Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

scpr-framework(SCPR 框架)

scpr-framework 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

scpr-framework 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 9,979。

总安装 218周安装 9GitHub Stars 39下载 71核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:scpr-framework(SCPR 框架)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sruthir28/enterprise-ai-skills
仓库路径:skills/scpr-framework
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sruthir28/enterprise-ai-skills --skill scpr-framework
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sruthir28/enterprise-ai-skills --skill scpr-framework

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理与分析。可通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件操作。

scpr-framework 属于待分类类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/scpr-framework

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/sruthir28/enterprise-ai-skills --skill scpr-fr…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

scpr-framework 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/sruthir28/enterprise-ai-skills --skill scpr-framework。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

scpr-framework 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

scpr-framework 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

scpr-framework 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

scpr-framework 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 218 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 71 次,GitHub 39 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

scpr-framework 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
scpr-framework

SCPR 框架 · 本页

21839只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

SCPR Framework

A structured approach to problem-solving and executive communication used in management consulting.

Framework Components

S - Situation: Current state of the market/business

  • What is the lay of the land?
  • Establish baseline context
  • Describe the stable environment before changes

C - Complication: Recent shift or change

  • What has changed recently?
  • New market dynamics (AI boom, regulatory changes, competitive threats)
  • The catalyst that creates urgency

P - Problem: Crisp question to solve

  • What specific strategic question must be answered?
  • Common examples: "How to grow revenue?", "How to enter new market?", "How to reduce costs?"
  • Must be specific and answerable

R - Recommendation: Proposed actions

  • What should be done and by when?
  • Priority actions to address the problem
  • Can be structured as issue tree branches (doesn't have to be only high-priority items)
  • Specific, actionable, time-bound

Core Principles

MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive)

  • Recommendations should not overlap
  • Together they should cover all necessary actions
  • Each recommendation addresses distinct aspect of the problem

Clarity

  • Each section should be concise
  • Problem statement must be answerable
  • Recommendations must be actionable

Example: Tech Startup Product Pivot

Situation Series B SaaS startup with $15M ARR selling project management software to creative agencies and marketing firms. Product focuses on task management, resource allocation, and client collaboration. 200 agency customers with average contract size $75K. Historically strong product-market fit with 25% YoY growth and 90% gross retention.

Complication AI-powered tools like ChatGPT, Notion AI, and Claude emerging as workflow automation alternatives. Customer usage metrics declining 15% over last 6 months. Exit interviews reveal agencies using AI for project briefs, status updates, and resource planning - core features of current product. Three enterprise deals ($500K pipeline) paused citing "evaluating AI-first solutions."

Problem How should we reposition the product and business model to return to 25%+ growth within 12 months while competing against general-purpose AI tools?

Recommendations

  1. Product: Launch AI-native workflow engine by Q2 2025

- Integrate LLM for automated project scoping and task breakdown - AI-powered resource matching based on skills and availability - Differentiate on agency-specific context (brand guidelines, client history, creative workflows)

  1. Positioning: Shift from "project management" to "AI-augmented agency operations" by Q1 2025

- Rebrand messaging around AI that understands agency workflows - Emphasize integration advantages over general tools - Target gap: ChatGPT lacks agency-specific memory and processes

  1. Pricing: Introduce usage-based AI tier by Q2 2025

- Base platform remains flat fee ($75K) - AI features charged per automation/generation - Capture value from high-usage customers, protect downside

Usage Patterns

When creating SCPR structure:

  1. Start with Situation (establish baseline)
  2. Identify Complication (what changed?)
  3. Frame Problem as specific question
  4. Develop MECE Recommendations with timeline

When analyzing existing content:

  1. Extract facts into S/C/P/R categories
  2. Test Problem for specificity
  3. Verify Recommendations are MECE
  4. Add timelines if missing

When reviewing SCPR:

  • Is Situation necessary context only (not exhaustive)?
  • Is Complication recent and urgent?
  • Is Problem answerable and specific?
  • Are Recommendations mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive?
  • Does each Recommendation include "by when"?

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Situation too detailed: Keep to essential context only
  • Complication = Problem: They're different. Complication is "what changed", Problem is "what question to solve"
  • Vague Problem: "Improve business" is too broad. "Increase revenue 40% in 12 months" is specific
  • Overlapping Recommendations: Ensure MECE structure
  • No timelines: Always include "by when" in Recommendations

平台分布

Codex

32.99%
按下载量换算23

Claude

31.01%
按下载量换算22

Cursor

20.35%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

10.18%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills