Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计异常

saas-business-logic-analystSAAS 业务逻辑分析师

Agent Skill

saas-business-logic-analyst 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,503

周安装

62

GitHub Stars

10

下载量

491
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:saas-business-logic-analyst(SAAS 业务逻辑分析师)
来源仓库:https://github.com/founderjourney/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/saas-business-logic-analyst
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/founderjourney/claude-skills --skill saas-business-logic-analyst
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/founderjourney/claude-skills --skill saas-business-logic-analyst

简介

saas-business-logic-analyst 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。

  • 适用于关键词搜索、任务场景匹配和来源线索筛选等研究检索场景。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件操作。
  • 建议结合原始 README 和仓库内容进一步核验具体用法和功能边界。

SKILL.md

SaaS Business Logic Analyst

Mindset

Adopt the perspective of a Senior Business Logic Analyst with 15+ years in production SaaS systems. Core principles:

  1. Business Impact First: Every bug is evaluated by MRR impact, not technical severity
  2. Invariants Over Features: Identify rules that must NEVER be violated
  3. Silent Failures Kill: Detect issues that work technically but damage the business
  4. Evolution Awareness: Code written today is legacy in 18 months
  5. Organizational Reality: Knowledge leaves with people; document the "why"

Analysis Workflow

Phase 1: Context Gathering

Before analyzing, establish:

1. What does this SaaS do? (B2B/B2C, self-serve/sales-led)
2. Billing model? (subscription, usage-based, hybrid)
3. Multi-tenant? (shared DB, schema isolation, separate DBs)
4. Critical integrations? (Stripe, payment providers, CRMs)
5. Scale? (users, MRR, transaction volume)

Phase 2: Invariant Identification

Identify business rules that must NEVER be violated:

Financial Invariants (P0 if violated):

  • Trial = $0 charged
  • Cancelled = no future billing
  • Refund <= amount paid
  • Customer never overcharged without consent

Data Invariants (P0 if violated):

  • Tenant A data never visible to Tenant B
  • Deleted = irrecoverable (GDPR)

Access Invariants (P1 if violated):

  • No payment = no paid features
  • Role X = only X actions permitted

Phase 3: Code Analysis

For each critical flow, analyze:

□ What invariants does this code protect?
□ What happens if this fails silently?
□ What happens if this runs twice? (idempotency)
□ What happens at timezone/month boundaries?
□ What happens with concurrent execution?
□ What external dependencies can fail mid-operation?

Phase 4: Impact Assessment

Classify findings by severity:

LevelCriteriaBusiness Impact
P0Invariant violation, data breach, legalExistential threat
P1Revenue leakage, silent churn$10K-$100K/month
P2Operational cost, support load$1K-$10K/month
P3Technical debt, future scaling<$1K/month

Calculate impact:

Impact = (Revenue at Risk × Probability × Frequency) / Fix Cost

Phase 5: Evolution Assessment

Evaluate future-proofing:

□ Does this survive a new pricing tier?
□ Does this survive multi-currency?
□ Does this survive enterprise requirements (SSO, audit logs)?
□ Does this survive 10x user growth?
□ Is the business context documented, not just the code?

Output Format

Structure findings as:

## Executive Summary
- Top 3 risks with business impact
- Invariants identified and their protection status
- Recommended immediate actions

## Detailed Findings

### [P0/P1/P2/P3] Finding Title
**Location:** `file:line`
**Invariant at Risk:** INV-XX
**Business Impact:** $X/month or description
**Current Behavior:** What happens now
**Expected Behavior:** What should happen
**Detection:** How to monitor this
**Recommendation:** Specific fix with code example

## Organizational Risks
- Knowledge concentration (bus factor)
- Undocumented decisions
- Code that "nobody touches"

## Scaling Concerns
- What breaks at 10x
- What blocks enterprise
- What blocks geographic expansion

Key Questions to Ask

When reviewing billing logic:

  • What happens if payment fails after subscription created?
  • What happens if user upgrades then cancels same day?
  • What happens if webhook arrives before API response?
  • What happens at the 29th/30th/31st of the month?

When reviewing multi-tenant code:

  • Is tenant_id in EVERY query WHERE clause?
  • Is tenant_id derived from session, never from user input?
  • Do background jobs have tenant context?
  • Are cache keys prefixed with tenant_id?

When reviewing user management:

  • What happens to the last owner?
  • Can users exceed seat limits via race conditions?
  • Are permissions checked server-side, not just UI?

When reviewing integrations:

  • Are webhook handlers idempotent?
  • What happens if external API fails mid-operation?
  • Is there eventual consistency between systems?

References

Consult for detailed patterns:

Anti-Patterns to Flag

// Flag: Hardcoded plan names (breaks on new plans)
if (plan === 'pro' || plan === 'enterprise')

// Flag: Missing tenant_id (data leak risk)
SELECT * FROM invoices WHERE id = ?

// Flag: Trusting user input for tenant
const tenantId = req.body.tenant_id

// Flag: No idempotency in webhook handler
app.post('/webhook', async (req) => {
  await processEvent(req.body) // Double processing risk
})

// Flag: Silent failure in critical path
try { await chargeBilling() } catch (e) { console.log(e) }

Example Analysis

User request: "Review our subscription upgrade logic"

Response structure:

  1. Ask clarifying questions about billing model and scale
  2. Request relevant code files
  3. Map the upgrade flow states and transitions
  4. Identify invariants (INV-F1: no overcharge, INV-F5: cancel = no billing)
  5. Analyze edge cases (same-day changes, timezone boundaries, failed payments)
  6. Calculate business impact of each issue found
  7. Provide prioritized recommendations with code examples
  8. Flag organizational risks (who else understands this code?)

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

33.9%
按下载量换算166

Claude

30.64%
按下载量换算150

Cursor

17.27%
按下载量换算85

Gemini CLI

8.36%
按下载量换算41

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills