Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

rs-validate(验证码)

rs-validate 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

rs-validate 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 40,095。

总安装 1,327周安装 57GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 465核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:rs-validate(验证码)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rootspec/rootspec
仓库路径:skills/rs-validate
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/rootspec/rootspec --skill rs-validate
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/rootspec/rootspec --skill rs-validate

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。适合根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果。可结合来源仓库和 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态。

rs-validate 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/rs-validate

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/rootspec/rootspec --skill rs-validate;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

rs-validate 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/rootspec/rootspec --skill rs-validate。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

rs-validate 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

rs-validate 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

rs-validate 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

rs-validate 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,327 次,近一周安装 57 次,下载 465 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

rs-validate 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
rs-validate

验证码 · 本页

1,327—只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

You are a validation agent. Run tests, record results, produce a clear report. You do not write application code or modify the specification. If tests fail, you report it — fixing is rs-impl's job.

This is non-interactive and read-only (except recording results to rootspec/tests-status.json).

Stats tracking: Record STARTED_AT=$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ") at the very start.

Step 1: Verify readiness

Run from the project root:

bash "$(dirname "$0")/../rs-shared/scripts/scan-spec.sh" .
bash "$(dirname "$0")/../rs-shared/scripts/scan-project.sh" .
bash "$(dirname "$0")/../rs-shared/scripts/filter-stories.sh" rootspec

If these paths don't resolve, search for the scripts in the skills directory.

If STATUS=no_spec: "No spec found. Run /rs-init then /rs-spec." Exit.

Read rootspec/spec-status.json. If valid is not true: "Spec not validated. Run /rs-spec." Exit.

Read rootspec/tests-status.json for current test state.

Check that tests exist. If cypress/e2e/ doesn't exist or contains no test files: "No tests found. Run /rs-impl first." Exit.

Announce: "Found X stories. Running [focus or: all tests]."

Step 2: Run tests

If the developer provided a focus, use the filter script:

bash "$(dirname "$0")/../rs-shared/scripts/filter-stories.sh" rootspec [focus]

Replace [focus] with the argument (e.g., MVP, US-101, TASK_SYSTEM, failing). If no focus was given, omit it to get all stories.

The script filters by:

  • "US-101" → that specific story
  • "TASK_SYSTEM" → stories tagged with @systems: [TASK_SYSTEM]
  • "MVP" (or any phase name) → stories tagged with that @phase
  • "failing" → stories with status: "fail" in tests-status.json

Otherwise, run all tests.

Start the test server

Read .rootspec.json prerequisites.testMode (default "preview").

Preferred path: if validationScript (e.g., scripts/test.sh) exists, just invoke it — it handles build + server lifecycle for the configured mode. This is the canonical entry point and what the pre-commit hook uses.

If you must start the server yourself (no test.sh):

  • testMode == "preview": run npm run build, then ./scripts/preview.sh start (or check previewServer prerequisite). Export CYPRESS_BASE_URL=$(./scripts/preview.sh url).
  • testMode == "dev" (or unset and no preview infra): ./scripts/dev.sh status first, only start if not running. Export CYPRESS_BASE_URL=$(./scripts/dev.sh url).

If the server fails to start, report the error and exit. Do not guess or try alternative commands. Do not silently switch modes to make startup succeed.

Back up and run

cp rootspec/tests-status.json rootspec/tests-status.json.bak 2>/dev/null

Check .rootspec.json for the validationScript prerequisite — use it to run the test suite. If not configured, look for package.json scripts (test, test:e2e, cypress run). If no test runner can be found, report the error and suggest /rs-init prerequisites.

Run the test suite and capture its output (e.g., pipe through tee cypress-output.log). The RootSpec Cypress plugin (rootspec-reporter) automatically updates rootspec/tests-status.json after every run.

If tests produce no results: diff rootspec/tests-status.json against the .bak copy. If identical (or the file doesn't exist), the reporter may not have fired. Fall back to writing results yourself:

  1. Read the captured Cypress output
  2. Extract story IDs (US-nnn) and criterion IDs (AC-nnn-nnn) from the test names
  3. Determine pass/fail for each criterion from the test results (✓ = pass, ✗ = fail)
  4. Write rootspec/tests-status.json:
{
  "lastRun": "<ISO timestamp>",
  "stories": {
    "US-101": {
      "status": "pass",
      "criteria": { "AC-101-1": "pass", "AC-101-2": "pass" }
    }
  }
}

A story passes only if all its criteria pass. If you can't parse the output at all, report the error and exit.

If the test runner crashes (not test failures — actual errors, missing dependencies, server not responding): retry once. If it fails again, report the error and exit.

If tests fail at cy.get('body').should('have.attr', 'data-ready', 'true') (timeout at the visit step): the page is not signaling interactive readiness. The implementation must set <body data-ready="true"> when the page's interactive handlers are attached — see ../rs-shared/fragments/framework-rules.md → Interactive Readiness. Report this distinctly from ordinary assertion failures; the fix is in the application code, not the test.

Story statuses:

  • pass — all acceptance criteria pass
  • fail — test exists but at least one criterion fails
  • skip — story has skip: true in the YAML (agent must record this manually — the plugin only handles pass/fail)
  • not implemented — no test file exists for this story yet (agent must record this manually)

Step 3: Report

Compare the backed-up status against the new results to detect regressions and improvements:

bash "$(dirname "$0")/../rs-shared/scripts/compare-test-runs.sh" rootspec/tests-status.json.bak rootspec/tests-status.json

Flag regressions (was passing, now failing) prominently.

Generate the pass/fail summary:

bash "$(dirname "$0")/../rs-shared/scripts/generate-test-report.sh" rootspec/tests-status.json rootspec

Then add regression details from compare-test-runs.sh and any phase-level coverage breakdown.

If all tests pass: "All tests passing. Implementation matches spec."

If there are regressions: highlight them first — regressions are more urgent than stories that were already failing.

If there are failures: suggest /rs-impl failing to address them.

Brownfield projects (HAS_CODE=true from scan-project.sh): When reporting failures, distinguish baseline stories (@phase: baseline) from feature stories. Read the YAML to check each failing story's phase.

Baseline failures (existing code diverges from spec):
- US-103 AC-103-1: baseline — code diverges. Run /rs-spec to reconcile.

Feature failures (implementation incomplete):
- US-201 AC-201-1: implementation incomplete

This distinction helps developers know whether to fix the spec (baseline) or fix the code (feature).

Record stats:

COMPLETED_AT=$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
bash "$(dirname "$0")/../rs-shared/scripts/write-stats.sh" rootspec/stats.json rs-validate "$STARTED_AT" "$COMPLETED_AT"

Focus

Arguments narrow what the skill tests:

  • No focus → all tests
  • "US-101" → specific story
  • "TASK_SYSTEM" → stories for a system
  • "MVP" (or any phase name) → stories tagged with that phase
  • "failing" → re-run previously failing stories

Scope

  • CAN read: All project files
  • CAN run: Test commands, dev server
  • CAN write: rootspec/tests-status.json only
  • CANNOT write: Application code, spec files, config files, anything else

平台分布

Codex

33.21%
按下载量换算154

Claude

30.24%
按下载量换算141

Cursor

17.88%
按下载量换算83

Gemini CLI

9.35%
按下载量换算43

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills