Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

security-patterns(安全模式)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

security-patterns 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 60,816。

总安装 364周安装 15GitHub Stars 21下载 119核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:security-patterns(安全模式)
来源仓库:https://github.com/thapaliyabikendra/ai-artifacts
仓库路径:skills/security-patterns
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/thapaliyabikendra/ai-artifacts --skill security-patterns
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/thapaliyabikendra/ai-artifacts --skill security-patterns

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

提供结构化安全检查表与反模式速查表,覆盖身份验证、授权与输入验证等核心领域。适用于代码评审辅助、架构规范对齐或新人培训材料参考。包含 FluentValidation、OAuth 2.0 等具体技术实现指引。需结合项目实际技术栈选择性采纳,通用模板可能存在适配偏差。

security-patterns 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/security-patterns

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/thapaliyabikendra/ai-artifacts --skill securit…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

security-patterns 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/thapaliyabikendra/ai-artifacts --skill security-patterns。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

security-patterns 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

security-patterns 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

security-patterns 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

security-patterns 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 364 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 119 次,GitHub 21 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

security-patterns 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
security-patterns

安全模式 · 本页

36421需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Security Patterns for Web Applications

Security patterns and practices for building secure ABP Framework applications.

When to Use

  • Conducting security audits
  • Implementing authentication/authorization
  • Creating threat models (STRIDE)
  • Reviewing code for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities
  • Designing permission systems
  • Validating input and sanitizing output

STRIDE Threat Model

Framework

CategoryThreatQuestionMitigation
SpoofingIdentity theftCan attacker impersonate user?Authentication, tokens
TamperingData modificationCan attacker modify data?Integrity checks, signing
RepudiationDenial of actionsCan user deny their actions?Audit logging
Information DisclosureData exposureCan attacker access sensitive data?Encryption, access control
Denial of ServiceAvailability attackCan attacker disrupt service?Rate limiting, scaling
Elevation of PrivilegeUnauthorized accessCan attacker gain higher privileges?Authorization, least privilege

Threat Model Template

## Threat Model: [Feature Name]

**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Reviewer**: [Name]

### Assets
| Asset | Sensitivity | Description |
|-------|-------------|-------------|
| Patient Data | HIGH | PII including medical records |
| User Credentials | CRITICAL | Passwords, tokens |
| Appointment Data | MEDIUM | Scheduling information |

### Threat Analysis
| ID | Category | Threat | Likelihood | Impact | Risk | Mitigation |
|----|----------|--------|------------|--------|------|------------|
| T1 | Spoofing | Attacker impersonates patient | Medium | High | HIGH | OAuth 2.0, MFA |
| T2 | Tampering | Attacker modifies appointment | Low | Medium | LOW | Authorization checks |
| T3 | Info Disclosure | Unauthorized patient data access | Medium | Critical | CRITICAL | Row-level security |
| T4 | Elevation | Receptionist gains admin access | Low | Critical | HIGH | Permission validation |

### Mitigations
| ID | Threat | Control | Status |
|----|--------|---------|--------|
| M1 | T1 | Implement OAuth 2.0 with OpenIddict | Implemented |
| M2 | T3 | Add row-level authorization in AppService | Pending |

OWASP Top 10 Checklist

1. Injection (A01)

// BAD: SQL Injection
var query = $"SELECT * FROM Users WHERE Email = '{email}'";

// GOOD: Parameterized query (EF Core does this automatically)
var user = await _dbContext.Users
    .FirstOrDefaultAsync(u => u.Email == email);

// BAD: Command injection
Process.Start("cmd", $"/c dir {userInput}");

// GOOD: Validate and sanitize input
if (!IsValidPath(userInput))
    throw new BusinessException("Invalid path");

2. Broken Authentication (A02)

// Checklist:
// [ ] Use OAuth 2.0 / OpenIddict
// [ ] Implement token expiry (short-lived access, long-lived refresh)
// [ ] Hash passwords with modern algorithm (BCrypt, Argon2)
// [ ] Implement account lockout after failed attempts
// [ ] Use secure session management
// [ ] Implement MFA for sensitive operations

3. Sensitive Data Exposure (A03)

// BAD: Logging PII
_logger.LogInformation("User {Email} logged in", user.Email);

// GOOD: Log identifiers only
_logger.LogInformation("User {UserId} logged in", user.Id);

// BAD: Returning sensitive data
return new UserDto { PasswordHash = user.PasswordHash };

// GOOD: Exclude sensitive fields
return new UserDto { Id = user.Id, Name = user.Name };

4. Security Misconfiguration (A05)

// Checklist:
// [ ] Disable debug mode in production
// [ ] Remove default credentials
// [ ] Configure CORS properly
// [ ] Set secure headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options)
// [ ] Disable directory listing
// [ ] Keep frameworks updated

5. Broken Access Control (A01)

// BAD: No authorization
public async Task<PatientDto> GetPatientAsync(Guid id)
{
    return await _repository.GetAsync(id);
}

// GOOD: Authorization enforced
[Authorize(ClinicPermissions.Patients.Default)]
public async Task<PatientDto> GetPatientAsync(Guid id)
{
    var patient = await _repository.GetAsync(id);

    // Additional check: Can user access this specific patient?
    await AuthorizationService.CheckAsync(patient, CommonOperations.Get);

    return ObjectMapper.Map<Patient, PatientDto>(patient);
}

ABP Authorization Patterns

Permission Definition

public static class {ProjectName}Permissions
{
    public const string GroupName = "{ProjectName}";

    public static class {Feature}
    {
        public const string Default = GroupName + ".{Feature}";
        public const string Create = Default + ".Create";
        public const string Edit = Default + ".Edit";
        public const string Delete = Default + ".Delete";
        public const string ViewAll = Default + ".ViewAll";
    }
}

AppService Authorization

[Authorize({ProjectName}Permissions.{Feature}.Default)]
public class {Entity}AppService : ApplicationService
{
    [Authorize({ProjectName}Permissions.{Feature}.Create)]
    public async Task<{Entity}Dto> CreateAsync(CreateUpdate{Entity}Dto input)
    {
        // Create logic
    }

    [Authorize({ProjectName}Permissions.{Feature}.Edit)]
    public async Task<{Entity}Dto> UpdateAsync(Guid id, CreateUpdate{Entity}Dto input)
    {
        // Update logic
    }

    [Authorize({ProjectName}Permissions.{Feature}.Delete)]
    public async Task DeleteAsync(Guid id)
    {
        // Delete logic
    }
}

Resource-Based Authorization

public async Task<PatientDto> GetAsync(Guid id)
{
    var patient = await _repository.GetAsync(id);

    // Check if current user can access this specific patient
    if (patient.AssignedDoctorId != CurrentUser.Id)
    {
        await AuthorizationService.CheckAsync(
            {ProjectName}Permissions.{Feature}.ViewAll);
    }

    return ObjectMapper.Map<Patient, PatientDto>(patient);
}

Security Audit Report Template

## Security Audit Report

**Application**: [Name]
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Auditor**: [Name]
**Risk Level**: Critical | High | Medium | Low

### Executive Summary
[1-2 paragraph overview of findings]

### Findings

#### [VULN-001] [Title]
- **Severity**: Critical | High | Medium | Low
- **Category**: OWASP A01-A10 / STRIDE
- **Location**: `path/to/file.cs:line`
- **Description**: [What the vulnerability is]
- **Impact**: [What could happen if exploited]
- **Reproduction Steps**:
  1. [Step 1]
  2. [Step 2]
- **Recommendation**: [How to fix]
- **Code Example**:

// Vulnerable code [code here]

// Fixed code [code here]


### Summary

| Severity | Count | Fixed | Pending |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 0 | 0 | 0 |

### Recommendations

1. [Priority recommendation]
2. [Secondary recommendation]

Security Checklist

Authentication

  • [ ] OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect implemented
  • [ ] Token expiry configured (access: 15-60 min, refresh: 7-30 days)
  • [ ] Password policy enforced (min length, complexity)
  • [ ] Account lockout after failed attempts
  • [ ] MFA available for sensitive operations
  • [ ] Secure password reset flow

Authorization

  • [ ] All endpoints have [Authorize] attribute
  • [ ] Permissions defined for all operations
  • [ ] Role-based access enforced
  • [ ] Resource-based authorization where needed
  • [ ] No permission bypass vulnerabilities
  • [ ] Least privilege principle applied

Input Validation

  • [ ] All DTOs have FluentValidation
  • [ ] SQL uses parameterized queries (EF Core)
  • [ ] File uploads restricted by type and size
  • [ ] API rate limiting configured
  • [ ] XSS prevention (output encoding)
  • [ ] CSRF protection enabled

Data Protection

  • [ ] PII not logged
  • [ ] Sensitive data encrypted at rest
  • [ ] TLS enforced (HTTPS only)
  • [ ] Secure headers configured
  • [ ] Error messages don't expose internals
  • [ ] Connection strings secured

Audit & Monitoring

  • [ ] Security events logged
  • [ ] Failed auth attempts tracked
  • [ ] Admin actions audited
  • [ ] Anomaly detection configured
  • [ ] Log integrity protected

Authorization Anti-Patterns (Quick Scan)

Use this table for rapid code review scanning:

PatternRisk LevelFix
No [Authorize] on public method🔴 CRITICALAdd [Authorize(Permission)]
[Authorize] only at class level🟡 MEDIUMAdd method-level permissions for mutations
No permission check for bulk operations🔴 HIGHCheck permission per operation or batch
Missing [RequiresTenant] on tenant-specific ops🔴 HIGHAdd [RequiresTenant] attribute
_dataFilter.Disable<IMultiTenant>() without comment🔴 CRITICALAdd justification comment or remove
Hardcoded secrets in code🔴 CRITICALUse configuration/secrets management
PII in log messages🟡 MEDIUMLog identifiers only, not PII

Multi-Tenancy Security

Dangerous Pattern: Disabling Tenant Filter

// ⚠️ DANGEROUS: Cross-tenant data exposure risk!
using (_dataFilter.Disable<IMultiTenant>())
{
    // This query now sees ALL tenants' data!
    var exists = await _repository.AnyAsync(x => x.Code == code);
}

Risks:

  • Cross-tenant data leakage
  • Incorrect validation results (e.g., "code already exists" when it exists in another tenant)
  • Security audit failures

When Disabling is Justified (Rare)

Only disable multi-tenancy with explicit justification comment:

// ✅ JUSTIFIED: License plate numbers must be globally unique across all tenants
// to ensure physical warehouse operations don't conflict between tenants sharing facilities.
// Approved by: [Name] on [Date]
using (_dataFilter.Disable<IMultiTenant>())
{
    var existsGlobally = await _licensePlateRepository.AnyAsync(
        lp => lp.LicensePlateNumber == input.LicensePlateNumber && !lp.ShippedOut);
}

Multi-Tenancy Security Checklist

  • No _dataFilter.Disable<IMultiTenant>() without documented justification
  • Cross-tenant uniqueness checks are truly required (not accidental)
  • Error messages don't reveal other tenants' data
  • Audit logging captures cross-tenant operations
  • Unit tests verify tenant isolation

Common Vulnerability Patterns

Missing Authorization

// VULNERABLE
public async Task<PatientDto> GetAsync(Guid id)
{
    return await _repository.GetAsync(id);
}

// SECURE
[Authorize({ProjectName}Permissions.Patients.Default)]
public async Task<PatientDto> GetAsync(Guid id)
{
    return await _repository.GetAsync(id);
}

Information Disclosure in Errors

// VULNERABLE
catch (Exception ex)
{
    return BadRequest(ex.ToString()); // Exposes stack trace
}

// SECURE
catch (Exception ex)
{
    _logger.LogError(ex, "Error processing request");
    throw new UserFriendlyException("An error occurred");
}

Insecure Direct Object Reference

// VULNERABLE: Any user can access any patient
[HttpGet("{id}")]
public async Task<PatientDto> Get(Guid id)
{
    return await _service.GetAsync(id);
}

// SECURE: Verify user can access this patient
[HttpGet("{id}")]
public async Task<PatientDto> Get(Guid id)
{
    var patient = await _service.GetAsync(id);
    if (!await CanAccessPatient(patient))
        throw new UnauthorizedAccessException();
    return patient;
}

References

平台分布

Cursor

30.09%
按下载量换算36

Claude Code

20.09%
按下载量换算24

github-copilot

18.17%
按下载量换算22

mcpjam

10.79%
按下载量换算13

crush

7.45%
按下载量换算9

cline

2.99%
按下载量换算4

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills