Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

security-detection-rule-management(安全检测规则管理)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

security-detection-rule-management 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 13,367。

总安装 9,449周安装 386GitHub Stars 445下载 3,026核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:security-detection-rule-management(安全检测规则管理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/elastic/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/security-detection-rule-management
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/elastic/agent-skills --skill security-detection-rule-management
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/elastic/agent-skills --skill security-detection-rule-management

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于安全检测规则管理与审计。security-detection-rule-management 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适合检查权限配置和凭据风险。可生成安全复核清单或漏洞排查建议。安装方式:通过 npx 从 GitHub 仓库添加技能。不能直接使用工具输出作为最终结论。

来源仓库内路径:skills/security-detection-rule-management

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/elastic/agent-skills --skill security-detectio…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

security-detection-rule-management 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/elastic/agent-skills --skill security-detection-rule-man…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

security-detection-rule-management 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

security-detection-rule-management 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

security-detection-rule-management 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

security-detection-rule-management 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 9,449 次,近一周安装 386 次,下载 3,026 次,GitHub 445 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

security-detection-rule-management 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
security-detection-rule-management

安全检测规则管理 · 本页

9,449445接触敏感数据未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Detection Rule Management

Create new detection rules for emerging threats and coverage gaps, and tune existing rules to reduce false positives. All operations use the Kibana Detection Engine API via rule-manager.js.

Execution rules

  • Start executing tools immediately — do not read SKILL.md, browse the workspace, or list files first.
  • Report tool output faithfully. Copy rule IDs, names, alert counts, exception IDs, and error messages exactly as returned by the API. Do not abbreviate rule UUIDs, invent rule names, or round alert counts.
  • When a tool returns an error (rule not found, API failure), report the exact error — do not guess at alternatives.

Prerequisites

Install dependencies before first use from the skills/security directory:

cd skills/security && npm install

Set the required environment variables (or add them to a .env file in the workspace root):

export ELASTICSEARCH_URL="https://your-cluster.es.cloud.example.com:443"
export ELASTICSEARCH_API_KEY="your-api-key"
export KIBANA_URL="https://your-cluster.kb.cloud.example.com:443"
export KIBANA_API_KEY="your-kibana-api-key"

Common multi-step workflows

TaskTools to call (in order)
Tune noisy SIEM rulerule_manager find/noisy-rules → run_query (investigate FPs) → rule_manager patch or add-exception
Add endpoint behavior exceptionfetch_endpoint_rule (get rule definition from GitHub) → add_endpoint_exception (scoped to rule.id)
Create new detection rulerun_query (test query against data) → rule_manager create
Investigate rule alert volumerule_manager get → run_query (query alerts index)

For endpoint behavior rules, always fetch the rule definition first to understand query logic and existing exclusions before adding an exception. For SIEM rules, always investigate alert patterns with run_query before tuning.

Critical: For endpoint behavior rules, always use fetch_endpoint_rule (not shell or direct script calls) to get the rule definition, then use add_endpoint_exception to add the exception. These are dedicated tools — do not invoke the underlying scripts manually.

Workflow: Tune a rule for false positives

Steps 1–2: Identify noisy rules and analyze false positives

Find noisy rules with noisy-rules or find, then get the rule definition and investigate alerts:

node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js noisy-rules --days 7 --top 20
node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js find --filter "alert.attributes.name:*Suspicious*" --brief
node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js get --id <rule_uuid>
node skills/security/alert-triage/scripts/run-query.js "kibana.alert.rule.name:\"<rule_name>\"" --index ".alerts-security.alerts-*" --days 7 --full

Look for patterns: same process/user/host → exception candidate; broad pattern → tighten query; legitimate software → exception; too broad → rewrite or adjust threshold.

Step 3: Choose a tuning strategy

In order of preference:

  1. Add exception — Best for specific known-good processes, users, or hosts. Does not modify the rule query. Use when the rule is correct in general but fires on known-legitimate activity.
  2. Tighten the query — Patch the rule's query to exclude the FP pattern. Best when the false positives stem from the query being too broad.
  3. Adjust threshold / alert suppression — For threshold rules, increase the threshold value. For any rule type, enable alert suppression to reduce duplicate alerts on the same entity.
  4. Reduce risk score / severity — Downgrade the rule's priority if it generates many low-value alerts but still has some detection value.
  5. Disable the rule — Last resort. Only if the rule provides no value or is completely redundant with another rule.

Steps 4–5: Apply tuning, verify, and document

Add exception (single/multi-condition, wildcard via matches):

node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js add-exception \
  --rule-uuid <rule_uuid> \
  --entries "process.executable:is:C:\\Program Files\\SCCM\\CcmExec.exe" "process.parent.name:is:CcmExec.exe" \
  --name "Exclude SCCM" --comment "FP: SCCM deployment" --tags "tuning:fp" "source:soc" --yes

Patch query, threshold, severity, or disable:

node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js patch --id <rule_uuid> --query "process.name:powershell.exe AND NOT process.parent.name:CcmExec.exe" --yes
node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js patch --id <rule_uuid> --max-signals 50 --yes
node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js patch --id <rule_uuid> --severity low --risk-score 21 --yes
node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js disable --id <rule_uuid> --yes

Write operations (patch, enable, disable, delete, add-exception, bulk-action) prompt for confirmation by default. Pass --yes to skip the prompt (required when called by an agent).

Verify with rule-manager.js get --id <rule_uuid>. Update triage cases via the case-management skill.


Workflow: Create new detection rule

Steps 1–2: Define the threat, data sources, and fields

Specify MITRE ATT&CK technique(s), required data sources (Endpoint, Network, Cloud), and malicious vs legitimate behavior. Common indexes: logs-endpoint.events.process-*, logs-endpoint.events.network-*, .alerts-security.alerts-*, logs-windows.*, logs-aws.*. Key fields: process.name, process.command_line, process.parent.name, destination.ip, winlog.event_id, event.action. Verify data with run-query.js:

node skills/security/alert-triage/scripts/run-query.js "process.name:certutil.exe" --index "logs-endpoint.events.process-*" --days 30 --size 5

Step 3: Write and test the query

Rule types: query (KQL field matching), eql (event sequences), esql (aggregations), threshold (volume-based), threat_match (IOC correlation), new_terms (first-seen). Test against Elasticsearch before creating:

node skills/security/alert-triage/scripts/run-query.js "process.name:certutil.exe AND process.command_line:(*urlcache* OR *decode*)" \
  --index "logs-endpoint.events.process-*" --days 30

For EQL, use --query-file to avoid shell escaping issues.

Validate query syntax before creating or patching a rule. The validate-query command catches common errors locally — escaped backslashes, mismatched parentheses, unbalanced quotes, and duplicate boolean operators:

node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js validate-query \
  --query "process.name:taskkill.exe AND process.command_line:(*chrome.exe* OR *msedge.exe*)" --language kuery

The create and patch commands also run validation automatically and reject invalid queries. Pass --skip-validation only if you are certain the query is correct despite triggering a check.

Common KQL syntax mistakes:

  • Escaped forward-slashes — KQL wildcards use plain text. Write */IM chrome.exe*, not *\/IM chrome.exe*.
  • Mismatched parentheses — every ( must have a matching ).
  • Unbalanced quotes — every " must be paired.
  • Duplicate operators — AND AND or OR OR is always an error.

Step 4: Create the rule

node skills/security/detection-rule-management/scripts/rule-manager.js create \
  --name "Certutil URL Download or Decode" \
  --description "Detects certutil.exe used to download files or decode Base64 payloads, a common LOLBin technique." \
  --type query \
  --query "process.name:certutil.exe AND process.command_line:(*urlcache* OR *decode*)" \
  --index "logs-endpoint.events.process-*" \
  --severity medium --risk-score 47 \
  --tags "OS:Windows" "Tactic:Defense Evasion" "Tactic:Command and Control" \
  --false-positives "IT administrators using certutil for legitimate certificate operations" \
  --references "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1140/" \
  --interval 5m --disabled

For complex rules (EQL sequences, MITRE mappings, alert suppression), use create --from-file rule_definition.json and --threat-file. See references/detection-api-reference.md for schema.

Step 5: Monitor and iterate

Monitor alert volume with noisy-rules --days 3 --top 10 and tune false positives as needed.


Workflow: Endpoint behavior rules tuning

Tune Elastic Endpoint behavior rules by adding Endpoint exceptions scoped to specific rules. Endpoint exceptions live in Security → Exceptions → Endpoint Security Exception List, not under individual SIEM rules.

Key principles: Always fetch the rule definition from protections-artifacts first. Always scope exceptions to the rule (rule.id or rule.name). Use full paths over process names. Run the mandatory entity cross-check (Step 4b) before any exception. Simulate impact (Step 5b) and aim for ≥60% noise reduction.

Scripts: fetch-endpoint-rule-from-github.js (get rule TOML by id), add-endpoint-exception.js (add to Endpoint Exception List; rule.id/rule.name required), check-exclusion-best-practices.js.

For the full step-by-step workflow (Steps 1–6), queries, and simulation templates, see references/endpoint-behavior-tuning-workflow.md. For exclusion best practices, see references/endpoint-rule-exclusion-best-practices.md.


Tool reference

rule-manager.js

All commands are run from the workspace root. All output is JSON unless noted.

CommandDescription
findSearch/list rules with optional KQL filter
getGet a rule by --id or --rule-id
createCreate a rule (inline flags or --from-file)
patchPatch specific fields on a rule
enableEnable a rule
disableDisable a rule
deleteDelete a rule
exportExport rules as NDJSON
bulk-actionBulk enable/disable/delete/duplicate/edit
add-exceptionAdd an exception item to a rule
list-exceptionsList items on an exception list
create-shared-listCreate a shared exception list
noisy-rulesFind noisiest rules by alert volume
validate-queryCheck query syntax before create/patch

Endpoint behavior tuning: fetch-endpoint-rule-from-github.js (get rule TOML by id), add-endpoint-exception.js (add to Endpoint Exception List; rule.id/rule.name required), check-exclusion-best-practices.js.

Exception entry format

Pass entries as field:operator:value. Operators: is, is_not, is_one_of, is_not_one_of, exists, does_not_exist, matches, does_not_match. Example: process.name:is:svchost.exe, file.path:matches:C:\\Program Files\\*.

Additional resources

Examples

  • "Find the noisiest detection rules from the last 7 days and help me tune one"
  • "Add an exception to exclude SCCM from the suspicious PowerShell rule"
  • "Create a new detection rule for certutil URL download or decode"

Guidelines

  • Report only tool output. When summarizing results, quote or paraphrase only what the tools returned. Do not invent IDs, hostnames, IPs, scores, process trees, or other details not present in the tool response.
  • Preserve identifiers from the request. If the user provides specific hostnames, agent IDs, case IDs, or other values, use those exact values in tool calls and responses — do not substitute different identifiers.
  • Confirm actions concisely. After executing a tool, confirm what was done using the tool's return data. Do not fabricate internal IDs, metadata, or status details unless they appear in the tool response.
  • Distinguish facts from inference. If you draw conclusions beyond what the tools returned (e.g., suggesting a MITRE technique based on observed behavior), clearly label those as your assessment rather than presenting them as tool output.
  • Start executing tools immediately. Do not read SKILL.md, browse directories, or list files before acting.
  • Report tool output verbatim. Copy rule IDs, names, alert counts, and error messages exactly as returned. Do not abbreviate UUIDs or round numbers.

Production use

  • All write operations (create, patch, enable, disable, delete, add-exception, bulk-action, add-endpoint-exception) prompt for confirmation. Pass --yes or -y to skip when called by an agent.
  • Endpoint exceptions suppress detections globally. Always scope exceptions to a specific rule using rule.id or rule.name in the entries. A broad, unscoped exception can silently reduce detection coverage.
  • Verify environment variables point to the intended cluster before running any script.
  • Use --dry-run with bulk-action to preview impact before executing bulk changes.

Environment variables

VariableRequiredDescription
ELASTICSEARCH_URLYesElasticsearch URL (for noisy-rules aggregation)
ELASTICSEARCH_API_KEYYesElasticsearch API key
KIBANA_URLYesKibana URL (for rules API)
KIBANA_API_KEYYesKibana API key

平台分布

Codex

36.61%
按下载量换算1,108

Claude

27.78%
按下载量换算841

Cursor

18.81%
按下载量换算569

Gemini CLI

9.88%
按下载量换算299

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills