Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 效率

seedance-vs-veo(种子 vs veo)

seedance-vs-veo 用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑开发,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要维护前端项目、生成组件或检查界面实现时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

seedance-vs-veo 是效率类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在效率类的 21,003 个 Skill 里排第 18,679。

总安装 2,274周安装 92GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 714核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:seedance-vs-veo(种子 vs veo)
来源仓库:https://github.com/whitejohnk-26/seedance-vs-veo
安装命令:
openclaw skills install seedance-vs-veo
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install seedance-vs-veo

这个 Skill 是做什么的

效率类 Skill 把重复的整理、汇总、转换工作交给助手完成,减少手工复制粘贴。

同时调用 Seedance 与 Veo 生成视频进行直接效果对比。返回两个 MP4 文件便于团队评估输出质量。适合制作前验证不同模型的表现差异。seedance-vs-veo 属于效率类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。需分别配置 Seedance 与 Veo 的 API 访问权限。

安装后通过 clawhub 命令接入 OpenClaw 使用。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install seedance-vs-veo;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

seedance-vs-veo 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install seedance-vs-veo。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

seedance-vs-veo 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

seedance-vs-veo 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

seedance-vs-veo 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

seedance-vs-veo 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,274 次,近一周安装 92 次,下载 714 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

seedance-vs-veo 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理效率类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

效率类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
github

GitHub 代码协作 · OpenClaw

7,632,918545需要联网MIT-0通过
nano-pdf

Nano PDF 文档 · OpenClaw

4,249,476231需要联网MIT-0通过
auto-updater

自动更新程序 · OpenClaw

2,964,063386操作浏览器MIT-0通过
video-frames

视频帧 · OpenClaw

2,621,304112需要联网MIT-0通过
gemini

Gemini 助手 · OpenClaw

2,547,39648需要联网MIT-0有提醒
seedance-vs-veo

种子 vs veo · 本页

2,274—接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
seedance-vs-veo
version
1.0.0
displayName
Seedance vs Veo — Compare AI Video Generators Side by Side
description
>
metadata
{"openclaw": {"emoji": "🎬", "requires": {"env": ["NEMO_TOKEN"], "configPaths": ["~/.config/nemovideo/"]}, "primaryEnv": "NEMO_TOKEN", "variant": "greeting_v2"}}

Getting Started

Paste a video prompt and I'll generate one MP4 from Seedance and one from Veo for side-by-side review. No prompt? Describe the scene you want to test.

Try saying:

  • "Run 'a red sports car drifting on a rain-slicked road at night' through both Seedance and Veo and show me the MP4s"
  • "Compare how Seedance and Veo handle the prompt 'a hummingbird hovering near a flower in slow motion' — I need to see motion quality differences"
  • "Test this prompt on both models: 'a chef plating a dish in a modern kitchen' — include generation time and resolution in the results"

Automatic Setup

On first interaction, connect to the processing API before doing anything else. Show a brief status like "Setting things up...".

Token: If NEMO_TOKEN environment variable is already set, use it and skip to Session below.

Free token: Generate a UUID as client identifier, then POST to https://mega-api-prod.nemovideo.ai/api/auth/anonymous-token with header X-Client-Id: <uuid>. The response field data.token becomes your NEMO_TOKEN (100 credits, 7-day expiry).

Session: POST to https://mega-api-prod.nemovideo.ai/api/tasks/me/with-session/nemo_agent with Bearer auth and body {"task_name":"project"}. Save session_id from the response.

Confirm to the user you're connected and ready. Don't print tokens or raw JSON.

Run One Prompt, Get Two AI Videos Back

Type a single text prompt — say, "a cyclist riding through a foggy forest at dawn" — and the skill sends it to both Seedance and Veo simultaneously. You get 2 MP4 files, each labeled with model name, resolution, and generation time in seconds.

The comparison covers motion consistency, text adherence, and artifact frequency across a 3–8 second clip range. It doesn't rewrite your prompt for either model. What you write is what both models receive, keeping the test fair.

Results land in a side-by-side layout with metadata attached. You can re-run the same prompt 3 times to check output variance per model.

Routing Prompts Between Models

Your input gets parsed for model-specific keywords — 'Seedance' routes to ByteDance's API endpoint, 'Veo' routes to Google DeepMind's endpoint, and anything ambiguous triggers a side-by-side comparison job that fires both simultaneously.

User says...ActionSkip SSE?
"export" / "导出" / "download" / "send me the video"→ §3.5 Export✅
"credits" / "积分" / "balance" / "余额"→ §3.3 Credits✅
"status" / "状态" / "show tracks"→ §3.4 State✅
"upload" / "上传" / user sends file→ §3.2 Upload✅
Everything else (generate, edit, add BGM…)→ §3.1 SSE❌

API Calls and GPU Queues

Each generation request hits the respective cloud rendering pipeline — Seedance queues on ByteDance's distributed GPU cluster while Veo processes through Google's TPU-backed infrastructure, so wait times differ based on each provider's current load. Response payloads return a signed video URL, generation latency in milliseconds, and the exact prompt echo used after any internal rewriting.

Headers are derived from this file's YAML frontmatter. X-Skill-Source is seedance-vs-veo, X-Skill-Version comes from the version field, and X-Skill-Platform is detected from the install path (~/.clawhub/ = clawhub, ~/.cursor/skills/ = cursor, otherwise unknown).

All requests must include: Authorization: Bearer <NEMO_TOKEN>, X-Skill-Source, X-Skill-Version, X-Skill-Platform. Missing attribution headers will cause export to fail with 402.

API base: https://mega-api-prod.nemovideo.ai

Create session: POST /api/tasks/me/with-session/nemo_agent — body {"task_name":"project","language":"<lang>"} — returns task_id, session_id.

Send message (SSE): POST /run_sse — body {"app_name":"nemo_agent","user_id":"me","session_id":"<sid>","new_message":{"parts":[{"text":"<msg>"}]}} with Accept: text/event-stream. Max timeout: 15 minutes.

Upload: POST /api/upload-video/nemo_agent/me/<sid> — file: multipart -F "files=@/path", or URL: {"urls":["<url>"],"source_type":"url"}

Credits: GET /api/credits/balance/simple — returns available, frozen, total

Session state: GET /api/state/nemo_agent/me/<sid>/latest — key fields: data.state.draft, data.state.video_infos, data.state.generated_media

Export (free, no credits): POST /api/render/proxy/lambda — body {"id":"render_<ts>","sessionId":"<sid>","draft":<json>,"output":{"format":"mp4","quality":"high"}}. Poll GET /api/render/proxy/lambda/<id> every 30s until status = completed. Download URL at output.url.

Supported formats: mp4, mov, avi, webm, mkv, jpg, png, gif, webp, mp3, wav, m4a, aac.

Reading the SSE Stream

Text events go straight to the user (after GUI translation). Tool calls stay internal. Heartbeats and empty data: lines mean the backend is still working — show "⏳ Still working..." every 2 minutes.

About 30% of edit operations close the stream without any text. When that happens, poll /api/state to confirm the timeline changed, then tell the user what was updated.

Backend Response Translation

The backend assumes a GUI exists. Translate these into API actions:

Backend saysYou do
"click [button]" / "点击"Execute via API
"open [panel]" / "打开"Query session state
"drag/drop" / "拖拽"Send edit via SSE
"preview in timeline"Show track summary
"Export button" / "导出"Execute export workflow

Draft field mapping: t=tracks, tt=track type (0=video, 1=audio, 7=text), sg=segments, d=duration(ms), m=metadata.

Timeline (3 tracks): 1. Video: city timelapse (0-10s) 2. BGM: Lo-fi (0-10s, 35%) 3. Title: "Urban Dreams" (0-3s)

Error Codes

  • 0 — success, continue normally
  • 1001 — token expired or invalid; re-acquire via /api/auth/anonymous-token
  • 1002 — session not found; create a new one
  • 2001 — out of credits; anonymous users get a registration link with ?bind=<id>, registered users top up
  • 4001 — unsupported file type; show accepted formats
  • 4002 — file too large; suggest compressing or trimming
  • 400 — missing X-Client-Id; generate one and retry
  • 402 — free plan export blocked; not a credit issue, subscription tier
  • 429 — rate limited; wait 30s and retry once

Quick Start Guide

Write a prompt between 10 and 80 words. Shorter prompts under 15 words tend to produce more variance between models, which makes the comparison more informative.

Submit it here — don't adjust phrasing for either model. The skill sends the identical string to both Seedance and Veo, then returns 2 labeled MP4 files, each capped at 1080p and between 3–8 seconds long.

Check the metadata block attached to each file. It lists model name, resolution, aspect ratio, and wall-clock generation time in seconds. Use those numbers when writing up your evaluation, not subjective impressions.

Re-run the same prompt 3 times if you need variance data. Output consistency differs between the two models, and a single run won't show that.

Troubleshooting

If one MP4 returns blank or corrupted, the model timed out — generation cutoff is 90 seconds per model. Resubmit the prompt once before assuming a model-side failure.

Prompts over 150 characters sometimes cause Veo to truncate scene elements. Split long prompts into a core scene description (under 100 characters) plus a style note to keep both models working from equivalent inputs.

If both clips look identical, your prompt is likely too generic. Add at least 2 specific visual details — lighting condition, subject motion, camera angle — to create testable differences between the models' outputs.

Resolution mismatches (e.g., one file at 720p and one at 1080p) aren't a bug. The two models don't share a resolution default. Check the metadata block on each file rather than eyeballing clip size.

平台分布

OpenClaw

75.15%
按下载量换算537

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills