Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

handoff(交接)

handoff 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

handoff 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 17,767。

总安装 380周安装 16GitHub Stars 83下载 133核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:handoff(交接)
来源仓库:https://github.com/robertguss/claude-code-toolkit
仓库路径:skills/handoff
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/robertguss/claude-code-toolkit --skill handoff
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/robertguss/claude-code-toolkit --skill handoff

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

handoff 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在开发流程中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。支持在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 等宿主环境中使用。安装前应核实维护状态及是否涉及敏感操作如命令执行或文件写入。

handoff 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/handoff

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/robertguss/claude-code-toolkit --skill handoff;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

handoff 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/robertguss/claude-code-toolkit --skill handoff。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

handoff 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

handoff 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

handoff 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

handoff 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 380 次,近一周安装 16 次,下载 133 次,GitHub 83 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

handoff 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
handoff

交接 · 本页

38083接触敏感数据未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Session Handoff Skill

Create structured documents that enable seamless continuity across Claude sessions.

When to Use

  • Ending a work session for the day
  • Before taking a break mid-task
  • Switching to a different project temporarily
  • When you want to capture state for a future session
  • Before a context reset you know is coming

Handoff Process

Step 1: Assess Session State

Quickly assess:

  1. What phase are we in? (exploration, planning, implementation, debugging, review)
  2. What's the active task? (what we're trying to accomplish)
  3. How far along are we? (just started, mid-way, almost done)

Step 2: Ask What Matters

Ask the user:

"I'll create a handoff document. Is there anything specific you want to make sure I capture? (Key decisions, code snippets, context about the problem, things you'll forget, etc.)"

Step 3: Generate Handoff Document

Create a structured document:

# Session Handoff: [Brief Description]

**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD] **Project:** [project name/path] **Session Duration:**
[approximate]

## Current State

**Task:** [What we're working on] **Phase:**
[exploration/planning/implementation/debugging/review] **Progress:** [where we
are - percentage or milestone]

## What We Did

[2-3 sentence summary of the session's work]

## Decisions Made

- **[Decision]** — [Rationale]
- **[Decision]** — [Rationale]

## Code Changes

**Files modified:**

- `path/to/file.ts` — [what and why]
- `path/to/other.ts` — [what and why]

**Key code context:** [Critical snippets or patterns to remember]

## Open Questions

- [ ] [Question needing resolution]
- [ ] [Question needing resolution]

## Blockers / Issues

- [Issue] — [current status]

## Context to Remember

[Important background, constraints, user preferences, domain knowledge - things
that would take time to re-establish]

## Next Steps

1. [ ] [First thing to do next session]
2. [ ] [Second thing]
3. [ ] [Third thing]

## Files to Review on Resume

- `path/to/key/file.ts` — [why it matters]

Step 4: Write the File

Write to: .claude/handoffs/[YYYY-MM-DD]-[brief-description].md

Confirm location with user:

"I'll save this to .claude/handoffs/[filename].md. Want a different location?"

What to Capture

Always Include

  1. Decisions with reasoning — The "why" is often more valuable than the "what"
  2. Code changes — File paths, what changed, the intent
  3. Current progress — Where in the task we stopped
  4. Next steps — Clear, actionable items to resume with
  5. User context — Constraints, preferences, domain knowledge they shared

Include When Relevant

  • Errors encountered — And how they were (or weren't) resolved
  • Dead ends — Approaches tried that didn't work (saves re-exploration)
  • Key files — Files to read to get back up to speed
  • External dependencies — APIs, services, tools involved

Skip

  • Verbose tool output (file listings, grep results)
  • Intermediate reasoning that reached conclusions
  • Repeated similar operations
  • Information that's obvious from the code

Format Guidelines

  • Bullet points — Scannable over narrative
  • File paths — src/foo.ts:42 not "that function"
  • Checkboxes for actions — - [] for next steps and open questions
  • Specifics — "Added retry logic to fetchUser()" not "made improvements"

Quality Check

Before saving, verify:

  1. Could a fresh Claude pick up from this? — Enough context to continue?
  2. Are decisions traceable? — Clear why things were decided?
  3. Are next steps actionable? — Know exactly what to do first?
  4. Is code work clear? — Know which files matter?

Using a Handoff Document

When starting a new session, the user can:

  1. Share the handoff file at session start
  2. Say "Resume from this handoff: [paste or path]"
  3. Reference it with @ mention if supported

The handoff should let you hit the ground running without lengthy re-explanation.

Example Handoff

# Session Handoff: Auth System Implementation

**Date:** 2025-01-15 **Project:** /Users/robert/projects/my-api **Session
Duration:** ~2 hours

## Current State

**Task:** Implementing user authentication for the API **Phase:** Implementation
**Progress:** ~60% - basic flow works, need refresh tokens

## What We Did

Built the core JWT authentication flow including token generation, validation
middleware, and login/logout endpoints. Hit an issue with key rotation that we
resolved by moving to config-based key paths.

## Decisions Made

- **JWT with RS256** — Stateless auth, works with distributed setup
- **Redis for refresh tokens** — Need revocation capability
- **15-min access token expiry** — Balance security/UX for mobile app

## Code Changes

**Files modified:**

- `src/auth/jwt.ts` — Token generation and validation logic
- `src/middleware/auth.ts` — Request authentication middleware
- `src/routes/auth.ts` — Login/logout endpoints
- `config/keys/` — RSA key pair storage

**Key code context:** Token validation uses RS256. Keys loaded from
`config/keys/` based on NODE_ENV.

## Open Questions

- [ ] Automatic vs opt-in refresh token rotation?
- [ ] Rate limit for login attempts? (User mentioned 10k DAU)

## Context to Remember

- Client is a mobile app - tokens need offline capability
- User has 10k daily active users - scale matters
- Using PostgreSQL for user storage
- User prefers explicit error messages over generic ones

## Next Steps

1. [ ] Implement `/auth/refresh` endpoint
2. [ ] Add rate limiting to `/auth/login`
3. [ ] Write tests for token expiry edge cases
4. [ ] Update API docs with auth flow

## Files to Review on Resume

- `src/auth/jwt.ts` — Core token logic
- `src/routes/auth.ts` — Current endpoint implementation

Key Reminders

  • Ask what matters to the user before generating
  • Decisions need reasoning — capture the "why"
  • File paths anchor the work — always include them
  • Next steps should be immediately actionable
  • Better slightly longer and useful than short and vague

平台分布

Codex

34.43%
按下载量换算46

Claude

28.74%
按下载量换算38

Cursor

19.45%
按下载量换算26

Gemini CLI

9.55%
按下载量换算13

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills