Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

sdlc-designSDLC 设计

Agent Skill

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

总安装

329

周安装

14

GitHub Stars

11

下载量

115
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sdlc-design(SDLC 设计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/peterbamuhigire/skills-web-dev
仓库路径:skills/sdlc-design
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/peterbamuhigire/skills-web-dev --skill sdlc-design
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/peterbamuhigire/skills-web-dev --skill sdlc-design

简介

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色和布局优化。

  • 适合让 Agent 生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用。
  • 使用时需结合现有品牌和设计系统,避免堆砌装饰元素;涉及页面改动时应通过截图或预览检查表现。
  • sdlc-design 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Platform Notes

  • Optional helper plugins may help in some environments, but they must not be treated as required for this skill.

SDLC Design Skill

Use When

  • Generate Design & Development documentation for SDLC projects. Covers System Design Document (SDD), Technical Specification, Interface Control Document (ICD), Database Design Document, Code Documentation standards, and API Documentation. Use when...
  • The task needs reusable judgment, domain constraints, or a proven workflow rather than ad hoc advice.

Do Not Use When

  • The task is unrelated to sdlc-design or would be better handled by a more specific companion skill.
  • The request only needs a trivial answer and none of this skill's constraints or references materially help.

Required Inputs

  • Gather relevant project context, constraints, and the concrete problem to solve; load templates only as needed.
  • Confirm the desired deliverable: design, code, review, migration plan, audit, or documentation.

Workflow

  • Read this SKILL.md first, then load only the referenced deep-dive files that are necessary for the task.
  • Apply the ordered guidance, checklists, and decision rules in this skill instead of cherry-picking isolated snippets.
  • Produce the deliverable with assumptions, risks, and follow-up work made explicit when they matter.

Quality Standards

  • Keep outputs execution-oriented, concise, and aligned with the repository's baseline engineering standards.
  • Preserve compatibility with existing project conventions unless the skill explicitly requires a stronger standard.
  • Prefer deterministic, reviewable steps over vague advice or tool-specific magic.

Anti-Patterns

  • Treating examples as copy-paste truth without checking fit, constraints, or failure modes.
  • Loading every reference file by default instead of using progressive disclosure.

Outputs

  • A concrete result that fits the task: implementation guidance, review findings, architecture decisions, templates, or generated artifacts.
  • Clear assumptions, tradeoffs, or unresolved gaps when the task cannot be completed from available context alone.
  • References used, companion skills, or follow-up actions when they materially improve execution.

Evidence Produced

CategoryArtifactFormatExample
Release evidenceSystem Design Document (SDD)Markdown doc covering architecture, data, interfaces, and technical specification per ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010docs/sdlc/sdd-checkout.md

References

  • Use the templates/ directory when the task needs a structured deliverable.

Generate a complete Design & Development documentation suite for software development projects. This skill produces 6 design documents that translate requirements (from sdlc-planning) into actionable technical architecture and implementation guidance.

Load Order

  1. Load world-class-engineering.
  2. Load system-architecture-design and database-design-engineering.
  3. Load this skill to turn approved requirements into executable design artifacts.

Executable Design Standard

Design documents must define:

  • critical flows, invariants, and failure handling
  • release-aware architecture and migration posture
  • observability, audit, and operational ownership expectations
  • contract evolution rules for live systems

When to Use

  • Translating an approved SRS into a technical architecture and system design
  • Documenting database schemas, stored procedures, and data models for a new system
  • Specifying API contracts for frontend, mobile, and third-party consumers
  • Defining interface contracts between system components and external systems
  • Establishing code documentation standards before development begins
  • Creating technical specifications for complex features or modules

When NOT to Use

  • Gathering raw requirements -- use project-requirements skill
  • Project-level planning (SDP, QA Plan, Risk Plan) -- use sdlc-planning skill
  • Planning a single feature (spec + implementation) -- use feature-planning skill
  • Writing test plans and test cases -- use sdlc-testing skill
  • Writing deployment or user documentation -- use sdlc-user-deploy skill
  • Planning an Android companion app -- use android-saas-planning skill

Document Inventory

#DocumentFilePurposeAudienceLength
1System Design Documenttemplates/system-design-document.mdOverall architecture, components, interactionsArchitects, senior devs, tech leads20-40 pages
2Technical Specificationtemplates/technical-specification.mdImplementation details, algorithms, data structuresDevelopers implementing the system20-40 pages
3Interface Control Documenttemplates/interface-control-document.mdInterface contracts between components/systemsIntegration engineers, API consumers15-30 pages
4Database Design Documenttemplates/database-design-document.mdSchema, data models, relationships, proceduresDBAs, backend developers20-40 pages
5Code Documentation Standardstemplates/code-documentation-standards.mdInline comments, docstrings, documentation rulesAll developers10-20 pages
6API Documentationtemplates/api-documentation.mdEndpoint specs, auth, errors, SDK examplesFrontend/mobile devs, integrators20-40 pages

Prerequisites

Before generating design documents, ensure these inputs exist:

InputSourceRequired?
Software Requirements Spec (SRS)sdlc-planning skill outputYes
Project Vision & Scopesdlc-planning skill outputYes
Tech stack decisionsProject context or defaultsYes
Approved feature list with prioritiesSRS or stakeholder sign-offYes
Module inventorySRS or modular-saas-architectureRecommended
Existing database schemas (if migrating)Codebase auditIf applicable
API consumers list (mobile, web, 3rd party)Project contextRecommended

Generation Workflow

Generate documents in this order. Each builds on the previous.

Step 1: System Design Document (architecture baseline)
    |
Step 2: Database Design Document (data layer foundation)
    |
Step 3: Technical Specification (implementation details)
    |
Step 4: Interface Control Document (component contracts)
    |
Step 5: API Documentation (consumer-facing specs)
    |
Step 6: Code Documentation Standards (team conventions)

Rationale: Architecture drives database design. Database and architecture together inform technical specs. Interface contracts are defined after components are known. API docs are consumer-facing views of interface contracts. Code standards apply across all layers.

Architecture Patterns Supported

PatternWhere UsedSkill Reference
MVVM + Clean ArchitectureAndroid (Presentation / Domain / Data layers)android-development
Three-Panel Web Architecture/public/, /adminpanel/, /memberpanel/multi-tenant-saas-architecture
REST API + Dual AuthSession (web) + JWT (mobile)dual-auth-rbac
Row-Level Multi-Tenancyfranchise_id in every tenant-scoped querymulti-tenant-saas-architecture
Pluggable Module ArchitectureEnable/disable business modules per tenantmodular-saas-architecture
Repository PatternAndroid data access abstractionandroid-data-persistence
Service Layer PatternPHP business logic encapsulationphp-modern-standards

Cross-References to Existing Skills

Upstream Skills (use BEFORE this skill)

SkillRelationship
sdlc-planningProvides SRS, Vision & Scope, SDP as inputs. Design docs implement what planning docs specify.
project-requirementsRaw requirements gathered via guided interview. Feed into SRS, then into design.

Parallel Skills (use ALONGSIDE this skill)

SkillRelationship
mysql-best-practicesDatabase Design Document references these standards. Do not duplicate; cross-reference.
api-error-handlingAPI Documentation and Technical Spec reference error response patterns.
api-paginationAPI Documentation references pagination patterns (offset-based).
php-modern-standardsTechnical Spec and Code Documentation reference PHP 8+ standards.
android-developmentTechnical Spec references Android architecture layers (MVVM + Clean).
multi-tenant-saas-architectureSDD references tenant isolation, three-panel architecture.
dual-auth-rbacSDD and ICD reference dual auth flows and RBAC model.
vibe-security-skillSecurity architecture sections in SDD. Always apply alongside.

Downstream Skills (use AFTER this skill)

SkillRelationship
feature-planningUses design docs as input for individual feature specs and implementation plans.
sdlc-testingUses design docs to create test plans and test cases (future).
sdlc-user-deployUses design docs for deployment guides and user manuals.
saas-seederUses database design to bootstrap the SaaS template.

Adaptation Rules

SaaS vs Standalone

AspectMulti-Tenant SaaSStandalone App
SDD scopeThree-panel architecture, tenant isolationSingle app architecture
Database designfranchise_id on all tenant tablesNo tenant scoping
API authDual auth (Session + JWT)Single auth model
ICD complexityBackend-Mobile-Web + external integrationsFewer interface types
Security designZero-trust, audit trails, RBACSimpler security model

Mobile + Web vs Web-Only

AspectAndroid + WebWeb-Only
SDD componentsPHP backend + Android layers + Web frontendPHP backend + Web frontend
ICD scopeREST API + internal Android layer boundariesAJAX/fetch + internal PHP layers
API docsJWT auth + session auth sectionsSession auth only
Code docsPHP + Kotlin + SQL standardsPHP + SQL standards

MVP vs Full Product

AspectMVPFull Product
SDD depthCore modules only (3-5)All modules (10-20+)
Database designCore tables onlyComplete schema
API endpointsAuthentication + core CRUDFull endpoint inventory
ICDInternal interfaces onlyInternal + external integrations

Output Structure

When generating design documents for a project, create this structure:

docs/design/
├── 01-system-design-document.md
├── 01-sdd/
│   ├── component-design.md
│   ├── security-architecture.md
│   └── deployment-architecture.md
├── 02-database-design-document.md
├── 02-database/
│   ├── entity-relationship.md
│   ├── table-definitions.md
│   └── stored-procedures.md
├── 03-technical-specification.md
├── 03-tech-spec/
│   ├── module-specifications.md
│   └── algorithm-details.md
├── 04-interface-control-document.md
├── 05-api-documentation.md
├── 05-api/
│   ├── authentication-endpoints.md
│   ├── module-endpoints.md
│   └── error-reference.md
└── 06-code-documentation-standards.md

Each file must stay under 500 lines. Split into subdirectories as needed.

Quality Checklist

Run after generating all documents:

  • All 6 documents generated (or justified why one was skipped)
  • Each document stays under 500 lines (split if needed)
  • SDD references the correct tech stack with version numbers
  • SDD includes ASCII architecture diagrams (system context, high-level, deployment) — visual-aid locations marked with [DIAGRAM-PROMPT: <description>]
  • Every major design decision includes a ## Design Rationale block: chosen approach, rejected alternatives, trade-off reasoning
  • Major architectural decisions captured as Architecture Decision Records (ADRs): Context → Decision → Alternatives Considered → Consequences
  • Database Design references mysql-best-practices skill, not duplicate it
  • All tenant-scoped tables include franchise_id column
  • API Documentation references api-error-handling and api-pagination skills
  • ICD covers all interface types (backend-mobile, backend-web, external)
  • Technical Spec includes real PHP/Kotlin/SQL code examples in fenced code blocks with language identifiers
  • Code Documentation Standards cover PHP, Kotlin, and SQL
  • Security architecture addresses dual auth, RBAC, encryption, audit trails
  • Deployment environments (Windows dev, Ubuntu staging, Debian prod) documented
  • Rollout, migration, and rollback posture are explicit for live systems
  • All documents cross-reference each other and upstream SRS
  • No vague language -- all specifications are measurable and concrete
  • Examples are tailored to the project's actual tech stack and domain

Anti-Patterns (What NOT to Do)

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsDo This Instead
Design without approved SRSArchitecture without requirements is guessworkComplete sdlc-planning first
One massive design docExceeds 500-line limit, hard to maintainSplit into 6 focused documents
No ASCII diagramsText-only architecture is hard to understandInclude system context, component, deployment diagrams — mark points needing visuals with [DIAGRAM-PROMPT: <description>]
Copy MySQL standards into DB designDuplicates mysql-best-practices, goes staleCross-reference the skill
Skip tenant isolation designData leakage between tenantsAlways document franchise_id strategy
API docs without error codesConsumers can't handle failuresInclude complete error reference table
No interface versioning strategyBreaking changes cause outagesDocument versioning in ICD
God classes in component designViolates SRP, untestableDefine clear component boundaries
Design docs never updatedDocs become stale and misleadingUpdate at each phase gate
Platform-generic examplesDevelopers can't apply themUse your actual tech stack in examples
Design decisions without rationaleFuture maintainers cannot evaluate or change decisionsAdd ## Design Rationale to every key decision: state the chosen approach, rejected alternatives, and the trade-off reasoning
No Architecture Decision RecordsArchitecture history lost; audits failCapture each major architectural decision in a structured ADR: Context → Decision → Alternatives → Consequences

Template Files

Each template provides the complete structure, section-by-section guidance, example excerpts, anti-patterns, and a quality checklist.

  1. System Design Document
  2. Technical Specification
  3. Interface Control Document
  4. Database Design Document
  5. Code Documentation Standards
  6. API Documentation

References


Back to: Skills Repository Related: sdlc-planning | feature-planning | mysql-best-practices | api-error-handling Last Updated: 2026-03-15 (strengthened per Adjei 2023, Winston, Etter 2016)

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.03%
按下载量换算41

Claude

28.96%
按下载量换算33

Cursor

19.92%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

10.28%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills