Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

secure-web-search(安全网络搜索)

secure-web-search 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

secure-web-search 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 55,679。

总安装 470周安装 19GitHub Stars 17下载 147核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:secure-web-search(安全网络搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ronnycoding/.claude
仓库路径:skills/secure-web-search
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ronnycoding/.claude --skill secure-web-search
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ronnycoding/.claude --skill secure-web-search

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,可结合原始 README 进一步验证用途。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/ronnycoding/.claude --skill secure-web-search。建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免误触联网或文件操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/secure-web-search

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ronnycoding/.claude --skill secure-web-search;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

secure-web-search 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ronnycoding/.claude --skill secure-web-search。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

secure-web-search 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

secure-web-search 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

secure-web-search 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

secure-web-search 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 470 次,近一周安装 19 次,下载 147 次,GitHub 17 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

secure-web-search 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
secure-web-search

安全网络搜索 · 本页

47017权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
secure-web-search
description
Guide for performing secure web searches with privacy protection, source verification, and information validation. Use when the user wants to search the web securely, verify sources, fact-check information, or mentions secure search, privacy, source validation, or web research.

Secure Web Search Guide

This skill helps you perform secure web searches while protecting privacy, verifying sources, and validating information accuracy. Essential for research, fact-checking, and gathering reliable information.

Quick Start

When performing secure web searches, follow this workflow:

  1. Define search intent - What information do you need and why?
  2. Choose search method - Direct search, privacy-focused engine, or specialized tools
  3. Craft effective query - Use search operators and specific terms
  4. Verify sources - Check credibility, authority, and bias
  5. Validate information - Cross-reference multiple sources
  6. Protect privacy - Avoid tracking, use secure connections
  7. Document findings - Track sources and evidence
  8. Assess reliability - Determine confidence level in results

What is Secure Web Search?

Secure Web Search involves:

  • Privacy protection: Preventing tracking and data collection
  • Source verification: Ensuring information comes from credible sources
  • Information validation: Cross-referencing and fact-checking
  • Bias awareness: Recognizing potential source biases
  • Safe browsing: Avoiding malicious sites and phishing
  • Data integrity: Ensuring information hasn't been altered

Search Privacy Protection

Privacy-Focused Search Engines

DuckDuckGo:

  • No tracking or profiling
  • No search history storage
  • Anonymous search results
  • Built-in tracker blocking

Startpage:

  • Google results without tracking
  • Anonymous view feature
  • No IP address logging
  • EU-based privacy protection

Brave Search:

  • Independent index
  • No user profiling
  • Anonymous search
  • Open-source transparent ranking

Searx/SearXNG:

  • Meta-search engine
  • Self-hostable
  • No tracking
  • Aggregates multiple search engines

Search Privacy Best Practices

Avoid revealing patterns:

  • Don't use personal information in queries
  • Vary search terms to prevent profiling
  • Use broad terms before narrow searches
  • Consider timing of searches

Protect identity:

  • Use VPN for sensitive searches
  • Clear cookies regularly
  • Use private/incognito mode
  • Disable search history

Secure connections:

  • Always use HTTPS
  • Verify SSL certificates
  • Avoid public WiFi for sensitive searches
  • Use encrypted DNS (DoH/DoT)

Effective Search Techniques

Basic Search Operators

Exact phrase matching:

"exact phrase here"

Example: "climate change impact" 2024

Exclude terms:

search term -excluded

Example: python tutorial -Django

OR operator:

term1 OR term2

Example: JavaScript OR TypeScript framework

Wildcard:

search * term

Example: best * programming language 2024

Site-specific search:

site:domain.com search term

Example: site:github.com authentication library

File type search:

filetype:ext search term

Example: filetype:pdf security best practices

Date range:

search term after:2024-01-01
search term before:2024-12-31

Example: AI developments after:2024-06-01

Advanced Search Operators

Related sites:

related:domain.com

Example: related:stackoverflow.com

In URL:

inurl:keyword

Example: inurl:documentation API design

In title:

intitle:keyword

Example: intitle:"best practices" security

Cache view:

cache:domain.com

Example: cache:example.com/article

Numeric ranges:

search term 100..500

Example: laptop price $800..$1200

Combining operators:

site:edu filetype:pdf "research paper" climate change after:2023

Source Verification

Credibility Assessment

Check domain authority:

  • .edu (educational institutions)
  • .gov (government agencies)
  • .org (organizations - verify legitimacy)
  • .com (commercial - verify credibility)

Verify author credentials:

  • Professional qualifications
  • Academic affiliations
  • Industry experience
  • Publication history
  • Peer recognition

Review publication date:

  • Recent information for current topics
  • Historical context for established facts
  • Update frequency
  • Version or revision history

Assess editorial standards:

  • Fact-checking processes
  • Editorial oversight
  • Correction policies
  • Source citations

Red Flags for Unreliable Sources

Content warning signs:

  • No author attribution
  • Extreme or sensational language
  • Unsupported claims
  • No citations or references
  • Grammar and spelling errors
  • Contradicts established facts

Site warning signs:

  • No about page or contact info
  • Excessive advertising
  • Misleading domain names
  • No privacy policy
  • Poor site security (no HTTPS)
  • Popup-heavy design

Bias indicators:

  • Political or ideological slant
  • Financial conflicts of interest
  • Selective fact presentation
  • Emotional manipulation
  • Echo chamber characteristics

Source Verification Checklist

  • [ ] Author identified and credentials verified
  • [ ] Publication date is recent (for current topics)
  • [ ] Domain is reputable and secure (HTTPS)
  • [ ] Information is cited with sources
  • [ ] Cross-referenced with other credible sources
  • [ ] No obvious bias or agenda
  • [ ] Editorial standards are evident
  • [ ] Contact information available
  • [ ] No red flags for misinformation
  • [ ] Consistent with expert consensus

Information Validation

Cross-Reference Multiple Sources

Triangulation method:

  1. Find at least 3 independent sources
  2. Compare information across sources
  3. Look for consensus on key facts
  4. Note discrepancies and investigate
  5. Prioritize primary sources

Source diversity:

  • Academic research papers
  • Reputable news organizations
  • Government/official statistics
  • Industry experts
  • Independent fact-checkers

Primary vs secondary sources:

  • Primary: Original research, data, documents
  • Secondary: Analysis, interpretation, reporting
  • Prefer primary when available
  • Verify secondary against primary

Fact-Checking Resources

Established fact-checkers:

  • FactCheck.org
  • Snopes.com
  • PolitiFact
  • Full Fact
  • AFP Fact Check
  • Reuters Fact Check

Academic databases:

  • Google Scholar
  • PubMed (medical)
  • JSTOR
  • arXiv (preprints)
  • IEEE Xplore (technical)

Government sources:

  • Official statistics agencies
  • Regulatory bodies
  • Legislative databases
  • Public records

Specialized validators:

  • Media Bias/Fact Check (news bias)
  • Retraction Watch (scientific retractions)
  • AllSides (political bias)
  • NewsGuard (news reliability)

Evidence Quality Assessment

Strongest evidence:

  • Peer-reviewed research
  • Official government data
  • Primary source documents
  • Expert consensus
  • Replicated studies

Moderate evidence:

  • Reputable journalism
  • Industry reports
  • Expert opinions
  • Well-documented analysis
  • Established organizations

Weakest evidence:

  • Anecdotal reports
  • Social media claims
  • Unverified sources
  • Conflicting information
  • Opinion pieces without support

Secure Search Workflows

Research Workflow

1. Planning phase:

  • Define research question
  • Identify key terms and concepts
  • List potential source types
  • Determine credibility requirements

2. Initial search:

  • Use broad terms to understand landscape
  • Identify authoritative sources
  • Note common themes and terminology
  • Bookmark promising sources

3. Deep research:

  • Use advanced search operators
  • Access primary sources
  • Cross-reference findings
  • Track citations and references

4. Verification:

  • Check author credentials
  • Verify publication dates
  • Cross-reference facts
  • Consult fact-checkers

5. Documentation:

  • Save source URLs
  • Note access dates
  • Record key quotes with citations
  • Track evidence quality

Fact-Checking Workflow

1. Identify claim:

  • Extract specific factual claim
  • Note original source
  • Understand context

2. Search for primary source:

  • Find original data or research
  • Verify attribution
  • Check for misquotes or context removal

3. Consult fact-checkers:

  • Search established fact-checking sites
  • Look for previous verification
  • Note fact-checker methodology

4. Expert verification:

  • Find domain experts
  • Check academic consensus
  • Review peer-reviewed research

5. Document findings:

  • True/False/Misleading/Unverified
  • Evidence summary
  • Source quality assessment
  • Confidence level

Investigative Research Workflow

1. Start with known facts:

  • Establish baseline verified information
  • Identify information gaps
  • List questions to answer

2. Expand search scope:

  • Use related search operators
  • Explore connected topics
  • Find primary documents

3. Follow citation trails:

  • Check source references
  • Find original studies
  • Trace information lineage

4. Verify independently:

  • Don't rely on single source
  • Cross-reference multiple times
  • Check for contradictions

5. Assess confidence:

  • Rate evidence quality
  • Note uncertainties
  • Document limitations

Privacy and Security

Protecting Search Privacy

Browser configuration:

  • Use privacy-focused browsers (Brave, Firefox)
  • Enable tracking protection
  • Block third-party cookies
  • Use extensions (uBlock Origin, Privacy Badger)
  • Enable Do Not Track

Network security:

  • Use VPN for sensitive searches
  • Enable DNS over HTTPS (DoH)
  • Avoid public WiFi for sensitive research
  • Use Tor for maximum anonymity (when necessary)

Search history management:

  • Regularly clear history
  • Use private/incognito mode
  • Disable search suggestions
  • Use separate browser profiles

Account isolation:

  • Don't search while logged into services
  • Use separate email for sensitive topics
  • Avoid Google/Microsoft accounts for private searches
  • Use disposable email addresses

Safe Browsing Practices

Verify HTTPS:

  • Check for padlock icon
  • Verify certificate validity
  • Avoid HTTP sites for sensitive information
  • Be cautious of certificate warnings

Avoid malicious sites:

  • Don't click suspicious links
  • Verify URLs before clicking
  • Use link checkers (VirusTotal)
  • Enable safe browsing features

Phishing protection:

  • Verify sender/domain legitimacy
  • Hover over links before clicking
  • Check for misspellings in URLs
  • Don't enter credentials on unknown sites

Download safety:

  • Scan files with antivirus
  • Only download from trusted sources
  • Verify file signatures when available
  • Use sandboxed environments for testing

Search Query Best Practices

Effective Query Construction

Be specific:

❌ programming
✅ Python async programming best practices 2024

Use quotes for phrases:

❌ climate change effects
✅ "climate change effects" agricultural productivity

Combine operators:

✅ site:edu filetype:pdf "machine learning" ethics
✅ (Python OR JavaScript) tutorial -beginners after:2024

Target specific sources:

✅ site:github.com authentication library stars:>1000
✅ site:stackoverflow.com [python] database connection pooling

Query Refinement

Start broad, then narrow:

  1. General topic search
  2. Add specific terms
  3. Filter by date/type
  4. Target authoritative sources

Use search feedback:

  • Check "related searches"
  • Review autocomplete suggestions
  • Note common terminology
  • Adjust based on results quality

Iterate and refine:

  • Try multiple phrasings
  • Use synonyms
  • Adjust specificity
  • Change search operators

Bias and Perspective Awareness

Recognizing Bias

Political bias:

  • Left/right leaning language
  • Selective fact presentation
  • Partisan framing
  • Ideological assumptions

Commercial bias:

  • Sponsored content
  • Affiliate relationships
  • Advertising influence
  • Product promotion

Confirmation bias:

  • Seeking supporting evidence only
  • Ignoring contradictory information
  • Cherry-picking sources
  • Motivated reasoning

Cultural bias:

  • Western-centric perspectives
  • Regional assumptions
  • Cultural stereotypes
  • Language limitations

Seeking Diverse Perspectives

Geographic diversity:

  • International news sources
  • Regional publications
  • Non-Western perspectives
  • Local reporting

Ideological diversity:

  • Conservative and liberal sources
  • Academic vs popular sources
  • Industry vs independent analysis
  • Government vs watchdog groups

Expertise diversity:

  • Academic researchers
  • Industry practitioners
  • Policy makers
  • Affected communities

Methodological diversity:

  • Quantitative studies
  • Qualitative research
  • Case studies
  • Meta-analyses

Specialized Search Types

Academic Research Search

Academic databases:

  • Google Scholar
  • PubMed (medical/health)
  • IEEE Xplore (engineering/tech)
  • JSTOR (humanities)
  • arXiv (preprints)

Search strategies:

author:"lastname" "research topic"
allintitle: key terms here
"exact methodology phrase"
filetype:pdf site:edu

Quality indicators:

  • Peer-reviewed journals
  • Citation count
  • H-index of authors
  • Impact factor
  • Recent publication

News and Current Events

Reputable news sources:

  • Associated Press (AP)
  • Reuters
  • BBC News
  • NPR
  • ProPublica (investigative)

News search techniques:

"news topic" after:YYYY-MM-DD
site:reuters.com OR site:ap.org topic
"breaking news" -opinion -editorial

Verification:

  • Check multiple news sources
  • Find original statements/documents
  • Consult fact-checkers
  • Note update timestamps

Technical Documentation

Official sources:

  • Official documentation sites
  • GitHub repositories
  • Stack Overflow
  • Technical blogs (verified experts)

Search patterns:

site:docs.python.org specific function
site:github.com language:python topic stars:>100
[tag] error message site:stackoverflow.com
"official documentation" framework version

Legal and Regulatory

Official sources:

  • Government websites (.gov)
  • Legal databases
  • Regulatory agencies
  • Court records

Search techniques:

site:gov law OR regulation topic
filetype:pdf "legal code" section
"court case" parties site:justia.com
"federal register" regulation

Documentation and Citation

Recording Sources

Essential information:

  • Full URL
  • Page title
  • Author(s)
  • Publication date
  • Access date
  • Publisher/site name
  • Relevant quotes with page numbers (for PDFs)

Organization methods:

  • Bookmarking tools (Pocket, Raindrop.io)
  • Reference managers (Zotero, Mendeley)
  • Note-taking apps (Notion, Obsidian)
  • Spreadsheets with metadata

Citation Formats

APA style:

Author, A. A. (Year, Month Day). Title of page. Site Name. URL

MLA style:

Author Last Name, First Name. "Title of Page." Website Name, Day Month Year, URL.

Chicago style:

Author First Name Last Name, "Title of Page," Website Name, accessed Month Day, Year, URL.

Simple attribution:

Source: [Title] by [Author] ([Site], [Date]) - [URL]

Quality Assessment Framework

CRAAP Test

Currency:

  • When was information published/updated?
  • Is it current enough for your topic?
  • Are links functional?

Relevance:

  • Does it answer your question?
  • Is it appropriate for your audience/purpose?
  • Is it at the right level (basic/advanced)?

Authority:

  • Who is the author/publisher?
  • What are their credentials?
  • Is contact information provided?
  • Is domain appropriate (.edu, .gov, .org)?

Accuracy:

  • Is information supported by evidence?
  • Can you verify information elsewhere?
  • Are sources cited?
  • Is language unbiased?

Purpose:

  • Why was information published?
  • Is there commercial/political agenda?
  • Is it fact, opinion, or propaganda?
  • Is bias evident?

Confidence Levels

High confidence (90%+):

  • Multiple authoritative sources agree
  • Primary sources verified
  • Peer-reviewed research
  • Expert consensus
  • Recent and comprehensive

Medium confidence (50-90%):

  • Reputable sources with some agreement
  • Secondary sources verified
  • Some expert support
  • Reasonably current
  • Minor inconsistencies

Low confidence (<50%):

  • Single source or conflicting sources
  • Unverified claims
  • Questionable authority
  • Outdated information
  • Significant inconsistencies

Unverified:

  • Cannot confirm information
  • Conflicting evidence
  • No credible sources
  • Requires further investigation

Red Flags and Warning Signs

Content Red Flags

Misinformation indicators:

  • No author or credentials
  • Extreme claims without evidence
  • Emotional manipulation
  • Conspiracy theories
  • "Too good to be true" claims

Low quality indicators:

  • Poor grammar/spelling
  • Clickbait headlines
  • Excessive ads
  • Autoplay videos
  • No dates or sources

Manipulation indicators:

  • Cherry-picked statistics
  • Misleading graphs
  • Out-of-context quotes
  • Logical fallacies
  • False equivalencies

Technical Red Flags

Security concerns:

  • No HTTPS encryption
  • Invalid SSL certificates
  • Suspicious download prompts
  • Excessive permissions requests
  • Malware warnings

Privacy concerns:

  • Excessive tracking scripts
  • Data collection without notice
  • No privacy policy
  • Suspicious redirects
  • Fingerprinting techniques

Best Practices Checklist

When performing secure web searches:

  • [ ] Use privacy-focused search engine or incognito mode
  • [ ] Craft specific query with appropriate operators
  • [ ] Verify HTTPS on all visited sites
  • [ ] Check source credibility and author credentials
  • [ ] Cross-reference with at least 3 independent sources
  • [ ] Consult fact-checkers for controversial claims
  • [ ] Note publication dates and update frequency
  • [ ] Assess potential bias and conflicts of interest
  • [ ] Document sources with full citation information
  • [ ] Rate confidence level in findings
  • [ ] Clear browser history after sensitive searches
  • [ ] Use VPN for highly sensitive research

Key Principles

  1. Privacy first - Protect your search privacy and identity
  2. Verify sources - Check credibility before trusting information
  3. Cross-reference - Never rely on a single source
  4. Think critically - Question claims and assess evidence
  5. Use operators - Leverage advanced search techniques
  6. Document thoroughly - Track sources and evidence
  7. Stay current - Check publication dates and updates
  8. Recognize bias - Understand source perspectives and agendas
  9. Secure connections - Always use HTTPS and avoid malicious sites
  10. Assess confidence - Rate reliability of your findings

Workflow Summary

When user asks to perform secure web search:

  1. Define objective - What information is needed and why?
  2. Plan search strategy - Choose engines, operators, and sources
  3. Protect privacy - Use appropriate privacy tools and techniques
  4. Execute search - Craft effective queries with operators
  5. Verify sources - Check credibility, authority, and bias
  6. Cross-reference - Find multiple independent confirmations
  7. Fact-check - Consult fact-checkers and primary sources
  8. Assess quality - Apply CRAAP test and evidence evaluation
  9. Document findings - Record sources with full citations
  10. Rate confidence - Determine reliability level of information

Remember: Secure web search combines privacy protection, source verification, and critical thinking. Always question information, verify independently, and protect your privacy throughout the research process.

平台分布

Codex

38.15%
按下载量换算56

Claude

30.46%
按下载量换算45

Cursor

18.87%
按下载量换算28

Gemini CLI

10.25%
按下载量换算15

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills