Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
待分类只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

roberts-rules罗伯茨规则

Agent Skill

roberts-rules 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

269

周安装

11

GitHub Stars

37

下载量

87
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:roberts-rules(罗伯茨规则)
来源仓库:https://github.com/simhacker/moollm
仓库路径:skills/roberts-rules
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/simhacker/moollm --skill roberts-rules
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/simhacker/moollm --skill roberts-rules

简介

roberts-rules 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。

  • 适合在开发过程中围绕仓库状态和协作事项进行整理。
  • 支持在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 等环境中使用。
  • 安装前建议确认维护状态及是否涉及敏感操作如文件读写或命令执行。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Robert's Rules

*"Structure forces genuine exploration of the decision space."*

Parliamentary procedure prevents LLMs from short-circuiting to statistically-likely conclusions.

The Stages

procedure:
  stages:
    1_call_to_order:
      chair: "Announces meeting purpose"
      required: true

    2_review_minutes:
      purpose: "What did we decide last time?"
      source: "Previous meeting minutes"
      action: "Amendments or approval"

    3_new_business:
      purpose: "Topics requiring decision"
      format: "List of agenda items"

    4_motion:
      who: "Any member"
      format: "I move that [specific action]"
      requirement: "Must be actionable"

    5_second:
      who: "Different member"
      format: "I second the motion"
      meaning: "Worth discussing (not agreement)"
      if_no_second: "Motion dies"

    6_debate:
      structure: "Pro, con, pro, con..."
      time_limits: "Optional per speaker"
      amendments: "Can be proposed during debate"

    7_vote:
      methods: [voice, show_of_hands, roll_call]
      record: "All positions logged"
      threshold: "Simple majority unless specified"

    8_adjourn:
      chair: "Meeting closed"
      next_meeting: "Scheduled if needed"

Implementation

# meeting/MEETING.yml
meeting:
  id: strategy-review-2026-01-05
  committee: strategy-board
  chair: joe  # Continuity guardian runs the meeting

  minutes_from: strategy-review-2025-12-15.yml

  agenda:
    - "Client X engagement decision"
    - "Q1 pricing review"

  status: in_progress
  current_stage: debate

Motion Format

motion:
  id: motion-001
  mover: frankie
  text: "I move that we accept Client X with explicit scope boundaries."

  second:
    by: tammy
    timestamp: "2026-01-05T14:23:00Z"

  status: under_debate

Debate Structure

debate:
  motion: motion-001

  speakers:
    - speaker: frankie
      position: pro
      points:
        - "Budget aligned with our capacity"
        - "Exciting growth opportunity"
        - "Clear deliverables defined"

    - speaker: maya
      position: con
      points:
        - "Reputation for scope creep"
        - "Similar clients have burned us"
        - "Opportunity cost for other work"

    - speaker: vic
      position: pro_with_reservations
      points:
        - "Financials look solid"
        - "But we lack scope creep data"
        - "Suggest milestone-based contract"

    - speaker: joe
      position: defer
      points:
        - "2022 client was similar, went badly"
        - "But circumstances differ"
        - "Need more information"

    - speaker: tammy
      position: conditional_pro
      points:
        - "If we add explicit scope boundaries..."
        - "And milestone-based billing..."
        - "Risk becomes manageable"

Amendment Process

amendment:
  to: motion-001
  mover: vic
  text: "Add: with milestone-based billing and quarterly scope review"

  second:
    by: tammy

  vote:
    for: [frankie, vic, tammy, joe]
    against: [maya]
    result: passes

  motion_now: "Accept Client X with explicit scope boundaries, milestone-based billing, and quarterly scope review"

Vote Recording

vote:
  motion: motion-001 (as amended)
  method: roll_call

  votes:
    frankie: aye
    maya: nay
    joe: aye
    vic: aye
    tammy: aye

  result:
    for: 4
    against: 1
    abstain: 0

  outcome: PASSES

  minority_view:
    maya: "I remain concerned about scope creep risk. Recording my objection for the minutes."

Minutes Format

# meeting/minutes/strategy-review-2026-01-05.yml
minutes:
  meeting_id: strategy-review-2026-01-05
  date: "2026-01-05"
  attendees: [maya, frankie, joe, vic, tammy]
  chair: joe

  previous_minutes: approved_without_amendment

  motions:
    - id: motion-001
      text: "Accept Client X with explicit scope boundaries, milestone-based billing, and quarterly scope review"
      outcome: PASSES (4-1)
      dissent: maya

  action_items:
    - assignee: vic
      task: "Draft milestone-based contract"
      due: "2026-01-12"

    - assignee: tammy
      task: "Design quarterly scope review process"
      due: "2026-01-10"

  next_meeting: "2026-01-12 to review contract"

Commands

CommandAction
CALL TO ORDERBegin meeting
REVIEW MINUTESRead and approve previous
NEW BUSINESS [item]Add agenda item
MOVE [action]Propose motion
SECONDSupport motion for debate
DEBATEOpen structured discussion
AMEND [change]Propose motion modification
CALL THE QUESTIONEnd debate, proceed to vote
VOTERecord positions
ADJOURNClose meeting

Why This Prevents Short-Circuiting

Without StructureWith Robert's Rules
LLM jumps to "likely" answerMust build case through stages
Hidden assumptions stay hiddenDebate surfaces them
Minority views lostRecorded in minutes
No accountabilityVotes create record
"Everyone agrees" illusionActual disagreement visible

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.6%
按下载量换算30

Claude

31.85%
按下载量换算28

Cursor

19.13%
按下载量换算17

Gemini CLI

9.03%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills