Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

sales-negotiation(销售谈判)

sales-negotiation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

sales-negotiation 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 32,980。

总安装 2,424周安装 99GitHub Stars 4下载 776核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sales-negotiation(销售谈判)
来源仓库:https://github.com/dengineproblem/agents-monorepo
仓库路径:skills/sales-negotiation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/dengineproblem/agents-monorepo --skill sales-negotiation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/dengineproblem/agents-monorepo --skill sales-negotiation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

销售谈判用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。sales-negotiation 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适用于价格协商策略、让步技巧和客户异议处理场景。提供常见问题应对话术库和利益交换点分析工具。使用前应熟悉企业定价政策与授权范围限制。建议在实际对话中测试建议有效性并及时调整策略。

来源仓库内路径:skills/sales-negotiation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/dengineproblem/agents-monorepo --skill sales-n…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

sales-negotiation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/dengineproblem/agents-monorepo --skill sales-negotiation。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

sales-negotiation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

sales-negotiation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

sales-negotiation 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

sales-negotiation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,424 次,近一周安装 99 次,下载 776 次,GitHub 4 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

sales-negotiation 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
sales-negotiation

销售谈判 · 本页

2,4244只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Sales Negotiation Expert

Expertise in negotiation strategy, procurement navigation, and deal closing techniques.

Negotiation Fundamentals

core_concepts:
  batna:
    definition: "Best Alternative To Negotiated Agreement"
    importance: "Your walk-away power"
    develop:
      - "Identify all alternatives"
      - "Evaluate each option"
      - "Strengthen best alternative"
      - "Know when to walk away"

  zopa:
    definition: "Zone of Possible Agreement"
    components:
      seller_walk_away: "Minimum acceptable price"
      buyer_walk_away: "Maximum willing to pay"
      zone: "Overlap between the two"
    visualization: |
      Seller min ----[====ZOPA====]---- Buyer max
                     ^              ^
                  Ideal outcome zone

  anchoring:
    definition: "First number sets the range"
    tactics:
      - "Anchor high when selling"
      - "Counter extreme anchors"
      - "Use market data to justify"

  concession_strategy:
    rules:
      - "Never concede without getting something"
      - "Make concessions smaller over time"
      - "Trade items of unequal value"
      - "Label your concessions"

Preparation Framework

negotiation_prep:
  know_yourself:
    - "Your BATNA (walk-away alternative)"
    - "Your target outcome"
    - "Your reservation price"
    - "Concessions you can offer"
    - "Non-negotiables"

  know_them:
    - "Their likely BATNA"
    - "Their constraints (budget, timeline)"
    - "Their decision criteria"
    - "Who has authority"
    - "Personal motivations"

  know_the_deal:
    - "Market rates/benchmarks"
    - "Competitive landscape"
    - "Total value (not just price)"
    - "Implementation costs"
    - "Long-term implications"

  preparation_checklist:
    before_meeting:
      - "[ ] Research company financials"
      - "[ ] Understand procurement process"
      - "[ ] Map all stakeholders"
      - "[ ] Prepare value justification"
      - "[ ] Plan concession sequence"
      - "[ ] Practice difficult scenarios"
      - "[ ] Set target and walk-away"

Objection Handling

objection_framework:
  acknowledge_explore_respond:
    acknowledge: "Show you heard and understand"
    explore: "Dig deeper to find real objection"
    respond: "Address root cause"

  common_objections:
    price_too_high:
      reframe: "Let's discuss the value relative to investment"
      questions:
        - "Compared to what?"
        - "What's the cost of not solving this?"
        - "What ROI would justify this investment?"
      tactics:
        - "Break down per user/month"
        - "Show competitive comparison"
        - "Quantify business impact"
        - "Offer payment terms"

    we_have_budget_constraints:
      reframe: "Let's find a solution within your constraints"
      questions:
        - "What is your budget range?"
        - "What could we adjust to fit?"
        - "Can budget be shifted from elsewhere?"
      tactics:
        - "Phased implementation"
        - "Reduced scope to start"
        - "Different payment structure"
        - "Push to next fiscal period"

    need_to_think_about_it:
      reframe: "Absolutely. Help me understand what you're weighing"
      questions:
        - "What specifically needs more thought?"
        - "What would help you decide?"
        - "What's your timeline for decision?"
      tactics:
        - "Offer to address concerns now"
        - "Schedule follow-up call"
        - "Send relevant materials"
        - "Identify real objection"

    using_competitor:
      reframe: "Many customers switched from them. Mind if I ask why you chose them?"
      questions:
        - "What's working well?"
        - "What could be better?"
        - "When is your renewal?"
      tactics:
        - "Highlight differentiators"
        - "Share switch case studies"
        - "Offer pilot alongside"
        - "Plant seeds for renewal"

    not_the_right_time:
      reframe: "When would be better, and why?"
      questions:
        - "What's happening now?"
        - "What needs to change?"
        - "What's the cost of waiting?"
      tactics:
        - "Create urgency"
        - "Show risk of delay"
        - "Offer to start small"
        - "Book future follow-up"

    need_approval:
      reframe: "Makes sense. How can I help you make the case?"
      questions:
        - "What does [approver] care about most?"
        - "What objections might they have?"
        - "Can I join the conversation?"
      tactics:
        - "Provide ROI materials"
        - "Offer exec-to-exec call"
        - "Share similar customer references"
        - "Create internal champion deck"

Procurement Navigation

procurement_process:
  stages:
    rfp_issued:
      actions:
        - "Influence requirements upfront"
        - "Understand evaluation criteria"
        - "Build relationships pre-RFP"
      tips:
        - "Shape the RFP before it's issued"
        - "Position unique capabilities"

    evaluation:
      actions:
        - "Score well on all criteria"
        - "Differentiate meaningfully"
        - "Demonstrate value clearly"
      tips:
        - "Know the scorecard"
        - "Address all requirements"
        - "Provide references proactively"

    shortlist:
      actions:
        - "Deep dive demos"
        - "Reference calls"
        - "Proof of concept"
      tips:
        - "Personalize to their needs"
        - "Win the champion"
        - "Address concerns directly"

    negotiation:
      actions:
        - "Commercial terms"
        - "Legal review"
        - "Final pricing"
      tips:
        - "Know their constraints"
        - "Have trade-offs ready"
        - "Don't negotiate against yourself"

  procurement_tactics_response:
    competitive_bid:
      tactic: "We're evaluating multiple vendors"
      response: "What criteria matter most to you?"
      counter: "Focus on unique value, not just price"

    budget_deadline:
      tactic: "We need to use budget by end of quarter"
      response: "Let's structure something that works"
      counter: "Use urgency but don't over-discount"

    splitting_business:
      tactic: "We're thinking of splitting between vendors"
      response: "What would consolidation savings mean to you?"
      counter: "Highlight total cost of multiple vendors"

    last_minute_ask:
      tactic: "Just need 10% more discount to sign today"
      response: "Help me understand what changed"
      counter: "Trade for value, not free concession"

Concession Strategy

concession_principles:
  never_free:
    rule: "Every concession requires something in return"
    examples:
      - "Happy to reduce price by 10% for 3-year term"
      - "We can waive setup fee if you sign this week"
      - "I can include premium support for annual payment"

  diminishing_size:
    pattern: "Each concession smaller than the last"
    example:
      first: "5% discount"
      second: "3% additional"
      third: "1% final"
    message: "Signals you're reaching limit"

  trade_unequal_value:
    concept: "Give what's cheap to you, valuable to them"
    examples:
      - "Training (low cost, high value)"
      - "Extended payment terms"
      - "Additional user licenses"
      - "Implementation support"

concession_trades:
  if_you_give:
    - "Lower price"
    - "Extended payment terms"
    - "Free add-ons"
    - "Waived fees"
    - "Extra support"

  ask_for:
    - "Longer contract term"
    - "Upfront payment"
    - "Case study/reference"
    - "Expanded scope"
    - "Faster decision"
    - "Executive sponsor"
    - "Referral commitment"

Closing Techniques

closing_approaches:
  assumptive_close:
    technique: "Assume the sale, discuss implementation"
    example: "So for onboarding, would you prefer to start
              with the sales team or marketing team first?"
    when: "Strong buying signals present"

  alternative_close:
    technique: "Offer two positive options"
    example: "Would you prefer the annual plan with 20% savings,
              or the quarterly plan for flexibility?"
    when: "Decision is about 'which', not 'if'"

  summary_close:
    technique: "Recap value and ask for commitment"
    example: "So we've agreed this solves [problem], will save
              [amount], and integrates with [system].
              Shall we move forward?"
    when: "After thorough discovery and demo"

  urgency_close:
    technique: "Create legitimate time pressure"
    example: "We have capacity for implementation this month.
              Next available slot would be Q2.
              Does this timeline work?"
    when: "Real deadline or constraint exists"

  trial_close:
    technique: "Test readiness before asking"
    example: "On a scale of 1-10, how confident are you
              this solves your problem?"
    when: "Uncertain about objections"

  puppy_dog_close:
    technique: "Let them experience before deciding"
    example: "Why don't you try it for 30 days and see
              how the team likes it?"
    when: "Product sells itself through use"

  sharp_angle_close:
    technique: "Turn their request into commitment"
    example: "If I can get you that feature by Q2,
              can we sign today?"
    when: "They make a specific request"

buying_signals:
  verbal:
    - "What are the next steps?"
    - "How soon can we start?"
    - "Can you send the contract?"
    - "What's the implementation timeline?"
    - "Who do we need to involve?"

  behavioral:
    - "Asking detailed questions"
    - "Involving additional stakeholders"
    - "Discussing internal processes"
    - "Comparing options openly"
    - "Leaning in, engaged"

Competitive Displacement

displacement_strategy:
  positioning:
    frontal_attack:
      when: "Clear superiority on key criteria"
      approach: "Direct comparison on strengths"

    flanking:
      when: "Strength in specific area"
      approach: "Reframe evaluation criteria"

    niche:
      when: "Specialized capability"
      approach: "Focus on unique use case"

  competitive_questions:
    discovery:
      - "What solutions have you looked at?"
      - "What do you like about your current provider?"
      - "What would you change if you could?"
      - "When is your contract up?"

    positioning:
      - "What would make you consider alternatives?"
      - "What's missing from current solution?"
      - "How do they compare on [your strength]?"

  handling_competitive_situations:
    when_behind:
      - "Understand their evaluation criteria"
      - "Find unique differentiator"
      - "Offer proof of concept"
      - "Go higher/wider in organization"
      - "Focus on long-term partnership"

    when_ahead:
      - "Don't get complacent"
      - "Accelerate timeline"
      - "Lock in champion"
      - "Address all concerns"
      - "Make switching cost clear"

  competitive_landmines:
    concept: "Questions that expose competitor weakness"
    examples:
      - "Ask about [feature they lack]"
      - "Ask about [support issue they have]"
      - "Ask about [scalability problem]"
      - "Ask about [security concern]"

Negotiation Tactics

tactics_playbook:
  value_creation:
    expand_pie:
      - "Add services/support"
      - "Bundle products"
      - "Extend relationship"
      - "Create partnership"

    trade_across_issues:
      - "Trade price for term"
      - "Trade timeline for scope"
      - "Trade features for references"

  value_claiming:
    anchoring_high:
      when: "You're presenting first"
      how: "Start at top of range with justification"

    silence:
      when: "After making offer"
      how: "Let them respond first"

    flinching:
      when: "They make extreme ask"
      how: "Express surprise, ask them to explain"

  countering_tactics:
    good_cop_bad_cop:
      recognize: "One nice, one aggressive"
      counter: "Address both together, deal with decision maker"

    higher_authority:
      recognize: "'I need to check with my boss'"
      counter: "Ask to include authority in conversation"

    nibbling:
      recognize: "Small asks at the end"
      counter: "Treat as new negotiation"

    deadline_pressure:
      recognize: "'Must decide today'"
      counter: "Ask what happens if you don't"

Лучшие практики

  1. Prepare thoroughly — 80% успеха в подготовке
  2. Listen more than talk — понимай их позицию
  3. Trade, don't concede — каждая уступка за что-то
  4. Know your BATNA — сила в готовности уйти
  5. Focus on interests — не позиции, а интересы
  6. Document everything — соглашения в письменном виде

平台分布

Codex

35.3%
按下载量换算274

Claude

30.38%
按下载量换算236

Cursor

15.8%
按下载量换算123

Gemini CLI

9.1%
按下载量换算71

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills