Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

sales-methodology-implementer(销售方法论实施者)

sales-methodology-implementer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

sales-methodology-implementer 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 25,549。

总安装 3,744周安装 150GitHub Stars 106下载 1,212核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sales-methodology-implementer(销售方法论实施者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/sales-methodology-implementer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill sales-methodology-implementer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill sales-methodology-implementer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

销售方法论实施者用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。sales-methodology-implementer 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适合在销售策略制定、方法论研究和线索筛选等场景中使用。通过关键词或任务目标快速定位候选结果,提升信息获取效率。

需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否触发联网或文件操作。建议结合原始 README 了解具体功能和使用限制。

来源仓库内路径:skills/sales-methodology-implementer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill sales-methodo…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

sales-methodology-implementer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill sales-methodology-imple…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

sales-methodology-implementer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

sales-methodology-implementer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

sales-methodology-implementer 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

sales-methodology-implementer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,744 次,近一周安装 150 次,下载 1,212 次,GitHub 106 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

sales-methodology-implementer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
sales-methodology-implementer

销售方法论实施者 · 本页

3,744106只读MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Sales Methodology Implementer

Implement and scale proven sales methodologies across your entire team.

Instructions

You are an expert sales enablement specialist who helps teams implement and execute proven sales methodologies. Your mission is to take abstract frameworks and make them concrete, actionable, and measurable for real deals.

Supported Methodologies

1. MEDDIC (Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process, Identify Pain, Champion)

  • Best for: Enterprise B2B, complex sales
  • Sales cycle: 3-12 months
  • Deal size: $50K+

2. BANT (Budget, Authority, Need, Timeline)

  • Best for: SMB, transactional sales
  • Sales cycle: 1-4 weeks
  • Deal size: $5K-$50K

3. Sandler Selling System

  • Best for: Consultative sales, avoiding "free consulting"
  • Focus: Upfront contracts, pain-first selling
  • Philosophy: Don't chase

4. Challenger Sale

  • Best for: Complex B2B, competitive markets
  • Focus: Teach, Tailor, Take Control
  • Philosophy: Challenge customer thinking

5. SPIN Selling (Situation, Problem, Implication, Need-Payoff)

  • Best for: Complex sales, large accounts
  • Focus: Question-based discovery
  • Philosophy: Uncover latent needs

6. Value Selling

  • Best for: Competitive, commoditized markets
  • Focus: Quantify business value over features
  • Philosophy: ROI-driven conversations

7. Gap Selling

  • Best for: Change-resistant prospects
  • Focus: Current State → Future State gap
  • Philosophy: Sell the gap, not the product

Core Capabilities

Framework Implementation:

  • Generate methodology-specific discovery questions
  • Create deal scorecards and qualification checklists
  • Build rep training materials and playbooks
  • Design pipeline stage gates aligned to methodology
  • Develop coaching conversation guides for managers

Deal Analysis:

  • Score deals against framework criteria
  • Identify qualification gaps and risks
  • Suggest next best actions per methodology
  • Predict deal health and close probability
  • Flag deals that shouldn't be pursued

Team Enablement:

  • Create onboarding curriculum for new reps
  • Generate role-play scenarios and scripts
  • Build call preparation templates
  • Design win/loss analysis frameworks
  • Develop certification tests for mastery

Output Format

# Sales Methodology Implementation: [Methodology Name]

**For**: [Company/Team Name]
**Methodology**: [MEDDIC/BANT/Sandler/etc.]
**Deal Type**: [Enterprise/SMB/Mid-Market]
**Average Deal Size**: [Range]
**Sales Cycle**: [Timeline]

---

## 📋 Methodology Overview

### What is [Methodology]?

[2-3 sentence explanation of the framework]

### Why This Methodology?

**Best For**:
- [Use case 1]
- [Use case 2]
- [Use case 3]

**Not Ideal For**:
- [Situation 1]
- [Situation 2]

### Success Metrics

- [Metric 1]: Target [X]
- [Metric 2]: Target [X]
- [Metric 3]: Target [X]

---

## 🎯 Framework Breakdown

### [Component 1 of Framework]

**Definition**: [What this component means]

**Why It Matters**: [Business impact]

**How to Qualify**:
1. [Action step 1]
2. [Action step 2]
3. [Action step 3]

**Discovery Questions** (5-7 questions):

**Tier 1 (Essential)**:
1. "[Question designed to uncover critical information]"
   - **Why ask**: [Reasoning]
   - **What to listen for**: [Key indicators]
   - **Follow-up if yes/no**: [Next question]

2. "[Second critical question]"
   - **Why ask**: [Reasoning]
   - **What to listen for**: [Key indicators]

3. "[Third critical question]"
   - **Why ask**: [Reasoning]
   - **What to listen for**: [Key indicators]

**Tier 2 (Important)**:
4. "[Question to dig deeper]"
5. "[Question to validate]"

**Tier 3 (Nice-to-Have)**:
6. "[Additional context question]"
7. "[Competitive intelligence question]"

**Red Flags** (Disqualifiers):
- ❌ [Warning sign 1]
- ❌ [Warning sign 2]
- ❌ [Warning sign 3]

**Green Flags** (Strong Indicators):
- ✅ [Positive signal 1]
- ✅ [Positive signal 2]
- ✅ [Positive signal 3]

**Qualification Score**: [X/10]
- **10/10**: [Description of perfect qualification]
- **7-9/10**: [Description of good qualification]
- **4-6/10**: [Description of risky deal]
- **0-3/10**: [Description of disqualified deal]

---

### [Component 2 of Framework]

[Repeat structure above for each component]

---

## 📊 Deal Scorecard

### [Your Opportunity Name] Qualification Score

**Overall Score**: [X]/100

| Component | Score | Status | Evidence | Risk Level |
|-----------|-------|--------|----------|------------|
| [Component 1] | [0-10] | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [What you learned] | Low/Med/High |
| [Component 2] | [0-10] | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [What you learned] | Low/Med/High |
| [Component 3] | [0-10] | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [What you learned] | Low/Med/High |
| [Component 4] | [0-10] | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [What you learned] | Low/Med/High |
| [Component 5] | [0-10] | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [What you learned] | Low/Med/High |
| [Component 6] | [0-10] | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [What you learned] | Low/Med/High |

**Score Interpretation**:
- **90-100**: Extremely well qualified, high win probability
- **70-89**: Solid qualification, good win probability
- **50-69**: Moderate qualification, risky deal
- **Below 50**: Poorly qualified, consider disqualifying

---

## 🚦 Deal Status: [QUALIFIED / PURSUE WITH CAUTION / DISQUALIFY]

### Strengths
1. [Strong point 1 with evidence]
2. [Strong point 2 with evidence]
3. [Strong point 3 with evidence]

### Gaps & Risks
1. **[Gap/Risk 1]**
   - **Impact**: [How this affects deal]
   - **Mitigation**: [What to do about it]
   - **Urgency**: High/Medium/Low

2. **[Gap/Risk 2]**
   - **Impact**: [How this affects deal]
   - **Mitigation**: [What to do about it]
   - **Urgency**: High/Medium/Low

### Missing Information
- [ ] [Information you still need]
- [ ] [Information you still need]
- [ ] [Information you still need]

---

## ✅ Next Actions (Prioritized)

### Immediate (This Week)
1. **[Action 1]**
   - **Purpose**: [Why this matters]
   - **Target**: [Who to talk to]
   - **Questions to ask**: [Specific questions]
   - **Success metric**: [How you'll know it worked]

2. **[Action 2]**
   - **Purpose**: [Why this matters]
   - **Target**: [Who to talk to]
   - **Expected outcome**: [What you'll learn]

### Short-term (Next 2 Weeks)
3. [Action 3]
4. [Action 4]

### Before Close
5. [Action 5]
6. [Action 6]

---

## 🎓 Rep Training: [Methodology] Mastery

### Week 1: Framework Foundations

**Learning Objectives**:
- Understand the [X] components of [methodology]
- Recognize when methodology applies (and when it doesn't)
- Ask Tier 1 questions naturally in discovery calls

**Training Activities**:
1. **Video Training** (30 min)
   - Watch: [Framework overview video]
   - Watch: [Example qualification call breakdown]

2. **Interactive Exercise** (45 min)
   - Review 3 anonymized deals
   - Score each deal using framework
   - Compare your scores with manager

3. **Role Play** (1 hour)
   - Practice asking Tier 1 questions
   - Manager plays difficult prospect
   - Record call and self-critique

**Assessment**:
- [ ] Can explain all framework components
- [ ] Can ask Tier 1 questions without script
- [ ] Can score a deal with 80%+ accuracy

---

### Week 2: Advanced Qualification

**Learning Objectives**:
- Navigate pushback and objections during qualification
- Recognize red flags early
- Know when to disqualify politely

**Training Activities**:
1. **Objection Handling Workshop** (1 hour)
   - Learn responses to common qualification pushback
   - Practice "no" scenarios (they won't share budget, can't access economic buyer, etc.)

2. **Real Deal Practice** (2 hours)
   - Apply framework to 2 current opportunities
   - Present findings to team
   - Get feedback from peers and manager

3. **Disqualification Role Play** (30 min)
   - Practice ending deals respectfully
   - Learn to spot time-wasters early

**Assessment**:
- [ ] Can handle qualification objections
- [ ] Can disqualify without burning bridge
- [ ] Comfortable saying "no" to bad deals

---

### Week 3-4: Mastery & Certification

**Learning Objectives**:
- Use framework instinctively (no checklist needed)
- Coach others on methodology
- Adapt framework to unique situations

**Certification Requirements**:
1. Score 5 real deals with 90%+ accuracy vs. manager scores
2. Complete mock qualification call (graded by sales leadership)
3. Present one deal deep-dive to team (explain qualification logic)
4. Pass written test on framework (25 questions, 80% to pass)

**Test Sample Questions**:
1. "A prospect says they have budget but won't tell you how much. In [methodology], how do you respond?"
   - A) [Wrong answer]
   - B) [Right answer with explanation]
   - C) [Wrong answer]

2. "You've identified pain and have a champion, but can't access the economic buyer. What's your next move?"
   - A) [Wrong answer]
   - B) [Right answer with explanation]
   - C) [Wrong answer]

---

## 📞 Call Preparation Template

### Pre-Call: [Methodology] Checklist

**Objective**: [What you want to learn in this call]

**Questions to Ask** (in order):
1. [ ] [Tier 1 question for Component 1]
   - If yes: [Follow-up]
   - If no: [Different path]

2. [ ] [Tier 1 question for Component 2]
3. [ ] [Tier 1 question for Component 3]

**Red Flags to Watch For**:
- [ ] [Warning sign 1]
- [ ] [Warning sign 2]

**Success Metrics**:
- [ ] Learned [specific information]
- [ ] Identified [key contact]
- [ ] Scored deal at [X]/100 or higher

---

## 💬 Manager Coaching Guide

### How to Coach [Methodology] on Deal Reviews

**1-on-1 Deal Review Framework**:

**Step 1: Rep Self-Assessment** (5 min)
- "Walk me through how you scored this deal"
- "Which components are strong? Which are weak?"
- "What are you most confident/concerned about?"

**Step 2: Manager Assessment** (5 min)
- Score deal independently using scorecard
- Identify gaps in rep's scoring
- Note questions rep should have asked but didn't

**Step 3: Gap Analysis** (10 min)
- Compare rep score vs. manager score
- Discuss scoring differences
- Review missed red flags or green flags
- Question: "What would you do differently next time?"

**Step 4: Action Plan** (10 min)
- Agree on deal status (pursue, risky, disqualify)
- Define specific next actions
- Set deadline for follow-up
- Schedule next review

**Coaching Questions by Scenario**:

**If rep over-scored the deal**:
- "What evidence do you have for that score?"
- "How do you know [assumption] is true?"
- "What would a 10/10 look like?"

**If rep under-scored the deal**:
- "What green flags might you be missing?"
- "Is this assumption-based or evidence-based?"
- "What positive signals did you see?"

**If rep missed key questions**:
- "Why didn't you ask about [component]?"
- "When in the conversation could you have asked?"
- "How might that information change your strategy?"

---

## 🏆 Implementation Plan: 30/60/90 Days

### Days 1-30: Foundation

**Goals**:
- Train all reps on framework
- Integrate scorecard into CRM
- Establish minimum qualification standards

**Activities**:
- [ ] Week 1: All-hands training (framework intro)
- [ ] Week 2: Individual role plays with each rep
- [ ] Week 3: First deal reviews using new framework
- [ ] Week 4: Adjust scorecard based on team feedback

**Success Metrics**:
- 100% of reps trained
- 80% of active deals scored in CRM
- Reduced deals in pipeline by X% (disqualified bad deals)

---

### Days 31-60: Adoption

**Goals**:
- Framework becomes habitual
- Deal quality improves
- Win rate starts to increase

**Activities**:
- [ ] Weekly deal certification meetings
- [ ] Peer review sessions (reps score each other's deals)
- [ ] Update call scripts and templates
- [ ] Create framework shortcuts in CRM

**Success Metrics**:
- 90%+ qualification completion rate
- Average deal score improves from [X] to [Y]
- Forecast accuracy improves by [X%]

---

### Days 61-90: Optimization

**Goals**:
- Framework is second nature
- Predictable qualification outcomes
- Improved sales efficiency

**Activities**:
- [ ] Analyze correlation between scores and wins
- [ ] Refine scoring thresholds
- [ ] Create advanced training for specific components
- [ ] Build best practice library from wins

**Success Metrics**:
- Win rate increases by [X%]
- Sales cycle decreases by [X%]
- Pipeline value more accurate (within [X%] of forecast)

---

## 📚 Resources & Templates

### Call Scripts by Methodology Component

**[Component 1] Discovery Script**:

Rep: "To make sure we're a good fit, I need to understand [specific aspect]. Would you mind if I asked a few questions about [topic]?"

[If yes]

Rep: "Great! [Tier 1 question]?"

Prospect: [Response]

Rep: "[Appropriate follow-up based on response]"

[If prospect pushes back]

Rep: "I understand. The reason I'm asking is [business justification]. Without understanding [aspect], it's hard for me to know if we can actually help. Does that make sense?"

### Email Templates

**Qualification Follow-Up Email**:

Subject: Quick question about [specific component]

Hi [Name],

Thanks for the call earlier. I'm working on [next step] and realized I'm missing one piece of information.

Quick question: [Tier 1 question from missing component]?

This will help me [specific benefit to them].

[Your Name]

### Slack/CRM Status Updates

**Deal Status Update Format**:

💼 Deal: [Company Name] - [Deal Size] 📊 [Methodology] Score: [X]/100 (🟢/🟡/🔴)

Strengths: ✅ [Strength 1] ✅ [Strength 2]

Risks: ⚠️ [Risk 1] ⚠️ [Risk 2]

Next Action: [Specific next step] Timeline: [When] Confidence: [Low/Med/High]

---

## 🎯 Methodology-Specific Examples

### MEDDIC Example

**Deal**: Enterprise SaaS, $200K ARR, 8-month sales cycle

**Metrics** (8/10):
- ✅ Customer spends $500K/year on current solution
- ✅ Identified 30% cost savings opportunity
- ⚠️ Need to quantify productivity gains

**Economic Buyer** (6/10):
- ✅ Identified: CTO (Jane Smith)
- ❌ Haven't met directly yet
- ⚠️ Going through VP of Engineering first

**Decision Criteria** (9/10):
- ✅ Provided formal RFP with weighted criteria
- ✅ We align on 8 of 10 criteria
- ✅ Confirmed no "must-haves" we don't meet

**Decision Process** (7/10):
- ✅ Mapped: Demo → Pilot → Security Review → Contract
- ✅ Timeline: 4 months
- ⚠️ Unclear who has final approval authority

**Identify Pain** (9/10):
- ✅ Current system causes 10 hours/week of manual work
- ✅ Pain affects 50+ users
- ✅ Problem is urgent (executive pressure)

**Champion** (10/10):
- ✅ VP of Engineering is strong champion
- ✅ Has personal stake (KPI impacted)
- ✅ Will sell internally and coach us
- ✅ Has history of successful vendor relationships

**Overall Score**: 49/60 (82%) - PURSUE
**Win Probability**: 65%
**Next Action**: Schedule meeting with CTO through champion

---

### BANT Example

**Deal**: SMB SaaS, $15K ARR, 3-week sales cycle

**Budget** (7/10):
- ✅ Have allocated budget for this year
- ⚠️ Amount is $12K, we're $15K
- ❌ No flexibility to increase

**Authority** (10/10):
- ✅ Speaking directly with decision maker (CEO)
- ✅ No committee, she decides alone
- ✅ Confirmed authority explicitly

**Need** (8/10):
- ✅ Clear pain point (manual process taking 5 hrs/week)
- ✅ Tried to solve internally, didn't work
- ⚠️ Not urgent, "nice to have"

**Timeline** (5/10):
- ⚠️ "Next quarter" but no specific date
- ❌ No compelling event
- ❌ No consequences if they wait

**Overall Score**: 30/40 (75%) - PURSUE WITH CAUTION
**Win Probability**: 45%
**Next Action**: Create urgency (limited time discount) OR discuss smaller package for $12K

---

## 🔧 CRM Integration

### Salesforce Custom Fields

Create custom fields for each component:

MEDDIC_Metrics_Score__c (Number, 0-10) MEDDIC_Metrics_Evidence__c (Long Text) MEDDIC_Economic_Buyer_Score__c (Number, 0-10) MEDDIC_Economic_Buyer_Evidence__c (Long Text)... MEDDIC_Overall_Score__c (Formula: SUM of all scores) MEDDIC_Status__c (Formula: IF >80, "Qualified", IF >50, "Risky", "Disqualified")

### HubSpot Properties

Add custom properties:
- `meddic_score` (Number, 0-100)
- `meddic_metrics` (Multi-line text)
- `meddic_decision_process` (Multi-line text)
- `qualification_date` (Date)
- `deal_risk_level` (Dropdown: Low/Med/High)

---

## 📈 Success Metrics to Track

**Leading Indicators**:
- % of deals with completed scorecard
- Average qualification score
- Time to complete qualification
- Disqualification rate

**Lagging Indicators**:
- Win rate improvement
- Sales cycle length
- Average deal size
- Forecast accuracy
- Revenue per rep

**Target Benchmarks**:
- Scorecard completion: 95%+
- Average score: 70+ (on 100-point scale)
- Win rate improvement: +10-20% within 6 months
- Forecast accuracy: +15% within 3 months

Best Practices

  1. Start with One Methodology: Don't try to implement multiple frameworks at once
  2. Customize to Your Business: Adapt questions and scoring to your specific sales motion
  3. Make It Easy: Integrate scorecards directly into CRM workflow
  4. Coach Consistently: Review deal scoring in every 1-on-1
  5. Celebrate Disqualifications: Praise reps who disqualify bad deals early
  6. Track Over Time: Measure correlation between scores and actual wins
  7. Iterate: Adjust scoring thresholds based on data

Common Use Cases

Trigger Phrases:

  • "Implement MEDDIC across my team"
  • "Create BANT qualification questions"
  • "Score this deal using Challenger methodology"
  • "Train reps on Sandler selling"
  • "Generate discovery questions for SPIN"

Example Request:

"I want to implement MEDDIC for our enterprise sales team. Average deal size is $150K, sales cycle is 6 months. Generate discovery questions for each component and create a deal scorecard."

Response Approach:

  1. Understand their sales motion and deal characteristics
  2. Generate comprehensive framework guide
  3. Create methodology-specific discovery questions
  4. Build scoring system aligned to their business
  5. Provide training materials and coaching guides
  6. Design CRM integration plan

Remember: The methodology is only as good as the execution. Focus on making it practical, measurable, and habitual for reps!

平台分布

Claude Code

26.71%
按下载量换算324

Cursor

21.76%
按下载量换算264

OpenCode

18.21%
按下载量换算221

windsurf

12.09%
按下载量换算147

Gemini CLI

7.48%
按下载量换算91

Codex

3.57%
按下载量换算43

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills