Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

self-improving-agent自我改进 Agent

Agent Skill

self-improving-agent 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

620,928

周安装

26,395

GitHub Stars

47

下载量

217,536
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:self-improving-agent(自我改进 Agent)
来源仓库:https://github.com/charon-fan/agent-playbook
仓库路径:skills/self-improving-agent
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/charon-fan/agent-playbook --skill self-improving-agent
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/charon-fan/agent-playbook --skill self-improving-agent

简介

通用的自我改进代理,可以使用多内存架构从所有技能经验中学习。

  • 实现语义、情景和工作记忆,以提取模式、抽象见解,并在整个代码库中不断发展技能指导
  • 通过基于钩子的集成自动触发技能完成、错误和会话事件;通过可追踪的进化标记检测并纠正不准确的指导
  • 根据模式置信度和应用频率,优先考虑 10 多个技能类别(PRD 规划、架构、API 设计、调试、代码审查、性能、安全、测试、部署)的更新
  • 将反馈循环与用户评级、根本原因分析和验证工作流程整合在一起,以防止过度概括并保持指导准确性

SKILL.md

Self-Improving Agent

"An AI agent that learns from every interaction, accumulating patterns and insights to continuously improve its own capabilities." — Based on 2025 lifelong learning research

Overview

This is a universal self-improvement system that learns from ALL skill experiences, not just PRDs. It implements a complete feedback loop with:

  • Multi-Memory Architecture: Semantic + Episodic + Working memory
  • Self-Correction: Detects and fixes skill guidance errors
  • Self-Validation: Periodically verifies skill accuracy
  • Hooks Integration: Auto-triggers on skill events (before_start, after_complete, on_error)
  • Evolution Markers: Traceable changes with source attribution

Research-Based Design

Based on 2025 research:

ResearchKey InsightApplication
SimpleMemEfficient lifelong memoryPattern accumulation system
Multi-Memory SurveySemantic + Episodic memoryWorld knowledge + experiences
Lifelong LearningContinuous task stream learningLearn from every skill use
Evo-MemoryTest-time lifelong learningReal-time adaptation

The Self-Improvement Loop

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    UNIVERSAL SELF-IMPROVEMENT                    │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                 │
│   Skill Event → Extract Experience → Abstract Pattern → Update  │
│        │                  │                │         │          │
│        ▼                  ▼                ▼         ▼          │
│   ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐       │
│   │              MULTI-MEMORY SYSTEM                      │       │
│   ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤       │
│   │  Semantic Memory   │  Episodic Memory  │ Working Memory │  │
│   │  (Patterns/Rules)  │  (Experiences)    │  (Current)     │  │
│   │  memory/semantic/  │  memory/episodic/ │  memory/working/│  │
│   └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘       │
│                                                                 │
│   ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐       │
│   │              FEEDBACK LOOP                            │       │
│   │  User Feedback → Confidence Update → Pattern Adapt   │       │
│   └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘       │
│                                                                 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

When This Activates

Automatic Triggers (via hooks)

EventTriggerAction
before_startAny skill startsLog session start
after_completeAny skill completesExtract patterns, update skills
on_errorBash returns non-zero exitCapture error context, trigger self-correction

Manual Triggers

  • User says "自我进化", "self-improve", "从经验中学习"
  • User says "分析今天的经验", "总结教训"
  • User asks to improve a specific skill

Evolution Priority Matrix

Trigger evolution when new reusable knowledge appears:

TriggerTarget SkillPriorityAction
New PRD pattern discoveredprd-plannerHighAdd to quality checklist
Architecture tradeoff clarifiedarchitecting-solutionsHighAdd to decision patterns
API design rule learnedapi-designerHighUpdate template
Debugging fix discovereddebuggerHighAdd to anti-patterns
Review checklist gapcode-reviewerHighAdd checklist item
Perf/security insightperformance-engineer, security-auditorHighAdd to patterns
UI/UX spec issueprd-planner, architecting-solutionsHighAdd visual spec requirements
React/state patterndebugger, refactoring-specialistMediumAdd to patterns
Test strategy improvementtest-automator, qa-expertMediumUpdate approach
CI/deploy fixdeployment-engineerMediumAdd to troubleshooting

Multi-Memory Architecture

1. Semantic Memory (memory/semantic-patterns.json)

Stores abstract patterns and rules reusable across contexts:

{
  "patterns": {
    "pattern_id": {
      "id": "pat-2025-01-11-001",
      "name": "Pattern Name",
      "source": "user_feedback|implementation_review|retrospective",
      "confidence": 0.95,
      "applications": 5,
      "created": "2025-01-11",
      "category": "prd_structure|react_patterns|async_patterns|...",
      "pattern": "One-line summary",
      "problem": "What problem does this solve?",
      "solution": { ... },
      "quality_rules": [ ... ],
      "target_skills": [ ... ]
    }
  }
}

2. Episodic Memory (memory/episodic/)

Stores specific experiences and what happened:

memory/episodic/
├── 2025/
│   ├── 2025-01-11-prd-creation.json
│   ├── 2025-01-11-debug-session.json
│   └── 2025-01-12-refactoring.json
{
  "id": "ep-2025-01-11-001",
  "timestamp": "2025-01-11T10:30:00Z",
  "skill": "debugger",
  "situation": "User reported data not refreshing after form submission",
  "root_cause": "Empty callback in onRefresh prop",
  "solution": "Implement actual refresh logic in callback",
  "lesson": "Always verify callbacks are not empty functions",
  "related_pattern": "callback_verification",
  "user_feedback": {
    "rating": 8,
    "comments": "This was exactly the issue"
  }
}

3. Working Memory (memory/working/)

Stores current session context:

memory/working/
├── current_session.json   # Active session data
├── last_error.json        # Error context for self-correction
└── session_end.json       # Session end marker

Self-Improvement Process

Phase 1: Experience Extraction

After any skill completes, extract:

What happened:
  skill_used: {which skill}
  task: {what was being done}
  outcome: {success|partial|failure}

Key Insights:
  what_went_well: [what worked]
  what_went_wrong: [what didn't work]
  root_cause: {underlying issue if applicable}

User Feedback:
  rating: {1-10 if provided}
  comments: {specific feedback}

Phase 2: Pattern Abstraction

Convert experiences to reusable patterns:

Concrete ExperienceAbstract PatternTarget Skill
"User forgot to save PRD notes""Always persist thinking to files"prd-planner
"Code review missed SQL injection""Add security checklist item"code-reviewer
"Callback was empty, didn't work""Verify callback implementations"debugger
"Net APY position ambiguous""UI specs need exact relative positions"prd-planner

Abstraction Rules:

If experience_repeats 3+ times:
  pattern_level: critical
  action: Add to skill's "Critical Mistakes" section

If solution_was_effective:
  pattern_level: best_practice
  action: Add to skill's "Best Practices" section

If user_rating >= 7:
  pattern_level: strength
  action: Reinforce this approach

If user_rating <= 4:
  pattern_level: weakness
  action: Add to "What to Avoid" section

Phase 3: Skill Updates

Update the appropriate skill files with evolution markers:

<!-- Evolution: 2025-01-12 | source: ep-2025-01-12-001 | skill: debugger -->

## Pattern Added (2025-01-12)

**Pattern**: Always verify callbacks are not empty functions

**Source**: Episode ep-2025-01-12-001

**Confidence**: 0.95

### Updated Checklist
- [ ] Verify all callbacks have implementations
- [ ] Test callback execution paths

Correction Markers (when fixing wrong guidance):

<!-- Correction: 2025-01-12 | was: "Use callback chain" | reason: caused stale refresh -->

## Corrected Guidance

Use direct state monitoring instead of callback chains:

// ✅ Do: Direct state monitoring const prevPendingCount = usePrevious(pendingCount);

Phase 4: Memory Consolidation

  1. Update semantic memory (memory/semantic-patterns.json)
  2. Store episodic memory (memory/episodic/YYYY-MM-DD-{skill}.json)
  3. Update pattern confidence based on applications/feedback
  4. Prune outdated patterns (low confidence, no recent applications)

Self-Correction (on_error hook)

Triggered when:

  • Bash command returns non-zero exit code
  • Tests fail after following skill guidance
  • User reports the guidance produced incorrect results

Process:

## Self-Correction Workflow

1. Detect Error
   - Capture error context from working/last_error.json
   - Identify which skill guidance was followed

2. Verify Root Cause
   - Was the skill guidance incorrect?
   - Was the guidance misinterpreted?
   - Was the guidance incomplete?

3. Apply Correction
   - Update skill file with corrected guidance
   - Add correction marker with reason
   - Update related patterns in semantic memory

4. Validate Fix
   - Test the corrected guidance
   - Ask user to verify

Example:

<!-- Correction: 2025-01-12 | was: "useMemo for claimable ids" | reason: stale data at click time -->

## Self-Correction: Click-Time Computation

**Issue**: Using useMemo for claimable IDs caused stale data
**Fix**: Compute at click time for always-fresh data
**Pattern**: click_time_vs_open_time_computation

Self-Validation

Use the validation template in references/appendix.md when reviewing updates.

Hooks Integration

Wiring Hooks in Claude Code Settings

Add to Claude Code settings (~/.claude/settings.json):

{
  "hooks": {
    "PreToolUse": [
      {
        "matcher": "Bash|Write|Edit",
        "hooks": [
          {
            "type": "command",
            "command": "bash ${SKILLS_DIR}/self-improving-agent/hooks/pre-tool.sh \"$TOOL_NAME\" \"$TOOL_INPUT\""
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "PostToolUse": [
      {
        "matcher": "Bash",
        "hooks": [
          {
            "type": "command",
            "command": "bash ${SKILLS_DIR}/self-improving-agent/hooks/post-bash.sh \"$TOOL_OUTPUT\" \"$EXIT_CODE\""
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "Stop": [
      {
        "matcher": "",
        "hooks": [
          {
            "type": "command",
            "command": "bash ${SKILLS_DIR}/self-improving-agent/hooks/session-end.sh"
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}

Replace ${SKILLS_DIR} with your actual skills path.

Additional References

See references/appendix.md for memory structure, workflow diagrams, metrics, feedback templates, and research links.

Best Practices

DO

  • ✅ Learn from EVERY skill interaction
  • ✅ Extract patterns at the right abstraction level
  • ✅ Update multiple related skills
  • ✅ Track confidence and apply counts
  • ✅ Ask for user feedback on improvements
  • ✅ Use evolution/correction markers for traceability
  • ✅ Validate guidance before applying broadly

DON'T

  • ❌ Over-generalize from single experiences
  • ❌ Update skills without confidence tracking
  • ❌ Ignore negative feedback
  • ❌ Make changes that break existing functionality
  • ❌ Create contradictory patterns
  • ❌ Update skills without understanding context

Quick Start

After any skill completes, this agent automatically:

  1. Analyzes what happened
  2. Extracts patterns and insights
  3. Updates relevant skill files
  4. Logs to memory for future reference
  5. Reports summary to user

References

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

27.1%
按下载量换算58,952

OpenCode

25.92%
按下载量换算56,385

Gemini CLI

16.61%
按下载量换算36,133

Antigravity

12.85%
按下载量换算27,953

Codex

7.7%
按下载量换算16,750

openclaw

3.86%
按下载量换算8,397

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills