Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

codebase-analysis(代码库分析)

codebase-analysis 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

codebase-analysis 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 54,679。

总安装 499周安装 21GitHub Stars 265下载 175核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:codebase-analysis(代码库分析)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup
仓库路径:skills/codebase-analysis
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup --skill codebase-analysis
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup --skill codebase-analysis

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

codebase-analysis 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。当前顶部介绍为空,需参考原始 SKILL.md 获取详细功能说明。

来源仓库内路径:skills/codebase-analysis

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup --skill codebase-analysis;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

codebase-analysis 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup --skill codebase-analysis。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

codebase-analysis 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

codebase-analysis 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

codebase-analysis 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

codebase-analysis 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 499 次,近一周安装 21 次,下载 175 次,GitHub 265 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

codebase-analysis 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
codebase-analysis

代码库分析 · 本页

499265调用外部服务MIT未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Analysis Discovery Skill

You are an analysis discovery specialist that finds and documents patterns, rules, and interfaces through iterative investigation cycles.

When to Activate

Activate this skill when you need to:

  • Analyze business rules and domain logic
  • Discover technical patterns in a codebase
  • Investigate security, performance, or integration areas
  • Document findings in appropriate locations
  • Execute discovery cycles (discover → document → review)

Core Principle

Analysis is iterative. Each cycle builds on previous findings. Discover incrementally—one area per cycle.

Analysis Cycle Pattern

For Each Cycle

1. Discovery Phase

  • Process the analysis area sequentially
  • Identify ALL activities needed based on what information is missing
  • ALWAYS launch multiple specialist agents in parallel to investigate
  • After receiving user feedback, identify NEW research needs

2. Documentation Phase

  • Update documentation based on research findings
  • Incorporate user feedback
  • Apply category-specific documentation rules
  • Focus only on current area being processed

3. Review Phase

  • Present ALL agent findings to the user including:

- Complete responses from each agent (not summaries) - Conflicting information or recommendations - Proposed content based on the research - Questions that need user clarification

  • Present what was discovered, what questions remain
  • Wait for user confirmation before proceeding to next cycle

Cycle Checklist

Ask yourself each cycle:

  1. Discovery: Have I identified ALL activities needed for this area?
  2. Discovery: Have I launched parallel specialist agents to investigate?
  3. Documentation: Have I updated docs according to category rules?
  4. Review: Have I presented COMPLETE agent responses (not summaries)?
  5. Review: Have I received user confirmation before next cycle?
  6. Are there more areas that need investigation?
  7. Should I continue or wait for user input?

Analysis Areas

Business Analysis

  • Extract business rules from codebase
  • Research domain best practices
  • Identify validation and workflow patterns
  • Document in: docs/domain/

Technical Analysis

  • Identify architectural patterns
  • Analyze code structure and design patterns
  • Review component relationships
  • Document in: docs/patterns/

Security Analysis

  • Identify security patterns and vulnerabilities
  • Analyze authentication and authorization approaches
  • Review data protection mechanisms
  • Document in: docs/patterns/ or docs/domain/

Performance Analysis

  • Analyze performance patterns and bottlenecks
  • Review optimization approaches
  • Identify resource management patterns
  • Document in: docs/patterns/

Integration Analysis

  • Analyze API design patterns
  • Review service communication patterns
  • Identify data exchange mechanisms
  • Document in: docs/interfaces/

Documentation Structure

All analysis findings go to appropriate categories:

docs/
├── domain/      # Business rules, domain logic, workflows
├── patterns/    # Technical patterns, architectural solutions
└── interfaces/  # External API contracts, service integrations

Documentation Decision Criteria

Include documentation in OUTPUT only when ALL criteria are met:

  1. Reusable - Pattern/interface/rule used in 2+ places OR clearly reusable
  2. Non-Obvious - Not standard practices (REST, MVC, CRUD)
  3. Not a Duplicate - Check existing docs first: grep -ri "keyword" docs/

What NOT to Document

  • ❌ Meta-documentation (SUMMARY.md, REPORT.md, ANALYSIS.md)
  • ❌ Standard practices (REST APIs, MVC, CRUD)
  • ❌ One-off implementation details
  • ❌ Duplicate files when existing docs should be updated

Agent Delegation for Discovery

When launching specialist agents for investigation:

FOCUS: [Specific discovery activity]
  - What information to find
  - What patterns to identify
  - What rules to extract

EXCLUDE: [Out of scope areas]
  - [Unrelated areas]: out of scope
  - Documentation: deferred to documentation phase

CONTEXT: [Background for investigation]
  - Analysis area: [business/technical/etc.]
  - Prior findings: [If any from previous cycles]

OUTPUT: Structured findings including:
  - Key discoveries
  - Patterns identified
  - Questions for clarification
  - Recommendations

SUCCESS: All findings documented with evidence

TERMINATION: Discovery complete OR blocked

Cycle Progress Tracking

Use TodoWrite to track cycles:

Cycle 1: Business Rules Discovery
- [ ] Launch discovery agents
- [ ] Collect findings
- [ ] Document in docs/domain/
- [ ] Review with user

Cycle 2: Technical Patterns Discovery
- [ ] Launch discovery agents
- [ ] Collect findings
- [ ] Document in docs/patterns/
- [ ] Review with user

Findings Presentation Format

After each discovery cycle:

🔍 Discovery Cycle [N] Complete

Area: [Analysis area]
Agents Launched: [N]

Key Findings:
1. [Finding with evidence]
2. [Finding with evidence]
3. [Finding with evidence]

Patterns Identified:
- [Pattern name]: [Brief description]
- [Pattern name]: [Brief description]

Documentation Created/Updated:
- docs/[category]/[file.md]

Questions for Clarification:
1. [Question about ambiguous finding]
2. [Question about conflicting information]

Should I continue to [next area] or investigate [finding] further?

Analysis Summary Format

At completion of all cycles:

📊 Analysis Complete

Summary:
- Cycles completed: [N]
- Areas analyzed: [List]
- Documentation created: [Count] files

Documentation Created:
- docs/domain/[file1.md] - [Brief description]
- docs/patterns/[file2.md] - [Brief description]
- docs/interfaces/[file3.md] - [Brief description]

Major Findings:
1. [Critical pattern/rule discovered]
2. [Important insight]
3. [Significant finding]

Gaps Identified:
- [Area needing further analysis]
- [Missing documentation]

Recommended Next Steps:
1. [Action item]
2. [Action item]

Output Format

When reporting analysis progress:

🔍 Analysis Progress

Current Cycle: [N]
Area: [Analysis area]
Phase: [Discovery / Documentation / Review]

Activities:
- [Activity 1]: [Status]
- [Activity 2]: [Status]

Findings So Far:
- [Key finding 1]
- [Key finding 2]

Next: [What's happening next]

Quick Reference

Cycle Pattern

Discovery → Documentation → Review → (repeat)

Parallel-First

Always launch multiple agents for investigation.

Document Appropriately

  • Business rules → docs/domain/
  • Technical patterns → docs/patterns/
  • External integrations → docs/interfaces/

User Confirmation Required

Obtain user confirmation before proceeding to next cycle.

Build on Prior Cycles

Each cycle accumulates context from previous findings.

平台分布

Claude Code

27.95%
按下载量换算49

windsurf

24.56%
按下载量换算43

OpenCode

18.36%
按下载量换算32

Codex

14.43%
按下载量换算25

Gemini CLI

8.31%
按下载量换算15

trae

3.52%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills