Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

security-frameworks(安全框架)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

security-frameworks 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 58,892。

总安装 399周安装 16GitHub Stars 61下载 129核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:security-frameworks(安全框架)
来源仓库:https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins
仓库路径:skills/security-frameworks
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill security-frameworks
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill security-frameworks

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

提供主流安全框架与标准的应用指导。security-frameworks 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。支持 OWASP、NIST 等框架的快速查询与落地建议。帮助构建符合行业规范的安全基线配置。输出内容需适配组织内部流程与安全政策。可在 Codex、Gemini CLI 等平台集成使用。

来源仓库内路径:skills/security-frameworks

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill s…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

security-frameworks 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill security-fr…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

security-frameworks 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

security-frameworks 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

security-frameworks 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

security-frameworks 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 399 次,近一周安装 16 次,下载 129 次,GitHub 61 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

security-frameworks 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
security-frameworks

安全框架 · 本页

39961操作浏览器MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Security Frameworks Planning

Comprehensive guidance for security framework alignment and control mapping before development begins.

When to Use This Skill

  • Preparing for ISO 27001 certification
  • Planning SOC 2 Type I or Type II audits
  • Implementing NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
  • Mapping CIS Controls to your environment
  • Creating cross-framework control mappings

Framework Comparison

When to Use Which Framework

FrameworkBest ForCertification?Geography
ISO 27001Enterprise ISMS, international recognitionYes (3rd party)Global
SOC 2SaaS/Cloud providers, customer trustYes (CPA firm)Primarily US
NIST CSFRisk management, federal requirementsNoUS-focused
CIS ControlsTactical implementation, prioritizationNoGlobal

Framework Relationships

                    ┌─────────────────┐
                    │   Regulations   │
                    │ (GDPR, HIPAA)   │
                    └────────┬────────┘
                             │ drives
                    ┌────────▼────────┐
                    │   Frameworks    │
                    │(ISO, NIST, CIS) │
                    └────────┬────────┘
                             │ implements
                    ┌────────▼────────┐
                    │    Controls     │
                    │ (specific tech) │
                    └────────┬────────┘
                             │ evidenced by
                    ┌────────▼────────┐
                    │    Audits       │
                    │ (SOC 2, ISO)    │
                    └─────────────────┘

ISO 27001:2022

Structure Overview

Clauses 4-10: Management System Requirements
├── 4. Context of the organization
├── 5. Leadership
├── 6. Planning
├── 7. Support
├── 8. Operation
├── 9. Performance evaluation
└── 10. Improvement

Annex A: 93 Controls in 4 Themes
├── A.5 Organizational controls (37)
├── A.6 People controls (8)
├── A.7 Physical controls (14)
└── A.8 Technological controls (34)

Key Controls for Development

ControlTitleImplementation
A.5.1Policies for information securityDocument security policies
A.5.15Access controlRBAC, least privilege
A.5.23Information security for cloud servicesCloud security controls
A.8.4Access to source codeGit access, code review
A.8.8Management of technical vulnerabilitiesVulnerability scanning
A.8.9Configuration managementIaC, hardening
A.8.25Secure development lifecycleSSDLC
A.8.28Secure codingOWASP, static analysis
A.8.29Security testingDAST, penetration testing
A.8.31Separation of environmentsDev/Test/Prod isolation

ISMS Implementation Approach

// Control implementation tracking
public class IsmsControlTracker
{
    public record ControlStatus
    {
        public required string ControlId { get; init; } // e.g., "A.8.28"
        public required string ControlTitle { get; init; }
        public required ImplementationStatus Status { get; init; }
        public required string Owner { get; init; }
        public required List<string> Evidence { get; init; }
        public required DateTimeOffset LastReviewDate { get; init; }
        public required DateTimeOffset NextReviewDate { get; init; }
        public string? GapDescription { get; init; }
        public string? RemediationPlan { get; init; }
    }

    public enum ImplementationStatus
    {
        NotApplicable,
        NotImplemented,
        PartiallyImplemented,
        FullyImplemented
    }

    public GapAnalysisReport GenerateGapAnalysis(
        IEnumerable<ControlStatus> controls)
    {
        var gaps = controls
            .Where(c => c.Status != ImplementationStatus.FullyImplemented
                     && c.Status != ImplementationStatus.NotApplicable)
            .OrderBy(c => c.ControlId);

        return new GapAnalysisReport
        {
            TotalControls = controls.Count(),
            FullyImplemented = controls.Count(c =>
                c.Status == ImplementationStatus.FullyImplemented),
            PartiallyImplemented = controls.Count(c =>
                c.Status == ImplementationStatus.PartiallyImplemented),
            NotImplemented = controls.Count(c =>
                c.Status == ImplementationStatus.NotImplemented),
            NotApplicable = controls.Count(c =>
                c.Status == ImplementationStatus.NotApplicable),
            Gaps = gaps.ToList()
        };
    }
}

SOC 2

Trust Services Criteria (TSC)

CategoryDescriptionKey Criteria
Security (Required)System protected against unauthorized accessCC6.x
AvailabilitySystem available for operationA1.x
Processing IntegritySystem processing is complete, accuratePI1.x
ConfidentialityConfidential information protectedC1.x
PrivacyPersonal information protectedP1.x-P8.x

Common Criteria (Security)

CC1 - Control Environment
CC2 - Communication and Information
CC3 - Risk Assessment
CC4 - Monitoring Activities
CC5 - Control Activities
CC6 - Logical and Physical Access Controls
CC7 - System Operations
CC8 - Change Management
CC9 - Risk Mitigation

SOC 2 Control Examples

## CC6.1 - Logical Access Security

### Control Description
The entity implements logical access security software, infrastructure,
and architectures over protected information assets to protect them
from security events to meet the entity's objectives.

### Implementation
- Authentication via Azure AD with MFA required
- RBAC with least privilege principle
- Service accounts with managed identities
- API access via OAuth 2.0 tokens

### Evidence
- Azure AD configuration export
- Role assignment documentation
- Access review reports (quarterly)
- MFA enforcement policy

Type I vs Type II

AspectType IType II
ScopePoint in timePeriod of time (6-12 months)
FocusDesign of controlsDesign AND operating effectiveness
EvidencePolicies, configurationsLogs, samples, testing
Use CaseFirst audit, quick reportCustomer assurance, ongoing

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

Core Functions

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                      GOVERN                         │
│   Organizational context, strategy, oversight       │
├────────────┬────────────┬────────────┬─────────────┤
│  IDENTIFY  │  PROTECT   │   DETECT   │   RESPOND   │
│  Assets &  │ Safeguards │ Continuous │  Incident   │
│   Risks    │            │ Monitoring │  Response   │
├────────────┴────────────┴────────────┴─────────────┤
│                      RECOVER                        │
│             Resilience & Recovery                   │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Function Breakdown

FunctionCategoryKey Activities
GOVERNOrganizational ContextEstablish risk management strategy
Risk Management StrategyDefine risk tolerance
Roles & ResponsibilitiesAssign accountability
PolicyDocument policies
OversightBoard/executive involvement
IDENTIFYAsset ManagementInventory systems and data
Risk AssessmentIdentify and assess risks
ImprovementContinuous improvement
PROTECTIdentity ManagementAccess control, authentication
Awareness & TrainingSecurity training
Data SecurityEncryption, classification
Platform SecuritySecure configurations
Technology InfrastructureSecure architecture
DETECTContinuous MonitoringSecurity monitoring
Adverse Event AnalysisThreat detection
RESPONDIncident ManagementIncident response
Incident AnalysisRoot cause analysis
Incident ResponseContainment, eradication
Incident MitigationLimit impact
RECOVERIncident RecoveryRestore operations
ImprovementsPost-incident learning

Implementation Tiers

TierNameDescription
1PartialAd hoc, reactive
2Risk InformedRisk aware but informal
3RepeatableFormal policies, consistent
4AdaptiveContinuous improvement, predictive

CIS Controls v8

Control Categories

Implementation Groups (IG):
IG1 - Essential Cyber Hygiene (56 safeguards)
IG2 - IG1 + Enhanced (130 safeguards)
IG3 - IG1 + IG2 + Advanced (153 safeguards)

18 Control Areas

#ControlIG1Key Safeguards
1Inventory of Enterprise Assets✓Asset discovery, inventory
2Inventory of Software Assets✓Software inventory
3Data Protection✓Classification, encryption
4Secure Configuration✓Hardening, baselines
5Account Management✓Centralized auth, MFA
6Access Control Management✓Least privilege, RBAC
7Continuous Vulnerability Management✓Scanning, patching
8Audit Log Management✓Centralized logging
9Email and Web Browser Protections✓Filtering, sandboxing
10Malware Defenses✓Anti-malware, EDR
11Data Recovery✓Backups, testing
12Network Infrastructure ManagementSegmentation, hardening
13Network Monitoring and DefenseIDS/IPS, NDR
14Security Awareness and Skills Training✓Training program
15Service Provider ManagementVendor assessment
16Application Software SecuritySSDLC, testing
17Incident Response ManagementIR plan, testing
18Penetration TestingAnnual pen test

Priority Implementation

## CIS IG1 Priority Controls

### Start Here (Quick Wins)
1. **Control 1.1**: Maintain accurate asset inventory
2. **Control 4.1**: Establish secure configuration process
3. **Control 5.1**: Establish centralized account management
4. **Control 6.1**: Establish access granting process

### Next Priority
5. **Control 7.1**: Establish vulnerability management process
6. **Control 8.1**: Establish audit logging
7. **Control 11.1**: Establish data recovery practices
8. **Control 14.1**: Establish security awareness program

### Then
9. **Control 3.1**: Establish data management process
10. **Control 10.1**: Deploy anti-malware

Cross-Framework Mapping

Control Mapping Matrix

CapabilityISO 27001SOC 2 TSCNIST CSF 2.0CIS v8
Access ControlA.5.15, A.8.2-8.5CC6.1-6.3PR.AA5, 6
Asset ManagementA.5.9-5.11CC6.1ID.AM1, 2
EncryptionA.8.24CC6.1, CC6.7PR.DS3.6, 3.9
LoggingA.8.15CC7.2DE.AE8
Vulnerability MgmtA.8.8CC7.1ID.RA7
Incident ResponseA.5.24-5.28CC7.4, CC7.5RS17
Change ManagementA.8.32CC8.1PR.IP4.2
Secure DevelopmentA.8.25-8.31CC8.1PR.IP16

.NET Control Implementation Examples

// Access Control implementation (multiple frameworks)
// ISO 27001 A.5.15 / SOC 2 CC6.1 / NIST PR.AA / CIS 5,6

public class AccessControlService
{
    private readonly IAuthorizationService _authService;
    private readonly IAuditLogger _auditLogger;

    public async Task<AuthorizationResult> Authorize(
        ClaimsPrincipal user,
        string resource,
        string action,
        CancellationToken ct)
    {
        // Log access attempt (CIS 8 / NIST DE.AE)
        var accessAttempt = new AccessAttempt
        {
            UserId = user.GetUserId(),
            Resource = resource,
            Action = action,
            Timestamp = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow
        };

        var result = await _authService.AuthorizeAsync(user, resource, action);

        accessAttempt.Success = result.Succeeded;
        accessAttempt.Reason = result.Failure?.FailureReasons
            .FirstOrDefault()?.Message;

        await _auditLogger.Log(accessAttempt, ct);

        return result;
    }
}

// Secure configuration (ISO A.8.9 / NIST PR.IP / CIS 4)
public class SecureConfigurationValidator
{
    public ValidationResult ValidateConfiguration(IConfiguration config)
    {
        var issues = new List<ConfigurationIssue>();

        // Check for secure defaults
        if (config["AllowHttp"] == "true")
        {
            issues.Add(new ConfigurationIssue
            {
                Setting = "AllowHttp",
                Issue = "HTTP should be disabled in production",
                Severity = Severity.High,
                Remediation = "Set AllowHttp=false"
            });
        }

        // Check TLS configuration
        var tlsVersion = config["MinTlsVersion"];
        if (tlsVersion != "1.2" && tlsVersion != "1.3")
        {
            issues.Add(new ConfigurationIssue
            {
                Setting = "MinTlsVersion",
                Issue = "TLS 1.2 or higher required",
                Severity = Severity.Critical,
                Remediation = "Set MinTlsVersion=1.2"
            });
        }

        return new ValidationResult { Issues = issues };
    }
}

Framework Selection Guide

Decision Tree

What is your primary driver?

├─ Customer requirement for audit report?
│   ├─ US customers → SOC 2
│   └─ International customers → ISO 27001
│
├─ Regulatory requirement?
│   ├─ US Federal → NIST CSF + FedRAMP
│   └─ Healthcare → HIPAA (use NIST CSF)
│
├─ Starting security program?
│   └─ CIS Controls IG1 (practical starting point)
│
└─ Enterprise-wide ISMS?
    └─ ISO 27001 (comprehensive management system)

Security Framework Checklist

Pre-Assessment

  • Identify applicable frameworks
  • Determine scope boundaries
  • Inventory systems in scope
  • Document current controls
  • Conduct gap analysis

Control Implementation

  • Prioritize gaps by risk
  • Create remediation roadmap
  • Implement missing controls
  • Document evidence
  • Test control effectiveness

Audit Preparation

  • Collect evidence artifacts
  • Prepare control narratives
  • Test samples (Type II)
  • Address known gaps
  • Brief stakeholders

Cross-References

  • Data Privacy: gdpr-compliance, hipaa-compliance for data protection
  • PCI: pci-dss-compliance for payment security
  • AI: ai-governance for AI-specific controls

Resources

平台分布

Antigravity

29.87%
按下载量换算39

trae

22.68%
按下载量换算29

windsurf

17.51%
按下载量换算23

Claude Code

10.94%
按下载量换算14

Codex

8.46%
按下载量换算11

Gemini CLI

3.11%
按下载量换算4

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills