Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

scan-scss-styling(扫描 scss 样式)

scan-scss-styling 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

scan-scss-styling 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 60,316。

总安装 371周安装 15GitHub Stars 6下载 116核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:scan-scss-styling(扫描 scss 样式)
来源仓库:https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform
仓库路径:skills/scan-scss-styling
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform --skill scan-scss-styling
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform --skill scan-scss-styling

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

scan-scss-styling 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息搜集与整理。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。

建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发联网或文件读写操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/scan-scss-styling

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform --skill scan-scss-stylin…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

scan-scss-styling 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform --skill scan-scss-styling。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

scan-scss-styling 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

scan-scss-styling 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

scan-scss-styling 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

scan-scss-styling 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 371 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 116 次,GitHub 6 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

scan-scss-styling 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
scan-scss-styling

扫描 scss 样式 · 本页

3716只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks per file read. Prevents context loss from long files. Simple tasks: ask user whether to skip.
Critical Thinking Mindset — Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources, admit uncertainty, self-check output, cross-reference independently. Certainty without evidence = root of all hallucination.
AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid: - Verify AI-generated content against actual code. AI hallucinates variable names, mixin signatures, and hex color values. Grep to confirm existence before documenting. - NEVER invent variable values, hex colors, breakpoint values, or mixin signatures. Grep declarations — NOT usages — to confirm before documenting. - Trace full dependency chain after edits. Always trace full chain. - Surface ambiguity before coding. NEVER pick silently.

Prerequisites: MUST ATTENTION READ before executing:

Scan & Update Reference Doc — Surgical updates only, NEVER full rewrite. 1. Read existing doc first — understand structure and manual annotations 2. Detect mode: Placeholder (headings only) → Init. Has content → Sync. 3. Scan codebase (grep/glob) for current patterns 4. Diff findings vs doc — identify stale sections only 5. Update ONLY diverged sections. Preserve manual annotations. 6. Update metadata (date, version) in frontmatter/header 7. NEVER rewrite entire doc. NEVER remove sections without evidence obsolete.
Output Quality — Token efficiency without sacrificing quality. 1. No inventories/counts — stale instantly 2. No directory trees — use 1-line path conventions 3. No TOCs — AI reads linearly 4. One example per pattern — only if non-obvious 5. Lead with answer, not reasoning 6. Sacrifice grammar for concision in reports 7. Unresolved questions at end

Quick Summary

Goal: Scan project stylesheets → populate docs/project-reference/scss-styling-guide.md with BEM methodology usage, SCSS architecture, mixin/variable inventory, theming patterns, responsive breakpoints, and design token conventions.

Workflow:

  1. Classify — Detect styling approach and scan mode
  2. Scan — Parallel sub-agents discover patterns with file:line evidence
  3. Report — Write findings incrementally to report file
  4. Generate — Build/update reference doc from report
  5. Fresh-Eyes — Round 2 verification validates all variable names and file paths

Key Rules:

  • Generic — works with any CSS methodology (SCSS, Less, CSS Modules, Tailwind, CSS-in-JS)
  • MUST ATTENTION detect styling approach FIRST — scan patterns differ significantly
  • Every variable value, mixin signature, and breakpoint must come from actual declarations
  • Focus on project conventions — NOT generic CSS tutorials

Scan SCSS Styling

Phase 0: Detect Styling Approach & Mode

[BLOCKING] Before any other step, run in parallel:

  1. Read docs/project-reference/scss-styling-guide.md

- Detect mode: Init (placeholder) or Sync (populated) - In Sync mode: extract section list → skip re-scanning well-documented sections

  1. Detect styling approach:
SignalApproachAgent Emphasis
*.scss files presentSCSS/SassBoth agents (variables + BEM)
*.less files presentLessAdapt variable patterns to Less syntax
*.module.css/*.module.scssCSS ModulesFocus on naming conventions, composition
tailwind.config.* presentTailwind CSSConfig-first: extract theme overrides, custom utilities
styled-components/emotion in depsCSS-in-JSComponent-level style colocation, theme provider
Multiple approachesHybridDocument each separately with clear boundary
  1. Detect BEM usage:
SignalBEM AdoptionNotes
block__element--modifier patterns in templatesActive BEMDocument separator style and nesting rules
Mixed BEM and utility classesPartial BEMDocument which layer uses which approach
Only utility classes (Tailwind, Bootstrap)No BEMDocument utility class conventions instead
  1. Load styling config from docs/project-config.json designSystem.tokenFiles if available.
  2. Detect source scope for token discovery (whitelist):

- src/**/styles/**/*.{scss,css} — global styles - src/**/themes/**/*.{scss,css} — theme files - src/**/tokens/**/*.{scss,css} — token files - EXCLUDE: node_modules, dist, .nx, coverage, component-local styles

Evidence gate: Confidence <60% on primary approach → report uncertainty, proceed with Agent 1 (structure) only.

Phase 1: Plan

Create TaskCreate entries for each sub-agent and each verification step. Do not start Phase 2 without tasks created.

Phase 2: Execute Scan (Parallel Sub-Agents)

Launch 2 general-purpose sub-agents in parallel. Each MUST:

  • Write findings incrementally after each category — NEVER batch at end
  • Cite file:line for every variable name, mixin, and example
  • Confidence: >80% document; 60-80% note as "observed (unverified)"; <60% omit
  • Declarations only — NOT usages when cataloguing variables and mixins

All findings → plans/reports/scan-scss-styling-{YYMMDD}-{HHMM}-report.md

Agent 1: SCSS Architecture & Variables

Think (Import chain dimension): What's the entry point? Where do global styles load? Is there a predictable import order (reset → tokens → utilities → components)? What breaks if the order changes?

Think (Variable declaration dimension): Which variables are authoritative declarations vs usages? Are CSS custom properties mirroring SCSS variables (dual-declaration pattern)? What's the naming convention (BEM-inspired, semantic, functional)?

Think (Breakpoint dimension): Where are breakpoints defined? Is there a responsive mixin or just raw media queries scattered across files? Mobile-first or desktop-first?

  • Glob for **/*.scss (or detected extension) within whitelist scope
  • Find global stylesheet entry points and their @import/@use/@forward chains
  • Grep for SCSS variable declarations (^\s*\$[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*\s*:) — dedupe, group by category
  • Grep for CSS custom property declarations (--[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*\s*:) in :root or theme blocks
  • Find mixin definitions (@mixin\s+[a-zA-Z]) — capture signature + one usage example
  • Find function definitions (@function\s+[a-zA-Z])
  • Find breakpoint definitions — extract values from media queries and breakpoint variables

Quality gate: If a variable category has <3 unique declarations OR >200, log "scope too narrow/broad — manual refinement required."

Agent 2: BEM Patterns & Theming

Think (BEM convention dimension): What's the exact separator style (double-underscore __, double-dash --, or variants)? What's the maximum nesting depth before patterns break? Are modifiers on blocks, elements, or both?

Think (Theming dimension): How many themes exist? Is theming via CSS custom property overrides, SCSS theme maps, or class-based switching? How does a developer add a new theme?

Think (Component scoping dimension): Are styles co-located with components (scoped) or global? What naming convention prevents cross-component contamination?

  • Grep for BEM class patterns in templates/HTML (__ and -- separators) — find 5+ concrete examples
  • Find BEM naming conventions in SCSS (nesting patterns, &__element, &--modifier)
  • Discover theming patterns — CSS custom property overrides, theme class switching, dark mode
  • Find component-scoped vs global style patterns and where each is used
  • Look for z-index management (variables, scale, stacking context rules)
  • Find animation/transition conventions (duration variables, easing variables)
  • Identify color palette — grep declarations only (hex, hsl, rgb in variable declarations)

Phase 3: Analyze & Generate

Read full report. Apply fresh-eyes protocol:

Round 1 (main agent): Build section drafts from report findings.

Round 2 (fresh sub-agent, zero memory):

  • Do ALL variable names in examples exist as actual declarations? (Grep verify — declarations, not usages)
  • Do mixin names in examples match actual @mixin definitions? (Grep verify)
  • Do color values come from declarations, not fabricated hex codes?
  • Are breakpoint values read from actual config, not assumed from common values?

Target Sections

SectionContent
BEM MethodologySeparator style, nesting rules, block/element/modifier examples from actual components
SCSS ArchitectureFile organization, import chain, global vs component style boundary
Mixins & FunctionsTable: name, signature, purpose, file:line — declarations only
Variables & TokensTable: category (color/spacing/type/breakpoint), variable name, purpose, file:line
ThemingTheme approach, CSS custom property blocks, how to add/modify a theme
Responsive PatternsBreakpoint definitions, responsive mixin usage, mobile-first vs desktop-first
Color PaletteColor variables/tokens grouped by semantic role (not raw hex list)
Z-Index ScaleZ-index variable definitions and layer naming conventions
Anti-PatternsWhat NOT to do — global overrides, specificity hacks, hardcoded values

Phase 4: Write & Verify

  1. Write updated doc with <!-- Last scanned: YYYY-MM-DD --> at top
  2. Surgical update only — preserve unchanged sections
  3. Verify (Glob): ALL stylesheet file paths in examples exist
  4. Verify (Grep): ALL variable names match actual declarations — NOT usages
  5. Verify (Grep): ALL mixin names match actual @mixin definitions
  6. Report: sections created vs updated, approach detected, undocumented styling gaps

Closing Reminders

  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small TaskCreate tasks BEFORE starting
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION detect styling approach in Phase 0 — patterns differ significantly by approach
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION NEVER invent variable values, hex colors, or mixin signatures — grep declarations
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION sub-agents write findings incrementally after each category — NEVER batch at end
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION declarations only for variables/mixins — NOT usages — in the catalog
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Round 2 fresh-eyes is non-negotiable — validates variable names and values
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION read existing doc first, scan codebase, diff, surgical update only. Never rewrite entire doc.
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION output quality: no counts/trees/TOCs, 1 example per pattern, lead with answer.
  • MUST ATTENTION critical thinking — every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Never present guess as fact.
  • MUST ATTENTION AI mistake prevention — holistic-first, fix at responsible layer, surface ambiguity before coding, re-read after compaction.

Anti-Rationalization:

EvasionRebuttal
"Styling approach obvious, skip Phase 0 detection"Phase 0 is BLOCKING — SCSS vs Tailwind vs CSS-in-JS require completely different agent patterns
"Variable names look standard ($primary-color)"Grep-verify every variable name against actual declarations — AI hallucinates variable names
"Breakpoints are probably 768px/1024px"Read breakpoint declarations — NEVER assume common values
"Color values look right"ALL color values must come from grep of actual declarations
"Usages and declarations are the same thing"NEVER mix them — document only declarations as authoritative
"Round 2 not needed for styling docs"Main agent rationalizes fabricated variable values. Fresh-eyes mandatory.

[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and break into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using TaskCreate.

平台分布

Codex

38.54%
按下载量换算45

Claude

27.75%
按下载量换算32

Cursor

19.01%
按下载量换算22

Gemini CLI

9.87%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills