Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

search-page-audit(搜索页面审核)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

search-page-audit 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 50,189。

总安装 624周安装 25GitHub Stars 35下载 202核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:search-page-audit(搜索页面审核)
来源仓库:https://github.com/superamped/ai-marketing-skills
仓库路径:skills/search-page-audit
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/superamped/ai-marketing-skills --skill search-page-audit
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/superamped/ai-marketing-skills --skill search-page-audit

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险和认证流程排查。适合梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。不能将工具输出直接作为最终结论,涉及密钥或生产系统时应先确认最小权限。使用时需关注操作边界和脱敏方式,避免误操作关键数据。

search-page-audit 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/search-page-audit

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/superamped/ai-marketing-skills --skill search-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

search-page-audit 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/superamped/ai-marketing-skills --skill search-page-audit。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

search-page-audit 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

search-page-audit 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

search-page-audit 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

search-page-audit 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 624 次,近一周安装 25 次,下载 202 次,GitHub 35 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

search-page-audit 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
search-page-audit

搜索页面审核 · 本页

62435需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Search Audit

Usage

Ask your AI tool to audit a URL for search and AI readiness. You can optionally request a focus area — seo-only, geo-only, eeat-only, or content-only.

Process

Step 1: Fetch & Parse

Fetch the page at the provided URL. Extract:

  • Full HTML source (for schema, meta tags, heading structure)
  • Rendered page content (for content evaluation)

Then fetch these three files from the same domain:

  • {domain}/robots.txt — check for AI crawler directives
  • {domain}/sitemap.xml — check for existence
  • {domain}/llms.txt — check for existence

Step 2: SEO Fundamentals (10 checks)

Evaluate traditional SEO hygiene. These are prerequisites — if broken, nothing else matters.

  1. HTTPS — Page is served over HTTPS
  2. Title tag — Exists, 50-60 characters, descriptive
  3. Meta description — Exists, 150-160 characters, includes target intent
  4. Single H1 — Exactly one H1 tag present
  5. Heading hierarchy — Logical order (H1 > H2 > H3), no skipped levels, no empty headings
  6. Image alt text — All images have descriptive alt attributes
  7. Clean URL — Descriptive, readable, no excessive parameters
  8. Internal links — Links to and from related pages on the site
  9. Crawlable content — Key content in standard HTML, not hidden behind JavaScript rendering
  10. Page speed — No obvious performance issues (heavy uncompressed images, render-blocking scripts, excessive DOM size)

Step 3: Content Structure (10 checks)

Evaluate how well the content is structured for both human readers and AI extraction.

  1. Direct answer up front — Each section leads with the key insight in the first 1-2 sentences
  2. Question-based headings — H2s/H3s mirror how users phrase queries (What is..., How do I..., Why does...)
  3. Short paragraphs — 2-4 sentences per paragraph, no wall-of-text blocks
  4. FAQ section — Dedicated Q&A section with real customer/user questions, 1-3 sentence answers
  5. Comparison tables — Side-by-side content uses tables (35% higher AI extractability)
  6. Lists for structure — Numbered lists for processes, bullet points for features/options
  7. "[TERM] is..." definitions — Key concepts defined with at least two defining sentences
  8. Conversational keywords — 5+ natural, long-tail query variations woven into content
  9. Intent clusters — Covers related follow-up questions a user would likely ask next
  10. Multimedia — Images, video, or infographics present as content signals

Step 4: AI & GEO Readiness (10 checks)

Evaluate technical signals that determine whether AI systems can find, extract, and cite this page.

  1. AI crawler access — robots.txt does not block GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or other AI user agents
  2. llms.txt exists — Domain has an llms.txt file communicating AI crawling policies
  3. Organization schema — JSON-LD with @type Organization present (site-wide entity definition)
  4. Article/Page schema — Appropriate JSON-LD for the content type (Article, HowTo, Product) with dateModified
  5. FAQPage schema — Separate FAQPage JSON-LD if FAQ section exists
  6. Author schema — Author entity linked in structured data
  7. BreadcrumbList schema — JSON-LD clarifying site hierarchy
  8. Schema validates — All structured data passes validation (well-formed JSON, no errors)
  9. Mobile responsive — Content readable and functional across screen sizes
  10. Sitemap inclusion — Domain has a sitemap.xml and it's accessible

Step 5: E-E-A-T & Authority (8 checks)

Evaluate trust signals that determine whether AI systems choose to cite this page over competitors.

  1. Author identified — Content has a named author, not "admin" or anonymous
  2. Author bio present — Author bio with credentials, expertise, and link to author page
  3. Author page exists — Dedicated author page with full credentials, external profiles, and publication history
  4. Sources cited — Key claims backed by specific data points with clear attribution
  5. Original data or insight — Contains first-party research, proprietary analysis, or unique expert perspective
  6. Freshness signals — Publication date and/or last-updated date visible on page
  7. Trust pages accessible — Privacy policy, terms, and relevant compliance pages exist and are linked
  8. About page with entity info — About Us/About page clearly defines the business entity

Output Format

Present the report in this exact structure:

# Page Audit Report

**URL:** [url]
**Date:** [current date]
**Overall Score:** X/38

---

## SEO Fundamentals (X/10)

✓/✗ HTTPS
✓/✗ Title tag — [note: actual title, character count]
✓/✗ Meta description — [note: actual description, character count]
✓/✗ Single H1
✓/✗ Heading hierarchy
✓/✗ Image alt text — [note: X of Y images have alt text]
✓/✗ Clean URL
✓/✗ Internal links
✓/✗ Crawlable content
✓/✗ Page speed

## Content Structure (X/10)

✓/✗ Direct answer up front
✓/✗ Question-based headings
✓/✗ Short paragraphs
✓/✗ FAQ section
✓/✗ Comparison tables
✓/✗ Lists for structure
✓/✗ "[TERM] is..." definitions
✓/✗ Conversational keywords
✓/✗ Intent clusters
✓/✗ Multimedia

## AI & GEO Readiness (X/10)

✓/✗ AI crawler access — [note: which crawlers blocked/allowed]
✓/✗ llms.txt
✓/✗ Organization schema
✓/✗ Article/Page schema — [note: type found, dateModified present?]
✓/✗ FAQPage schema
✓/✗ Author schema
✓/✗ BreadcrumbList schema
✓/✗ Schema validates
✓/✗ Mobile responsive
✓/✗ Sitemap inclusion

## E-E-A-T & Authority (X/8)

✓/✗ Author identified — [note: author name if found]
✓/✗ Author bio present
✓/✗ Author page exists
✓/✗ Sources cited — [note: X citations found]
✓/✗ Original data or insight
✓/✗ Freshness signals — [note: dates found]
✓/✗ Trust pages accessible
✓/✗ About page with entity info

---

## Score Summary

| Category | Score | Rating |
|----------|-------|--------|
| SEO Fundamentals | X/10 | |
| Content Structure | X/10 | |
| AI & GEO Readiness | X/10 | |
| E-E-A-T & Authority | X/8 | |
| **Overall** | **X/38** | |

**Rating scale:** 90%+ Excellent | 75-89% Good | 60-74% Needs Work | Below 60% Poor

---

## Priority Fixes

[Top 5 failed criteria ranked by impact. For each:]

1. **[Failed criterion]** — [Why it matters + specific fix with actual suggested text/code where possible]
2. ...

Rules

  • Be objective. If borderline, lean toward FAIL and explain in priority fixes.
  • Be specific in fixes — suggest actual meta description text, actual schema JSON, actual heading rewrites. "Add a meta description" is not useful. "Add meta description: '[suggested text]'" is.
  • For schema checks, search page source for <script type="application/ld+json"> and evaluate each block.
  • Priority fixes should weight: technical foundation > AI readiness > content structure > E-E-A-T (you can't build authority on a broken page).
  • If user specifies a focus area, still run all checks but only expand detail on the requested section.

平台分布

Codex

35.54%
按下载量换算72

Claude

31.49%
按下载量换算64

Cursor

20.1%
按下载量换算41

Gemini CLI

9.26%
按下载量换算19

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills