- name
- scope-sentinel
- version
- 1.0.0
- description
- >
- author
- J. DeVere Cooley
- category
- everyday-tools
- tags
- metadata
- openclaw
- emoji
- 🎯
- os
- ["darwin", "linux", "win32"]
- cost
- free
- requires_api
- false
- tags
Scope Sentinel
"The most expensive line of code is the one you didn't need to write. The most expensive refactor is the one you started 'while you were in there.'"
What It Does
You sit down to fix a bug in the checkout flow. Two hours later you've reformatted the auth module, added types to three utility files, renamed a database column, and upgraded a dependency. The bug? Still there.
Scope Sentinel watches what you're *actually doing* and compares it to what you *said* you'd do. When the delta grows too large, it intervenes — not to stop you, but to make the drift *visible* so you can choose consciously.
The Drift Model
Scope Definition
At the start of a task, your scope is defined by:
SCOPE ANCHOR:
├── Task statement: "Fix checkout failing for international addresses"
├── Target files: src/checkout/address.ts, src/checkout/validation.ts
├── Target behavior: International addresses should pass validation
├── Branch name: fix/international-address-checkout
└── Estimated files to touch: 2-4Drift Detection
As you work, every file modification is classified:
| Classification | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| On-scope | Directly addresses the stated task | Fixing the address validation regex |
| Adjacent | Related to the task, reasonable to include | Updating the test for address validation |
| Tangential | Same area of code but different concern | Adding types to the checkout module |
| Drift | Different area, different concern | Refactoring the auth module |
| Rabbit hole | Deep change triggered by a discovery during on-scope work | Upgrading a dependency because you noticed it was outdated |
The Drift Gradient
ON-SCOPE ──── ADJACENT ──── TANGENTIAL ──── DRIFT ──── RABBIT HOLE
✓ ✓ ⚠ 🔴 🕳️
"This is "This is "This is "This is "What year
the fix" part of related but a different is it?"
the fix" not the fix" task"How It Works
Phase 1: ANCHOR
├── Capture the task statement (from branch name, commit message, or explicit declaration)
├── Identify the target area of the codebase
├── Establish the scope boundary (files, modules, behaviors)
└── Set drift tolerance (tight, normal, or exploratory)
Phase 2: MONITOR
├── For every file modification, classify:
│ ├── Is this file in the target area?
│ ├── Does this change relate to the stated task?
│ ├── Is this change necessary for the task to succeed?
│ └── Would this change make sense as a separate commit/PR?
├── Track accumulated drift:
│ ├── Files touched outside scope
│ ├── Lines changed outside scope
│ └── Time spent outside scope
└── Track scope expansion events (when you discover the task is bigger than expected)
Phase 3: ALERT
├── When drift accumulates past threshold:
│ ├── Name the drift ("You've started refactoring auth — this is unrelated to checkout")
│ ├── Quantify it ("4 files, 87 lines, ~25 minutes of off-scope work")
│ ├── Offer choices:
│ │ ├── STASH: Save off-scope changes for a separate task
│ │ ├── COMMIT SEPARATELY: Make a separate commit for the off-scope work
│ │ ├── EXPAND SCOPE: Acknowledge the scope grew (with justification)
│ │ └── CONTINUE: You're aware and choosing to continue
│ └── Log the decision for later review
└── Resume monitoring with updated scope (if expanded)
Phase 4: SESSION SUMMARY
├── At end of session, report:
│ ├── Time on-scope vs. time drifted
│ ├── Files changed on-scope vs. off-scope
│ ├── Drift events and how they were resolved
│ └── Suggested follow-up tasks for off-scope discoveriesAlert Format
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ SCOPE SENTINEL: DRIFT DETECTED ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ ║
║ YOUR TASK: Fix checkout for international addresses ║
║ ║
║ DRIFT: ║
║ You've been modifying src/auth/middleware.ts for 18 minutes.║
║ This file is not related to checkout or address validation. ║
║ ║
║ HOW YOU GOT HERE: ║
║ checkout/address.ts → noticed untyped import ║
║ → opened utils/types.ts to add types ║
║ → noticed auth/middleware.ts also uses these types ║
║ → started "fixing" auth types too ║
║ ║
║ ACCUMULATED OFF-SCOPE: ║
║ ├── 3 files outside checkout/ ║
║ ├── 47 lines of changes unrelated to the bug ║
║ └── ~18 minutes of drift ║
║ ║
║ OPTIONS: ║
║ [1] STASH off-scope changes, return to checkout bug ║
║ [2] COMMIT SEPARATELY ("add types to auth middleware") ║
║ [3] EXPAND SCOPE (justify: "types are prerequisite") ║
║ [4] CONTINUE (I know, I'll wrap up soon) ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝Session Summary
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ SCOPE SENTINEL: SESSION REPORT ║
║ Task: Fix international address checkout ║
║ Duration: 2h 14m ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ ║
║ FOCUS SCORE: 68/100 ║
║ ║
║ TIME BREAKDOWN: ║
║ ├── On-scope: 1h 22m (62%) ████████████░░░░░░░░ ║
║ ├── Adjacent: 18m (13%) ██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ║
║ ├── Tangential: 16m (12%) ██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ║
║ └── Drift: 18m (13%) ██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ║
║ ║
║ DRIFT EVENTS: 2 ║
║ ├── Auth middleware typing (stashed → separate task) ║
║ └── Utility function rename (committed separately) ║
║ ║
║ FOLLOW-UP TASKS GENERATED: ║
║ ├── "Add TypeScript types to auth middleware" ║
║ └── "Rename formatAddress → formatPostalAddress globally" ║
║ ║
║ TASK STATUS: Bug fixed. PR ready. ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝Drift Tolerance Modes
| Mode | Threshold | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Tight | Alert after 1 off-scope file or 5 minutes of drift | Bug fixes, hotfixes, time-sensitive tasks |
| Normal | Alert after 3 off-scope files or 15 minutes of drift | Feature work, standard development |
| Exploratory | Alert after 6 off-scope files or 30 minutes of drift | Refactoring, investigation, learning a new codebase |
| Off | No alerts | Freeform hacking, prototyping, creative exploration |
When to Invoke
- At the start of every focused task. Set your scope anchor.
- When working on bug fixes (scope drift is most costly here)
- When working against a deadline (every drifted minute hurts)
- When you notice yourself saying "while I'm in here..." (the classic drift phrase)
- During code review prep (to ensure your PR is focused)
Why It Matters
Scope drift isn't laziness — it's a natural consequence of how developers think. You see a problem, you want to fix it. The impulse is productive. But unchecked, it turns a 30-minute bug fix into a 4-hour PR that touches 15 files and is impossible to review.
Scope Sentinel doesn't stop you from doing extra work. It makes sure the extra work is deliberate, not accidental.
Zero external dependencies. Zero API calls. Pure file-change monitoring.