Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

rust-mutability(Rust mutability 命令行)

rust-mutability 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

rust-mutability 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 20,201。

总安装 235周安装 10GitHub Stars 29下载 82核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:rust-mutability(Rust mutability 命令行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/huiali/rust-skills
仓库路径:skills/rust-mutability
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/huiali/rust-skills --skill rust-mutability
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/huiali/rust-skills --skill rust-mutability

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue 和 Pull Request 协作信息。适合围绕代码变更和仓库状态进行整理与查询。可结合原始 README 进一步核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围和是否会触发命令执行。需注意维护状态和网络访问限制。

rust-mutability 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/rust-mutability

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/huiali/rust-skills --skill rust-mutability;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

rust-mutability 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/huiali/rust-skills --skill rust-mutability。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

rust-mutability 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

rust-mutability 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

rust-mutability 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

rust-mutability 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 235 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 82 次,GitHub 29 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

rust-mutability 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
rust-mutability

Rust mutability 命令行 · 本页

23529需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Mutability Types

TypeControllerThread-SafeUse Case
&mut TExternal callerYesStandard mutable borrow
Cell<T>InteriorNoCopy types with interior mutability
RefCell<T>InteriorNoNon-Copy types with interior mutability
Mutex<T>InteriorYesMulti-threaded interior mutability
RwLock<T>InteriorYesMulti-threaded read-write lock

Solution Patterns

Pattern 1: External Mutability

// Standard mutable borrow
fn increment(counter: &mut u32) {
    *counter += 1;
}

// Mutable method
impl Counter {
    fn increment(&mut self) {
        self.value += 1;
    }
}

When to use: Default choice, mutability controlled by caller.

Pattern 2: Cell for Copy Types

use std::cell::Cell;

struct State {
    count: Cell<u32>,
}

impl State {
    // Get immutable &self, mutate interior
    fn increment(&self) {
        self.count.set(self.count.get() + 1);
    }
}

When to use: Simple values (Copy types) need interior mutability.

Trade-offs: Only works with Copy types, no references.

Pattern 3: RefCell for Non-Copy Types

use std::cell::RefCell;

struct Cache {
    data: RefCell<HashMap<String, Value>>,
}

impl Cache {
    fn insert(&self, key: String, value: Value) {
        self.data.borrow_mut().insert(key, value);
    }

    fn get(&self, key: &str) -> Option<Value> {
        self.data.borrow().get(key).cloned()
    }
}

When to use: Need &mut T from &self, single-threaded.

Trade-offs: Runtime borrow checking, can panic.

Pattern 4: Mutex for Thread Safety

use std::sync::Mutex;

struct SharedState {
    data: Mutex<HashMap<String, Value>>,
}

impl SharedState {
    fn insert(&self, key: String, value: Value) {
        self.data.lock().unwrap().insert(key, value);
    }
}

When to use: Multi-threaded interior mutability.

Trade-offs: Lock contention, can deadlock.

Pattern 5: RwLock for Read-Heavy Workloads

use std::sync::RwLock;

struct Config {
    settings: RwLock<HashMap<String, String>>,
}

impl Config {
    fn get(&self, key: &str) -> Option<String> {
        self.settings.read().unwrap().get(key).cloned()
    }

    fn update(&self, key: String, value: String) {
        self.settings.write().unwrap().insert(key, value);
    }
}

When to use: Many readers, few writers.

Trade-offs: Write locks more expensive than Mutex.

Borrow Rules

At any time, you can have either:
├─ Multiple &T (immutable borrows)
└─ OR one &mut T (mutable borrow)

Never both simultaneously

Error Code Quick Reference

CodeMeaningDon't SayAsk Instead
E0596Cannot get mutable reference"add mut"Does this really need mutability?
E0499Multiple mutable borrows conflict"split borrows"Is data structure design correct?
E0502Borrow conflict"separate scopes"Why both borrows needed simultaneously?
RefCell panicRuntime borrow error"use try_borrow"Is runtime checking appropriate?

Workflow

Step 1: Choose Mutability Strategy

Single-threaded?
  Need &mut from &self?
    → RefCell<T>
  Copy type?
    → Cell<T>
  Otherwise?
    → &mut T

Multi-threaded?
  Simple atomic?
    → AtomicU64/AtomicBool
  Complex data?
    Read-heavy → RwLock<T>
    Write-heavy → Mutex<T>

Step 2: Handle Borrow Conflicts

E0499 (multiple mut borrows)?
  → Split struct into smaller pieces
  → Use Cell/RefCell for interior mutability
  → Redesign to avoid simultaneous access

E0502 (borrow conflict)?
  → Minimize borrow scopes
  → Clone data if needed
  → Restructure code flow

Step 3: Consider Trade-offs

RefCell?
  ✅ Flexible
  ❌ Runtime panics possible
  → Use in prototypes, single-threaded

Mutex?
  ✅ Thread-safe
  ❌ Lock contention
  → Profile before optimizing

RwLock?
  ✅ Many readers efficient
  ❌ Writer starvation possible
  → Use when reads >> writes

Thread-Safe Selection

Atomic Types

use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicU64, Ordering};

let counter = AtomicU64::new(0);
counter.fetch_add(1, Ordering::Relaxed);

Use when: Simple counters, flags.

Mutex

use std::sync::Mutex;

let data = Mutex::new(HashMap::new());
data.lock().unwrap().insert(key, value);

Use when: Thread-safe mutation, balanced read/write.

RwLock

use std::sync::RwLock;

let data = RwLock::new(HashMap::new());
data.read().unwrap().get(&key);  // Many readers
data.write().unwrap().insert(key, value);  // Few writers

Use when: Read-heavy workloads (10+ reads per write).

Common Pitfalls

1. Borrow Conflict

Symptom: E0499, E0502 errors

// ❌ Bad: multiple mutable borrows
let r1 = &mut data.field1;
let r2 = &mut data.field2;  // Error!

// ✅ Good: split borrows
let (field1, field2) = (&mut data.field1, &mut data.field2);

// ✅ Better: restructure
struct Data {
    part1: Part1,
    part2: Part2,
}

2. RefCell Panic

Symptom: "already borrowed" panic at runtime

// ❌ Bad: nested borrows
let cell = RefCell::new(vec![1, 2, 3]);
let borrow1 = cell.borrow();
let borrow2 = cell.borrow_mut();  // Panics!

// ✅ Good: drop first borrow
{
    let borrow1 = cell.borrow();
    // use borrow1...
}  // dropped
let borrow2 = cell.borrow_mut();  // OK

// ✅ Better: use try_borrow
if let Ok(mut b) = cell.try_borrow_mut() {
    // safe mutation
}

3. Lock Held Across Await

Symptom: Deadlock in async code

// ❌ Bad: MutexGuard across await
let guard = mutex.lock().unwrap();
async_op().await;  // DANGER

// ✅ Good: drop lock before await
let value = {
    let guard = mutex.lock().unwrap();
    guard.clone()
};  // lock dropped
async_op().await;

Review Checklist

When reviewing mutability code:

  • Mutability truly necessary (not premature)
  • Appropriate mutability type chosen (Cell/RefCell/Mutex)
  • RefCell used only in single-threaded contexts
  • Mutex/RwLock used for multi-threaded access
  • Lock scopes minimized to avoid contention
  • No locks held across .await points
  • Borrow conflicts resolved at design level
  • Runtime panics handled (try_borrow)
  • Atomic types used for simple counters/flags
  • Read-write patterns match RwLock choice

Verification Commands

# Check compilation
cargo check

# Look for borrow conflict errors
cargo check 2>&1 | grep -E "E0499|E0502|E0596"

# Run tests
cargo test

# Check for deadlocks (with loom)
cargo test --features loom

# Clippy warnings
cargo clippy -- -W clippy::mutex_atomic

Advanced Patterns

Splitting Borrows

// ✅ Split struct to enable simultaneous borrows
struct Data {
    readers: Vec<Reader>,
    writers: Vec<Writer>,
}

fn process(data: &mut Data) {
    let readers = &data.readers;
    let writers = &mut data.writers;  // OK, different fields
    // use both...
}

Interior Mutability with Shared Ownership

use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};

#[derive(Clone)]
struct Shared {
    inner: Arc<Mutex<Inner>>,
}

impl Shared {
    fn update(&self) {
        self.inner.lock().unwrap().modify();
    }
}

Related Skills

  • rust-ownership - Ownership and borrowing fundamentals
  • rust-concurrency - Thread-safe patterns
  • rust-unsafe - UnsafeCell and low-level mutability
  • rust-anti-pattern - Mutability anti-patterns
  • rust-performance - Lock contention optimization

Localized Reference

  • Chinese version: SKILL_ZH.md - 完整中文版本,包含所有内容

平台分布

Codex

33.3%
按下载量换算27

Claude

30.73%
按下载量换算25

Cursor

17.04%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

8.93%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills