Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发规范

rspec-best-practices(rspec 最佳实践)

rspec-best-practices 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

rspec-best-practices 是开发规范类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发规范类的 1,265 个 Skill 里排第 765。

总安装 490周安装 20GitHub Stars 15下载 158核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:rspec-best-practices(rspec 最佳实践)
来源仓库:https://github.com/igmarin/rails-agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/rspec-best-practices
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/igmarin/rails-agent-skills --skill rspec-best-practices
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/igmarin/rails-agent-skills --skill rspec-best-practices

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发规范类 Skill 用来统一代码风格、目录结构和评审口径,产出多为检查清单或改写建议。

用于记录任务执行中的错误和用户纠正,适合持续优化 Agent 行为模式。支持经验缺口识别和最佳实践沉淀,提升长期学习能力。使用时可结合原始 README 和仓库路径进一步核验具体机制。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/igmarin/rails-agent-skills --skill rspec-best-practices 安装前建议确认是否会触发文件写入或配置变更操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/rspec-best-practices

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/igmarin/rails-agent-skills --skill rspec-best-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

rspec-best-practices 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/igmarin/rails-agent-skills --skill rspec-best-practices。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

rspec-best-practices 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

rspec-best-practices 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

rspec-best-practices 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

rspec-best-practices 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 490 次,近一周安装 20 次,下载 158 次,GitHub 15 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

rspec-best-practices 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发规范类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发规范类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
vercel-react-best-practices

Vercel React 最佳实践 · Codex、Claude

8,490,72025,918操作浏览器MIT通过
web-design-guidelines

网页设计指南 · Codex、Claude

6,686,01625,885需要联网MIT有提醒
remotion-best-practices

Remotion 最佳实践 · Codex、Claude

6,505,6323,027操作浏览器MIT有提醒
supabase-postgres-best-practices

Supabase Postgres 最佳实践 · Codex、Claude

3,175,5232,030需要联网MIT通过
next-best-practices

Next.js 最佳实践 · Codex、Claude

1,848,240841操作浏览器MIT通过
rspec-best-practices

rspec 最佳实践 · 本页

49015需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

RSpec Best Practices

Use this skill when the task is to write, review, or clean up RSpec tests.

Core principle: Prefer behavioral confidence over implementation coupling. Good specs are readable, deterministic, and cheap to maintain.

Quick Reference

AspectRule
Spec typesModel: domain logic; Request: HTTP endpoints (prefer over controller); Job: background processing; Service/PORO: no Rails helpers; System: critical E2E only (slow)
AssertionsTest behavior, not implementation
FactoriesMinimal — only attributes needed; use traits for optional states; prefer build/build_stubbed over create
MockingStub external boundaries, not internal code
IsolationEach example independent; no shared mutable state
Namingdescribe for class/method, context for scenario
Service specsRequired: describe '.call' and subject(:result) for the primary invocation
let vs let!Default to let; let! ONLY when object must exist before example runs
External service mockingallow(ServiceClass).to receive(:method) — not instance_double; instance_double only for injected collaborators
Example namesPresent tense: it 'returns the user', never it 'should...'; NEVER contains the word "and" — split into separate examples
aggregate_failuresUse when asserting multiple related items in one example

TDD Workflow

When driving new behaviour with RSpec, follow this sequence:

  1. Write the failing spec — pick the smallest spec type that exercises the intended behaviour (model > service > request > system).
  2. Run it and confirm the failure message — the error should be about missing code, not a setup problem.
  3. Implement the minimum code to make the spec pass.
  4. Refactor — clean up duplication and naming while keeping the suite green.
  5. Verify — run the full relevant spec file, then the suite, before committing.

Choosing the best first failing spec for a Rails change

Change typeStart with
Pure domain logicModel or PORO service spec
HTTP endpoint behaviourRequest spec
Background processingJob spec
Cross-layer user journeySystem spec (sparingly)

Factory Design

Minimal factories only. Never rely on factory defaults for business logic — set explicitly or use traits. Avoid create when build/build_stubbed suffices.

Service Spec (anchor pattern)

RSpec.describe Invoices::MarkOverdue do
  describe '.call' do
    subject(:result) { described_class.call(invoice: invoice) }

    context 'when the invoice is overdue and unpaid' do
      let(:invoice) { create(:invoice, due_date: 2.days.ago, paid_at: nil) }

      it 'marks the invoice overdue' do
        expect { result }.to change { invoice.reload.overdue? }.from(false).to(true)
      end
    end

    context 'when the invoice is already paid' do
      let(:invoice) { create(:invoice, due_date: 2.days.ago, paid_at: 1.day.ago) }

      it 'does not change the invoice' do
        expect { result }.not_to change { invoice.reload.updated_at }
      end
    end
  end
end

→ Full examples: EXAMPLES.md | Copy-paste templates: assets/spec_templates.md

Shared Examples

Use only when the same behavioural contract applies to multiple subjects without per-example let overrides. Avoid when each context needs different setup — that signals a wrong abstraction. → Example in EXAMPLES.md

One Behavior Per Example — NEVER "and" in Example Names

The word "and" in an it / specify description means the example is asserting two behaviors. Split it. One behavior per example. Applies to every spec type — model, request, service, job, mailer, system.

# BAD — two assertions; if the first fails, the second never runs
it 'returns 201 and creates the record' do; end
it 'saves the order and sends the confirmation email' do; end
it 'updates the user and logs the change' do; end

# GOOD — one observable outcome per example
it 'returns 201' do; end
it 'creates the record' do; end

it 'saves the order' do; end
it 'sends the confirmation email' do; end

Self-check before finalizing any spec: scan every it '...' / it "..." / specify '...' string for the word and (case-insensitive, word-boundary). Every hit is a split — no exceptions for "convenience" examples like 'returns nil and does not raise'.

Output Style

When asked to write or review RSpec specs, your output MUST satisfy each rule below. Each is graded independently — one violation drops the whole check.

  1. Spec file path mirrors the source: app/foo/bar.rb → spec/foo/bar_spec.rb.
  2. # frozen_string_literal: true as the first line of every spec file.
  3. RSpec.describe uses the full constant path (RSpec.describe Module::Class do), not a string.
  4. describe '#method' / describe '.class_method' for each method under test.
  5. context 'when...' / context 'with...' for scenario variations — never use context to group methods.
  6. let for test data, let! ONLY when the object must exist before the action under test.
  7. No let_it_be unless the project already depends on test-prof (check Gemfile.lock first).
  8. NO "and" in any example description — split on every occurrence (see section above). This is the most-missed rule; do an explicit scan before returning the spec.
  9. subject(:result) {...} for service / PORO specs invoking .call.
  10. travel_to / freeze_time for any time-dependent assertion — never set past Time.now or stub Time.current directly.
  11. External boundaries mocked at the class-method level (allow(SomeClient).to receive(:method)); ActiveRecord finders are NEVER mocked.

Flaky Tests & Deterministic Assertions

CauseFix
Time-dependent logicfreeze_time / travel_to; never set past dates as shortcut
State leakageEach example sets up own state; avoid before(:all)
Async jobsqueue_adapter =:test + have_enqueued_job; never assert side-effects imperatively
External HTTPWebMock / VCR; never allow real network in CI
DB state bleedTransactional fixtures or DatabaseCleaner; never share let! across contexts
Race conditionsExplicit Capybara waits; avoid sleep
Imprecise assertionschange.from().to() over final state; exact values over be_truthy/be_falsey; never assert updated_at

Assets

平台分布

Codex

34.37%
按下载量换算54

Claude

29.27%
按下载量换算46

Cursor

19.95%
按下载量换算32

Gemini CLI

9.81%
按下载量换算15

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills