

.learnings/*.md
!.learnings/.gitkeep

Hook Integration

Enable automatic reminders through agent hooks. This is opt-in - you must explicitly configure hooks.

Quick Setup (Claude Code / Codex)

Create .claude/settings.json in your project:

{
  "hooks": {
    "UserPromptSubmit": [{
      "matcher": "",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh"
      }]
    }]
  }
}

This injects a learning evaluation reminder after each prompt (~50-100 tokens overhead).

Full Setup (With Error Detection)

{
  "hooks": {
    "UserPromptSubmit": [{
      "matcher": "",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh"
      }]
    }],
    "PostToolUse": [{
      "matcher": "Bash",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/error-detector.sh"
      }]
    }]
  }
}

Available Hook Scripts

ScriptHook TypePurpose
scripts/activator.shUserPromptSubmitReminds to evaluate learnings after tasks
scripts/error-detector.shPostToolUse (Bash)Triggers on command errors

See references/hooks-setup.md for detailed configuration and troubleshooting.

Automatic Skill Extraction

When a learning is valuable enough to become a reusable skill, extract it using the provided helper.

Skill Extraction Criteria

A learning qualifies for skill extraction when ANY of these apply:

CriterionDescription
RecurringHas See Also links to 2+ similar issues
VerifiedStatus is resolved with working fix
Non-obviousRequired actual debugging/investigation to discover
Broadly applicableNot project-specific; useful across codebases
User-flaggedUser says "save this as a skill" or similar

Extraction Workflow

  1. Identify candidate: Learning meets extraction criteria
  2. Run helper (or create manually):
   ./skills/self-improvement/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name --dry-run
   ./skills/self-improvement/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name
  1. Customize SKILL.md: Fill in template with learning content
  2. Update learning: Set status to promoted_to_skill, add Skill-Path
  3. Verify: Read skill in fresh session to ensure it's self-contained

Manual Extraction

If you prefer manual creation:

  1. Create skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md
  2. Use template from assets/SKILL-TEMPLATE.md
  3. Follow Agent Skills spec:

- YAML frontmatter with name and description - Name must match folder name - No README.md inside skill folder

Extraction Detection Triggers

Watch for these signals that a learning should become a skill:

In conversation:

  • "Save this as a skill"
  • "I keep running into this"
  • "This would be useful for other projects"
  • "Remember this pattern"

In learning entries:

  • Multiple See Also links (recurring issue)
  • High priority + resolved status
  • Category: best_practice with broad applicability
  • User feedback praising the solution

Skill Quality Gates

Before extraction, verify:

  • [ ] Solution is tested and working
  • [ ] Description is clear without original context
  • [ ] Code examples are self-contained
  • [ ] No project-specific hardcoded values
  • [ ] Follows skill naming conventions (lowercase, hyphens)

Multi-Agent Support

This skill works across different AI coding agents with agent-specific activation.

Claude Code

Activation: Hooks (UserPromptSubmit, PostToolUse) Setup: .claude/settings.json with hook configuration Detection: Automatic via hook scripts

Codex CLI

Activation: Hooks (same pattern as Claude Code) Setup: .codex/settings.json with hook configuration Detection: Automatic via hook scripts

GitHub Copilot

Activation: Manual (no hook support) Setup: Add to .github/copilot-instructions.md:

## Self-Improvement

After solving non-obvious issues, consider logging to `.learnings/`:
1. Use format from self-improvement skill
2. Link related entries with See Also
3. Promote high-value learnings to skills

Ask in chat: "Should I log this as a learning?"

Detection: Manual review at session end

Clawdbot

Activation: Workspace injection + inter-agent messaging Setup: Configure workspace path in ~/.clawdbot/clawdbot.json Detection: Via session tools and workspace files (AGENTS.md, SOUL.md, TOOLS.md)

Clawdbot uses a workspace-based model with injected prompt files. See references/clawdbot-integration.md for detailed setup.

Agent-Agnostic Guidance

Regardless of agent, apply self-improvement when you:

  1. Discover something non-obvious - solution wasn't immediate
  2. Correct yourself - initial approach was wrong
  3. Learn project conventions - discovered undocumented patterns
  4. Hit unexpected errors - especially if diagnosis was difficult
  5. Find better approaches - improved on your original solution

Copilot Chat Integration

For Copilot users, add this to your prompts when relevant:

After completing this task, evaluate if any learnings should be logged to .learnings/ using the self-improvement skill format.

Or use quick prompts:

  • "Log this to learnings"
  • "Create a skill from this solution"
  • "Check .learnings/ for related issues"

Clawdbot Integration

Clawdbot uses workspace-based prompt injection with specialized files for different concerns.

Workspace Structure

~/clawd/                    # Default workspace (configurable)
├── AGENTS.md              # Multi-agent workflows, delegation patterns
├── SOUL.md                # Behavioral guidelines, communication style
├── TOOLS.md               # Tool capabilities, MCP integrations
└── sessions/              # Session transcripts (auto-managed)

Clawdbot Promotion Targets

Learning TypePromote ToExample
Agent coordinationAGENTS.md"Delegate file searches to explore agent"
Communication styleSOUL.md"Be concise, avoid disclaimers"
Tool gotchasTOOLS.md"MCP server X requires auth refresh"
Project factsCLAUDE.mdStandard project conventions

Inter-Agent Learning

Clawdbot supports session-based communication:

  • sessions_list - See active/recent sessions
  • sessions_history - Read transcript from another session
  • sessions_send - Send message to another session

Hybrid Setup (Claude Code + Clawdbot)

When using both:

  1. Keep .learnings/ for project-specific learnings
  2. Use clawdbot workspace files for cross-project patterns
  3. Sync high-value learnings to both systems

See references/clawdbot-integration.md for complete setup, promotion formats, and troubleshooting.

平台分布

OpenClaw

96.05%
按下载量换算1,409

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills