Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

security-testing(安全测试)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

security-testing 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 34,785。

总安装 2,184周安装 91GitHub Stars 331下载 728核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:security-testing(安全测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
仓库路径:skills/security-testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill security-testing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill security-testing

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于自动化安全测试用例生成和执行。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。适合模拟常见攻击向量进行防御验证。可检查输入验证和输出编码实现质量。安装需通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库获取。适用于持续集成中的安全门禁测试。

security-testing 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/security-testing

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill secur…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

security-testing 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill security-testin…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

security-testing 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

security-testing 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

security-testing 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

security-testing 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,184 次,近一周安装 91 次,下载 728 次,GitHub 331 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

security-testing 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
security-testing

安全测试 · 本页

2,184331接触敏感数据MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Security Testing

<default_to_action> When testing security or conducting audits:

  1. TEST OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities systematically
  2. VALIDATE authentication and authorization on every endpoint
  3. SCAN dependencies for known vulnerabilities (npm audit)
  4. CHECK for injection attacks (SQL, XSS, command)
  5. VERIFY secrets aren't exposed in code/logs

Quick Security Checks:

  • Access control → Test horizontal/vertical privilege escalation
  • Crypto → Verify password hashing, HTTPS, no sensitive data exposed
  • Injection → Test SQL injection, XSS, command injection
  • Auth → Test weak passwords, session fixation, MFA enforcement
  • Config → Check error messages don't leak info

Critical Success Factors:

  • Think like an attacker, build like a defender
  • Security is built in, not added at the end
  • Test continuously in CI/CD, not just before release </default_to_action>

Quick Reference Card

When to Use

  • Security audits and penetration testing
  • Testing authentication/authorization
  • Validating input sanitization
  • Reviewing security configuration

OWASP Top 10 (2021)

#VulnerabilityKey Test
1Broken Access ControlUser A accessing User B's data
2Cryptographic FailuresPlaintext passwords, HTTP
3InjectionSQL/XSS/command injection
4Insecure DesignRate limiting, session timeout
5Security MisconfigurationVerbose errors, exposed /admin
6Vulnerable Componentsnpm audit, outdated packages
7Auth FailuresWeak passwords, no MFA
8Integrity FailuresUnsigned updates, malware
9Logging FailuresNo audit trail for breaches
10SSRFServer fetching internal URLs

Tools

TypeToolPurpose
SASTSonarQube, SemgrepStatic code analysis
DASTOWASP ZAP, BurpDynamic scanning
Depsnpm audit, SnykDependency vulnerabilities
Secretsgit-secrets, TruffleHogSecret scanning

Agent Coordination

  • qe-security-scanner: Multi-layer SAST/DAST scanning
  • qe-api-contract-validator: API security testing
  • qe-quality-analyzer: Security code review

Key Vulnerability Tests

1. Broken Access Control

// Horizontal escalation - User A accessing User B's data
test('user cannot access another user\'s order', async () => {
  const userAToken = await login('userA');
  const userBOrder = await createOrder('userB');

  const response = await api.get(`/orders/${userBOrder.id}`, {
    headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userAToken}` }
  });
  expect(response.status).toBe(403);
});

// Vertical escalation - Regular user accessing admin
test('regular user cannot access admin', async () => {
  const userToken = await login('regularUser');
  expect((await api.get('/admin/users', {
    headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userToken}` }
  })).status).toBe(403);
});

2. Injection Attacks

// SQL Injection
test('prevents SQL injection', async () => {
  const malicious = "' OR '1'='1";
  const response = await api.get(`/products?search=${malicious}`);
  expect(response.body.length).toBeLessThan(100); // Not all products
});

// XSS
test('sanitizes HTML output', async () => {
  const xss = '<script>alert("XSS")</script>';
  await api.post('/comments', { text: xss });

  const html = (await api.get('/comments')).body;
  expect(html).toContain('<script>');
  expect(html).not.toContain('<script>');
});

3. Cryptographic Failures

test('passwords are hashed', async () => {
  await db.users.create({ email: 'test@example.com', password: 'MyPassword123' });
  const user = await db.users.findByEmail('test@example.com');

  expect(user.password).not.toBe('MyPassword123');
  expect(user.password).toMatch(/^\$2[aby]\$\d{2}\$/); // bcrypt
});

test('no sensitive data in API response', async () => {
  const response = await api.get('/users/me');
  expect(response.body).not.toHaveProperty('password');
  expect(response.body).not.toHaveProperty('ssn');
});

4. Security Misconfiguration

test('errors don\'t leak sensitive info', async () => {
  const response = await api.post('/login', { email: 'nonexistent@test.com', password: 'wrong' });
  expect(response.body.error).toBe('Invalid credentials'); // Generic message
});

test('sensitive endpoints not exposed', async () => {
  const endpoints = ['/debug', '/.env', '/.git', '/admin'];
  for (let ep of endpoints) {
    expect((await fetch(`https://example.com${ep}`)).status).not.toBe(200);
  }
});

5. Rate Limiting

test('rate limiting prevents brute force', async () => {
  const responses = [];
  for (let i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
    responses.push(await api.post('/login', { email: 'test@example.com', password: 'wrong' }));
  }
  expect(responses.filter(r => r.status === 429).length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});

Security Checklist

Authentication

  • Strong password requirements (12+ chars)
  • Password hashing (bcrypt, scrypt, Argon2)
  • MFA for sensitive operations
  • Account lockout after failed attempts
  • Session ID changes after login
  • Session timeout

Authorization

  • Check authorization on every request
  • Least privilege principle
  • No horizontal escalation
  • No vertical escalation

Data Protection

  • HTTPS everywhere
  • Encrypted at rest
  • Secrets not in code/logs
  • PII compliance (GDPR)

Input Validation

  • Server-side validation
  • Parameterized queries (no SQL injection)
  • Output encoding (no XSS)
  • Rate limiting

CI/CD Integration

# GitHub Actions
security-checks:
  steps:
    - name: Dependency audit
      run: npm audit --audit-level=high

    - name: SAST scan
      run: npm run sast

    - name: Secret scan
      uses: trufflesecurity/trufflehog@main

    - name: DAST scan
      if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
      run: docker run owasp/zap2docker-stable zap-baseline.py -t https://staging.example.com

Pre-commit hooks:

#!/bin/sh
git-secrets --scan
npm run lint:security

Agent-Assisted Security Testing

// Comprehensive multi-layer scan
await Task("Security Scan", {
  target: 'src/',
  layers: { sast: true, dast: true, dependencies: true, secrets: true },
  severity: ['critical', 'high', 'medium']
}, "qe-security-scanner");

// OWASP Top 10 testing
await Task("OWASP Scan", {
  categories: ['broken-access-control', 'injection', 'cryptographic-failures'],
  depth: 'comprehensive'
}, "qe-security-scanner");

// Validate fix
await Task("Validate Fix", {
  vulnerability: 'CVE-2024-12345',
  expectedResolution: 'upgrade package to v2.0.0',
  retestAfterFix: true
}, "qe-security-scanner");

Agent Coordination Hints

Memory Namespace

aqe/security/
├── scans/*           - Scan results
├── vulnerabilities/* - Found vulnerabilities
├── fixes/*           - Remediation tracking
└── compliance/*      - Compliance status

Fleet Coordination

const securityFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
  strategy: 'security-testing',
  agents: [
    'qe-security-scanner',
    'qe-api-contract-validator',
    'qe-quality-analyzer',
    'qe-deployment-readiness'
  ],
  topology: 'parallel'
});

Common Mistakes

❌ Security by Obscurity

Hiding admin at /super-secret-admin → Use proper auth

❌ Client-Side Validation Only

JavaScript validation can be bypassed → Always validate server-side

❌ Trusting User Input

Assuming input is safe → Sanitize, validate, escape all input

❌ Hardcoded Secrets

API keys in code → Environment variables, secret management


Compliance & Agent CLI

For v3 agent-specific commands (aqe security...), SAST/DAST scanning code, compliance audits (SOC2/GDPR/HIPAA), secret detection, and security gates, see references/compliance-agent-commands.md.

Related Skills


Remember

Think like an attacker: What would you try to break? Test that. Build like a defender: Assume input is malicious until proven otherwise. Test continuously: Security testing is ongoing, not one-time.

With Agents: Agents automate vulnerability scanning, track remediation, and validate fixes. Use agents to maintain security posture at scale.

Run History

After each security scan, append results to run-history.json in this skill directory:

node -e "
const fs = require('fs');
const h = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('.claude/skills/security-testing/run-history.json'));
h.runs.push({date: new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0], scan_types: ['sast','deps'], findings: {critical: 0, high: 0, medium: 0, low: 0}});
fs.writeFileSync('.claude/skills/security-testing/run-history.json', JSON.stringify(h, null, 2));
"

Read run-history.json before each scan — track finding count by severity over time. Alert if critical findings increase.

Skill Composition

  • During code review → Use with /code-review-quality for combined quality + security review
  • Validate findings → Use /pentest-validation to prove exploitability
  • Compliance → Use /compliance-testing for regulatory requirements

Gotchas

  • npm audit may report false positives for dev dependencies — filter with --omit=dev for production-relevant results
  • Agent may skip DAST in favor of faster SAST-only scans — explicitly request both if needed
  • security-compliance domain has 100% success rate — use as model for other skill reliability
  • When scanning dependencies, check both direct and transitive — npm audit --all catches nested vulnerabilities

平台分布

Claude Code

27.86%
按下载量换算203

trae

21.13%
按下载量换算154

Antigravity

17.23%
按下载量换算125

github-copilot

12.17%
按下载量换算89

windsurf

7.33%
按下载量换算53

Codex

3.09%
按下载量换算22

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills