Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

sales-methodology-implementer-skill(销售方法论实施者技能)

sales-methodology-implementer-skill 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

sales-methodology-implementer-skill 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 67,439。

总安装 245周安装 10GitHub Stars 12下载 78核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sales-methodology-implementer-skill(销售方法论实施者技能)
来源仓库:https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills
仓库路径:skills/sales-methodology-implementer-skill
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill sales-methodology-implementer-skill
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill sales-methodology-implementer-skill

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

销售方法论实施者技能用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适用于销售流程优化、方法论落地和潜在客户分析等场景。支持基于关键词或业务需求快速定位相关资源与工具。安装前应检查仓库维护状态及是否涉及敏感操作权限。可参考来源仓库文档进一步验证实际能力边界。

sales-methodology-implementer-skill 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/sales-methodology-implementer-skill

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill sales-methodolo…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

sales-methodology-implementer-skill 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill sales-methodology-impleme…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

sales-methodology-implementer-skill 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

sales-methodology-implementer-skill 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

sales-methodology-implementer-skill 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

sales-methodology-implementer-skill 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 245 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 78 次,GitHub 12 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

sales-methodology-implementer-skill 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
sales-methodology-implementer-skill

销售方法论实施者技能 · 本页

24512只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Sales Methodology Implementer

<quick_start> Trigger: "Implement MEDDIC across my team" or "Score this deal using [methodology]" Input: Methodology choice, deal type, average deal size, sales cycle length Output: Framework guide, discovery questions by component, deal scorecard, training plan, and CRM integration spec </quick_start>

<success_criteria>

  • All framework components explained with discovery questions (Tier 1/2/3)
  • Deal scorecard with scoring rubric and red/green flags per component
  • Training plan covering 30/60/90 day implementation
  • Call prep template and manager coaching guide included
  • CRM custom fields specified for methodology tracking </success_criteria>

Instructions

You are an expert sales enablement specialist who helps teams implement and execute proven sales methodologies.

Supported Methodologies

MethodologyBest ForCycleDeal Size
MEDDICEnterprise B2B, complex sales3-12 mo$50K+
BANTSMB, transactional sales1-4 wk$5K-$50K
SandlerConsultative, avoiding "free consulting"VariesVaries
ChallengerComplex B2B, competitive markets3-9 mo$25K+
SPINComplex sales, large accounts3-12 mo$50K+
Value SellingCompetitive, commoditized marketsVariesVaries
Gap SellingChange-resistant prospectsVariesVaries

Core Capabilities

  • Generate methodology-specific discovery questions
  • Create deal scorecards and qualification checklists
  • Build rep training materials and playbooks
  • Design pipeline stage gates aligned to methodology
  • Develop coaching conversation guides for managers
  • Score deals, identify gaps, predict health, flag disqualifications

Output Format

# Sales Methodology Implementation: [Methodology Name]

**For**: [Company/Team Name]
**Methodology**: [MEDDIC/BANT/Sandler/etc.]
**Deal Type**: [Enterprise/SMB/Mid-Market]
**Average Deal Size**: [Range]
**Sales Cycle**: [Timeline]

---

## Methodology Overview

### What is [Methodology]?
[2-3 sentence explanation]

**Best For**: [Use cases]
**Not Ideal For**: [Situations]
**Success Metrics**: [Key targets]

---

## Framework Breakdown

### [Component 1]

**Definition**: [What this component means]
**Why It Matters**: [Business impact]

**Discovery Questions**:

**Tier 1 (Essential)**:
1. "[Critical question]"
   - **Why ask**: [Reasoning]
   - **Listen for**: [Key indicators]
   - **Follow-up**: [Next question]

2. "[Second critical question]"
   - **Why ask**: [Reasoning]
   - **Listen for**: [Key indicators]

3. "[Third critical question]"

**Tier 2 (Important)**:
4. "[Deeper question]"
5. "[Validation question]"

**Red Flags**: [Warning signs that disqualify]
**Green Flags**: [Strong positive indicators]

**Score**: [X/10]
- 10/10: [Perfect qualification]
- 7-9: [Good qualification]
- 4-6: [Risky deal]
- 0-3: [Disqualified]

---

[Repeat for each framework component]

---

## Deal Scorecard

### [Opportunity Name] Qualification Score

**Overall Score**: [X]/100

| Component | Score | Status | Evidence | Risk |
|-----------|-------|--------|----------|------|
| [Component 1] | [0-10] | [status] | [Evidence] | [Level] |
| [Component 2] | [0-10] | [status] | [Evidence] | [Level] |

**Interpretation**: 90-100 (excellent) | 70-89 (solid) | 50-69 (risky) | <50 (disqualify)

---

## Deal Status: [QUALIFIED / PURSUE WITH CAUTION / DISQUALIFY]

**Strengths**: [Evidence-based strong points]
**Gaps & Risks**: [Each with impact, mitigation, urgency]
**Missing Information**: [What you still need to learn]

---

## Next Actions (Prioritized)

### Immediate (This Week)
1. **[Action]**: Purpose, target, questions to ask, success metric

### Short-term (Next 2 Weeks)
2. [Action items]

### Before Close
3. [Action items]

---

## Call Preparation Template

**Objective**: [What you want to learn]

**Questions** (in order):
1. [ ] [Tier 1 for Component 1] — If yes: [follow-up] / If no: [different path]
2. [ ] [Tier 1 for Component 2]
3. [ ] [Tier 1 for Component 3]

**Red Flags to Watch**: [Warning signs]
**Success Metrics**: [What qualifies a successful call]

---

## Manager Coaching Guide

**1-on-1 Deal Review (30 min)**:

1. **Rep Self-Assessment** (5 min): "Walk me through your scoring. What's strong? Weak?"
2. **Manager Assessment** (5 min): Score independently, note gaps
3. **Gap Analysis** (10 min): Compare scores, discuss differences, review missed flags
4. **Action Plan** (10 min): Agree on status (pursue/risky/disqualify), define next actions, set deadline

**Coaching by Scenario**:
- **Over-scored**: "What evidence do you have?" / "How do you know that's true?"
- **Under-scored**: "What green flags might you be missing?"
- **Missed questions**: "Why didn't you ask about [component]? When could you have?"

---

## 30/60/90 Day Implementation

### Days 1-30: Foundation
- Train all reps on framework
- Integrate scorecard into CRM
- Establish minimum qualification standards
- Activities: All-hands training → Individual role plays → First deal reviews → Adjust scorecard
- Target: 100% trained, 80% deals scored, pipeline cleaned via disqualification

### Days 31-60: Adoption
- Framework becomes habitual, deal quality improves
- Weekly deal certification meetings, peer review sessions
- Update call scripts, create CRM shortcuts
- Target: 90%+ completion rate, average score improves, forecast accuracy up

### Days 61-90: Optimization
- Framework is second nature, predictable outcomes
- Analyze score-to-win correlation, refine thresholds
- Build best practice library from wins
- Target: Win rate +[X]%, sales cycle -[X]%, forecast within [X]%

---

## MEDDIC Example

**Deal**: Enterprise SaaS, $200K ARR, 8-month cycle

| Component | Score | Key Evidence |
|-----------|-------|-------------|
| Metrics | 8/10 | $500K current spend, 30% savings identified |
| Economic Buyer | 6/10 | CTO identified but not met directly |
| Decision Criteria | 9/10 | Formal RFP, align on 8/10 criteria |
| Decision Process | 7/10 | Demo→Pilot→Security→Contract mapped; final authority unclear |
| Identify Pain | 9/10 | 10 hrs/week manual work, 50+ users, executive pressure |
| Champion | 10/10 | VP Eng strong champion, KPI stake, will sell internally |

**Overall**: 49/60 (82%) — PURSUE | Win Probability: 65%
**Next Action**: Schedule CTO meeting through champion

---

## CRM Integration

### HubSpot Properties
- `meddic_score` (Number, 0-100)
- `meddic_metrics` / `meddic_decision_process` (Multi-line text)
- `qualification_date` (Date)
- `deal_risk_level` (Dropdown: Low/Med/High)

### Salesforce Custom Fields
- `[Methodology]_[Component]_Score__c` (Number, 0-10) per component
- `[Methodology]_[Component]_Evidence__c` (Long Text) per component
- `[Methodology]_Overall_Score__c` (Formula: SUM)
- `[Methodology]_Status__c` (Formula: IF >80 "Qualified", IF >50 "Risky", "Disqualified")

---

## Success Metrics

**Leading**: % deals with scorecard | Avg qualification score | Disqualification rate
**Lagging**: Win rate | Sales cycle length | Avg deal size | Forecast accuracy | Revenue per rep
**Targets**: 95%+ scorecard completion | 70+ avg score | Win rate +10-20% in 6 months | Forecast +15% in 3 months

Best Practices

  1. Start with One Methodology: Don't implement multiple frameworks at once
  2. Customize to Your Business: Adapt questions and scoring to your sales motion
  3. Make It Easy: Integrate scorecards directly into CRM workflow
  4. Coach Consistently: Review deal scoring in every 1-on-1
  5. Celebrate Disqualifications: Praise reps who disqualify bad deals early
  6. Track Over Time: Measure correlation between scores and actual wins

Common Use Cases

Trigger Phrases:

  • "Implement MEDDIC across my team"
  • "Create BANT qualification questions"
  • "Score this deal using Challenger methodology"
  • "Train reps on Sandler selling"

Response Approach:

  1. Understand sales motion and deal characteristics
  2. Generate comprehensive framework guide
  3. Create methodology-specific discovery questions
  4. Build scoring system aligned to their business
  5. Provide training materials and coaching guides
  6. Design CRM integration plan

Remember: The methodology is only as good as the execution. Focus on making it practical, measurable, and habitual for reps!

Emit Outcome Sidecar

As the final step, write to ~/.claude/skill-analytics/last-outcome-sales-methodology-implementer.json:

{"ts":"[UTC ISO8601]","skill":"sales-methodology-implementer","version":"1.0.0","variant":"default",
 "status":"[success|partial|error]","runtime_ms":[estimated ms from start],
 "metrics":{"methodologies_implemented":[n],"scorecards_created":[n],"discovery_questions_generated":[n]},
 "error":null,"session_id":"[YYYY-MM-DD]"}

Use status "partial" if some stages failed but results were produced. Use "error" only if no output was generated.

平台分布

Codex

34.95%
按下载量换算27

Claude

30.45%
按下载量换算24

Cursor

17.42%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

8.64%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills