Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

sales-compete销售竞争

Agent Skill

sales-compete 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,518

周安装

62

GitHub Stars

13

下载量

486
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sales-compete(销售竞争)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sales-skills/sales
仓库路径:skills/sales-compete
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sales-skills/sales --skill sales-compete
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sales-skills/sales --skill sales-compete

简介

sales-compete 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。

  • 适用于需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息定位的研究检索场景。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。
  • 该技能归类于研究检索类别,主要服务于销售相关的信息查找需求。

SKILL.md

Competitive Displacement Campaigns

Help the user find competitor customers, identify those ready to switch, and build targeted outreach with displacement-specific messaging. This skill is platform-agnostic but references Apollo.io's technographic and intent data as the primary source. The same frameworks apply to ZoomInfo, G2, BuiltWith, HG Insights, or any technographic/intent provider.

Step 1 — Gather context

If references/learnings.md exists, read it first for accumulated knowledge.

Ask the user:

  1. Which competitor are you targeting?

- Name the specific competitor (or competitors) whose customers you want to win - If targeting multiple, rank them — start with one

  1. What do you sell, and what's the primary displacement angle?

- A) Price — your product is more cost-effective - B) Features — you do something they can't - C) UX/ease of use — you're simpler to adopt and use - D) Support/service — you provide better support or faster response times - E) Performance/scale — you handle their workload better - F) Multiple angles — describe them

  1. What data sources do you have access to?

- A) Apollo.io (technographic + intent data) - B) ZoomInfo (technographic + intent) - C) G2 (comparison page visits, reviews) - D) BuiltWith / HG Insights (tech installs) - E) LinkedIn Sales Navigator - F) CRM data (existing competitive deals) - G) None yet — recommend one

  1. What's your ICP? (Overlay on top of the competitor's installed base — not every competitor customer is a good fit for you)

If the user's request already provides most of this context, skip directly to the relevant step. Lead with your best-effort answer using reasonable assumptions (stated explicitly), then ask only the most critical 1-2 clarifying questions at the end — don't gate your response behind gathering complete context.

Step 2 — Identify the installed base

Use technographic filters to find companies using the competitor's product:

Technographic search strategy

  • Apollo: Search > Technologies filter > search for competitor name. Apollo tracks 10,000+ technologies. Use "is any of" to capture multiple product names (e.g., "Datadog" AND "Datadog APM" AND "Datadog Infrastructure")
  • ZoomInfo: Similar technographic filters under Advanced Search
  • BuiltWith/HG Insights: Deeper technographic data, especially for web technologies
  • G2: Export companies that visited your competitor's G2 profile or comparison pages

Layer firmographic filters

Don't target the entire installed base — narrow to your ICP:

  • Company size: Match your sweet spot (competitor may serve SMB to enterprise; you may only win in mid-market)
  • Industry: Focus on verticals where your displacement angle resonates strongest
  • Geography: Match your coverage area
  • Revenue/funding: Ensure they can afford your product

Accuracy expectations

Data sourceAccuracyLagBest for
Apollo technographic70-80%3-6 monthsBroad installed base discovery
BuiltWith/HG Insights80-90%1-3 monthsWeb/SaaS technology detection
G2 visitor dataHigh intent signalReal-timeActive evaluators
CRM win/loss data100% (your data)CurrentKnown competitive encounters

In LeadMagic

  • Google Ads Search: Analyze competitor Google search ads — ad copy, keywords, landing page URLs. See what competitors bid on and how they position (1 credit per ad).
  • Meta Ads Search: Research competitor Facebook/Instagram ads — creative, copy, and engagement. Understand their social advertising strategy (1 credit per ad).
  • B2B Ads Search: Discover competitor B2B display and social campaigns. See which accounts they're targeting with ABM-style advertising (1 credit per ad).
  • Technographics: Via Company Search, identify what technology stack competitors and their customers use — useful for displacement campaigns targeting specific tools.
  • Competitors Search: Discover companies in the same competitive space as your targets.
  • API-first: All endpoints available via REST API at api.leadmagic.io — automate competitive monitoring in your pipeline.
  • Best for: Teams wanting programmatic competitive ad intelligence without expensive CI platforms.

Step 3 — Find displacement signals

Layer signals on top of the installed base to identify companies ready to switch:

Signal types, ranked by displacement readiness

SignalSourceReadiness levelWhat it means
Researching alternativesIntent data (Apollo/Bombora), G2 comparison viewsVery highActively evaluating — act fast
New leader hiredJob change alerts (Apollo, LinkedIn)HighNew VP/CTO in first 90 days = re-evaluation window
Contract renewal timingIndustry knowledge, sales intelHigh60-90 days before renewal is the sweet spot
Hiring for roles your product replacesJob postings (Apollo, LinkedIn)Medium-highBuilding capacity = potential dissatisfaction with current tool
Competitor mentioned in negative contextG2 reviews, Reddit, socialMediumPublic dissatisfaction, but may not be actively looking
Funding eventApollo, CrunchbaseMediumNew budget to re-evaluate stack
Technographic changeApollo, BuiltWithMediumRemoving adjacent tools may signal broader stack re-evaluation

Signal stacking

Multiple signals compound readiness. Score each prospect:

Signals presentPriorityAction
3+ signals (e.g., new CTO + researching alternatives + contract renewal)ImmediateDirect outreach, top of queue
2 signals (e.g., new leader + hiring)HighPrioritized outreach within 1-2 weeks
1 strong signal (researching alternatives)Medium-highStandard outreach cadence
1 weak signal (funding, tech change)MediumAdd to nurture, monitor for additional signals
ICP fit only, no signalsLowLong-term nurture, not active outreach

Step 4 — Build the displacement list

Tiered output

TierCriteriaVolume targetOutreach approach
Tier 1 — ActiveICP fit + 2+ displacement signals10-15% of baseHyper-personalized, multi-channel, reference specific signals
Tier 2 — PrimedICP fit + 1 signal or very strong fit25-35% of basePersonalized at segment level, competitor-aware messaging
Tier 3 — LatentICP fit, no active signal50-60% of baseNurture content, thought leadership, not direct displacement pitch

Per-prospect messaging angles

For each Tier 1 prospect, identify the specific displacement angle:

Prospect situationMessaging angle
New leader (first 90 days)"As you evaluate your stack..." — frame as helping them succeed in their new role
Researching alternatives"I noticed companies like yours are evaluating [category]..." — don't reveal your data source
Hiring for roles your product addresses"I see you're scaling [function]..." — position as enabling growth, not replacing tools
Negative competitor reviews"Many [competitor] customers tell us..." — reference common pain points, not specific reviews
Contract renewal approaching"Before you renew..." — create urgency around the renewal window

Competitive battle card framework

For the outreach team, create a quick-reference battle card:

  1. Their pitch: What the competitor says about themselves (1-2 sentences)
  2. Their weakness: Where they genuinely fall short (be honest, not FUD)
  3. Your differentiator: What you do that they can't or won't (specific, provable)
  4. Proof point: Customer story, benchmark, or data point that proves it
  5. Landmine question: A question the prospect should ask the competitor that exposes the weakness

Step 5 — Displacement playbooks

Design signal-specific outreach strategies:

Playbook: New leader (job change)

  • Timing: Wait 30-60 days after start date (let them get settled, but before they've committed to the existing stack)
  • Entry point: Congratulate → offer industry insight → soft ask
  • Don't: Pitch immediately. They're drinking from a firehose.
  • Sequence: 5-touch over 3 weeks — see /sales-cadence for detailed design

Playbook: Active evaluator (researching alternatives)

  • Timing: Immediately — they're in-market now
  • Entry point: Lead with value, not "I saw you're looking at alternatives"
  • Don't: Reference the intent data directly. It's creepy.
  • Sequence: 4-touch over 2 weeks, faster pace — see /sales-cadence

Playbook: Contract renewal window

  • Timing: 60-90 days before estimated renewal
  • Entry point: "Before you auto-renew, here's what's changed in [category]..."
  • Don't: Assume you know their renewal date. Use it as a hypothesis.
  • Sequence: 6-touch over 4 weeks — longer cadence to build case before deadline

Playbook: Long-time user, general dissatisfaction

  • Timing: Ongoing nurture until a trigger event occurs
  • Entry point: Thought leadership, not direct pitch — "Here's what best-in-class [function] teams do differently"
  • Don't: Trash the competitor. They've used it for years and may have champions internally.
  • Sequence: Monthly nurture touchpoint — see /sales-cadence

Before recommending a specific platform skill

This skill covers a strategy domain across many platforms. Before pointing the user to any specific platform skill (any /sales-{platform} listed in ### Related skills, e.g., /sales-leadmagic), read that platform skill's actual SKILL.md first. The 1-line description in ### Related skills is enough to *identify* a candidate — it's not enough to *commit* to it or to write a prompt that invokes it well.

How to read it:

  • If ~/.claude/skills/{skill-name}/SKILL.md exists locally, Read it.
  • For sales-* skills, WebFetch directly from this repo: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sales-skills/sales/main/skills/{skill-name}/SKILL.md — e.g., for sales-mailshake: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sales-skills/sales/main/skills/sales-mailshake/SKILL.md.
  • For non-sales-* skills (third-party), look up {org}/{repo} in ~/.claude/skills/sales-do/references/skill-sources.md if installed and fetch the same skills/{skill-name}/SKILL.md path under that repo.

After reading, ground your recommendation in something concrete from the SKILL.md (its scope, a sub-flow, its argument-hint shape, or a "Do NOT use for..." negative trigger). Align any generated invocation with the platform skill's argument-hint. If the platform skill turns out not to fit the user's situation, swap to another or handle the question here directly rather than recommending a poor fit.

Related skills

  • /sales-prospect-list — Build general prospect lists (non-competitive)
  • /sales-cadence — Design the multi-channel sequence for displacement outreach
  • /sales-objection — Handle "we're happy with [competitor]" and loyalty objections
  • /sales-intent — Interpret buying signals beyond competitive displacement
  • /sales-positioning — Develop competitive messaging frameworks
  • /sales-leadmagic — LeadMagic competitive ad intelligence, technographics, and company enrichment
  • /sales-do — Not sure which skill to use? The router matches any sales objective to the right skill. Install: npx skills add sales-skills/sales --skill sales-do

Gotchas

  • Don't trash-talk the competitor in outreach. Lead with your value, not their flaws. Negative selling triggers defensiveness — especially if the prospect chose the competitor and feels personally attached to the decision.
  • Don't assume technographic data is real-time. Tech installs in Apollo and similar tools can be 3-6 months stale. A company may have already switched away from the competitor, or the install may be a free tier/trial they never actually use. Always validate with additional signals.
  • Don't target the entire installed base. Most competitor users are happy — or at least not unhappy enough to switch. Blasting 10,000 competitor customers with "switch to us" messages wastes effort and damages your brand. Focus on those with displacement signals.
  • Don't forget switching costs. The prospect isn't just evaluating your product vs. the competitor — they're evaluating your product vs. the competitor PLUS the pain of migrating. Address migration support, onboarding help, and data transfer upfront or the prospect won't engage.
  • Self-improving: If you discover something not covered here, append it to references/learnings.md with today's date.

Examples

Example 1: Targeting Datadog customers

User says: "Help me take customers away from Datadog" Skill does:

  1. Clarifies the user's product, displacement angle (price, simplicity, or specific capability)
  2. Builds a technographic search for Datadog users within ICP
  3. Layers intent signals (researching "Datadog alternatives", new engineering leaders, hiring SREs)
  4. Creates tiered displacement list with per-prospect messaging angles
  5. Designs signal-specific outreach playbooks Result: Targeted displacement campaign with tiered list, battle card, and signal-specific sequences

Example 2: Prioritizing known competitor customers

User says: "I know 50 companies use [competitor]. Which ones should I target first?" Skill does:

  1. Applies signal stacking to all 50 accounts
  2. Scores and ranks by displacement readiness
  3. Creates a prioritized hit list with specific outreach approach per tier Result: Prioritized list with clear "start here" guidance and per-account messaging angles

Example 3: New CTO at a competitor account

User says: "A competitor's customer just hired a new CTO. How do I approach?" Skill does:

  1. Identifies the job change displacement playbook
  2. Recommends 30-60 day timing, congratulate-first approach
  3. Designs the outreach sequence with CTO-relevant messaging
  4. Suggests what NOT to do (don't pitch immediately, don't trash their current stack) Result: Timed outreach plan for the new leader displacement window

Troubleshooting

Technographic data shows few results

Cause: Competitor's technology isn't well-tracked in your data provider, or they use a private/custom deployment Solution: Try multiple data sources (Apollo + BuiltWith + G2). Use competitor name in intent topics as an alternative signal. Check CRM win/loss data for known competitive encounters.

High intent but no responses

Cause: Messaging is too aggressive ("switch from X") or too generic (doesn't address the prospect's specific situation) Solution: Revisit messaging angles — lead with the prospect's pain, not your product. Test whether softening the competitive angle improves response rates. Consider whether the intent signal was false positive.

Competitor customers say "we're happy"

Cause: They may genuinely be happy, or they're brushing you off because the pitch wasn't relevant Solution: Shift from displacement to education — share thought leadership that makes them question whether "happy" means "optimal." Use /sales-objection for handling the loyalty objection specifically.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude

32.5%
按下载量换算158

Codex

32.01%
按下载量换算156

Cursor

20.14%
按下载量换算98

Gemini CLI

8.65%
按下载量换算42

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills