Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

security(安全)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

security 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 41,772。

总安装 1,140周安装 48GitHub Stars 12下载 399核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:security(安全)
来源仓库:https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills
仓库路径:skills/security
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill security
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill security

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

security 用于辅助安全审计、权限检查和凭据风险排查。适合梳理敏感配置、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。security 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用该技能。不能将工具输出直接当作最终结论,尤其涉及密钥或生产系统时。

应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界,确保合规安全。

来源仓库内路径:skills/security

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill security;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

security 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill security。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

security 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

security 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

security 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

security 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,140 次,近一周安装 48 次,下载 399 次,GitHub 12 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

security 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
security

安全 · 本页

1,14012接触敏感数据MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Security is not optional - it's a fundamental requirement. This skill helps you build secure applications from the start, not bolt on security as an afterthought.

<quick_start> Security essentials for any new project:

  1. Secrets: Never commit to git, validate at startup //.env (gitignored) + envSchema.parse(process.env)
  2. Auth: Short-lived JWTs + httpOnly cookies jwt.sign(payload, secret, {expiresIn: '15m'})
  3. Input: Validate everything with schemas const data = z.object({email: z.string().email()}).parse(input)
  4. SQL: Always use parameterized queries (ORMs handle this)
  5. RLS: Enable on all Supabase tables with user-scoped policies </quick_start>

<success_criteria> Security implementation is successful when:

  • All secrets in environment variables, validated at startup
  • No secrets in version control (verified with gitleaks)
  • JWT tokens short-lived (≤15 min) with refresh token rotation
  • All user input validated with Zod or similar schema validation
  • RLS enabled on all database tables with appropriate policies
  • CSP headers configured (no unsafe-inline where possible)
  • Security checklist completed before deployment </success_criteria>

<security_mindset>

The Security Mindset

Core Principles

  1. Defense in depth - Multiple layers of security, not one wall
  2. Least privilege - Grant minimum access required
  3. Never trust input - Validate everything from users and external systems
  4. Fail secure - Errors should deny access, not grant it
  5. Keep secrets secret - API keys never in code or logs

Security Questions to Ask

Before shipping any feature:

  • What data does this expose?
  • Who can access this endpoint/page?
  • What happens if the user sends malicious input?
  • Are secrets properly protected?
  • Is sensitive data logged? </security_mindset>

JWT vs Session

AspectJWTSession
StorageClient (localStorage/cookie)Server (DB/Redis)
ScalabilityStateless, easy to scaleRequires shared session store
RevocationHard (need blacklist)Easy (delete from store)
SizeLarger (contains claims)Small (just session ID)
Best forAPIs, microservicesTraditional web apps

JWT Best Practices

// DO: Short-lived access tokens + refresh tokens
const accessToken = jwt.sign(
  { userId: user.id, role: user.role },
  process.env.JWT_SECRET,
  { expiresIn: '15m' } // Short-lived!
);

const refreshToken = jwt.sign(
  { userId: user.id },
  process.env.JWT_REFRESH_SECRET,
  { expiresIn: '7d' }
);

// DON'T: Long-lived tokens with sensitive data
// Bad example - never do this:
// { expiresIn: '365d' } // Too long!
// Including PII like SSN in token payload

Token Storage

MethodXSS SafeCSRF SafeRecommendation
localStorageNoYesAvoid for auth
httpOnly cookieYesNo (needs CSRF token)Recommended
Memory (variable)YesYesBest for SPAs

Refresh Token Flow

┌─────────┐                    ┌─────────┐                    ┌─────────┐
│ Client  │                    │  Server │                    │   DB    │
└────┬────┘                    └────┬────┘                    └────┬────┘
     │                              │                              │
     │  Login (email, password)     │                              │
     │─────────────────────────────>│                              │
     │                              │  Verify credentials          │
     │                              │─────────────────────────────>│
     │                              │<─────────────────────────────│
     │  Access token (15m)          │                              │
     │  Refresh token (7d)          │  Store refresh token hash    │
     │<─────────────────────────────│─────────────────────────────>│
     │                              │                              │
     │  API call + access token     │                              │
     │─────────────────────────────>│                              │
     │  Response                    │                              │
     │<─────────────────────────────│                              │
     │                              │                              │
     │  [Access token expired]      │                              │
     │  Refresh token               │                              │
     │─────────────────────────────>│  Verify refresh token        │
     │                              │─────────────────────────────>│
     │  New access token            │                              │
     │<─────────────────────────────│                              │

Password Handling

import bcrypt from 'bcrypt';

// DO: Hash with sufficient rounds
const SALT_ROUNDS = 12; // ~300ms on modern hardware
const hash = await bcrypt.hash(password, SALT_ROUNDS);

// DO: Constant-time comparison
const isValid = await bcrypt.compare(inputPassword, storedHash);

// DON'T: Use weak hashing algorithms like MD5 or SHA1 for passwords

Password Requirements

const passwordSchema = z.string()
  .min(8, 'Minimum 8 characters')
  .max(128, 'Maximum 128 characters')
  .regex(/[a-z]/, 'Must contain lowercase')
  .regex(/[A-Z]/, 'Must contain uppercase')
  .regex(/[0-9]/, 'Must contain number')
  .regex(/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/, 'Must contain special character');

// Check against common passwords (haveibeenpwned API)
async function isPasswordPwned(password: string): Promise<boolean> {
  const sha1 = crypto.createHash('sha1').update(password).digest('hex').toUpperCase();
  const prefix = sha1.slice(0, 5);
  const suffix = sha1.slice(5);

  const response = await fetch(`https://api.pwnedpasswords.com/range/${prefix}`);
  const text = await response.text();

  return text.includes(suffix);
}

<secrets_management>

Secrets Management

Golden rule: Never commit secrets to version control. Use .env files (gitignored), validate all env vars at startup with Zod schemas, support rotation with multiple active secrets, and never log sensitive data.

See reference/secrets-management.md for gitignore patterns, env var templates, Zod validation, rotation patterns, and log masking. </secrets_management>

<input_validation>

Input Validation

Validate at System Boundaries

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    Your Application                      │
│                                                          │
│   ┌──────────┐     VALIDATE      ┌──────────────────┐  │
│   │  User    │ ───────────────>  │  Business Logic   │  │
│   │  Input   │                   │  (trusted data)   │  │
│   └──────────┘                   └──────────────────┘  │
│                                                          │
│   ┌──────────┐     VALIDATE      ┌──────────────────┐  │
│   │ External │ ───────────────>  │  Services         │  │
│   │   API    │                   │                   │  │
│   └──────────┘                   └──────────────────┘  │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Schema Validation (Zod)

import { z } from 'zod';

// Define schemas
const createUserSchema = z.object({
  email: z.string().email(),
  password: z.string().min(8).max(128),
  name: z.string().min(1).max(100),
  age: z.number().int().min(13).max(120).optional(),
});

// Validate input
export async function createUser(input: unknown) {
  const data = createUserSchema.parse(input); // Throws if invalid
  // data is now typed and validated
  return db.users.create(data);
}

// API handler
export async function POST(req: Request) {
  try {
    const body = await req.json();
    const user = await createUser(body);
    return Response.json(user, { status: 201 });
  } catch (error) {
    if (error instanceof z.ZodError) {
      return Response.json({ errors: error.errors }, { status: 400 });
    }
    throw error;
  }
}

Sanitization

import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
import { JSDOM } from 'jsdom';

const window = new JSDOM('').window;
const purify = DOMPurify(window);

// Sanitize HTML (for rich text fields)
const cleanHtml = purify.sanitize(userInput, {
  ALLOWED_TAGS: ['b', 'i', 'em', 'strong', 'a', 'p'],
  ALLOWED_ATTR: ['href']
});

// For plain text - escape or strip HTML
const plainText = purify.sanitize(userInput, { ALLOWED_TAGS: [] });

</input_validation>

<sql_injection>

SQL Injection Prevention

The Problem

Attackers can manipulate SQL queries through unsanitized input. Example attack payload: '; DROP TABLE users; --

The Solution: Parameterized Queries

// SAFE: Parameterized query (Prisma)
const user = await prisma.user.findUnique({
  where: { email: email }
});

// SAFE: Parameterized query (raw SQL)
const user = await db.query(
  'SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = $1',
  [email]
);

// SAFE: Supabase
const { data } = await supabase
  .from('users')
  .select()
  .eq('email', email);

Supabase RLS (Row Level Security)

-- Enable RLS
ALTER TABLE posts ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;

-- Users can only see their own posts
CREATE POLICY "Users see own posts"
  ON posts FOR SELECT
  USING (auth.uid() = user_id);

-- Users can only create posts as themselves
CREATE POLICY "Users create own posts"
  ON posts FOR INSERT
  WITH CHECK (auth.uid() = user_id);

-- Users can only update their own posts
CREATE POLICY "Users update own posts"
  ON posts FOR UPDATE
  USING (auth.uid() = user_id);

-- Users can only delete their own posts
CREATE POLICY "Users delete own posts"
  ON posts FOR DELETE
  USING (auth.uid() = user_id);

</sql_injection>

<xss_prevention>

XSS Prevention

The Problem

Attackers inject malicious scripts that execute in victim's browser, stealing cookies/data.

The Solution: Auto-escaping + CSP

// React auto-escapes by default - this is safe
return <div>Welcome, {userName}</div>;

// AVOID rendering raw HTML from user input
// If you absolutely must render user HTML, ALWAYS sanitize with DOMPurify first
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
const sanitizedContent = DOMPurify.sanitize(userContent);

Content Security Policy

// next.config.js
const securityHeaders = [
  {
    key: 'Content-Security-Policy',
    value: [
      "default-src 'self'",
      "script-src 'self'", // Avoid 'unsafe-inline' if possible
      "style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'",
      "img-src 'self' data: https:",
      "font-src 'self'",
      "connect-src 'self' https://api.supabase.co",
    ].join('; ')
  }
];

</xss_prevention>

<csrf_protection>

CSRF Protection

The Problem

Attackers trick authenticated users into submitting malicious requests to your site.

The Solution: CSRF Tokens + SameSite Cookies

// Server: Generate token
import { randomBytes } from 'crypto';

function generateCsrfToken(): string {
  return randomBytes(32).toString('hex');
}

// Store in session
session.csrfToken = generateCsrfToken();

// Client: Include in forms as hidden field
// Server: Validate token matches session

// Modern approach: SameSite cookies (most effective)
res.cookie('session', sessionId, {
  httpOnly: true,
  secure: true,
  sameSite: 'strict', // or 'lax'
});

</csrf_protection>

TopicReference FileWhen to Load
Auth patternsreference/auth-patterns.mdJWT, OAuth, sessions
Secretsreference/secrets-management.mdAPI keys, env vars
Input validationreference/input-validation.mdSanitization, schemas
Supabase RLSreference/rls-policies.mdRow level security
OWASP Top 10reference/owasp-top-10.mdVulnerability checklist

To load: Ask for the specific topic or check if context suggests it.

Before deploying:

Authentication

  • Passwords hashed with bcrypt (12+ rounds)
  • JWT tokens short-lived (15 min max)
  • Refresh tokens stored securely
  • Session cookies httpOnly + secure + sameSite

Secrets

  • No secrets in code or version control
  • Environment variables validated at startup
  • Secrets not logged

Input

  • All user input validated with schemas
  • SQL uses parameterized queries
  • HTML sanitized before rendering
  • File uploads validated (type, size, name)

Headers

  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSP header configured
  • CORS restricted to allowed origins
  • Security headers set (HSTS, X-Frame-Options)

Authorization

  • RLS enabled on all tables
  • API endpoints check permissions
  • Admin routes protected
  • Rate limiting on auth endpoints

Emit Outcome Sidecar

As the final step, write to ~/.claude/skill-analytics/last-outcome-security.json:

{"ts":"[UTC ISO8601]","skill":"security","version":"1.0.0","variant":"default",
 "status":"[success|partial|error]","runtime_ms":[estimated ms from start],
 "metrics":{"vulnerabilities_found":[n],"fixes_applied":[n],"audit_checks_passed":[n]},
 "error":null,"session_id":"[YYYY-MM-DD]"}

Use status "partial" if some stages failed but results were produced. Use "error" only if no output was generated.

平台分布

Claude Code

26.15%
按下载量换算104

Antigravity

22.04%
按下载量换算88

Gemini CLI

19.04%
按下载量换算76

Codex

12.22%
按下载量换算49

OpenCode

7.1%
按下载量换算28

windsurf

3.32%
按下载量换算13

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills