Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

roundtable-adaptive圆桌会议适应性

Agent Skill

roundtable-adaptive 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

24,349

周安装

985

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

7,644
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:roundtable-adaptive(圆桌会议适应性)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jimmyclanker/roundtable-adaptive
安装命令:
openclaw skills install roundtable-adaptive
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install roundtable-adaptive

简介

自适应多模型圆桌会议支持最多四名 AI 参与辩论。

  • 两轮制交叉批评机制提升结论严谨性与全面性。roundtable-adaptive 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 可配置模型组合与评分权重满足特定偏好需求。
  • 需要控制账户具备足够额度支撑多模型并发调用。
  • 共识分数仅作参考,最终决策权归属使用者本人。

SKILL.md

name
roundtable
description
Adaptive multi-model AI roundtable. Runs up to 4 AI models (configurable) in 2 debate rounds with cross-critique and formal consensus scoring. Requires a configured Anthropic provider (Claude Opus recommended). Optionally adds GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI), Grok 4, and Gemini 3.1 Pro via Blockrun proxy. Works with Claude-only fallback if optional providers are unavailable. Writes results to local filesystem. Debate panel agents are persistent thread sessions; meta-panel and synthesis agents are one-shot.
metadata
clawdis
emoji
🎯
requires
env
config
config
requiredEnv
stateDirs
tags

Roundtable v2 — Adaptive Multi-Model Orchestrator

Trigger: roundtable [--mode] [prompt] from any channel your agent monitors. Output: Posted to your configured output channel (set ROUNDTABLE_OUTPUT_CHANNEL in your OpenClaw config, or results are posted back to the triggering channel). Panel agents: Persistent sessions (mode="session", thread=true) — stay alive in the Discord thread for follow-up questions. Meta-panel analysts and synthesis agent are one-shot (mode="run").

The orchestrator = COORDINATOR ONLY. Uses your default model unless overridden in panels.json. Never argues a position, never joins the panel.

Core principle: the Meta-Panel (4 premium models) designs the optimal WORKFLOW for the task — parallel debate, sequential pipeline, or hybrid — then the right agents execute it.

Configuration

Before using, set your output channel in panels.json (or the triggering channel is used):

{
  "output": {
    "channel": "discord",
    "target": "YOUR_CHANNEL_ID_HERE"
  }
}

If using Discord threads (optional — creates one thread per roundtable for clean organization):

{
  "output": {
    "channel": "discord",
    "target": "YOUR_CHANNEL_ID_HERE",
    "useThreads": true
  }
}

Without this config, results are posted directly to the channel where the command was issued.

Cost transparency

ComponentCost per full run
Claude Opus (OAuth)Free
GPT-5.3 Codex (OAuth)Free
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Blockrun)~$0.05
Grok 4 (Blockrun)~$0.08
Total (full panel)~$0.13–$0.50
Degraded mode (Claude only)Free

--quick flag halves cost (1 round only).


Setup

Minimum (degraded mode — free):

  1. Configure anthropic provider in openclaw.json (OAuth or API key)
  2. Optionally add openai-codex for GPT-5.3 Codex
  3. Done — Grok/Gemini slots fall back to Claude Sonnet

Full panel (adds Grok 4 + Gemini 3.1 Pro via Blockrun):

  1. Install Blockrun: openclaw plugins install @blockrun/clawrouter then openclaw gateway restart
  2. Fund the Blockrun wallet with USDC on Base (~$5-10). Address shown during install.
  3. Full panel costs ~$0.13–$0.50/run; Claude and GPT slots remain free via OAuth.

Results are saved to {workspace}/memory/roundtables/YYYY-MM-DD-slug.json (created automatically).


Trigger Patterns

Optional: auto-trigger a dedicated channel

You can configure a Discord channel as a roundtable-only channel in your AGENTS.md:

Any message in channel [YOUR_CHANNEL_ID] → treat as a roundtable topic automatically.
No prefix needed. Message → auto-detect mode → create thread → spawn orchestrator.

This is entirely optional — the explicit roundtable command works from any channel.

Explicit trigger (any channel)

Explicit trigger (any channel)

  • roundtable [prompt] — auto-detect mode, full flow
  • roundtable --debate [prompt] — force parallel debate mode
  • roundtable --build [prompt] — force build/coding mode
  • roundtable --redteam [prompt] — force adversarial mode
  • roundtable --vote [prompt] — force decision mode
  • roundtable --quick [prompt] — skip meta-panel, use default panel for mode, 1 round only
  • roundtable --panel model1,model2,model3 [prompt] — manual panel override, skip meta-panel
  • roundtable --validate [prompt] — add Round 3 agent validation of synthesis
  • roundtable --no-search [prompt] — skip web search (use only for purely theoretical/abstract topics)

Step -1: Create a Thread (FIRST ACTION)

Before anything else, create a thread in your configured channel and save the thread ID.

-1a) Dedup check (REQUIRED)

Avoid double-spawn if the same topic is triggered twice.

  1. Normalize topic string:

- lowercase - trim - collapse multiple spaces - remove trailing punctuation

  1. List recent threads in the target channel:
message(action='thread-list', channel='discord', channelId='[CHANNEL_ID]', limit=25)
  1. If an existing active thread title matches normalized topic (+ same mode tag like [[DEBATE]]) created in last 24h:

- reuse that thread (THREAD_ID = existing_thread_id) - post: ♻️ Duplicate topic detected — reusing existing thread. - do NOT spawn a new orchestrator/panel

  1. If no match: create a new thread.

-1b) Create thread (if no dedup hit)

message(
  action = 'thread-create',
  channel = '[your configured channel]',
  channelId = '[CHANNEL_ID from user config]',
  threadName = '🎯 [topic — max 8 words] [[MODE]]',
  message = '**Panel:** [model list]\
**Mode:** [mode] | **Rounds:** [N]\
⏳ Analysis in progress...'
)

Save the returned thread ID as THREAD_ID.

All subsequent message() calls use target = THREAD_ID, NOT the channel ID.

If thread creation fails or channel is not configured: fall back to posting directly in the active channel.


Step 0: Web Search Grounding (always first)

Run a web search on the topic before anything else — meta-panel and all agents will have current context.

web_search(query = prompt, count = 5)

Timeout policy: If web_search returns no result or errors within ~10s, do NOT block — continue immediately with CURRENT_CONTEXT = "No real-time data available (search failed or timed out).". The roundtable proceeds on model knowledge only.

Caching: If re-running the same topic within the same session, reuse the prior CURRENT_CONTEXT block — do not re-search.

Summarize results into a CURRENT_CONTEXT block (max 250 words):

  • Key facts, recent developments, relevant data points
  • Date of search
  • If no useful results found: note "No relevant real-time data found" and continue

This block is injected into:

  1. The meta-panel prompt (so they design the workflow with current context)
  2. Every Round 1 agent prompt (so all panelists argue from the same updated baseline)

Step 0b: Meta-Panel — Workflow Design

Skip if: --panel flag used, OR --quick flag used.

Spawn 4 premium meta-analysts in parallel

Read panels.jsonmeta.models. For each:

sessions_spawn(
  task = filled prompts/meta-panel.md,
  model = model_id,
  mode = "run",
  label = "rt-meta-[A/B/C/D]",
  runTimeoutSeconds = 90
)

0b. Synthesize workflow from 4 recommendations

After collecting all meta responses, the orchestrator synthesizes the final workflow:

  1. Workflow type: majority vote among 4 recommendations

- Tie → prefer hybrid (more flexible)

  1. Stage composition: tally model recommendations per stage

- For each stage position, pick the most-recommended model - If a model is not in agents.defaults.models allowlist → skip, use next - If a model is your orchestrator's model → skip (reserved for the orchestrator, never a panelist)

  1. Rounds: median of recommendations (round up if tie) — hard cap at 3 max, always
  1. Synthesis model: most-recommended premium model not on the main panel
  1. Log the decision (include in output header):

> "Meta-panel designed workflow: [type]. Stages: [N]. Panel: [models]. Synthesis: [model]."

0c. Workflow types explained

parallel_debate — classic roundtable

  • All agents in Stage 1 work independently, same prompt
  • Round 2: cross-critique
  • Best for: debates, opinions, risk analysis, decision-making

sequential — output chains between stages

  • Stage 1 agents produce outputs (drafts, code, research)
  • Stage 2 agents receive Stage 1 outputs and review/validate/improve
  • Best for: coding (write → review), research (collect → synthesize), creative (draft → refine)
  • Round 2 within Stage 1 still possible; Stage 2 is a separate pass

hybrid — parallel within stages, sequential between

  • Stage 1: N agents work in parallel on different aspects
  • Stage 2: 1-2 premium agents receive ALL Stage 1 outputs and produce integrated output
  • Best for: complex analysis (parallel research → premium synthesis)

0d. Panel degradation rule

If any agent fails and fallback is SAME MODEL FAMILY → log: ⚠️ PANEL DEGRADED — [role] substituted [original] with [fallback] (same family: [family])

Always surface this in META section of final output with actionable guidance:

  • If degraded due to missing blockrun → "Action: Start Blockrun at localhost:8402 for full panel, or use --panel budget for stable 2-model run"
  • If degraded due to model not in allowlist → "Action: Add [model] to agents.defaults.models in openclaw.json"
  • If degraded due to API error → "Action: Check provider API key / quota, then retry"

Step 1: Detect Mode (if no flag given)

ModeKeywords
debatepros/cons, tradeoff, should we, ethics, compare, opinion, better
buildimplement, code, architecture, build, design, develop, create
redteamattack, vulnerability, failure, risk, break, threat, exploit
votechoose, decide, which one, best option, select, recommend between
defaultanything else

Step 2: Execute Workflow

parallel_debate (standard)

Round 1: Spawn all panel agents in parallel as persistent thread-bound sessions.

sessions_spawn(
  task = filled prompts/round1.md,
  model = model_id,
  mode = "session",        ← persistent — stays alive in the thread
  label = "rt-[role]",
  thread = true            ← bound to the thread from Step -1
)
  • Save session keys: { "attacker": sessionKey, "defender": sessionKey, ... }
  • Each agent writes their full response + SELF-DIGEST (last section)
  • Collect all self-digests
  • ⚠️ Agents stay alive — users can address them directly for follow-up questions

Round 2 (if rounds ≥ 2): Send cross-critique prompt to each existing session via sessions_send.

  • Do NOT re-spawn — reuse session keys from Round 1
  • [SELF_DIGEST] = this agent's own digest from Round 1
  • [PEER_DIGESTS] = other agents' digests (labeled with role)
  • Extract AGREEMENT SCORES from each response

Round 3 (if --validate): See Step 4.

sequential

Stage 1: Spawn agents in parallel as persistent sessions (mode="session", thread=true).

  • Use standard prompts/round1.md.
  • Round 2 cross-critique via sessions_send to existing sessions (no re-spawn).
  • Collect full Stage 1 outputs for Stage 2.

Stage 2: Spawn new persistent sessions (mode="session", thread=true).

  • Build prompt: prompts/round1.md base + prepend Stage 1 outputs as context
  • Label: "STAGE 1 OUTPUT from [Role]: [full output]"
  • Stage 2 agents review/validate/improve Stage 1 work and write SELF-DIGESTs

hybrid

Stage 1: Parallel persistent sessions (mode="session", thread=true), each with a different sub-task.

  • Customize Round 1 prompt to specify each agent's sub-task:

> "Your specific task for this stage: [task from workflow design]"

  • Agents write SELF-DIGESTs

Stage 2: 1-2 new persistent sessions (mode="session", thread=true) with all Stage 1 outputs embedded.

  • Build prompt: prompts/round1.md base + "You are integrating and synthesizing the work of multiple agents. Their outputs: [all Stage 1 outputs]"
  • Stage 2 produces the integrated output

Step 3: Consensus Scoring

After Round 2 (parallel_debate) or Stage 2 (sequential/hybrid):

Extract AGREEMENT SCORES from each agent's Round 2 response. Build score matrix: { agent_role: { peer_role: score_1_to_5 } } Consensus % = (sum of all scores / (n_scores × 5)) × 100 If no Round 2 scores (quick mode / sequential): omit consensus %, mark as "N/A"

Note on Round 3: Round 3 validation uses ACCURATE/PARTIALLY/INACCURATE — this is a separate metric from consensus %. Round 3 checks synthesis fidelity, not inter-agent agreement. Do NOT mix these two metrics. Consensus % comes only from Round 2 scores; Round 3 result appears separately in the META block as Validated: yes/no/partial.

Step 4: Round 3 — Validation (--validate flag only)

When to recommend --validate to the user:

  • Consensus % < 40% (high disagreement — synthesis risks distortion)
  • Redteam mode (adversarial stakes — synthesis must be bulletproof)
  • Build mode with 3+ Stage 2 models (complex integration, easy to misrepresent)
  • User explicitly mentions "high-stakes", "final decision", or "publishing this"

When NOT to use it: Quick mode, debate on subjective topics, or when time matters more than precision.

Draft synthesis first (Step 5 below), but do NOT post.

Spawn validation agents:

sessions_spawn(
  task = filled prompts/round3-validation.md,
  model = original agent model,
  label = "rt-r3-validate-[role]",
  runTimeoutSeconds = 60
)

Tally:

  • 2+ INACCURATE → rewrite synthesis incorporating corrections
  • 1 INACCURATE → note in META: ⚠️ [Role] flagged misrepresentation: [correction summary]
  • All ACCURATE/PARTIAL → mark Validated: yes or Validated: partial in META

Step 5: Synthesis — Spawned Neutral Model

Never write synthesis yourself.

sessions_spawn(
  task = filled prompts/final-synthesis.md,
  model = [synthesis model from meta-panel recommendation, or anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 as default],
  label = "rt-synthesis",
  mode = "run",
  runTimeoutSeconds = 180
)

Fill prompts/final-synthesis.md placeholders:

  • [ROUND1_SUMMARIES] → all self-digests: "[ROLE] ([model]): [digest]"
  • [ROUND2_SUMMARIES] → critiques: "[ROLE] criticized [peer]'s [claim] because [reason]"
  • [CONSENSUS_SCORES] → full score matrix + calculated %
  • [DISCORD_THREAD_ID] → the THREAD_ID from Step -1 (synthesis agent posts here)

Post to Discord using THREAD_ID from Step -1 (not the channel ID). All round outputs and the final synthesis go into the same thread.


Step 6: Persist Results

Save to {workspace}/memory/roundtables/YYYY-MM-DD-[topic-slug].json:

{
  "date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
  "topic": "[prompt]",
  "mode": "[mode]",
  "workflow_type": "parallel_debate|sequential|hybrid",
  "stages": [{ "model": "...", "role": "...", "task": "..." }],
  "meta_panel_recommendation": "[summary of meta votes]",
  "panel_degraded": false,
  "panel_degradation_notes": "",
  "consensus_pct": "XX% or N/A",
  "synthesis_model": "[model]",
  "validated": "yes|no|partial",
  "elapsed_time_sec": 0,
  "synthesis": "[final synthesis text]"
}

Also append one JSONL line to {workspace}/memory/roundtables/scorecard.jsonl with: ts, topic, mode, workflow_type, elapsed_time_sec, consensus_pct, validated, panel_degraded.


Edge Cases

SituationAction
Web search failsContinue with note "No real-time context available" in all prompts
--no-search flagSkip Step 0 web search entirely
Meta-panel all failUse default panel for detected mode, log warning
--quickSkip meta-panel + round 2. Always uses parallel_debate workflow. Spawns default panel for detected mode (3 models). Synthesizes after round 1 only.
--panel overrideSkip meta-panel, use specified models, default to parallel_debate
Fallback = same familyContinue + log PANEL DEGRADED warning in META
Both model and fallback failSkip agent, note in META — do not wait, do not block
No blockrun configuredWarn user: "Blockrun not available. Using budget panel. Full panel requires Blockrun at localhost:8402." Auto-switch to budget profile from panels.json.
Agent timeout (any round)FAIL-CONTINUE: treat as absent, mark [TIMEOUT] in META, proceed with surviving agents
Agent fails mid-Round 2Use its Round 1 digest as final position, omit its scores from consensus calculation
Synthesis agent failsOrchestrator writes synthesis, note: "Synthesis by orchestrator (bias risk — no neutral model available)"
Stage 2 agent failsNote in META, synthesize with Stage 1 only
0 agents respondReport failure, suggest retry
1 agent respondsSkip Round 2 (no peers), synthesize from Round 1 only, mark consensus "N/A"
--context-from SLUGLoad {workspace}/memory/roundtables/[slug].json, extract synthesis field, prepend to CURRENT_CONTEXT as "PRIOR ROUNDTABLE CONTEXT: [synthesis]". If file not found: warn and continue without prior context.

Placeholder Contract

When filling prompt templates, apply this rule for every [PLACEHOLDER]:

PlaceholderIf missing/failedAction
[CURRENT_CONTEXT]Web search failedInsert: "No real-time context available."
[SELF_DIGEST]Agent timed out R1Skip agent entirely from R2
[PEER_DIGESTS]All peers failedSkip R2, go to synthesis directly
[ROUND1_SUMMARIES]No R1 outputsAbort with error: "0 agents responded"
[ROUND2_SUMMARIES]Quick mode / no R2Insert: "No cross-critique (quick mode or single round)"
[CONSENSUS_SCORES]No scores extractedInsert: "N/A — scores not available"
[SYNTHESIS_DRAFT]Synthesis failedSkip R3, note in META

Never leave a [PLACEHOLDER] unfilled in a prompt. Unfilled placeholders confuse models and produce garbage output.

Score Parsing (Round 2)

Agents write scores in free text. Extract scores with this heuristic:

  1. Look for the SCORES: block
  2. Match pattern: - [Role]: X/5 — extract integer X (1–5)
  3. If no clean integer found, scan for digit 1–5 nearest to the role name
  4. If still ambiguous → assign 3 (neutral) and note [SCORE INFERRED] in META

Do NOT crash the workflow on a malformed score block.


Quick Reference: Default Panels (fallback if meta-panel fails)

debate:  [opus-4.6, gpt-5.3-codex, gemini-3.1-pro, grok-4] → Advocate / Devil's Advocate / Analyst / Contrarian
build:   [opus-4.6, gemini-3.1-pro, grok-4, gpt-5.3-codex] → Architect / Reviewer / Engineer / Implementer
redteam: [opus-4.6, gemini-3.1-pro, grok-4, gpt-5.3-codex] → Defender / Analyst / Attacker / Red Teamer
vote:    [opus-4.6, gemini-3.1-pro, grok-4, gpt-5.3-codex]  → 4-way vote panel
(all via blockrun/ prefix — see panels.json for exact model IDs and fallbacks)

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

72.2%
按下载量换算5,519

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills